Unions condemn Northamptonshire Reform councils over flag ban
In the unions' joint statement, they said: "This isn't about neutrality - it's about erasure."The Pride flag is a symbol of dignity, respect, and the ongoing fight for equality."It said the flying the flag "during celebrations and key dates shows solidarity".The unions said the council's policy sends "the wrong message to LGBTQ+ residents, staff, and patients across the region".They urged the authorities' leaders to reconsider."We're proud to stand with our LGBTQ+ members and colleagues. We call on local leaders to do the same," they added.
In response to the criticism, Anderson said: "Banning the flying of any flag that isn't the union flag is a great first step."He said foreign or Pride flags had "absolutely nothing" to do with running a local council.In a statement, West Northamptonshire Council said it "continues to support all residents... and community-led activities, including providing its support to organising the recent Northampton Pride activities".North Northamptonshire Council said it would fly "other national flags when it is appropriate to do so".It said the policy applied to flagpoles "at our corporate buildings" but not other flag poles across North Northamptonshire. A spokesperson said the authority would be "happy to work with the local community and town and parish councils to raise flags at some locations, where appropriate".
Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
7 minutes ago
- BBC News
Keir Starmer shares Europe-led Gaza peace plan with Donald Trump
Sir Keir Starmer has presented a European-led peace plan for Gaza to Donald Trump, during a meeting in Scotland with the US follows a call with leaders of France and Germany over the weekend after US-led peace talks broke down last week, Downing Street emergency UK cabinet meeting will be held this week to discuss the plans as well as aid efforts in Gaza, after warnings of mass starvation in the comes amid renewed international and domestic pressure on the prime minister to immediately recognise Palestinian statehood. Downing Street has not given details of the peace plan, promising the "next steps" would be set out after this week's cabinet meeting, a date for which is yet to be earlier, a spokesman for Sir Keir said the proposals would also be presented to allies, including Arab states, over the coming days. In an article over the weekend, the prime minister likened the plans to the proposed "coalition of the willing" to support any potential deal to end the war in comes after the US and Israel withdrew their negotiating teams from Qatar on Thursday, with Trump saying Hamas "didn't really want to make a deal" and Israel saying it would "alternative options" to free Monday, Sir Keir's spokesman said the UK, France and Germany were working on proposals to "deliver immediate relief to those on the ground".The plans "build on the collaboration to date" between the three countries and would also "set out a pathway to peace and a sustainable route to a two-state solution," the spokesman added. However, Trump suggested that getting aid into Gaza is his focus, before discussing future peace plans."Before we get to phase two, which is what's going to happen afterwards, we want to get the children fed," he told reporters during his meeting with Starmer. MP Palestine pressure Sir Keir's spokesman also told reporters the Palestinian right to statehood was "inalienable", and it was a "question of when, not if" the UK will agree to recognition. It comes after 255 MPs signed a letter calling for the government to immediately recognise Palestine as a state - up from 221 on includes 147 Labour MPs - more than half the party's letter came after President Macron announced France intends to recognise Palestinian statehood in the coming months. At a press conference at Trump Turnberry, both Trump and Sir Keir agreed on the need for more aid to into World Health Organization (WHO) has warned malnutrition in Gaze has reached "alarming levels", with rates on a "dangerous trajectory", as aid airdrops resumed in the joined a weekend aid drop into Gaza, flying supplies in through Jordan as Israel paused its military announced at the weekend that it would suspend fighting in three areas of Gaza for 10 hours a day, and open secure routes for aid ahead of his meeting with Trump, Sir Keir described "images of starving children" in Gaza as "revolting".At the meeting, both leaders "agreed that urgent action was needed to bring an end to the suffering" in Gaza, Downing Street said. 