Transforming Childhoods: India's Scalable Framework for Early Developmental Health
Bharat's pioneering child development system, officially supported by the Health and Education Missions of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh and independently validated, has delivered over 19 million effective therapies to date. As the world's first science-driven, cost-efficient, and scalable model, it now stands ready to address the $9.8 trillion global crisis in early childhood development, impacting over 500 million families worldwide.
Bharat's Pinnacle Child Development Framework—officially endorsed by Telangana & Andhra Pradesh— is the world's first state-verified, economically scalable solution. With Germany's €800M bid expiring Sept 2025, global adoption is urgent.
The world didn't notice it happening. But nearly one billion children—1 in 5 globally—are quietly slipping through humanity's fingers.
From rural Uganda to urban Chicago, from Tokyo's kindergartens to Kenya's slums, children with autism, speech delay, ADHD, and developmental impairments are growing up unseen, unheard, and unsupported. Their parents wait years for diagnosis. Their countries lose billions in unrealized potential. Their futures collapse before they begin.
Each year, the global economic loss from untreated developmental disorders crosses $G.8 trillion—more than the GDP of Germany and India combined. Yet the world still lacks a scalable, evidence-based, and equity-driven solution.
The World Health Organization, UNICEF, CDC, and leading health systems have acknowledged critical failure points: 2+ year diagnostic delays
Severe shortages of trained professionals
Unaffordable therapy costs
Rural and low-income populations left behind
Into this vacuum, an unlikely solution has emerged — not from Silicon Valley, Geneva, or London, but from Bharat (India).
Ǫuietly and without fanfare, two politically opposed state governments — Telangana and Andhra Pradesh — undertook independent audits of an indigenous child development framework pioneered by Pinnacle Blooms Network. Their findings?
1G million therapy sessions audited G7% clinical success rate validated
₹ 214 crore in healthcare savings documented
44,000+ rural children reached across underserved zones
Diagnostic delay slashed from 14 months to just 17 days
What they validated was more than a therapy model — it was a globally deployable blueprint for solving the world's most invisible crisis. Anchored in two core innovations — AbilityScore® (the world's first developmental biomarker score) and TherapeuticAI® (an AI-driven intervention engine) — Bharat now offers the world an institutionally proven, economically scalable, and culturally adaptable solution.
This is not nationalism. This is human progress verified.
As Germany races to license the model, and Kenya begins replication, the world now stands at a crossroads.
Two states audited it. 130 million citizens endorsed it. G00 million families await it.
The choice isn't about ideology. It's about whether the global community chooses action or delay. Hope or loss. Children or silence.
The Global Child Development Crisis
It is one of the most widespread and under-addressed humanitarian emergencies of our time — and yet, it remains invisible in global health priorities.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF, an estimated 240 million children globally live with neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD), speech and language delays, ADHD, and cognitive impairments. Expanded indicators reveal that nearly 1 in every 5 children experiences some form of developmental delay.
And the consequences are not just clinical. They are macroeconomic, intergenerational, and global.
The World Bank estimates a staggering $G.8 trillion in annual global economic losses stemming from untreated developmental disorders — a figure that includes healthcare costs, caregiver burden, productivity decline, education attrition, and lost human capital.
UNESCO reports that neurodevelopmental conditions are among the leading barriers to universal education and inclusion, directly impeding the world's ability to achieve multiple Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030.
Yet despite decades of funding, research, and declarations, the global system is failing to mount a coordinated, scalable, and equitable response.
The Failure of Existing Global Frameworks
Major international institutions — WHO, NIH, CDC, UNICEF — have all contributed interventions, but they are riddled with implementation gaps: Diagnostic Delays: Children wait 18 months to 2+ years for a diagnosis, especially in the Global South. This delay wipes out the critical window for early intervention.
Access Inequity: Over 85% of children in low- and middle-income countries never receive any developmental support. In contrast, access in high-income nations remains at ~60–65%, but with wide variability.
