Ghislaine Maxwell asks Supreme Court to overturn conviction, citing Epstein deal with federal authorities
'This case is about what the government promised, not what Epstein did,' her attorneys wrote in a newly filed brief, as reported by Axios.
Maxwell, who was sentenced to 20 years in prison for grooming and abusing underage girls alongside Epstein, contends that the plea agreement reached between Epstein and the government in 2008 extended immunity to his alleged co-conspirators.
Maxwell's lawyer, David Oscar Markus, appealed not just to the court but directly to President Donald Trump, invoking his well-known emphasis on 'deals.'
'President Trump built his legacy in part on the power of a deal—and surely he would agree that when the United States gives its word, it must stand by it,' Markus said. 'We are appealing not only to the Supreme Court but to the President himself to recognize how profoundly unjust it is to scapegoat Ghislaine Maxwell for Epstein's crimes, especially when the government promised she would not be prosecuted.'
When asked by reporters if he would consider issuing a pardon for Maxwell, Trump replied: 'Nobody's approached me with it. Nobody's asked me about it. It's in the news about that aspect of it, but right now, it would be inappropriate to talk about it.'
Trump has previously said he has the authority to issue such a pardon, without committing either way.
Maxwell recently held closed-door meetings with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on July 24 and 25. The nature of those discussions has not been disclosed in the Supreme Court filing, but the meetings have triggered sharp criticism from Democrats.
Senators Dick Durbin and Sheldon Whitehouse have demanded the Department of Justice release transcripts and recordings of the meetings, warning that Maxwell might manipulate the situation in exchange for leniency.
In a letter to Blanche, the senators said: 'Given her documented record of lying and her desire to secure early release, there are serious concerns that Ms. Maxwell may provide false information or selectively withhold information, in return for a pardon or sentence commutation.'
They also criticised the DOJ for not fulfilling former Attorney General Pam Bondi's promise to make the 'full Epstein files' public.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
August 6, 1985, Forty Years Ago: Assam Voter List
The prospects of holding early parliamentary elections in Assam appeared to recede when a team of the student agitation leaders arrived in New Delhi and demanded a fresh revision of rolls with a 'clear set of directives'. The leaders met the Chief Election Commissioner, R K Trivedi, and emphasised in a memorandum that the assumption that any non-citizen entering Assam before 1971 had automatically acquired citizenship was not legally tenable. The Union Cabinet has given its approval to increase the number of Supreme Court judges from 18 to 30, it is learnt. The Cabinet is also believed to have agreed to raise the strength of high court judges. The government will now bring a bill in Parliament to this effect. What was worrying the government was the accumulation of a large number of cases in high courts and the Supreme Court. A conspiracy to cause disorder in Haryana and kill very important persons, including CM Bhajan Lal, family members of Gen R S Dayal, who led the military action in the Golden Temple last year, and the senior superintendent of police, Ludhiana, was unearthed by the Kurukshetra police following the arrest of five persons. One foreign-made .455 bore revolver, hand grenades, two guns and a large quantity of ammunition have been recovered. The legendary Bob Marshall outclassed second seed Subhash Agrawal and Indian national champion Geet Sethi beat holder Michael Ferreira to set up a clash between experience and youth in the final of the 25th World Amateur Billiards Championship on August 6. The 75-year-old Marshall beat Agrawal in all departments of the game to record a convincing 2809-1872 win while Sethi forged ahead in the last hour to topple holder Ferreira 2513-2379.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Local body polls likely after Diwali, to be held in phases: SEC
Maharashtra state election commissioner Dinesh Waghmare on Tuesday said that local self-government elections are likely to be held after Diwali and may be conducted in phases due to limited availability of resources like electronic voting machines (EVMs). He clarified that voter verifiable paper audit trail (VVPAT) slips will not be used during the elections, as these are not single-candidate contests but involve multiple candidates in each ward. (HT) Waghmare was speaking to reporters after reviewing preparations for the upcoming elections in Nashik. 