logo
Irish Examiner view: What kind of future are we building?

Irish Examiner view: What kind of future are we building?

Irish Examiner11-06-2025
It has long been a cliché to seize upon a particular headline or story as illustrating the seriousness of a society's challenges, the personification of its problems.
However, this week offered us a true indictment of our country.
The Child Poverty Monitor report for 2025 was launched yesterday by the Children's Rights Alliance, and shows that the consistent poverty rate among children is higher than in any other age group. It also found that the rate also rose significantly last year. The term 'significantly' is appropriate.
CEO Tanya Ward said: 'What is deeply concerning is the number of children in consistent poverty, who are living in these conditions perpetually, which rose by a staggering 45,107 in 2024 to 102,977.
'These are children for whom a decent standard of living and aspirations of a better future diminish day by day.'
Notwithstanding the untruths promoted by the far right and other bad actors, Ireland is a wealthy country with huge resources. The fact that over 100,000 Irish children are in consistent poverty should be a matter of profound shame for all of us. It is a betrayal of the principles of any civilised democracy that such a situation can develop.
As Ms Ward pointed out, not only are those children in the grip of poverty now, their chances of a better future are compromised by the conditions and circumstances we have allowed to become a toxic web this country.
The housing and accommodation crisis is clearly one of the dominant strands in that web, which made another announcement yesterday particularly timely.
Housing minister James Browne brought proposals to Cabinet for an overhaul of rent pressure zones, which will now apply across the entire country.
This move is part of an overall Government plan to attract international investment to kickstart the building of apartments.
Facilitating property investment by overseas operators is not a move likely to win favour with many people struggling to find homes, but all options must be considered in a crisis of this scale.
That is no exaggeration when over 100,000 children are in poverty, and when the prospect of intergenerational poverty is very real for many of them.
Trump's vain display of power
Senator Tom Clonan made a telling comparison online yesterday when considering the situation in Los Angeles, where US president Donald Trump has mobilised thousands of National Guard troops.
They have been sent to the city in response to the reaction of locals to a series of crackdowns on and arrests in immigrant communities, which included the arrest of a union leader acting as an observer.
The National Guard presence has now been augmented by the mobilisation of hundreds of US Marines, a rare instance of US army personnel being deployed on home soil.
Nothing says loss of civil control and order quite like sending in the army, no matter the location. As Mr Clonan noted on social media, in a nod to our own recent history, it is 'never a good idea to deploy marines/paratroopers into civilian environment — we learned at considerable cost in Ireland that 'police primacy' is only solution to public disorder'.
Whether Trump is genuinely interested in quelling public disorder or has another agenda altogether is another matter entirely.
The governor of California is Gavin Newsom, one of the (increasingly numerous) potential Democratic Party candidates who may run for president in 2028. Is Trump trying to blacken Newsom's reputation ahead of that campaign or does he have even baser reasons?
We have seen over the decades that military adventures are a tried-and-trusted ploy of US presidents seeking to distract voters from other issues — though such adventures tend to occur abroad rather than at home.
Trump has had a well-publicised spat in recent days with X owner Elon Musk —his billionaire backer and one-time sidekick — with the two exchanging various insults online. Sending armed troops to the second-largest city in the US is the kind of expression of raw power that might be expected of someone fond of expressions of raw power.
That may be Trump's motivation, but for many others it looks like another marker of US decline — with the end of that decline not yet in sight.
Fact or fiction
The death of novelist Frederick Forsyth was announced this week. He was 86.
A successful journalist in the 60s, he was broke when he hit upon an idea for a thriller, writing The Day of the Jackal in 35 days. The book became a runaway success and Forsyth went on to write a series of thrillers including The Odessa File and The Dogs of War — they sold in their millions and many were also made into successful films.
He spent several years living in Wicklow during the 70s, availing of the Irish tax exemption for artists and writers which had been introduced by Charles Haughey.
He would later claim that when he told Haughey of his desire to leave Ireland and return to Britain, he was offered a seat in the Seanad — though it might be as well to file that yarn with his claim to have spied for M16 while working as a journalist.
In later years, he advocated for Brexit and doubted climate change, but was always honest about his motives. 'I am slightly mercenary,' he said once. 'I write for money.'
Read More
Irish Examiner view: We need to eradicate TB for good
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Conor McGregor declares intention to enter Irish presidential race
Conor McGregor declares intention to enter Irish presidential race

