Beloved radio star tragically dies in London hospital after four decades on air as colleagues pay tribute
Simon Marlow had worked for the British Forces Broadcasting Service since 2007 and sadly died in London on Friday June 27.
The presenter, who made his first break on radio as a freelance voice in 1987, had several stints at UK stations like Radio City, 2-TEN, Chiltern Radio and Classic FM.
He later became a familiar star at BFBS both on the radio and helping behind the scenes with production.
During his time with BFBS, Simon was posted across the globe including Afghanistan, Cyprus, Brunei, Germany, the Falklands and Northern Ireland.
Known for his deep love of music and his passion for bringing the armed forces community together, Simon's voice was a constant companion to troops stationed around the world.
Simon had worked for the British Forces Broadcasting Service since 2007 and sadly died in London on Friday June 27
He was described as a 'force of nature' by colleagues.
During the 2020 Coronavirus pandemic, Simon was based in Gibraltar and shortly after planned to retire just across the border in Spain.
The broadcaster was most recently based in Northern Ireland working as a station manager for BFBS.
Tributes have poured in for the star including from BFBS CEO, Ben Chapman who described Simon has 'making a difference'.
He said: 'Wherever Simon was, whoever he was with, there was always laughter. He made a difference.'
The BFBS official X account also shared the news, writing: 'It is with great sadness that we announce the death of our much-loved colleague, Simon Marlow.
Simon worked for BFBS worldwide as a radio presenter and producer, most recently as Station Manager at BFBS Northern Ireland.'
It comes after radio broadcaster Darren Scott died after a lengthy battle with stage four cancer last month.
Darren passed away aged 61 after a lengthy battle with stage 4 malignant melanoma, South African radio station HOT 102.7FM confirmed in a statement.
Malignant melanoma, also known as metastatic melanoma, is when skin cancer spreads beyond the primary site to other parts of the body, such as the lymph nodes and internal organs.
Darren is survived by his two sons Mark and Matthew, while his loved ones and colleagues have also flocked to pay tribute to the 'dedicated' and beloved radio star.
His former partner Sarah-Kate Accetta told East Coast Radio that she and their two sons have to learn to face life without him.
'As we make our way back home now, to not only commemorate his life, but to learn how to face life without him, I ask from the bottom of my heart: please pray for the boys,' she said.
'Their world has changed forever, and we need every bit of strength we can hold onto. I will cherish the opportunity to fill their days with laughter and love, with the many, many wild, wonderful, and unforgettable stories about their dad.'
Meanwhile, HOT 102.7FM Breakfast presenter Simon Parkinson said: 'Darren was the most dedicated radio person I've ever known.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
35 minutes ago
- Sky News
Wes Streeting admits improving GP services will be a challenge but is one he will 'take on the chin'
Improving NHS GP services will be a challenge but it is one the health secretary will take "on the chin", he told Sky News. The government launched its 10-year plan for the NHS on Thursday, including moving care into the community, digitising the service and focusing on prevention rather than sickness. Labour pledged in its manifesto to "build an NHS fit for the future", including cutting waiting times and the "return of the family doctor". But since coming to power last July, 62 GP surgeries have closed, and 5.8 million people a month waited more than 14 days to see a GP compared with 5.4 million in the same period last year. Health Secretary Wes Streeting told Sky News health correspondent Ashish Joshi: "I take your challenge on the chin about trying to stop practices from closing, trying to stop GPs leaving the profession and to make sure people have an improving experience in general practice. "That's why neighbourhood health is such a big part of the plan. "When I'm reporting back on progress, whether on GPs recruited or the fact NHS waiting lists are the lowest levels in two years, it's not because I think jobs done, I'm not trying to do victory laps or overclaim what we've managed to do. "It's more to report back to a sceptical public that actually, we are moving finally in the right direction. "But I don't doubt for a moment there is more to do and I take that challenge really seriously because we can't succeed without GPs and the NHS will not survive and thrive without bringing back that family doctor relationship." 4:56 Earlier, Sir Keir Starmer said the 10-year plan's aim is to shift care away from under-pressure medical facilities and closer to people's homes, while taking measures to prevent people needing treatment in the first place. Core elements of his plan include a hugely enhanced NHS app to give patients more control over their care and access to more data, new neighbourhood health centres open six days a week and at least 12 hours a day, and new laws on food and alcohol to prevent ill health. He said the government had already done much to turn things around, with new staff in mental health and general practice, 170 new diagnostic services, new surgical hubs, mental health units, ambulance sites, and "record investment right across the system". But he added: "I'm not going to stand here and say everything is perfect now - we have a lot more work to do, and we will do it. "Because of the fair choices we made, the tough Labour decisions we made, the future already looks better for the NHS."
