Apple's new ‘Answers' team set to build ChatGPT-style app
Until now, Apple has been resistant to making its own AI chatbot, citing reasons such as low consumer interest. Instead, it partnered with OpenAI to bring ChatGPT into Siri, giving users access to 'world knowledge' without having to develop the technology itself.
But it's now clear that many users rely on AI chatbots like ChatGPT for various purposes, such as their search capabilities. While ChatGPT is now integrated with Apple's personal AI system, Apple Intelligence, doesn't support search features — a sign that Apple may be falling behind in the AI space. Gurman also pointed out that Apple is now hiring for this team, looking for people with experience in building search engines and algorithms.
The move comes shortly after the company's chief executive Tim Cook, told staff following earnings call, that the AI revolution is 'ours to grab'. He also assured them that Apple will be investing heavily to make it a reality.
Apple reported a revenue of $94.04 billion in its third quarter, up 10% from last year. Net profit reached $23.4 billion, or $1.57 per diluted share, a 12% increase in earnings per share.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
15 minutes ago
- First Post
No more cheap flights? AI pricing can take ticket costs to your personal 'pain point' payment
In contrast to pricing strategies of the past (think: yield management, seasonal variation, and advance purchase discounts), AI could use predictive behavioural manipulation– taking what it knows of the consumer and warping the price accordingly read more Using AI to determine the highest a customer is willing to pay for a particular flight ticket could mean each individual paying the most their pocket will allow: a probable end to the concept of "cheap flight tickets". Image for Representation A recent white paper authored by Uri Yerushalmi, chief AI officer and co-founder of Israeli software firm Fetcherr, has revealed a potentially transformative and controversial approach to airline pricing. The document, circulated among prospective clients, outlines a pilot AI-driven pricing model already tested by an unnamed airline. The system, modelled on generative AI principles, replaces traditional fare structures with a labyrinthine array of dynamically shifting price classes, aimed at maximising yield well beyond human cognitive processing. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD To call this merely dynamic pricing is to understate the scale of the change. Airlines have long tinkered with fare variability, but what Fetcherr proposes enters a new domain where AI not only responds to market signals but generates its own version of them, simulating demand and adjusting fares in real time. 'Exploitation phase,' Yerushalmi wrote with little subtlety, according to a Bloomberg report. In contrast to pricing strategies of the past (think: yield management, seasonal variation, and advance purchase discounts) what Fetcherr is offering now is closer to predictive behavioural manipulation. It takes what it knows of the consumer, or of consumers like them, and warps price accordingly. In that moment, the ticket, instead of being a commodity, becomes a wager on how badly you need to get home during a festival or how much you're willing to stretch for a weekend with family. Delta Air Lines has already begun integrating Fetcherr's platform into its operations. At its July earnings call, President Glen Hauenstein disclosed that the company had deployed the system across 3 per cent of its domestic routes, with an ambition to scale that to 20 per cent by year-end. 'We like what we see,' Hauenstein said, describing the initiative as being in a 'heavy testing phase.' Perhaps relieving to many flyers is the fact that at least lawmakers have been swift and unforgiving in responding to the proposal. Arizona Senator Ruben Gallego, backed by other Democrats, sent a letter to Delta CEO Ed Bastian warning of 'data privacy concerns' and the potential to push consumers toward their individual 'pain point.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Republican Senator Josh Hawley called Delta's system 'the worst thing I have heard from the already awful airline industry.' Democratic Congressman Greg Casar introduced a bill that would outlaw 'surveillance pricing.' It's not hard to see why the backlash is bipartisan. Americans may grumble about security lines or seat widths, but airfare pricing has long remained an opaque ritual they grudgingly accept. Now, however, it seems that ritual may be gamified, and by a machine, no less. The suggestion that airlines could price seats not by value, but by what each person can endure, ignites deeper fears about the commodification of necessity. Where that lies on the scale of ethics is anyone's guess. Delta Air Lines has tried to reassure critics. In a July 31 letter to Gallego, the airline's chief external affairs officer Peter Carter described Fetcherr's software as a 'decision-support tool' that analysts 'oversee and fine-tune.' He stressed that pricing recommendations move 'in both directions,' and said there were 'no fare product[s] Delta has ever used, is testing or plans to use that targets customers with individualized prices based on personal data.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Yet earlier statements muddy the waters. In a blog post from 2024, since scrubbed from Fetcherr's website, the company forecasted a future of 'individualized pricing' based on behavioural indicators like purchase history and the 'real-time context of each booking inquiry.' The blog positioned this as a vision, not a current reality, and acknowledged that privacy laws could constrain implementation. We're living in the golden age of algorithmic nudging, and if pricing is becoming personal, it's also becoming intimate. AI is not only learning what we want, it's also figuring out how much we'll suffer to get it. In an earnings event last November, Delta's Hauenstein suggested exactly this. 'Could we take a $20 increase in our fares and not see a decline in market share? Could we take a $40?' he mused, adding, 'We will have a price that's available on that flight, on that time to you, the individual.' Other airlines have expressed concern. American Airlines CEO Robert Isom, speaking on his company's earnings call, called AI-driven pricing 'bait and switch' and 'unethical.' 'It's not something we would do,' he stated. Southwest Airlines has also clarified that it does not rely on artificial intelligence to set fares. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The irony is that even while these airlines distance themselves from the practice, they may soon find themselves pulled into it. 'The Holy Grail,' as Deutsche Bank managing director Michael Linenberg put it, is 'meeting each and every individual's personal demand curve.' That is the vision, the dream: the perfect, profitable equilibrium where every customer pays exactly what they can be stretched to pay.
