
MyVoice: Views of our readers 9th July 2025
This refers to the article 'Secular and Socialist-A constitutional debate beyond words' (The Hans India, July 8). In 1973, while overturning its own verdict in the Golaknath v. State of Punjab case (1967), the Supreme Court, in the Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala case, introduced the concept of the 'Basic Structure' of the Constitution. In this judgment, the Supreme Court interpreted that the power granted to the Parliament under Article 368 does not extend to altering the basic structure of the Constitution.
In other words, even while exercising its constitutional amending power, the Parliament cannot make changes to the basic structure of the Constitution, which includes elements such as the supremacy of the Constitution, the sovereign, democratic, and republican nature of the Indian state, secularism, social justice, economic justice, and the rule of law. Therefore, the words 'secular' and 'socialist', which were added to the Preamble of the Constitution by Indira Gandhi in 1976, has been considered part of the basic structure by the Supreme Court in 1973. Hence, any attempt to remove these words is meaningless.
Dr Jitesh Mori, Kutch
Punish addicts and drug peddlers
Apropos 'Drug abuse is destroying young lives' (THI July 6). Substance abuse is fast emerging as one of the prominent social and public health challenges the country has been facing. That the youth have fallen for this dreadful addiction is adding to the worries. A two-pronged strategy must be adopted to nip it in the bud. Imposing severe punishment on those using, trading in and providing logistic support to the drug cartel, and throttling the supply chain of nefarious substances with whatever it takes, be it judicial, law-enforcement and citizens' participation.
Dr George Jacob, Kochi
Secularism can never bring harmony
Why do intellectuals who argue for or against secularism not realise its basic historical roots? Secularism was a solution specifically designed for Christianity, applicable to a particular region (Europe) and period (16th to 18th centuries), during which various Christian denominations were in conflict and the State separated from the Church. While it proved to be successful, its original intent was not to serve as a universal solution for handling pluralism across all cultures and times.
Intellectuals often overlook the significant stress on the secularism model in Europe today, as the continent struggles to cope with the massive influx of Islam. Similarly, in India, polarisation and friction between the two main religious groups are only increasing, despite strictly adhering to secularism. India has managed its pluralism more effectively than any other culture throughout history, and it is preferable to examine these successful solutions rather than focus on a solution that appears to be failing globally, particularly in India.
Dr Pingali Gopal, Hanumakonda
Hats-off to rail library at Nagpur railway station
The Nagpur railway station has opened a 'rail Library' for passengers, aiming to enhance their experience and promote the reading habit, while waiting for their train's arrival or of some guest. This free of cost initiative, under the aegis of Central Railway's Nagpur Division, operates on a 'take a book, leave a book' principle. Passengers can borrow books and donate their own, fostering a culture of reading and knowledge sharing. The library, catering to all age-groups, offers a variety of books, including fiction, biographies, self-help books and children's literature.
Encouraged by the response to the rail library, Indian Railways plans to expand this facility to other zones with Kerala being the next in line. Interestingly, before the pandemic, many railway stations had bookstalls. Many have remained shut ever since. Except for the bookstall at Aluva railway station, none of the other stalls have reopened ostensibly due to the steep hike in license fees. It is expected from a common man's perspective that the rail library will be a hit with the masses and pave the way for more such libraries in other major stations.
Yash Pal Ralhan, Jalandhar-144003
Gadkari has set fine precedent
This refers to the THI editorial 'Gadkari's remarks call for 'Atmanirbhar Bharat 2047 reality check' (July 8). Nitin Gadkari has touched on crucial points on the poor becoming poorer while the rich are becoming financially stout at the cost of BPL families. As accurately assessed, imposition of GST on all items is devouring hard earnings of the poor. Nearly one third of the country's population lives on porridge.
Some retired employees were cheated by the government under EPS-95 (FCI for instance), which stalled their wage revisions twice over. The GOI and the Prime Minister Narendra Modi are aware of their pathetic plight. Unlike Gadkari, it seems like cabinet ministers are timorous to open their minds before Modi.