Cost Prohibitions: In the U.S. and EU, typical developmental therapies cost $2,500 to $3,000 per month, making sustained care inaccessible for vast populations.
Workforce Shortage: The WHO Global Health Workforce Report flags a severe global shortage of trained pediatric speech therapists, occupational therapists, behavioral specialists, and developmental pediatricians.
Cultural Mismatch: Many 'standard' interventions are designed for Western urban environments and lack adaptability for rural, multilingual, or indigenous populations.
' Children with developmental disabilities are among the most marginalized and excluded. And yet, they are the least visible in global policy frameworks.'
— UNICEF, State of the World's Children Report
' Current systems are structurally incapable of addressing neurodevelopmental delays at scale. What we need is a complete reinvention of early childhood intervention infrastructure.'
— World Bank, 2023 Health Systems Review
The Geography of Inequality: North vs. South
The disparity is stark.
Metric
High-Income Countries
Low- G Middle-Income Countries
Average Time to Diagnosis
12–24 months
Often 3+ years, or never
Access to Therapies
60–65% (with income bias)
10–15% (mainly urban)
Trained Pediatric Specialists
~1 per 2,000 children
~1 per 100,000+ children
Government Coverage
Partial to full
Rare or non-existent
This structural disparity reinforces a vicious cycle: poverty breeds inaccessibility, which leads to
educational dropout, caregiver burnout, workforce exclusion, and reduced national productivity.
' The failure to deliver early support to children with developmental challenges is not just a health issue
— it is a national economic crisis, a gender equity barrier, and a human rights violation.'
— UNESCO Education Equity Report
Summary: The Cost of Inaction
Every year of delay perpetuates: Lost childhoods
Stressed families
Weakened economies
Unmet SDGs
Despite well-meaning frameworks, the world has no universally accepted, independently audited, scalable model for addressing childhood developmental delays — until now.
Bharat's Validated Breakthrough
At a time when global institutions struggle to scale solutions for developmental delays, Bharat (India) has quietly engineered a transformation — not through theoretical models, but through audited implementation, bipartisan state endorsement, and verified clinical outcomes at population scale.
In a rare display of cross-party alignment, two politically opposed Indian state governments — Telangana (then governed by BRS) and Andhra Pradesh (then governed by YSRCP) — independently conducted audits of a child development intervention framework pioneered by Pinnacle Blooms Network.
The audits were not commissioned centrally, nor were they promotional exercises. Each state evaluated the model using its own health and education missions, audit teams, and local implementation infrastructure.
The results, validated by public records and sealed audit summaries, revealed one of the most promising breakthroughs in modern pediatric public health.
Dual-State Audit Outcomes
Parameter
Telangana State Audit
Andhra Pradesh State Audit
Clinical Success Rate
G7% (measurable developmental improvement)
G7% (audited across therapy goals)
Population Covered
130 million (combined)
50 million
Therapy Sessions Evaluated
1G million+
1G million+
Economic Savings
N/A (not calculated in audit)
₹ 214 crore (~$25M)
Rural Outreach
44,000+ underserved children
reached
Documented impact across backward districts
Diagnostic Delay Reduction
From 14 months ➝ 17 days
Similar metrics validated
These outcomes were not self-declared, but government-audited, signed, and institutionally recorded, giving the model a level of legitimacy exceeding most Western pilot studies.
