logo
What politicians can learn from a stunning win in New York (over trash)

What politicians can learn from a stunning win in New York (over trash)

Washington Post26-06-2025
Dominic Pino is the Thomas L. Rhodes journalism fellow at National Review Institute and host of the American Institute for Economic Research podcast 'Econception.'
The people of New York City have been dealing with some garbage choices. And I'm not talking about the candidates for mayor.
The nation's largest city has finally decided to throw out its old ways and put trash in — get this! — containers. One of the shocking things that tourists from the rest of the country would discover when visiting New York is that, until recently, bags of trash accumulated on the sidewalks. Parents would be guiding their children around stinking piles of garbage while walking to the Lego or American Girl stores.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Group run by billionaire Elon Musk spent more than $47 million in the first half of the year
Group run by billionaire Elon Musk spent more than $47 million in the first half of the year

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Group run by billionaire Elon Musk spent more than $47 million in the first half of the year

The super PAC run by billionaire Elon Musk spent $47.4 million in the first half of the year, when the group was actively engaged in helping former Waukesha County Judge Brad Schimel run unsuccessfully for a seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The new filing by America PAC includes for the first time confirmation of $1 million payments that Musk gave to each of three individuals at a Green Bay rally "in appreciation for you taking the time to vote." It also reports that America PAC spent $27 million on in-kind payments for "petition incentives" on June 30. The payment came from the United States of America Inc., a new business created by Musk last year. It is not clear what those payments were for, but the super PAC offered Wisconsin voters $100 to register their opposition to "judicial activists" via a website. Musk's group also made numerous payments to consultants, media groups and canvassers in the first six months of the year. Overall, the report indicates Musk gave a little more than $18 million to America PAC in the first half of the year. That comes on top of the $27 million in-kind payment by the United States of America Inc. A spokesman for America PAC could not be immediately reached for comment. On April 1, liberal Dane County Judge Susan Crawford defeated Schimel, a conservative, in an election that determined the ideological control of the Supreme Court. Liberals now hold a 4-3 edge with Crawford's investiture on Aug. 1. The race set a record for the most spent on a judicial race in the United States. Even before America PAC's latest report, all sides had reported paying out more than $100 million on the hotly contested race, with independent groups far outspending the two candidates. Alison Dirr can be reached at adirr@ Contact Daniel Bice at (414) 313-6684 or dbice@ Follow him on X at @DanielBice or on Facebook at This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Group run by billionaire Elon Musk spent more than $47 million Solve the daily Crossword

Maxwell demands immunity after subpoena from House Oversight Committee
Maxwell demands immunity after subpoena from House Oversight Committee

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Maxwell demands immunity after subpoena from House Oversight Committee

An attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell said she would only speak with the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee if granted immunity — an idea the panel swiftly rejected. The panel last week subpoenaed Maxwell, an associate of Jeffrey Epstein, compelling her testimony amid demands on the Trump administration to release files from the financier who killed himself while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. Maxwell's attorney, David Oscar Markus, noted that she has filed an appeal before the Supreme Court and her testimony to the committee could jeopardize efforts to overturn her 2021 conviction for sex trafficking children. 'As you know, Ms. Maxwell is actively pursuing post-conviction relief — both in a pending petition before the United States Supreme Court and in a forthcoming habeas petition. Any testimony she provides now could compromise her constitutional rights, prejudice her legal claims, and potentially taint a future jury pool,' Markus wrote. 'Public reports—including your own statements—indicate that the Committee intends to question Ms. Maxwell in prison and without a grant of immunity. Those are non-starters. Ms. Maxwell cannot risk further criminal exposure in a politically charged environment without formal immunity.' A spokesperson for the committee immediately ruled out any grant of immunity. 'The Oversight Committee will respond to Ms. Maxwell's attorney soon, but it will not consider granting congressional immunity for her testimony,' committee spokesperson Jessica Collins said in a statement. Markus had said Maxwell would testify 'if a fair and safe path forward can be established.' Beyond a grant of immunity, Markus also asked for questions to be shared in advance and for any deposition to take place after the Supreme Court weighs Maxwell's petition. 'To prepare adequately for any congressional deposition—and to ensure accuracy and fairness—we would require the Committee's questions in advance. This is essential not only to allow for meaningful preparation, but also to identify the relevant documentation from millions of pages that could corroborate her responses,' he wrote. The letter then made an indirect reference to a possible pardon, something Markus has said he has not yet sought from President Trump. 'Of course, in the alternative, if Ms. Maxwell were to receive clemency, she would be willing—and eager—to testify openly and honestly, in public, before Congress in Washington, D.C.,' Markus wrote. Markus said without any of those arrangements, Maxwell would plead the fifth. House Oversight Democrats did not respond to comment Tuesday but had backed the move from Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) earlier this month to subpoena Maxwell. 'Oversight Democrats just unanimously voted to subpoena Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein's partner,' House Oversight Democrats wrote on the social platform X after the vote. 'This is progress. We will not stop fighting until the Epstein Files are released. Trump and Bondi must stop blocking the American people from the truth,' they wrote, referencing Attorney General Pam Bondi. Burchett said he understands the committee not caving to demands for immunity. 'Her attorneys are doing what her attorney's supposed to do, getting her the best deal,' Burchett told The Hill. 'They're trying to cut some time off her 20 years. But she is the gatekeeper, and she realizes it.' He said he does not have concerns about her credibility, adding that there should be 'plenty of documentation to back up what she says.' 'A bunch of politicians calling somebody a liar is kind of rich. I mean, that's just the pot calling the kettle black, you know?… I mean, we're not a bunch of pedophiles, but we can't stand in judgment of anybody on the truth train,' he said. Shortly after Burchett's motion, the same panel also voted to subpoena the Justice Department for the Epstein files, as well as several other figures from Democratic administrations: President Clinton, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former FBI Director James Comey, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former Attorney General Eric Holder, former Attorney General Merrick Garland and former FBI Director and special counsel Robert Mueller. Epstein ran with high-powered figures, including those in politics as well as Trump. The Wall Street Journal reported that Bondi has told Trump that he is referenced in the Epstein files. Republicans have mixed feelings about the value Maxwell's testimony would provide. Some view the convicted sex trafficker as the key to unlocking additional information about the Epstein saga — such as revealing other high-powered abusers of young women who have not yet faced legal consequences for their crimes, or other arrangements Epstein had that enabled the abuse. But others warn that Maxwell, who was complicit in the abuse and previously faced perjury charges (on which she was not convicted), is not a reliable witness and deserves no special treatment. The Justice Department reignited the Epstein furor when it released a memo concluding the financier died by suicide and did not keep a client list. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche last week flew to Tallahassee, Fla., where Maxwell is serving her 20-year sentence, undertaking two days of questioning with her. 'This Department of Justice does not shy away from uncomfortable truths, nor from the responsibility to pursue justice wherever the facts may lead,' he said ahead of the meetings. Updated at 3:55 p.m. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store