Irish Examiner

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

Conor McGregor declares intention to enter Irish presidential race

Former MMA fighter Conor McGregor has announced that he intends to seek to become the next president of Ireland — but wants to change how the nomination process works to enable him to do so. McGregor, who last week lost his appeal against a High Court jury's finding that he raped Nikita Hand, made the announcement on social media on Monday evening. Anyone who wishes to become president must secure nominations from at least 20 members of the Oireachtas or at least four local authorities. McGregor is alleging that this "presents a significant barrier to democratic participation". He claimed: "This system, while intended to ensure a degree of political influence among candidates, inadvertently restricts the direct voice of the Irish electorate. In light of this, I propose a petition advocating for a modification of the nomination process to allow my name be included on the ballot. In his post, McGregor said that citizens of Ireland should have the "unhindered right to determine the candidates who appear on the presidential ballot." He said he is therefore asking people to sign a petition to change the constitutional law. The current President, Michael D Higgins, was inaugurated for his second term on November 11, 2018. Therefore, the next presidential election is scheduled to take place on or up to 60 days before November 11, 2025. Two confirmed candidates so far There are just two confirmed candidates in this year's presidential race so far: Fine Gael's Mairead McGuinness — a former European Commissioner and MEP — and left-wing Galway West Independent TD Catherine Connolly. Riverdance star Michael Flatley is also said to be interested in running and will seek a nomination, a court has heard. The choreographer's barrister made the announcement last month during a High Court case he has taken in relation to works carried out at his mansion in Co Cork, the Castlehyde. Meanwhile, Nikita Hand has lodged a new civil action against McGregor as well as a couple he intended to call to give evidence in his appeal, before he withdrew the application in what were described as "mysterious circumstances". Ms Hand is suing McGregor as well as Samantha O'Reilly and Steven Cummins for damages in an action filed last week. It is understood that she alleges they engaged in malicious abuse of the process of the court.

€16 electricity price hike fear for EVERY Irish household as data centre costs cut amid €250 budget energy credit calls
€16 electricity price hike fear for EVERY Irish household as data centre costs cut amid €250 budget energy credit calls

The Irish Sun

time3 hours ago

  • The Irish Sun

€16 electricity price hike fear for EVERY Irish household as data centre costs cut amid €250 budget energy credit calls