The Core Innovations Validated
The success is anchored in two patented, interoperable innovations:
1. AbilityScore®
A first-of-its-kind developmental biomarker scoring system, analyzing 344 parameters to provide a standardized, objective, and real-time profile of a child's developmental strengths and needs. Cuts through subjective assessments
Enables early detection in weeks, not years
Universally adaptable across languages and geographies
2. TherapeuticAI®
An AI-powered therapeutic engine that personalizes therapy plans in real time based on AbilityScore® inputs, caregiver feedback, progress metrics, and multimodal data (speech, behavior, cognition, motor). Reduces human dependency in early planning
Scales therapy quality in under-resourced areas
Drives measurable improvement with continuous AI adaptation
Rural Equity: Serving the Unseen
Perhaps the most significant validation lies in where the intervention worked: 44,000+ rural children in Telangana's backward regions received care under the audited model
Children who had never accessed therapy before were brought into the intervention grid
SEVA™ and National Heroes™ initiatives ensured children of farmers, sanitation workers, and frontline workers received therapy free of cost
Mothers in tribal belts were trained as frontline co-therapists via Pinnacle's Everyday Therapy™ methodology
This stands in contrast to traditional Western models that require high-cost urban infrastructure and highly specialized clinicians. Here, Bharat proved that equity is not charity — it's innovation applied at scale.
' No other pediatric developmental framework in the world today has been independently audited by two state governments, verified across 130 million citizens, and validated across 1S million sessions.'
— Lead Auditor, Andhra Pradesh State Health Mission
This isn't an Indian model.
This is a globally deployable, evidence-anchored framework now ready for international adoption.
The Global Roadmap for Adoption
The question confronting the global community is no longer 'What works?'
It is: 'How quickly can we adopt what has already been independently validated at population scale?'
With the Pinnacle framework now audited by two state governments, supported across 130 million citizens, and proven through 19 million therapy sessions, the time has come to shift from pilot projects to a structured international replication strategy.
The 5-Phase Implementation Plan
Phase 1: Stakeholder Alignment and Policy Onboarding Formal engagement with Ministries of Health, Education, and Social Welfare
Joint briefings with WHO, UNICEF, UNESCO, and World Bank country offices
Endorsement and inclusion of AbilityScore® C TherapeuticAI® into national pediatric and public health frameworks
Tools: Policy whitepaper, MoU templates, bilingual explainer decks
Outcome: Institutional onboarding and mandate establishment
Phase 2: Localization and Cultural Adaptation Translate AbilityScore® metrics and TherapeuticAI® interface into local languages
Adapt Everyday Therapy Programs™ to regional customs, household structures, and cultural parenting models
Incorporate local beliefs and indigenous developmental cues into the AI training model
Tools: Language packs, community panel inputs, regional behavior profiles
Outcome: Culturally rooted and context-aware deployment
Phase 3: Capacity Building and Workforce Training Establish Centers of Excellence in each country for trainer certification
Onboard therapists, special educators, community workers, and caregivers via structured modules
Issue digital certification for ongoing quality governance
Tools: Online learning system, hands-on bootcamps, audit-based certifications
Outcome: Local clinical capacity built for sustainable scaling
Phase 4: Pilot Implementation and Independent Evaluation Launch pilot cohorts in urban, peri-urban, and rural zones simultaneously
Deploy AI-backed dashboards to track child progress, caregiver satisfaction, and economic return
Commission third-party audit agencies to monitor and publish transparent pilot results
Tools: Real-time data dashboards, neutral audit playbooks
Outcome: Evidence-based adaptation proof across geographies
Phase 5: National Scale-Up and Global Integration Formal integration into national early childhood programs, digital health missions, and school readiness initiatives
Secure multilateral endorsements and funding partnerships (UNICEF, WHO, GPE, etc.)
Federate global dashboards showing anonymized cross-country progress comparisons
Tools: API-integrated global dashboards, SDG-linked reporting frameworks
Outcome: Replicable, transparent, institutionally embedded global system
Strategic Partnership Templates
To accelerate global replication, Pinnacle's model includes pre-structured partnership frameworks:
Stakeholder
Partnership Mode
Example Engagement
WHO / UNICEF / UNESCO
Global developmental framework integration
SDG-linked pediatric scorecard integration
Health G Education Ministries
National adoption and deployment
G20 country pilots, ASEAN cross-border pilot
Global NGOs (Save the Children, Plan International, BRAC)
Rural deployment C equity- based delivery
SEVA model expansion into Sub-Saharan Africa
CSR Arms of Global Corporates
Co-funding, capacity-building
Microsoft, Tata Trusts, Novo Nordisk CSR alliances
Academic and Research Institutions
Independent longitudinal evaluation C innovation labs
Joint AbilityScore® benchmarking projects
Real-Time Global Progress Monitoring
A key pillar of the roadmap is transparency and visibility.
