Megaquake Could Greatly Increase Flood Risk In The Northwest, Study Says
The new study, published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, says that if a megaquake rupture on the Cascadia Fault, some locations could drop by six feet almost instantly.
The Cascadia fault line runs through California's North Coast, along with coastal areas of Oregon and Washington and into southwest Canada.
Megaquakes have occurred on the fault at least seven times in geological records dating back over 3,000 years. It is thought that such quakes, those with magnitudes over 8.0, occur there every 400-600 years.
This extreme subsidence expands the floodplain in the region from 35 to 116 square miles or roughly the size of Fresno, California. The floodplain is the area that has a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year.
(Recent News: Earthquake Strikes Near Chile, Argentina, Tsunami Alert Canceled)
Besides just the change in geography, impacts to daily lives would be extreme. More than 14,000 residents and 22,500 structures would find themselves in the new floodplain. Nearly 800 miles of roads would also be more likely to flood. This megaquake would double flood exposure for the region.
The Cascadia fault line sits on the "Ring of Fire" zone typically associated with volcanoes, but this region is also a hotbed for large quakes.
Important caveat: There is no expectation that such a big quake is on the way any time soon, but scientists caution that when the big one hits, we may only have a few moments notice to get ready.
The last major earthquake that struck the region was the 1700 Cascadia Earthquake – a magnitude 9.0 quake. According to the USGS, it's one of the largest quakes in the history of North America and hundreds of people were killed by either landslides or the tsunami that followed. Entire villages were swept away or buried.
(WATCH: Elephants Form "Alert Circle" During California Quake)
That quake caused rapid subsidence of 1.5 to 6.5 feet.
Researchers are using the quake to create estimates of what a similar megaquake could do today.
More recently, land sank by more than 3 feet in parts of Japan following the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami.
Jonathan Belles has been a graphics meteorologist and writer for weather.com for nearly 9 years and also assists in the production of videos for The Weather Channel en español. His favorite weather is tropical weather, but also enjoys covering high-impact weather and news stories and winter storms. He's a two-time graduate of Florida State University and a proud graduate of St. Petersburg College.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
4 hours ago
- Gizmodo
The Pacific Dodged a Monster Tsunami After One of the Biggest Quakes Ever. Here's Why
The earthquake near the east coast of the Kamchatka Peninsula in Russia on July 30, 2025, generated tsunami waves that have reached Hawaii and coastal areas of the U.S. mainland. The earthquake's magnitude of 8.8 is significant, potentially making it one of the largest quakes ever recorded. Countries around much of the Pacific, including in East Asia and North and South America, issued alerts and, in some cases, evacuation orders in anticipation of potentially devastating waves. Waves of up to 4 meters [13.1 feet] hit coastal towns in Kamchatka near where the earthquake struck, apparently causing severe damage in some areas. But in other places waves have been smaller than expected, including in Japan, which is much closer to Kamchatka than most of the Pacific Rim. Many warnings have now been downgraded or lifted with relatively little damage. It seems that for the size of the earthquake, the tsunami has been rather smaller than might have been the case. To understand why, we can look to geology. The earthquake was associated with the Pacific tectonic plate, one of several major pieces of the Earth's crust. This pushes northwest against the part of the North American plate that extends west into Russia and is forced downwards beneath the Kamchatka peninsula in a process called subduction. The United States Geological Survey (USGS) says the average rate of convergence—a measure of plate movement—is around 80 millimeters [3.15 inches] per year. This is one of the highest rates of relative movement at a plate boundary. But this movement tends to take place as an occasional sudden movement of several meters. In any earthquake of this type and size, the displacement may occur over a contact area between the two tectonic plates of slightly less than 400 kilometers [249 miles] by 150 km [93 miles], according to the USGS. The Earth's crust is made of rock that is very hard and brittle at the small scale and near the surface. But over very large areas and depths, it can deform with slightly elastic behavior. As the subducting slab—the Pacific plate—pushes forward and descends, the depth of the ocean floor may suddenly change. Nearer to the coastline, the crust of the overlying plate may be pushed upward as the other pushes underneath, or—as was the case off Sumatra in 2004—the outer edge of the overlying plate may be dragged down somewhat before springing back a few meters. It is these near-instantaneous movements of the seabed that generate tsunami waves by displacing huge volumes of ocean water. For example, if the seabed rose just one meter [3 feet] across an area of 200 by 100 km [124 by 62 miles] where the water is 1 km [0.6 miles] deep, then the volume of water displaced would fill Wembley Stadium to the roof 17.5 million times. A one-meter rise like this will then propagate away from the area of the uplift in all directions, interacting with normal wind-generated ocean waves, tides, and the shape of the sea floor to produce a series of tsunami waves. In the open ocean, the