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
The success of this government now rests in Wes Streeting's hands
As part of his presentation on the 10-year plan for the NHS, the prime minister promised the nation 'a doctor in your pocket'. It was an all-too-rare example of the government offering the public a tangible, and significant, improvement in the quality of their individual and collective lives. Rather than the depressing routine of being bombarded with tax hikes and cuts to services and the welfare state, here is something – a greatly enhanced NHS app for smartphones – that the voters can actually look forward to. Sir Keir Starmer, flanked by a more confident-looking Rachel Reeves, declared that, under the plan, everyone will have the opportunity to use their smartphones or tablets to book appointments online, have access to 24/7 health advice, order repeat prescriptions, review their own medical records, and be given guidance to approach charities and companies that may supply more help. It would indeed be transformative, part of the long-overdue NHS transition from analogue to digital systems. If all goes well, the NHS will transform from a service with fax machines in its clinical offices to a world leader in the application of artificial intelligence to boost productivity and save lives. Indeed, in reviewing scan results, AI is already proving its worth. For these reasons and more, the government's NHS plan deserves a cautious welcome. Sir Keir was graceful enough to say that none of the extra resources flowing into the service would be there were it not for the decisions that his chancellor had taken. No one can deny that Ms Reeves made some serious errors of judgement in her first year in post, but she has also tried to rebalance the economy towards investment and put the public finances on a more sustainable footing. That her backbench colleagues sometimes blocked her is not entirely her fault. There is still, after all, such a thing as collective cabinet responsibility, and neither Ms Reeves nor Liz Kendall at the Department for Work and Pensions deserves to be scapegoated. Her private life should be respected. The welfare bill fiasco stands in stark contrast to the government's NHS reforms. The changes to sickness and disability benefits were essentially small-scale reforms, affecting, at most, £5bn out of a total social security budget of more than £300bn. The bill was also marred by being perceived, with reason, as a rushed attempt to plug a hole in the public finances – something Ms Reeves can be fairly criticised over. The rest of the social security sector, not least the state pension and its 'triple lock', was untouched by the welfare bill, entirely unrealistically, as was the tangle of other, in-work benefits within the universal credit system. There was no attempt and no time to 'roll the pitch' in policy terms, nor to carry the parliamentary Labour Party. Failure was almost preordained, and blame should be shared by all those involved. By comparison, the NHS reforms are, thus far, a model of public policy-making and political communication – and done at speed. Within a few weeks of taking office last year, the new health and social care secretary, Wes Streeting, commissioned the distinguished surgeon and health expert Lord Darzi to report on the state of the NHS. By September, he had reported, and in the spring, Mr Streeting announced the abolition of NHS England, which duplicated too much of the work of his department. Now, just within the first year of office, we have the 10-year plan: a long-term, comprehensive strategy, at least for England (health policy being a largely devolved matter). In medical terms, this 77-year-old patient, the NHS, has undergone a thorough examination, has been prescribed medicine, and has a treatment plan and, hopefully, the resources, skilled staff and industrial peace it needs to restore it to full vigour. Of course, Mr Streeting has the great advantage over Ms Kendall, and almost all his other colleagues, in that he is managing a real-terms increase in resources, rather than cuts and austerity. But, then again, an ageing population and advances in drugs, some expensive, will always pile on the pressure on the NHS. For that reason, Mr Streeting is wise to place preventative medicine at the forefront of his reforms. Prospectively, Mr Streeting will be the first health secretary to shift the traditional focus of the NHS on treatment towards prevention instead – public health measures (such as vaccine uptake), the promotion of lifestyle and dietary changes, and cancer screenings can save lives and huge amounts of money in the longer term – and the NHS will be less of a 'national sickness service'. With the expansion of free school meals, breakfast clubs and better access to dentistry, a marked improvement in the wellbeing of the nation's children should follow. The previous government's long-term staffing plan, launched in 2023, will be retained but amended to make use of more staff trained in the UK. The move towards a 'Neighbourhood Health Service' is also worthy of guarded praise. Purpose-built, multi-disciplinary 'drop-in" clinics with family-friendly opening hours sound like a fine idea for people to be able to access help, rapid tests and minor procedures. These clinics should take some of the strain off A&E departments – too often a first point of triage for non-emergency cases – as well as GP surgeries. Nonetheless, the GP service still has much to offer, provided patients can actually get an appointment; in any case, there will probably never be enough neighbourhood centres to replace experienced general practitioners. Reform of the NHS is essential for the good of the country. Politically, it is the most critical of all for the future of the government. Already, there are tentative signs that more resources are improving the service – more appointments, for example – and the public should, in due course, give the government the credit for that. But this is, to borrow a phrase, only the end of the beginning of a long journey of reform and modernisation. Mr Streeting has a difficult job ahead, especially in carrying the trade unions and professional bodies with him. He shows every sign that he understands the nature of the task – and the stakes. If the NHS is not delivering what the voters expect of it by the time of the next election, then they will start looking for second opinions and alternatives. If Mr Streeting fails, that would be the ultimate betrayal of the trust the British people placed in the Labour Party only one year ago.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
QUENTIN LETTS: Rachel Reeves resembled a sad, startled owlet. Heaven knows how this can be sustained...