'Unpredictable' Trump Going into the meeting, Trump suggested the US would set up new food centres in Gaza without fences, after almost daily reports of Palestinians being killed while waiting for food under the current US-led president blamed Hamas for stalling peace talks, saying the group had become "very difficult to deal with" and accusing it of stealing aid from Democrat Leader Sir Ed Davey warned the prime minister against accepting "warm words" from an "unpredictable" US president. "In both Ukraine and the Middle East the situation is utterly intolerable, and the prime minister needs to work with our allies to put a proper plan in place, so that we can lead even if Donald Trump continues to refuse to act," Sir Ed said. The Israeli military launched a campaign in Gaza in response to the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken least 59,821 people have been killed in Gaza since then, according to the territory's Hamas-run health ministry. Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
Telegraph
7 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Will of alleged IRA spy ‘Stakeknife' to be kept secret
Sir Julian said that there was 'the need to protect [Mr Johnson] and those named in the will from the real risk of serious physical harm or even death because they might be thought to be guilty by association' with Scappaticci. He said: 'The real risk to his life and wellbeing which the deceased faced in his lifetime is amply demonstrated. Publication of the will would be both undesirable and inappropriate.' The judge concluded that holding the hearing in public would have 'defeated the whole object' of the bid to have the will sealed. Sir Julian said in his 18-page ruling that Scappaticci was alleged to have been a leading member of the Provisional IRA, and was part of the 'Nutting Squad' from around 1980 until the mid-1990s, which interrogated suspected informers during the Troubles. In 2003, media reports claimed that Scappaticci had spied on the IRA for the British government, and that while working for both organisations 'was responsible for the torture and murder of dozens of alleged IRA informers'. Scappaticci always denied the claim but failed in a legal bid to force the British government to publicly state that he was not Stakeknife, forcing him to move to England in 2003. Sir Julian said: 'He could not have remained in Northern Ireland, as he could have been killed by one side or the other. Even after he moved to England and changed his name, he continued to receive death threats. Such was their nature that he had to relocate at short notice several times over the years.' Operation Kenova Operation Kenova was then launched to investigate the activities of Stakeknife within the Provisional IRA and crimes such as murder and torture, as well as the role played by the security services. The investigation, which was undertaken by Bedfordshire Police and cost tens of millions of pounds, reported its interim findings last year after Scappaticci's death. While it stopped short of naming him as Stakeknife, it found that more lives were probably lost than saved by the agent's actions. Jon Boutcher, the former chief constable of Bedfordshire Police and author of the interim report, said the identity of Stakeknife 'will have to be confirmed at some point' but that he would 'have to leave this to my final report'. He said: 'For now, it suffices to say that Mr Scappaticci was and still is inextricably bound up with and a critical person of interest at the heart of Operation Kenova. 'I believe that we found strong evidence of very serious criminality on the part of Mr Scappaticci and his prosecution would have been in the interests of victims, families and justice.' Prosecutors said at the time the interim report was published that the examination of files containing evidence of serious criminality by Scappaticci was at an advanced stage at the time of his death.