'Considering the limited availability of resources such as EVMs, the state election commission is planning to conduct the elections in a phase-wise manner. A decision will be taken on whether to first hold elections for zilla parishads and panchayat samitis, or for municipal councils and municipal corporations. The final schedule is yet to be decided,' he said. He clarified that voter verifiable paper audit trail (VVPAT) slips will not be used during the elections, as these are not single-candidate contests but involve multiple candidates in each ward. Waghmare underlined the complexity of local self-government elections compared to general elections. 'These elections require fresh ward delimitation, restructuring of wards, and updating of voter lists. Once the voter list revision drive is completed, the commission will announce the election schedule, and polls will be conducted within 35 to 40 days thereafter,' he said. Most municipal corporations and zilla parishads in the state have been under administrators for nearly three years, due to delays caused by court cases and pending decisions on OBC reservation and ward structures. The Supreme Court, in a recent order, directed the state government and election commission to hold local body elections within four months. Following the order, the state government issued a notification and instructed the commission to begin the ward delimitation process and publish updated voter rolls.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
‘Unconstitutional': Himachal high court strikes down clause regularising govt land encroachments
Shimla: In a ruling with wide ramifications, the Himachal Pradesh high court on Tuesday struck down Section 163-A of the Himachal Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1952, which allowed the state govt to frame rules for regularisation of encroachments on govt land, calling it "manifestly arbitrary and unconstitutional". A division bench of Justice Vivek Singh Thakur and Justice Bipin Chander Negi observed that by "condoning the illegal acts of the violators," the state was treating "lawbreakers equal to those persons who abide by the law". Section 163-A was added to the Act in 2002 during the Prem Kumar Dhumal-led BJP govt's tenure. The court directed the state govt to remove all encroachments by Feb 28, 2026, and to initiate suitable proceedings against the encroachers. The bench noted that there are approximately 57,549 cases of land encroachment across the state, covering an area of around 10,320 hectares (1.23 lakh bighas). The court also vacated any existing stays on the removal of these encroachments. Disposing of a petition filed by one Punam Gupta and others in 2002, the court directed the state govt to take action against the revenue authorities in whose jurisdiction land has been permitted to be encroached upon. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Most Beautiful Female Athletes Right Now Undo "It promotes dishonesty and encourages violation of law. Significantly, no action stands taken against the erring officials, who, in connivance, allowed such encroachments to happen throughout the state. It is not that thousands of encroachments came up overnight. The officials failed to discharge their duties. The functionaries adopted an ostrich-like attitude and approach," observed the bench. Taking into account the magnitude of encroachments on govt land, the court directed that the state govt should consider an amendment in the law pertaining to "criminal trespass" by bringing it in consonance with the amendments made in Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka, and Orissa. The state govt was also directed to make changes in the law to make municipal office bearers, as well as executive officer or commissioner, accountable to report encroachments and take action for their removal, or face consequences for violation of duty. 'Adverse possession law not applicable to govt land' The high court also reminded the state govt of a Supreme Court judgment in "State of Haryana vs Mukesh Kumar," urging it to consider removing a provision from Section 163 of the HP Land Revenue Act. This provision had allowed encroachers to claim title to govt land through the law of adverse possession. The bench clarified that adverse possession pleas would not be available in cases where land has been acquired for a public purpose. In such instances, the encroacher will not only face removal but also be liable to pay use and occupation charges, as well as for any benefits derived from the property. BOX 'Sec 163-A amendment violates edifice of law' The division bench held, "If the impugned provision (Section 163 A) is permitted to remain in the statute, it would defeat the very purpose for which the statute was created." The court observed that in the Act, there exists Section 163, whereby a detailed mechanism has been provided for the removal of encroachment from govt land. But the amendment in the Act by adding Section 163-A violates the very edifice of the principal statute and allows the regularisation of the encroachment. "It is destructive of the aim and object of the parent statute; it defeats its laudable object; it defies the constitutional provisions; it is demonstratively and excessively contradictory and mutually destructive," said the bench. MSID:: 123119798 413 |