Pinnacle's system enables: Country-by-country dashboards
Public reporting on diagnostic improvements, therapy outcomes, and rural reach
Data protection aligned with GDPR, DPDP (India), and HIPAA
No more guesswork. No more opaque claims. Global stakeholders will see what's working, where, and how fast — in real time.
The world doesn't need another pilot.
It needs a field-tested, government-audited, institutionally supported global delivery mechanism — now fully documented and ready for adoption.
The Countdown Clock
The world now stands at a decision point. The innovation is real. The audits are verified. The framework is scalable. But time — and control — may no longer be guaranteed.
Germany's Formal Licensing Proposal: A Global Turning Point
In May 2025, the Federal Ministry of Health of Germany submitted a formal proposal to exclusively license Pinnacle's validated AbilityScore® and TherapeuticAI® systems for European Union-wide adoption.
Offer Amount: €800 million (~USD 850 million)
Decision Deadline: September 30, 2025 (90-day exclusivity window)
Implication: Once executed, the intellectual property may fall under EU jurisdiction — with restricted global access, limited sovereignty, and region-specific customization.
This isn't just a licensing offer. It's a strategic move from one of the world's most powerful public health systems to claim first rights on a model India developed, validated, and deployed at scale.
Kenya's Independent Replication Attempt
In parallel, Kenya has initiated replication efforts based on Pinnacle's kiosk and rural therapeutic delivery model — specifically the TherapeuticAI® Kiosk Framework validated in Telangana's underserved districts.
While noble in intent, these replication efforts: Risk diverging from the audited clinical standards
May undermine global consistency in developmental metrics
Create confusion in data protection and sovereignty governance
Without centralized guidance or proper licensing, fragmented replication could dilute the credibility of what is currently the only dual-government audited model in the world.
Strategic Loss If the World Waits
Strategic Dimension
Risk of Inaction
Data Sovereignty
IP and therapy protocols governed by exclusive licensee country (Germany)
Global Equity
Low- and middle-income nations may lose low-cost or SEVA access
Implementation Control
WHO, UNICEF, and ministries may need to route adoption through a third- party gatekeeper
Price of Delay
Costs could rise sharply, excluding rural and underprivileged communities from timely access
Moral Cost
Global silence in the face of a validated, available, and scalable child development solution
If international stakeholders fail to act before September 30, 2025, the following global consequences may unfold:
' This isn't a window. It's a countdown. And once it closes, we may lose global parity in access, control, and cost forever.'
— Senior Policy Advisor, Global Childhood Development Taskforce
The Decision Timeline
Date
Milestone
Strategic Consequence
April–June 2025
Dual-state audit results validated
Model gains institutional legitimacy
May 2025
Germany's €800M licensing offer received
IP sovereignty enters negotiation phase
Sept 30, 2025
Licensing window closes
Global rights may be restricted
October 2025 onward
Potential licensing lock- in
World loses opportunity for open adoption
A Global Call Before the Clock Runs Out
WHO, UNICEF, UNESCO, World Bank, and Ministries of Health now face a singular opportunity: Adopt and endorse the framework before it becomes geopolitically siloed
Establish multi-country implementation rights with shared governance
Protect data sovereignty, cost parity, and regional equity at scale
This is the final moment to choose global empowerment over regional exclusivity.
The time to act isn't later — it's before September 30, 2025.
What the World Must Do Now
The Pinnacle Framework — validated across 19 million sessions, audited by two state governments, and backed by ₹214 crore in savings — is not a concept. It is an available, proven system.
The moment now demands not more discussion, but coordinated global adoption through structured, auditable, and sovereign partnerships.