Times
7 minutes ago
- Times
Edinburgh University has no need to apologise for sins of the past
The speed with which Edinburgh University's vice-chancellor Peter Mathieson has moved to issue a 'deep apology' for the university's colonial past and its links with slavery is predictable, but misguided. It was prompted by a race review which, for the past four years has been investigating the role played by the university and some of its most celebrated thinkers, reaching back to the 18th-century Enlightenment, in promoting 'racist ideas' and 'the advancement of colonialism'. Its conclusions are extreme. It argues that Edinburgh was 'a haven for professors and alumni who developed theories of racial inferiority and white supremacism'. It played 'an outsized role in developing pseudo-sciences … that habitually positioned black people at the bottom and white people at the top.' It accuses the university's sometime chancellor, and later foreign secretary, AJ Balfour, of being a racist, and blames his 1948 declaration, creating the state of Israel, for the 'historical harms' that have led to the present Middle East conflict; it goes on to recommend the university ceases 'its direct and indirect investments that are supporting the Israeli government's human rights and international law violations against Palestinian people today'. • Edinburgh University apologises for historic links to racist theories Most contentious of all, it proposes the university should drop the internationally accepted definition of antisemitism, on the grounds it prevents free discussion of Palestinian rights. This is dangerous territory. It goes well beyond the review's remit in examining the university's past links to colonialism, and suggests it should adopt a pro-Palestinian stance. By accepting the review and its recommendations, Mathieson is pitching the university into the centre of a political maelstrom. Across the western world, universities have been striving to maintain an equilibrium between those who demonstrate for Palestinian rights, and Jewish students exposed to antisemitism; in America, Harvard University and others are fighting for their very future as Donald Trump accuses them of supporting anti-Israel protesters and therefore inciting terrorism. If Edinburgh goes along with the recommendations of this review, on the grounds that a long-dead chancellor was responsible for what the review calls 'Israel's war of annihilation in Gaza', it will surrender any claim of independence at a time when establishing peace depends on diplomacy not defiance. Taking sides at a time when feelings run so high is the last thing a university should be doing. From the start, however, the review makes it abundantly clear that balance is not a priority. It says its aim is 'to shine a light on some of the darker aspects of university history', and in doing so it discounts the civilising aspects of Enlightenment thinkers such as David Hume and Adam Ferguson, preferring instead to focus on their racist inclinations, which, claims the review, have filtered through to the university's institutions today. • Student groups back Hamas legal bid to come off UK's terror list The review digs out, once again, the footnote Hume appended to one of his letters, where he suggested non-whites were of inferior intelligence; it castigates medical research at the university which examined the size and shape of African and West Indian skulls in a study known as 'comparative craniology'; it attacks, as a racist venture, the Darien expedition backed by the university, to set up a colony in Central America in the 1690s; and it even criticises the botanists searching for rare plants, who went along with it. Its conclusions are stark. The university, it says, was 'implicated in the practices and systems of enslavement and colonialism and apartheid and genocide of colonialised people across the world'.Yet even as it draws up the charge street, the review concedes the record is not quite as bleak as it is painted. 'Truth-telling,' it admits, 'is not without its complications.' Thus, as the abolition of slavery was being proposed in the late 18th century, multiple meetings were held by students and staff to debate its merits. Dugald Stewart, who taught race as part of his philosophy course, and believed Europeans were superior to non-whites, nevertheless argued that slavery was 'a moral abomination' and took issue with Hume on the subject. Even Ferguson, who is accused of holding racists views, believed that all human beings belonged to the same species. What is more, such views on race were common across Europe at the time, and were certainly not confined to Edinburgh. All of this might have contributed to a genuine debate on the study of race and race relations in the Enlightenment period. Instead the review chooses to see these early links to colonialism and slavery as influencing the whole ethos of the modern university, and proposes steps to reverse it. Among the recommendations are some that would cost the university millions of pounds at a time when its finances are in a perilous state, and would make the study of colonialism and slavery 'central to the [university's] educative mission'. It proposes the setting up of a fully-staffed centre for the study of slavery and colonialism; it recommends that all buildings financed originally by donations linked to the slave trade should be renamed, and any endowments deriving from the trade transferred to promote the hiring of academics from black or minority backgrounds. • Why students are so unhappy with Edinburgh University What the review at no stage recognises, is how the debate on academic freedom has developed since the early days of the Black Lives Matter campaign. There has been a pushback from universities which have found that promoting the interests of ethnic minorities over those of others has sometimes led to the cancelling or restricting of lecturers whose views do not conform to the current trend. Some higher education institutions have faced heavy fines for failing to stand up for the interests of academics targeted by students. There is nothing wrong with exploring a university's history, however unsavoury. That history should, however, be seen in the context of its time and judged against contemporary states of knowledge and opinion. Visiting the sins of the past on the universities of today is not only unfair, it may turn out to be counterproductive. The Edinburgh vice-chancellor's endorsement is one he could come to regret.