tsunami wave would not be noticed by boats and ships, which is why a cruise ship in Hawaii was quickly moved out to sea. The tsunami waves travel across the deep ocean at up to 440 miles per hour [708 km/hr], so they may be expected to reach any Pacific Ocean coastline within 24 hours. However, some of their energy will dissipate as they cross the ocean, so they will usually be less hazardous at the farthest coastlines away from the earthquake. The hazard arises from how the waves are modified as the seabed rises towards a shoreline. They will slow and, as a result, grow in height, creating a surge of water towards and then beyond the normal coastline. The Kamchatka earthquake was slightly deeper in the Earth's crust (20.7 km, 12.9 miles) than the Sumatran earthquake of 2004 and the Japanese earthquake of 2011. This will have resulted in somewhat less vertical displacement of the seabed, with the movement of that seabed being slightly less instantaneous. This is why we've seen tsunami warnings lifted some time before any tsunami waves would have arrived there. Alan Dykes, Associate Professor in Engineering Geology, Kingston University. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
History's biggest recorded tsunami happened in the US: A look back
(KSWB/KUSI) — Imagine a wall of water taller than the Empire State Building crashing through a quiet fjord in the dead of night. No warning, no time to run — just the rumbles of an earthquake, the thunder of a mountainside collapsing, and then, a wave unlike any other. No, this wasn't a scene from a Hollywood disaster film. It was real. On the night of July 9, 1958, along the Fairweather Fault in the Alaska Panhandle, nature unleashed the largest tsunami ever recorded after a 7.8 magnitude earthquake triggered a colossal rockslide into Lituya Bay — a narrow, glacier-carved inlet surrounded by steep cliffs. About 40 million cubic yards of rock fell into the water, triggering a towering wave that reached an almost unimaginable 1,720 feet, according to the United States Geological Survey (USGS). The natural event, also referred to as a mega-tsunami, obliterated tree lines and vegetation in the surrounding area. Remarkably, the giant wave was mostly localized within Lituya Bay due to its topography, preventing a wider Pacific disaster. The United Nations reported that five people died as a result of the tsunami, two of whom were on a fishing boat within the inlet. A few other lucky fishermen in the area made it out alive, with a USGS professional paper even noting that one couple 'was lifted up by the wave and carried across La Chaussee Spit, riding stern first just below the crest of the wave, like a surfboard.' Unlike most tsunamis caused by undersea earthquakes, the unfolding of the Lituya Bay event was triggered by a landslide. This fact has caused some to question whether this tsunami should be considered the largest ever recorded. Nonetheless, scientists with the United States Geological Survey have labeled it as such. As climate change increases the likelihood of glacial melt and destabilized terrain in some parts of the world, scientists warn that rare events like the Lituya Bay tsunami could happen in similar high-risk regions. As it stands, the occurrence etched southeastern Alaska into the geological history books.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
1,000-Foot Tall ‘Mega-Tsunami' Could Hit West Coast, Experts Warn
The Big One. For most residents of the world, particularly in California, the threat of a gigantic earthquake is always looming – one that would devastate communities, upend life as we know it, cause billions in damage, and take with it untold multitudes of casualties. Scary stuff. But with some earthquakes, there's also the aftermath, aka tsunamis. And scientists have been looking at one specific fault line off the west coast of North America, with regards to its imminent shifting, and the resulting, potential 'mega-tsunami.' A recent study from the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences looked at the Cascadia Subduction Zone, an offshore fault line that stretches from North Vancouver Island in Canada to Cape Mendocino in California. The team primarily looked at the flood risks, coupled with sea level rise, in relation to the Cascadia Subduction Zone. According to the study, there's a 15% chance of a rupture in the Cascadia Subduction Zone in the next 50 years, and a 29% chance by the year 2100. 'Today, and more so in 2100 as background sea levels rise, the immediate effect of earthquake-driven subsidence will be a delay in response and recovery from the earthquake due to compromised assets. Long-term effects could render many coastal communities uninhabitable,' said lead author of the study, Tina team also looked at past 'mega-tsunamis' to better evaluate the potential carnage in the Pacific Northwest. For example, by examining marine sediments, experts were able to confirm a 1,312-foot tsunami that struck the Hawaiian island of Lanai 105,000 years ago. That one was different, however, as it was created by a volcanic landslide. As for the Cascadia Subduction Zone, the last time that tectonic plate shifted was in 1700. It triggered an earthquake registering somewhere between 8.7 to 9.2 on the Richter scale. And the resulting tsunami struck both the west coast and across the Pacific in Japan. Now, researchers warn that the same zone is due for another shake. 'Given the global prevalence of subduction zones, these insights hold relevance beyond Cascadia, informing hazard assessments and mitigation strategies for tectonically active regions worldwide,' Dura added.1,000-Foot Tall 'Mega-Tsunami' Could Hit West Coast, Experts Warn first appeared on Surfer on Jul 28, 2025 Solve the daily Crossword