Here is what each global stakeholder group must now do:
1. WHO, UNICEF, UNESCO, and Multilateral Health Bodies
Immediate Actions:
• Issue a joint resolution recognizing Pinnacle's framework as a validated, scalable, equity-first model for global child development. Integrate AbilityScore® into early childhood screening recommendations.
Include TherapeuticAI® in WHO's Digital Health Guidelines for LMICs.
Commission a multilateral evaluation study under UNDP-UNICEF-WHO joint panel.
Suggested Language for Resolution:
' Recognizing the dual-state audited clinical e<icacy, equity impact, and economic scalability of the Pinnacle Framework (India), we resolve to initiate global assessment, endorsement, and structured regional adaptation of its core components — AbilityScore® and TherapeuticAI® — as part of our joint strategy toward SDG 3.2, 4.2, and 10.3.'
2. National Ministries of Health, Education, and Women G Child Development (G20, ASEAN, AU, SAARC)
Immediate Actions: Sign MoUs for pilot implementation using Phase 3 and Phase 4 roadmap (see Section 3).
Embed AbilityScore® into existing health worker protocols, ASHA/ANM/primary pediatric care channels.
Initiate formal national integration review via inter-ministerial coordination.
Suggested MoU Clause (Model Language):
' This MoU formalizes the collaboration between the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and Pinnacle Blooms Network to pilot and evaluate the AbilityScore® and TherapeuticAI® framework across [region/country], with the intent to establish a scalable, audited, and culturally adaptive national developmental intervention system.'
3. Global NGOs, Development Agencies, and Philanthropic Foundations
Immediate Actions: Adopt the SEVA™ model in their existing early childhood equity programs.
Fund rural kiosk expansion, training of mothers and caregivers in remote geographies.
Commission third-party evaluations for global comparability and reporting.
Suggested Partnership Objective:
' To support high-impact, audit-verifiable child development interventions in low-resource settings by co- deploying Pinnacle's rural-validated TherapeuticAI® framework under the principles of transparency, equity, and cross-country comparability.'
4. Academic Institutions, Global Research Networks, and Pediatric Associations
Immediate Actions: Launch peer-reviewed validation studies across multiple country settings.
Establish international knowledge consortiums for AbilityScore® benchmarking and evolution.
Host global summits on neurodevelopmental metrics and intervention AI ethics.
Suggested Research Collaboration Statement:
' We invite institutions globally to participate in a multi-site, longitudinal validation study of AbilityScore® as a universal developmental assessment scale, correlating it with local diagnostics, school readiness, caregiver well-being, and economic outcome metrics.'
5. CSR G Private Sector Leadership
Immediate Actions: Fund Centers of Excellence for training, dashboarding, and innovation labs.
Sponsor public access to therapy via SEVA for underserved regions.
Integrate TherapeuticAI® insights into inclusive hiring, employee family support policies.
Suggested CSR Commitment Statement:
' As part of our commitment to child welfare and inclusive development, we pledge support for audited, scalable frameworks like Pinnacle's AbilityScore® and TherapeuticAI®, including rural outreach and community capacity-building in the geographies we serve.'
A United Global Front
By synchronizing these stakeholder actions under one verifiable, evidence-led model, the world can finally: Standardize diagnosis
Personalize intervention
Scale equity
And protect sovereignty
The opportunity has already been validated. What's now required is action in time.
Here is the final section — Section Eight: Closing Statement – A Moment in Human History — crafted to distill everything into a singular, unignorable choice. It closes with moral clarity, strategic consequence, and emotional truth — ready for use in the highest policy and media corridors.
A Moment in Human History
This is not a proposal. It is not a whitepaper.
It is a mirror held up to the global conscience.
Two state governments — Telangana and Andhra Pradesh, politically opposed and institutionally autonomous — audited an indigenous framework across 130 million citizens. They validated 1G million therapy sessions. They documented ₹214 crore in public savings, a G7% clinical success rate, and life-changing impact in some of the most underserved corners of the world.
This isn't theory. This isn't marketing.
