Llandudno councillors who defected to Reform UK 'should resign'
Cllr Emery criticised the former Tory UK government for allowing the UK to 'stagnate and decline' while Cllr Montgomery said he felt 'let down' by the Conservatives. Cllr Emery represents the Gogarth Mostyn ward on Conwy County Council and the Gogarth ward on Llandudno Town Council.
Llandudno deputy mayor Cllr Tom Montgomery represents the Tudno ward on both Conwy County Council and Llandudno Town Council. But Mrs Finch-Saunders said the pair should now resign, calling for a by-election, believing that Llandudno voters wanted Conservative representatives, not Reform members. Sign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox.
'Obviously, it comes as some great disappointment to learn that Tom and Louise have defected to Reform,' said Mrs Finch-Saunders. 'I've always been a strong believer that you are only as good as the party you represent, in terms of standing for elections.
'Those voters deserve your trust. In these circumstances, a resignation should come forward for two town council seats and two county council seats. This would allow for the opportunity to prove their worth and stand against other politicians. I'm calling for them to resign and for a by-election to be called."
She added: 'I feel they have betrayed the residents who actually voted them in as Conservatives. Put it to the electorate, and that gives them a firm mandate to represent the very same people. Put it to the test that what they've done is the right choice for the residents.'
Speaking on behalf of both Cllr Louise Emery and Cllr Tom Montgomery, Cllr Emery said: 'We will respond accordingly tomorrow.' Both Cllr Emery and Cllr Montgomery were critical of Labour and the Conservatives in their resignation statements from the Tory party.
Responding on behalf of the Conwy Labour group, leader Hannah Fleet said: 'Obviously they are free to join whatever group they want to join. I'm rather surprised they would join a group that seem to be on record as wishing to privatise the NHS, but they are free to make their own decision.' Conwy Conservative group leader Cllr Cheryl Carlisle declined to comment.
Public notices in your area
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
4 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Nigel Farage's barmy Army plan for portakabin prisons 'would risk national security'
Defence sources said Vladimir Putin would be "delighted" by the plan - which would mean serving soldiers building prisons instead of serving on the NATO frontline NIGEL Farage's plan to draft in the army to build portakabin prisons would put national security at risk, defence sources have suggested. The Reform UK leader claimed his party would build 12,000 'Nightingale' Prisons on disused MoD land with help from the British Army. Launching the policy in London this week, Farage said: 'We'll work with private contractors, but we'll want to use the logistical skills that exist in the army and our armed forces to make this happen.' But defence sources warned forcing the Army to build prisons would damage readiness for urgent deployment if needed. ' Nigel Farage 's half-baked plan to draft the Army in to build prisons risks national security,' a defence source said. 'If Farage really wants to move brave soldiers away from the NATO frontline to build portacabin prisons, he should come clean about it. Putin would certainly be delighted.' The Army currently operates a 'forward land force' deployment in Estonia to deter Russian aggression on NATO's Eastern Flank. Military Aid to the Civilian Authorities – or MACA – are usually called upon to provide capabilities which relevant civil authorities do not have, or cannot generate in sufficient quantity in response to an emergency. The bar for requesting military aid is high, and must normally be approved by the Ministry of Defence. MACA requests have to prove that commercial, voluntary sector, and mutual aid alternatives have been discounted, that the civil authority lacks the necessary capability to fulfil the task, and that a definite need to act has been proved. It is unclear how this will work with current MACA rules, given Reform plan to use both commercial and public sector defence workers. A Labour source added: 'Farage's Nightingale Prison plans are a total nightmare. Imagine hardened criminals running around a prefab site put together in just 72 hours. 'These are botch-job plans from a Party desperate to look tough on crime.' In 2022/23 the charge rate for each soldier deployed was £4,000 per week: Reform have not made it clear how they would fund the Nightingale Prisons on MoD land.
The Independent
7 hours ago
- The Independent
Returning James Cleverly hits out at ‘one man band' Reform: 'The British people deserve better'
Sir James Cleverly has branded Nigel Farage 's Reform UK a a 'one-man band' and warned voters that the party is nowhere near ready to govern. The former foreign and home secretary, who this week returned to the shadow cabinet, complimented Mr Farage as'funny', 'interesting' and 'a very good communicator'. However, Sir James said Reform UK falls short of credibility. 'The challenge he's got is that he's the only one in his party that you can describe in those terms,' Sir James told The Times. 'If you're going to be taken seriously as a party of government, that's nowhere near enough. As much as he's smart and funny and talented, he's not omnipresent.' Questioning Reform's ability to govern, the former home secretary said: 'Who are Farage's shadow chancellor, shadow home secretary and shadow defence secretary? The fact is he hasn't got any of them. 'That's nowhere near good enough to be taken seriously as an alternative party of government. The British people deserve better.' He added that Mr Farage 'crumbles' under scrutiny, particularly when pressed on the cost of his policies. Sir James's return came as part of Kemi Badenoch 's shake-up of her top team, which she described as reflecting the Conservatives ' 'mission of renewal' after their election defeat. The former foreign secretary will now shadow Angela Rayner on housing, communities and local government. Sir James served in senior Cabinet roles when the Conservatives were in power before spending months on the back benches after coming third in last year's Tory leadership contest. As an influential former minister, he has since warned against pursuing a populist agenda like Mr Farage's Reform UK. Sir James also reflected on a turbulent personal year, losing a close army friend, his brother-in-law, and his father. He explained why he stepped back after the leadership race. 'I did actually need a bit of time, a bit more time with Susie, a bit of time with the family,' he told The Times. Now back in the shadow cabinet, he urged the party not to 'throw a leader under the bus' amid speculation over Ms Badenoch's future. 'My strong advice is [that] our effort, our time, our energy, our focus, is much, much better directed at making sure Kemi succeeds as leader. Kemi won fair and square. She's got strong ideas, she is a staunch Conservative,' he said. Sir James insisted the Tories must 'be hunters, not farmers' to win back voters.