SINN Fein is demanding the Government intervene and stop another price increase on electricity bills. The Commission for Regulation of Utilities is preparing to increase the network cost on bills to pay for future capital investment. 2 Sinn Fein's energy spokesman, Meath TD Darren O'Rourke 2 Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe said they are not prepared to come up with a package of energy credits to help families in this years budget Credit: Getty Images - Getty Yet at the same time the price of power for the big data centres around the country, which use up a large percentage of the Irish supply, are to be reduced. Sinn Fein slammed the proposed price increase for consumers and price cut for the data centres and said the timing is all wrong - especially with over 300,000 householders in arrears. It wants the Government to come up with a package of energy credits to help families in the forthcoming 2026 October Budget. The party's energy spokesman, Meath TD Darren O'Rourke, fumed: 'The CRU is preparing to hike the network costs that you have to pay but to cut them for data centres. 'The same data centres are hoarding more and more of the energy we produce, stalling the delivery of badly needed homes and putting our grid under real pressure. 'Big energy companies are intent on continuing to jack up their energy prices, all while raking in eye-watering profits. 'The Government pretends these issues are outside of their control but they are not. They are political decisions. 'They need to scrap the cut to costs for data centres and crucially use this Budget to bring forward badly needed support to help families and small businesses who are struggling with sky high energy costs. 'The Budget must include energy credits and extend the reduced VAT on electricity and gas bills until the end of the year.' Energy Minister Darragh O'Brien has already firmly ruled out energy credits to help with electricity and heating bills in October's budget. He said the €250 credits handed out to every Irish household as part of Budget 2025 cost the State €3.5billion. But the Fianna Fail man said the lower nine per cent VAT rate on gas and electric should be retained to avoid hiking energy prices further. Speaking to the Independent, he said: "I will be bringing an interim report to Government in advance of the Budget and we will assess that as to what measures can be taken. IRISH CUSTOMERS PAYING MORE "I think the vat reduction from 13.5 per cent to nine per cent is a very important one, one that I would like to see extended into next year. That decision will be taken at Budget time." Recent figures from Eurostat showed that Irish consumers are paying on average €350 a year more for their electricity than most European countries. Irish people pay on average €1,800 a year for their electricity - 30 per cent more than the rest of the EU. The proposed increase at the moment from the Commission for Regulation of Utilities will add at least €6 a year on household customer bills. The money will be used to pay for ESB Networks and Eirgrid's proposed €14billion investment over the next five years to upgrade their networks in Ireland to meet current and future demand. Both ESB and Eirgrid are seeking €16 a year on bills. The final decision will be made later in the year.

MEP calls on DAFM to 'review and revise' approach to GAEC 2
MEP calls on DAFM to 'review and revise' approach to GAEC 2

Agriland

time4 hours ago

  • Agriland

MEP calls on DAFM to 'review and revise' approach to GAEC 2

An Irish MEP has called on the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (DAFM) to revise its approach to the Good Agricultural and Environmental Condition 2 (GAEC 2). GAEC 2 is the conditionality standard of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) related to the protection of peatlands and wetlands. Last week, the department launched an appeals process for farmers seeking to have their land removed from the standard. However, farm organisations voiced concerns about several conditions attached to the appeals process. Midlands North-West MEP Ciaran Mullooly has also called on DAFM to "immediately clarify and withdraw unnecessary conditions it is imposing on landowners seeking to appeal the classification of their land under GAEC 2". He criticised the department's requirement that landowners applying for an appeal may have to provide: A signed declaration from the appellant that the parcel(s) in question has/have never been drained and he/she plans to carry out drainage works in 2025 as required; Evidence to show that the appellant plans to carry out drainage work in 2025 e.g. contractor quotations, estimate of costs etc as required. 'This demand completely misunderstands the purpose of the appeals process,' Mullooly said. 'Farmers are appealing the peat soil designation because they believe it is scientifically incorrect - not because of what they plan to do with the land next year. 'The decision on whether land is peat soil or not must be based on soil science - not hypothetical future land use or drainage plans. To suggest otherwise is to undermine the integrity of the entire process," he said. Ciaran Mullooly MEP The Midlands-North-West MEP said that the department risks "confusing and intimidating landowners". 'Once again, we see bureaucracy being used in a way that frustrates rather than facilitates access to a fair and transparent appeals process. "Farmers are entitled to have incorrect classifications overturned. That entitlement must not be made contingent on signing unnecessary undertakings or presenting irrelevant contractor paperwork," he said. The MEP is calling for the department to "immediately review and revise its approach to GAEC 2 peat soil appeals and ensure the process remains grounded in science, fairness, and farmers' rights". The Irish Farmers' Association (IFA) previously said that the department has made amendments to the appeals process. In an update to the appeal document, DAFM outlined that the documents which have caused concern are not required where no drainage works are planned on previously undrained/drained GAEC 2 land parcel(s) in 2025. Following the amendments, IFA Rural Development Committee chair John Curran said that it is "now clear that all farmers have the opportunity to appeal the indicative GAEC 2 status of individual parcels". 'The clarification also makes the need for signed declarations/proof of drainage works obsolete. "These requirements should be removed from appeal application requirements," he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store