This is evidence humanity has been waiting for — finally delivered.
The framework — AbilityScore® and TherapeuticAI® — now sits at a global inflection point: Germany is ready to license it exclusively.
Kenya is already replicating it independently.
Multilateral institutions have acknowledged the crisis but still lack a scalable model.
And G00 million families continue to wait in silence, watching their children lose years they will never get back.
This is a moment that will be written into institutional memory.
Either as the day the world finally came together to act — Or the day we knowingly let the window close.
The audits have been completed. The cost of delay is documented.
The global implementation roadmap is ready. The data is sovereign.
The science is proven. The equity is built-in. The urgency is real.
And now, the choice is global.
Action or Inaction
Act now — and transform the lives of millions of children while setting a precedent for how equity, science, and scalability can coexist.
Delay — and explain to the next generation why humanity chose geopolitics, pride, or inertia over solutions that were ready, proven, and waiting.
This is not Bharat's moment alone. This is humanity's moment.
And it is passing — quickly.
The countdown has already begun.
Let history record that we chose action.
Disclaimer:
This article is from the Brand Desk. User discretion is advised.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
24 minutes ago
- News18
Not Just A Stomach Ache: That Discomfort Could Be Hepatitis Hiding
For most people, a dull ache in the stomach or a wave of nausea after eating are usual signs of indigestion, but sometimes, this familiar discomfort may not be arising from the abdomen. In fact, it could be the liver's way of pointing towards more serious conditions like Hepatitis. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), hepatitis affects more than 300 million people, with India bearing one of the highest burdens in the world. This condition of the liver often hides itself until significant damage has already been done to the body. Even when its symptoms do appear, they mimic those of common digestive trouble, making diagnosis more difficult. In a situation where routine liver screening is still not that usual, the quiet symptoms of Hepatitis are unintentionally neglected until the liver starts to fail.
The Hindu
9 hours ago
- The Hindu
Liver diseases often go undetected; doctors call for early screening and awareness
An estimated 304 million people worldwide live with chronic hepatitis B or C, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Of these, 254 million have hepatitis B and 50 million have hepatitis C. The disease causes about 1.3 million deaths annually over 3,500 each day. India accounts for over 11.6% of the global burden, with around 29.8 million people living with hepatitis B and 5.5 million with hepatitis C. Hepatitis is inflammation of the liver, most commonly caused by viral infections, mainly hepatitis A, B, C, D, and E. Among these, hepatitis B and C can become chronic, potentially leading to cirrhosis, liver failure or cancer. Transmission can occur through unsafe injections, blood transfusions, sexual contact or from mother to child during childbirth. Despite the scale, most infections remain undiagnosed until complications arise. Doctors say this is due to vague early symptoms, inadequate screening, and widespread misconceptions. 'In the early stages, liver trouble may show up as fatigue, appetite loss or mild abdominal pain - symptoms that are easily overlooked,' said Vivekanandan Shanmugam, Lead Liver Transplant Surgeon, SIMS Hospital, Chennai . 'Even signs like dark urine or yellowing of the eyes are ignored. As a result, patients often present late.' He added that screening for hepatitis B and C is recommended for high-risk groups - those who had blood transfusions before the 1990s, dialysis patients and healthcare workers, but implementation remains patchy. 'Many people don't know they should get tested. There is stigma and poor access, especially in peripheral areas,' he said. Dr. Shanmugam also flagged the impact of over-the-counter painkillers and unregulated herbal supplements. 'The liver filters everything we consume. Long-term misuse of common drugs like paracetamol or herbal concoctions can silently damage the liver.' Radhika Venugopal, Senior Consultant - Hepatology, Liver Disease & Transplantation, Rela Hospital, Chennai, said symptoms such as nausea, fatigue, or weight loss are often ignored. 'By the time jaundice, swelling or bleeding appears, damage is usually advanced. Liver function tests and scans can help detect problems early,' she said. She noted that hepatitis testing is not well integrated into routine healthcare, particularly in rural settings. 'Pregnant women, people with HIV, and those undergoing surgery or dialysis must be screened, but enforcement is weak.' Dr. Venugopal also flagged the rise in 'lean MAFLD' (metabolic-associated fatty liver disease) in people with normal weight but underlying metabolic issues. 'Tools like FibroScan help detect this early.' Doctors recommend hepatitis B vaccination, avoiding excessive alcohol, limiting self-medication, and routine check-ups. 'The liver is silent until it's too late,' said Dr. Shanmugam.