The Guardian
8 hours ago
- The Guardian
Beware the blizzard of lies: US advice on how to handle Farage's Trump tactics
Truth, the progressive California politician Hiram Johnson once said, is the first casualty of war. Johnson's oft-cited remark was supposedly made in 1918 in reference to the first world war, which had by then caused millions of human casualties. More than a century later, truth is once again caught in the crossfire, this time as a casualty of 21st-century culture wars. If Donald Trump is the high priest of disinformation, then Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform, is showing signs of being a willing disciple, if his behaviour in the UK this week is anything to go by. Farage has proposed sending prisoners abroad – including to El Salvador, where the Trump administration has sent hundreds of deportees and suggested sending US citizens. He also suggested an extensive police recruitment drive and prison-building programme all while cutting health and education spending. In the US, the parroting of Trump's policies by a UK populist has not gone unnoticed. And for those who have studied the president's modus operandi – there is one particular tactic the British public should be braced for: the blizzard of lies and false statements that frequently overwhelms his opponents. The Trump experience, they say, contains sobering lessons for critics of Farage. US pro-democracy campaigners warn that Trump has become even harder to factcheck since his first term, thanks to a combination of factors including looser social media content moderation and a reluctance among some media owners to stand up to his intimidation tactics. The Washington Post, which tracked more than 30,000 lies or misleading statements from Trump during his presidency, lost subscribers and public trust after its billionaire owner, Jeff Bezos, reportedly vetoed an editorial endorsing the Democratic nominee Kamala Harris for president. 'It's become more difficult because there's less commitment from those who are in the best position to do the factchecking,' said Omar Noureldin, a senior vice-president for Common Cause, a non-partisan group. 'Seeking the truth here comes with costs and risks.' Complicating matters is the loss of trust in institutions, with many consumers relying on social media platforms for news. 'Even the best factchecking can be unpersuasive, because we're not just facing an information crisis here, but also a trust crisis in the American information ecosystem,' Noureldin said. Media watchers say the political environment has become so deeply polarised that factchecking can even have the counter-productive effect of further entrenching misplaced beliefs. 'From a lot of research, we're reaching the conclusion that factchecking hasn't been as effective as one would want,' said Julie Millican, the vice-president of Media Matters for America, a media watchdog. 'One reason is that information and disinformation spreads faster than you can check it. It takes a lot longer to factcheck something than it does for it go viral. 'But the other thing is factchecking can backfire. People so distrust institutions that factchecking can validate the misinformation in their minds and make them more inclined to believe the lie they believed in the first place.' A 2022 report from Protect Democracy suggested this was the result of a deliberate strategy of authoritarian regimes. 'Disinformation is spread through coordinated networks, channels and ecosystems, including politically aligned or state-owned media,' the report said. 'The goal is not always to sell a lie, but instead to undermine the notion that anything in particular is true.' Further compounding the problem in the US has been Trump's appointments of allies to key government agencies that have traditionally served as sources of accurate and reliable data for factcheckers. A case in point is Robert F Kennedy Jr, who has engaged in anti-vaccine theories, Trump's pick for health and human services secretary, putting him in charge of the country's vast health bureaucracy. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion 'Factchecking wasn't working very well in the first place, but now you can't even get access to the facts that you need be able to factcheck as well as you used to,' said Millican. The outlook seems bleak. Yet that does not make the problems insurmountable, campaigners insist. One answer is to invest in independent, non-partisan research. A prime purpose would be to increase media literacy among young people, who primarily get news from platforms such as TikTok which can be subject to disinformation tools such as AI-manipulated videos. The aim is to teach consumers how to spot doctored footage. 'Media literacy is extremely important and something that should be invested in and taught at a young age,' said Millican. Another solution is the development of 'pre-buttal' strategies to inoculate the public against disinformation, in effect getting the truth out first. Media Matters for America and Common Cause used this approach during last year's presidential election, partly by producing videos designed to counter anticipated false narratives surrounding voting procedures in certain areas. Also important, said Shalini Agarwal, special counsel at Protect Democracy, is calling out the demonisation of vulnerable groups, such as immigrants, as soon as it happens. A crucial role is played by media, even as Trump intensifies his assault on journalists as 'fake news' and tries to exclude certain established outlets from press briefings. 'It's really important when there are opportunities for one-on-one briefings and there are multiple reporters,' Agarwal said. 'Part of it is a sense of collective action. Often, whoever is speaking at the podium won't give a straightforward answer or gives a false answer and then tries to move on – it's incumbent when that happens for other reporters to jump in and say: 'Wait. What about what the other reporter asked?'' Millican has two pieces of advice for Britain and other European countries hoping to arm themselves against any coming authoritarian onslaught: fortify the media and preserve legislation designed to combat disinformation and illegal content online – represented by the online safety act in Britain and the digital safety act in the EU. 'The first thing that's going to happen in these authoritarian takeovers is they're going to try to silence and take over the media and information landscape,' she said. 'Any efforts to rein in hate speech or misinformation on platforms will be seen as tantamount to suppression of conservative thought or free speech. 'I can't stress enough trying to buffer the pollution of your information ecosystem as much as possible. One of the first things that they're going to do is just take down any barriers they can.'