All hail the embalmer's art. Labour spinners, in emergency reconstruction mode, paraded a remodelled Rachel Reeves at a London health-centre event. At least we were told it was the Chancellor. Madame Tussaud's might want to check that one of the waxworks hasn't done a runner. Twenty-three hours earlier Ms Reeves was in a state of quivering distress in the Commons. Now she was smiling. And smiling. Her cheeks were two beach balls, the skin as stretched and twangy as prophylactic latex. Her teeth were bared in a mad smile. Her eyes crinkled at the edges even if the jellies themselves looked lifeless in their sockets. The poor creature had been wheeled out as warm-up artiste for one of Sir Keir Starmer 's scintillating speeches, this time about some 10-year health plan. The PM was at his whizziest, clapping his hands, projecting at least 25 per cent too much heartiness. He kept saying 'fung-tastic'. No one does artificial delight more clunkily - except, perhaps, poor Rachel. Watching her was pretty fair agony. It being a medical facility, nurses stood in a crescent behind the Chancellor. They watched her with close interest. It is always good to have professionals in attendance, horse syringes at the ready in case a patient goes tonto. She made a two-minute speech. Houston, this is progress. It may not yet be the 60 minutes required at a budget but there are months before that. At present it is a matter of taking each hour as it comes and, with luck, limping to the end of the week. On Wednesday she would not have been able to manage more than a few words without Stan Laurel whimpering. Two minutes was an achievement. If they could save the Bionic Man, perhaps the miracle can be repeated. Her delivery? Odd. But then she has never been exactly a fluent orator. 'It's great to be here today,' she Daleked, pushing the air past those terrifying (terrified?) teeth. Her eyebrows did a lot of jumping. Trotting out some words about how 'proud' she was of 'the health of our nation's finances', she held that smile. Here was Ophelia cast in a Palladium chorus line. Or imagine a beaten boxer the morning after a fight, bruises disguised by the corner-men. As she finished her remarks there were insistent whoops led by a few partisans at the back. It felt forced. Coercive. Prime ministers and Chancellors have occasionally concocted stunts to show they do not completely hate one another. Gordon Brown and Tony Blair visited an ice-cream van. Rishi Sunak and Boris Johnson went to a bar. Even so, the sight of Sir Keir and his damaged colleague at a health centre counter evoked notions of a man delivering a friend to the local psychiatric ward. Sir Keir had been programmed to say that he was 'in lockstep' with his Chancellor. This was the line he kept uttering in his own speech and in broadcast interviews. His health plan came with a document entitled 'Fit For The Future'. He insisted that Ms Reeves was up to the job. She was going to be Chancellor 'into the next election and beyond it'. This was perhaps no more delusional than the rest of his guff about how he had fixed the economy and how we were now safe in the hands of 'stable' Labour. Towards the end of an event that was all about optics, Sir Keir averred: 'I don't believe in performative politics. I don't believe in rhetorical speeches with nothing to back them up.' This was said with the usual immense self-regard. He really does think he is tremendously good at being prime minister. Most unaccountably, however, voters seem to consider him a steaming dud. He and Ms Reeves had an awkward hug. Cameras caught her face, still plumped by unhappiness, gazing upwards, pop-eyed. The supposedly assured pilot of our nation's finances resembled a sad, startled owlet.
