logo
Far-right Sanseito party wins shock electoral gains in Japan on anti-foreigner platform

Far-right Sanseito party wins shock electoral gains in Japan on anti-foreigner platform

Japan's prime minister has launched an office focused on fostering "harmonious coexistence" with foreign nationals as an ultra-conservative party rode a wave of anti-immigration sentiment to unexpected electoral success.
In a shock to the long-ruling Liberal Democratic Party, previously fringe Sanseito won 14 seats in the 248-seat upper house on Sunday — becoming the fourth largest opposition party in parliament with its calls for a crackdown on "excessive acceptance of foreigners".
Sanseito had proposed "loyalty checks" for foreigners, as well as the suspension of social services to foreign residents and strict limits for hiring them.
The party's leader, Sohei Kamiya, recently told a rally that "under globalism, multinational companies have changed Japan's policies for their own purposes".
Analysts say Sanseito's rise has exposed long-simmering public anxiety about rising costs, over-tourism, and a stagnant economy — all of which the party blames on foreigners.
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba last week announced the establishment of an office within Japan's cabinet to manage an influx of foreigners needed to prop up the economy, which is affected by a rapidly aging population.
While Japan needed to accept some degree of foreign workers and invite spending by tourists, Mr Ishiba said the behaviour of some foreigners was causing Japanese people to feel "anxiety and unfairness", according to public broadcaster NHK.
The appeal of far-right politics was primarily driven by economic factors said Simon Avenell, a Japan expert at the Australian National University.
"First and foremost, it's about people's wallets," Professor Avenell said.
Japan's booming tourism sector is one of the few parts of the economy tracking well.
A record 36.9 million foreign visitors arrived in 2024 — a 47 per cent jump from the previous year and higher than pre-COVID levels.
"Tourists can afford to pay for an increase in price for a bowl of ramen while locals are struggling to buy a dozen eggs," Professor Avenell said.
"Buses are full. Trains are crowded. Locals feel pushed out of their own space," he said.
In polling, 29 per cent of voters told NHK that social security and a declining birthrate were their biggest concerns.
The price of rice, which remains a staple of the Japanese diet, has doubled over the past year.
In the face of economic anxiety, Sanseito's populist message has resonated with many Japanese voters.
Sanseito was created in 2019, emerging from an ultranationalist YouTube channel.
The party's "Japanese First" pitch is that the country is under cultural and economic threat from outsiders.
Foreigners, they claim, are driving up prices, overcrowding cities, committing crimes and buying up Japanese land.
"The requirement for aspiring candidates and party members to submit nationality information, ensuring they're 'pure Japanese,' is appealing," one Sanseito supporter told Japanese newspaper The Mainichi Shimbun last week.
Almost 3.8 million foreign residents lived in Japan as of late 2024, just under 3 per cent of its total population.
This is in stark contrast to other wealthy nations. Almost one-third of Australia's population was born overseas.
But numbers of foreign residents have steadily climbed as Japan cautiously relaxed its immigration laws in recent years, for example by creating special visa categories to address labour shortages in nursing and construction.
At the same time, tourism has exploded.
Japan had already seen the arrival of 18 million tourists by May this year — and cities like Kyoto and Tokyo are feeling the strain.
"The majority of Japanese citizens are not xenophobic," said Ryosuke Hanada, a Japanese citizen and PhD student at Macquarie University.
"What they want is an adjustment of the rules applied to temporary residents."
Mr Hanada said right-wing populism was feeding on real economic stress, visible demographic shifts, and a government that had, until now, avoided serious discussion about what integration or coexistence with foreigners might look like.
Sanseito has capitalised on resentment over foreign access to public resources and property.
"There are no restrictions on foreign land ownership in Japan," Mr Hanada said.
"This causes the increase of property prices in the Tokyo metropolitan area."
There are no publicly available records of the nationality of buyers in Japan, but one survey of housing developers by Mitsubishi UFJ Trust & Banking Corp suggested that 20 per cent to 40 per cent of new apartments in central Tokyo were being purchased by foreigners.
While some high-end properties in Tokyo or ski towns have seen foreign interest and inflated local prices, there's no widespread evidence that this is happening across the country.
Foreign residents who stay over three months are automatically enrolled in Japan's national health insurance scheme and can apply for public housing, childcare and other social services.
Nana Oishi, an associate professor in Japanese studies at the University of Melbourne, said many Japanese felt public resources should be "prioritised for struggling Japanese nationals".
"These perceptions have contributed to the appeal of Sanseito's messaging," she said.
And there's another layer: anxiety about global power shifts.
With the Trump administration floating new US tariffs on Japanese exports, some voters feel the need to adopt a more self-protective stance.
"There's this sense that, well, the Americans are looking after themselves … maybe we should too," said Professor Avenell.
Sanseito's sharp rise has forced the Liberal Democratic Party, a centre-right party which has long dominated Japanese politics, to react.
Professor Avenell said the government wasn't "prepared for the debate" yet moved quickly when anti-foreigner sentiment was reflected in the polls.
"Whether the panel [to manage foreigners] does anything meaningful is still unclear, but the politics have shifted," he said.
Some regions are already acting on over-tourism.
Differential pricing — where foreigners pay more for attractions like temples or services — has been introduced in tourist hotspots.
Other ideas, such as capping tourist numbers or restricting purchases in sensitive zones, have gained traction but face legal and economic hurdles.
But Dr Oishi said despite over-tourism in cities like Kyoto, "most Japanese cities continue to welcome international tourists and foreign residents".
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The US and China will go head-to-head in the battle to bring about artificial general intelligence
The US and China will go head-to-head in the battle to bring about artificial general intelligence