The Wire
9 hours ago
- The Wire
Recovery, the Unfinished Business of the Pandemic
The consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic far outlasted the health emergency. Long after infection curves flattened and emergency declarations were lifted, countries across the globe continued to wrestle with a deep economic, social and health-related fallout. In India, over 23 crore people were pushed into poverty during the pandemic years, with rural and informal sector workers bearing the brunt, and the economic spillover continues to be seen in the form of increased government debt, rising inflation, a stagnating hospitality industry and other things, even after half a decade has passed since the onset of COVID. In the health sector, the disruption to routine immunisation services led to measles outbreaks in numerous Sub-Saharan countries, while a UNICEF report warned that about 23 million children missed out on essential vaccines in 2020 alone. Mental health outcomes also deteriorated sharply. Data from the WHO shows that there was a 25% global increase in anxiety and depression in the first year of the pandemic. These aftershocks demonstrate that recovery is not a passive return to normalcy – it is a protracted and complex phase that demands sustained attention, governance and resource mobilisation. The COVID-19 pandemic has triggered worldwide efforts to mitigate the scale and impact of future health emergencies, including amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR); the creation of the Pandemic Fund and the WHO Pandemic Intelligence Hub; and the ACT-Accelerator, COVAX and One Health initiatives. The latest – and most talked-about – in this series of efforts is the WHO Pandemic Agreement, which was adopted on May 20, 2025 after three years of negotiations and discussions. It will become a legally binding international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response once it is signed by 60 countries. After India's vote in favour of the resolution to adopt the agreement, making it an official state party to the agreement, the prime minister has talked about its importance for vulnerable populations in the Global South that disproportionately bear the effects of health challenges. In order to successfully achieve this goal, the agreement needs to accomplish two things – chart out obligations targeted towards vulnerable populations, and highlight the specific ways in which pandemics' disproportionate impact on the Global South can be mitigated. While the agreement does lay the ground for equity in both aspects, it falls short of outlining implementable measures to achieve these goals meaningfully without hindering sovereign decisions. Notably, the Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing (PABS) annex, a critical component tied to equity and access, still has another year to be worked out, further delaying clarity on how benefit-sharing commitments will be operationalised. Commendably, the agreement talks about the need to provide affordable health and other social support services to 'persons in vulnerable situations'. It also calls for the mitigation of the socioeconomic impacts of pandemics on such persons. However, it misses an opportunity to guide state parties on when and how this should be done at the domestic and trans-national levels, especially at the time of recovery. Integrating recovery into the pandemic agreement Article 3 of the agreement, titled 'Preparedness, health system resilience and recovery', gestures toward the importance of post-pandemic strategies. However, recovery is buried within broader health system resilience goals and mentioned only in passing. It refers vaguely to 'developing post-pandemic health system recovery strategies' without outlining how, when or by whom such strategies must be developed, implemented or monitored. This diluted treatment effectively renders recovery a discretionary task, rather than an obligation. There is no requirement for countries to assess the long-term impacts of pandemics on vulnerable populations, nor is there any architecture for coordinating recovery efforts, allocating responsibilities or ensuring accountability. In the light of this gap, recovery must be established as a clear, foundational pillar within the pandemic agreement – not a vague aspiration buried under resilience. It is important to acknowledge at the onset that international treaties cannot impose rigid mandates on sovereign states. However, by creating shared expectations and enabling frameworks, they can support states in fulfilling recovery goals without infringing on national autonomy. Rather than prescribe uniform recovery models, the agreement can promote adaptable, equity-based cooperation that complements domestic efforts while ensuring accountability and consistency across borders. The agreement should require states to develop standalone national recovery frameworks tailored to their contexts, with explicit mandates for implementation, periodic review and transparent reporting. Recovery should be understood broadly – not just as restoring health systems but as