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Foxconn sells Lordstown car factory for $375 million
Taiwan's Foxconn said on Monday it had struck a deal to sell the Lordstown former car factory in Ohio for $375 million, including its machinery, but said it would continue to use the site to make a broader range of products aligned with its strategic priorities. Foxconn, which makes data center products for Nvidia and assembles iPhones for Apple, did not elaborate on products to be manufactured at the plant, but said the cloud and networking product business in particularly showed "significant growth". A source with direct knowledge of the matter said the Ohio site would support artificial intelligence data centers , without specifying details. Foxconn purchased the plant, a former General Motors small-car factory named after the town in Ohio where it is based, in 2022 from now-bankrupt U.S. electric vehicle startup Lordstown Motors Corp for $230 million, as part of its efforts to expand into EVs. Foxconn also invested in Lordstown and the companies started making electric pickup trucks there. But the partnership later soured, with Lordstown going out of business and suing Foxconn. Foxconn said on Monday it sold the factory to an "existing business partner", without giving details. It also said the company remained committed to automotive customers in the U.S. and said it would be able to rapidly ramp up automotive production to meet customer demand when required. Foxconn has expanded beyond its traditional role as an iPhone assembler. Last week it formed a strategic partnership with industrial motor maker TECO Electric & Machinery to build data centres.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
OpenAI Reportedly Planning Affordable 'Go' ChatGPT Plan Ahead of GPT-5 Launch
OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, appears to be developing a new subscription tier aimed at users looking for a more affordable AI experience. The potential new offering, reportedly named 'Go', is expected to fall below the current Plus ($20/month) and Pro ($200/month) plans, making ChatGPT more accessible to a wider audience. The first hint of this new pricing option emerged from a user named Tibor Bhaho on X (formerly Twitter), who shared a screenshot suggesting internal references to the 'Go' tier in the ChatGPT web app's source code. While OpenAI hasn't officially confirmed its plans, the timing coincides with rising anticipation surrounding the upcoming release of GPT-5. Currently, ChatGPT offers a free tier, the Plus plan, which provides access to advanced models like GPT-4-turbo, and the Pro plan designed for developers and power users. If the Go tier comes to market, it could fill a key middle ground — offering more functionality than the free version while being lighter on the wallet compared to existing paid options. What features the Go plan might include remains unclear. Industry observers speculate that it could provide access to simplified or smaller model variants such as o3 or o4-mini-high, potentially excluding high-end tools like OpenAI's agent features or the video generation tool Sora. In this way, OpenAI may strike a balance between affordability and capability, catering to casual users without overwhelming infrastructure or licensing costs. Beyond pricing changes, OpenAI seems to be quietly experimenting with new interface features as well. Some users have noticed additions like a 'Favourites' tab and a 'Pin chat' option, which could help users manage and retrieve past conversations more easily. These features, however, appear to be part of limited testing and have not been rolled out broadly. Meanwhile, excitement around GPT-5 continues to build. OpenAI has been working on the next-generation AI model for months, though its release timeline has reportedly been delayed several times due to internal safety reviews and performance evaluations. Speaking recently on a podcast with comedian Theo Von, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman hinted that GPT-5 is nearing its debut. Sharing a personal moment with the model, Altman said, 'It was a weird feeling,' after GPT-5 answered a complex question faster and more accurately than he could. 'It responded instantly and correctly,' he added, noting how the interaction gave him a glimpse of the technology's potential. As competition in the AI space intensifies, OpenAI's rumored budget offering could be a strategic move to expand its user base and maintain relevance across diverse user segments. While code-level discoveries like this often point to features in development, there's always a chance plans could shift. Until OpenAI issues an official announcement, the details around the Go plan — including its launch date and exact capabilities — remain speculative.