ABC News

time8 minutes ago

  • ABC News

The US and China will go head-to-head in the battle to bring about artificial general intelligence

Artificial intelligence is no longer just a race among a group of over-valued American tech companies and over-yachted billionaires. It's still that, but it's now also part of the great contest between the US and China. That means it's less about profits and return on investment, and more about geopolitics — national machismo, security and defence. It also means the coming transition from AI to AGI or artificial general intelligence — where machines theoretically surpass human intelligence — will be brought forward and will be much more significant for the world. It will be as momentous as the discovery of nuclear fission in 1938, which led to the development of nuclear weapons and the United States's first atom bomb test in July 1945, followed a month later by the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and then four years later by the Soviet Union's first test, followed by 30 years of Cold War. It's not clear which of the US or China will get to AGI first, but the loser won't be four years behind and won't be relying on slow pre-Internet espionage as the Soviets had to. But it looks like the US is playing catch-up: last week China's Unitree Robotics began selling a humanoid robot with artificial intelligence, including voice and image recognition, for just US$5,900, the first in what's expected to be a flood of well-priced AI machines for both the home and workplace (this one doesn't look like it can do the dishes yet, but it won't be long). US President Donald Trump recently launched "AI Action Day". The plan that he presented started with these words: "The United States is in a race to achieve global dominance in artificial intelligence (AI)." Note: dominance, not leadership, and not US companies, but "the United States". Next sentence: "Whoever has the largest AI ecosystem will set global AI standards and reap broad economic and military benefits." Note: "military". Yes, AGI will transform warfare, as nuclear weapons did 80 years ago. The Chinese government had much the same idea as Trump exactly eight years ago. Its AI plan was released on July 20, 2017, with the following ambition: "By 2030, China's AI theories, technologies, and applications should achieve world-leading levels, making China the world's primary AI innovation centre". Meanwhile, in the US, a company called Nvidia had just discovered that the chips it was making for video games could work nicely for artificial intelligence. In July 2017, at the same time as the Chinese government was launching its AI strategy, Nvidia and the Chinese equivalent of Google, Baidu, announced a partnership in which Baidu would use Nvidia's chips for AI, and the American company would get access to the Chinese market. On that day in 2017, Nvidia was worth a pretty handy $US100 billion ($152 billion); today it's worth $US4.2 trillion and is the world's most valuable company, after a three-year frenzy that has seen its share price increase 14-fold. The Nvidia-Baidu partnership doesn't seem to have been formally terminated, but it petered out a couple of years ago, around the same time as the US non-profit outfit OpenAI launched ChatGPT, kicking off the next era of AI. Since then, the US government under Joe Biden has been mainly concerned with regulating AI, partly prompted by the "Statement on AI Risk", published on May 30, 2023, by hundreds of AI experts, who declared: "Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war." But now, with Donald Trump, it's no more regulation — none (not that those worried AI experts in 2023 stopped what they were doing or even slowed the development of AI at breakneck speed, as if the need for regulations and the "risk of extinction" didn't exist). The first part of the Trump administration's AI plan involves "removing red tape and onerous regulation". The second part instructs the National Institute of Standards and Technology to "eliminate references to misinformation, diversity, equity, and inclusion, and climate change", and as he signed the executive order on stage at the Mellon Auditorium, Trump said they would be removing "woke Marxist lunacy in the AI models. Once and for all, we are getting rid of woke. OK?" You've got to get your priorities in the right order: deregulation comes before de-woking, but only just. What the US plan does NOT involve is government money, but there is plenty of that available in Silicon Valley and on Wall Street, so no need for the government to abandon tax cuts for the billionaires. Estimates of how much has been spent developing AI by the big US tech companies range from $US800 billion to $US1 trillion, and there is no sign of that slowing. If anything, it's speeding up as the companies approach the much more profitable (they think) singularity of AGI. The Chinese government, meanwhile, is estimated to have spent about $US150 billion developing its AI industry. It was done more cheaply because they were able to use open-source software from the US, a lot of it from OpenAI. No espionage required. Earlier this year, a Chinese company named DeepSeek galvanised the AI world and the US government by releasing an AI model called R1, which is as good as the American ones, much cheaper, and open source. Another Chinese company, Moonshot AI, has released another, better, open-source model called Kimi K2, capable of autonomously doing complex tasks, prompting some commentators to call it another DeepSeek moment, and a significant step towards AGI. But now, as standard AI starts to infiltrate every corner of life and become an explicit source of geopolitical competition between America and China, the question on the minds of everyone involved in the industry is, when will AGI happen? And when (not if) it does happen, what will that mean? For the first question, I asked ChatGPT. It replied: "My best evidence-based guess — based on current trends, expert forecasts, and technical bottlenecks — is that a true AGI tipping point could plausibly occur sometime between 2030 and 2040, but not before 2027, and quite possibly not until 2050 or later." So, between five and 15 years — not long. What will it mean? Plenty, both good and not good. Human-level cognition and autonomy in machines will be profoundly disruptive to humanity. The risks are obvious: the elimination of white-collar jobs leading to high levels of permanent unemployment, collapse of aggregate demand, along with inflation and interest rates, more effective cyber-attacks, autonomous weapons, more sophisticated propaganda and surveillance. And then there's that thing they were warning about in May 2023 — extinction. If the machines are smarter and better-informed than us, can we control them? What if they do to us what we did to the Neanderthals? The benefits are potentially enormous as well: better, more personalised healthcare, an exponential acceleration in science and research, improved productivity, less mundane work, and more leisure. That's why the Productivity Commission's overview for its "five pillars" report in preparation for the productivity roundtable in two weeks says its recommendations will "aim to give people and businesses the confidence and certainty they need to safely adopt powerful new AI tools," although it doesn't specifically talk about AGI. The 25 great and good at the roundtable will probably talk about that for half an hour before getting back to arguing about tax and human industrial relations. Alan Kohler is a finance presenter and columnist on ABC News, and he also writes for Intelligent Investor.