encompassing social, economic and mental health dimensions affected by pandemics. A comprehensive recovery approach must prioritise impact assessments focused on marginalised and vulnerable populations – including gender minorities, workers in the informal sector, migrants, senior citizens, homeless populations, persons with disabilities and ethnic minorities – who disproportionately suffer during crises. These assessments should directly inform targeted economic and social policies, such as livelihood restoration, social protection adjustments and reintegration support, to prevent widening inequalities in the post-crisis phase. Further, recovery goals must be multi-dimensional and should account for the wide-ranging impact of pandemics across different key areas. Accordingly, the agreement should embed principles for access to justice and redressal mechanisms for harms suffered during pandemics, the restoration of disrupted education systems, safeguards for the continuity of essential public and welfare services, mechanisms for the review of governmental decisions and actions during the state of exception, and the rebuilding of public trust through transparent and participatory governance. The absence of these dimensions risks a recovery that is piecemeal and opaque, weakening institutional integrity and leaving societies more vulnerable to future crises. International cooperation in recovery efforts In order to achieve the aim of equity, especially across the Global North-Global South divide, the international community must direct its attention to recovery efforts across national borders. The agreement must institutionalise mechanisms for international coordination and solidarity during the recovery phase, facilitating sharing of expertise, resources and data across countries to reduce regional vulnerabilities and promote equitable resilience. The bodies set up under the agreement do not account for this adequately, in terms of function or finances. The mechanisms set up under the agreement, such as PABS, deal with important functions like pathogen and data sharing, and pharmaceutical supply and distribution. There are no such systems established for recovery. The Coordinating Financial Mechanism previously established under the IHR has been envisaged as the mechanism to promote sustainable financing for the implementation of the pandemic agreement as well. Its mandate under the pandemic agreement is to 'support strengthening and expanding capacities for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, and contribute to the prompt availability of surge financing response necessary as of day zero, particularly in developing country Parties.' This conspicuously and concerningly misses recovery as a crucial stage of assessing impacts and developing strategies for rebuilding, which is especially crucial for low and middle-income countries in the Global South, including India. The cultural impact of international documents Understandably, international agreements cannot impose specific obligations in the same way that domestic laws can. Given the legally binding nature of the pandemic agreement, it should also refrain from interfering with sovereign and context-specific decisions adopted at the national and sub-national levels. At the same time, beyond policy prescriptions, international treaties play a critical role in shaping legal cultures and empowering civil society to demand justice and reform. By embedding preparedness, resilience-building and recovery within the pandemic agreement, the global community will be able to create a shared vocabulary and normative framework that activists, policymakers and courts can invoke domestically to advance equity and resilience. India's past experience has illustrated this dynamic vividly. The Vishakha Guidelines on workplace sexual harassment, which transformed protections for women, were grounded in India's commitments under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. Similarly, the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities has influenced landmark judicial decisions and legislative reforms enhancing disability rights and access to welfare in India. What can be done to prioritise recovery? While laying out the rules or procedure and terms of reference, the Intergovernmental Working Group empowered under the agreement must lay down specific provisions on recovery, including indicative domestic guidance, mechanisms for international cooperation and sustainable financing or recovery that recognises marginalisation and prioritises equity. Embedding principles that prioritise domestic and international efforts will shift recovery from a discretionary afterthought to a binding commitment that demands accountability without prescribing inflexible solutions. It provides states with a flexible but clear mandate to build inclusive, adaptive recovery architectures that address the deep, lasting fallout of pandemics. Shreyashi Ray is a senior resident fellow with the health team at the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy. Anchal Bhatheja is a research fellow at the centre.