Humanoid robots embodiment of China's AI ambitions
Humanoid robots embodiment of China's AI ambitions

News.com.au

time2 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Humanoid robots embodiment of China's AI ambitions

Serving craft beer, playing mahjong, stacking shelves and boxing, the dozens of humanoid robots at Shanghai's World AI Conference (WAIC) this weekend were embodiments of China's growing AI prowess and ambition. The annual event is primed at showcasing China's progress in the ever-evolving field of artificial intelligence, with the government aiming to position the country as a world leader on both technology and regulation as it snaps at the United States' heels. Opening the event on Saturday, Premier Li Qiang announced China would set up a new organisation for cooperation on AI governance, warning the benefits of development must be balanced with the risks. But in the cavernous expo next door, the mood was more giddy than concerned. "Demand is currently very strong, whether in terms of data, scenarios, model training, or artificial construction. The overall atmosphere in all these areas is very lively," said Yang Yifan, R&D director at Transwarp, a Shanghai-based AI platform provider. This year's WAIC is the first since a breakthrough moment for Chinese AI this January when startup DeepSeek unveiled an AI model that performed as well as top US systems for an apparent fraction of the cost. Organisers said the forum involved more than 800 companies, showcasing over 3,000 products -- the undeniable crowd pleasers being the humanoid robots and their raft of slightly surreal party tricks. At one booth, a robot played drums, half a beat out of time, to Queen's "We Will Rock You" while a man in safety goggles and a security vest hyped up a giggling crowd. Other droids, some dressed in working overalls or baseball caps, manned assembly lines, played curling with human opponents or sloppily served soft drinks from a dispenser. While most of the machines on display were still a little jerky, the increasing sophistication year-on-year was clear to see. The Chinese government has poured support into robotics, an area in which some experts think China might already have the upper hand over the United States. At Hangzhou-based Unitree's stall, its G1 android -- around 130 centimetres (four feet) tall, with a two-hour battery life -- kicked, pivoted and punched, keeping its balance with relative fluidity as it shadowboxed around a ring. Ahead of the conference's opening, Unitree announced it would launch a full-size humanoid, the R1, for under $6,000. - 'Digital humans' - Most high-tech helpers don't need hardware though. At the expo, AI companions -- in the form of middle-aged businessmen, scantily clad women and ancient warriors -- waved at people from screens, asking how their day was, while other stalls ran demos allowing visitors to create their own digital avatars. Tech giant Baidu on Saturday announced a new generation of technology for its "digital humans" -- AI agents modelled on real people, which it says are "capable of thinking, making decisions, and collaborating". The company recently ran a six-hour e-commerce broadcast hosted by the "digital human" of a well-known streamer and another avatar. The two agents beat the human streamer's debut sales in some categories, Baidu said. Over ten thousand businesses are using the technology daily already, the department's head Wu Chenxia told AFP. Asked about the impact on jobs -- one of the major concerns raised around widespread AI adoption -- Wu insisted that AI was a tool that should be used to improve quality and save time and effort, which still required human input. In China, the integration of AI into everyday life is beginning to pick up pace. At WAIC, Baidu also announced it had been granted a permit to operate fully driverless robotaxis in parts of the massive Pudong district, the service's first foray into downtown Shanghai. For now, few visitors to the WAIC expo seemed worried about the potential ramifications of the back-flipping dog robots they were excitedly watching. "When it comes to China's AI development, we have a comparatively good foundation of data and also a wealth of application scenarios," said Transwarp's Yang.

Taiwan opposition parliamentarians survive major recall election
Taiwan opposition parliamentarians survive major recall election

ABC News

time13 hours ago

  • ABC News

Taiwan opposition parliamentarians survive major recall election

When Prime Minister Anthony Albanese visited China recently, there were questions about what role Australia would play if China and the US went to war over Taiwan. The island's defence capabilities have also been front-of-mind for some Taiwanese people and parliamentarians during a domestic political stoush that came to a head on Saturday. For several months now, civil society groups in Taiwan have been campaigning to unseat 24 parliamentarians they considered to be too pro-China. But their efforts to expel the politicians, using a recall motion, have failed. So, what does that mean for Taiwan? Taiwan, a democratic self-governing island of 23 million people, has a political system that allows voters to remove their elected representatives before the end of their term through a legal process known as a recall. But recalls are rare, and had never been used on this scale before. Grassroots organisations behind this unprecedented mass recall campaign wanted to unseat opposition party parliamentarians they viewed as pro-Beijing. The campaigners believed these parliamentarians had been using their majority to block the democratically aligned Taiwan president's agenda, impacting government budgets and crucially, defence programs, which consequently created risks for Taiwan's security. "The opposition lawmakers have paralysed the government's ability to start the process of enhancing defence reforms and capabilities that Taiwan desperately needs in order to deter China from continuing to enhance military pressure on Taiwan," said William Yang, International Crisis Group's senior analyst for North-East Asia. The opposition parliamentarians had denied these accusations. Beijing has repeatedly insisted that Taiwan will one day become a part of China, refusing to rule out the use of force to achieve that. US intelligence suggests China's President Xi Jinping wants his military ready for a potential invasion by 2027. All recall votes against the 24 opposition party members from the Kuomintang (KMT) were rejected, according to Taiwan's Central Election Commission. It means the current makeup of Taiwan's parliament will remain the same. "The result shows the majority of the Taiwanese people still prefer the outcome from the Taiwanese election delivered in 2024," explained Mr Yang. The opposition party will continue to have a majority in the legislature, and the ruling party, President Lai Ching-te's Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), will continue to control the executive branch of government. Mr Yang described the results as a "double-edged sword". "On the one hand, the opposition party could feel that they have the momentum behind them, so they will try to make a way to push the government to provide more leverage and concessions," he said. "But at the same time, the opposition could also feel the heat in the way that they will be more cautious when it comes to blocking or stopping the government's agenda so that they won't face similar recall measures in the future." KMT chairman Eric Chu thanked Taiwan's voters and called for President Lai to apologise and reflect on his governance. "One should not lose the elections and then call for malicious recalls. One should not seek one-party dominance and destroy democracy," he told a press briefing in Taipei. "Most importantly, the people of Taiwan chose stability and chose a government that gets things done, rather than political infighting." Wu Szu-yao, secretary general of the DPP's legislative caucus, said the party respected the voters' decision with pleasure, adding the result would only strengthen the DPP's "anti-communist and pro-Taiwan" stance. "This time we saw China was trying everything it could to intervene," she told reporters at party headquarters in Taipei, pointing to Chinese military pressure and a disinformation campaign. "We must be more vigilant against their possible malicious intentions toward Taiwan." The groups seeking the recalls said theirs was an "anti-communist" movement, accusing the KMT of selling out Taiwan by sending lawmakers to China, not supporting defence spending and bringing chaos to parliament. Voters like Mr Hsu told the ABC the recall campaign had created a divided society, and political polarisation in Taiwan had become "extreme." He hoped for a return to normalcy after the recall vote result. "I hope everyone on this island can live happily, with a thriving economy, instead of being caught up in constant infighting." Jennifer Chang said she hoped that both sides of the political spectrum could find some common ground. "I think everyone should speak out and listen more," she said. Ms Liang, 60, believed people in Taiwan were tolerant. "They're open to different opinions and treat each other with respect. That's something I really value about Taiwan." Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store