Dr N S R Murthy, Secunderabad
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
India-US trade deal: Donald Trump administration may cut tariff to below 20%; putting India in favourable position against other countries
This is an AI image. United States is working toward an interim trade agreement with India that could reduce proposed tariffs to below 20%, giving the country a more favorable position compared to other countries in the region. Unlike many nations, India is not expected to receive a formal tariff hike notice this week, and the agreement may be announced through an official statement, Bloomberg reported, quoting sources. The proposed interim trade deal between the two nations would allow both the sides to continue negotiations, giving India time to address unresolved issues before a broader agreement expected later this year, the source added. India, US near trade deal. What happens next if New Delhi joins Trump's shortlist? The planned agreement is likely to set a baseline tariff of under 20%, down from the 26% initially proposed, with provisions to allow further adjustments as part of a final pact. However, the exact timeline for the interim deal remains uncertain. If finalised, India would likely join a select group of nations that have reached trade arrangements with the Trump administration. In contrast, several other countries were hit with surprise tariff hikes of up to 50% this week, ahead of the August 1 deadline. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 기미, 레이저말고 이렇게 해보세요 에스테틱최원장 Undo India is pushing for a more favourable deal than the one signed with Vietnam, which included 20% tariffs. Vietnam, caught off guard by the high rate, is now seeking a revision. So far, only the UK has officially signed trade deals with the Trump administration. Earlier on Thursday, Trump told NBC News that he is considering imposing blanket tariffs of 15% to 20% on most trading partners who haven't yet received specific rates. Currently, the baseline tariff for most US trade partners stands at 10%. For Asian countries, announced rates so far include 20% for Vietnam and the Philippines, and as high as 40% for Laos and Myanmar. Despite being among the earliest to initiate trade discussions this year, India-US relations have shown recent tensions. While Trump indicates an imminent agreement, he has also suggested additional tariffs regarding India's BRICS membership. An Indian negotiation team is expected to visit Washington soon to push forward trade talks. India has already made its final offer to the Trump administration and outlined its non-negotiable positions. The key sticking points remain, including the US demand for India to allow genetically modified (GM) crops, something New Delhi has firmly opposed, citing concerns for farmers, while the other unresolved issues include agricultural non-tariff barriers and regulatory hurdles in the pharmaceutical sector, the source added. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


United News of India
32 minutes ago
- United News of India
Selling SBI shares worth Rs 25000 cr part of privatisation: BEFI
Thiruvananthapuram, July 12 (UNI) Bank Employees Federation of India has alleged that the Centre's move to sell shares of State Bank of India (SBI) worth Rs 25,000 crore SBI) is an open attempt to privatize the bank in a phased manner sacrificing national interests. "In 2017, the bank had sold 522 million shares. This reduced the government's stake in the bank to 56.92 percent. Now, with the completion of the targeted share sale, the government's stake will diminish below 55 percent," BEFI vice president Saji Varghese said. "The sale of shares through qualified institutional placement has been reported by national media," he added. "Despite the vacancies of about one lakh employees and officers, the outsourcing of jobs and the deployment of daily wage workers without making them permanent is a prelude to privatization... After the budget presentation, the Union Finance Minister had announced that government would sell shares of public sector banks including SBI. Other public sector banks are also preparing for share sale" he said. The privatization of the country's largest public sector bank, SBI, will have far-reaching consequences. Public sector banks serve as a protective shield for the Indian economy. It is this protective shield that is being undermined through bank privatization, he stated. "As banks come under the control of corporates, services for the common people will get affected and services will be limited to the elite class," he added. The SBI plans to support loan growth, strengthen its balance sheet and meet regulatory requirements. It's also the first time since 2017 that the lender, majority owned by the government, tapped the equity market. UNI DS AAB RKM


India Gazette
39 minutes ago
- India Gazette
"Congress showing double standards on Aadhaar issue": BJP's Sambit Patra after Supreme Court verdict on SIR
New Delhi [India], July 12 (ANI): Reacting to the Supreme Court's decision on the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in Bihar, BJP MP Sambit Patra accused the Congress and Opposition parties of hypocrisy, stating they earlier opposed Aadhaar-voter ID linkage but are now demanding its inclusion. He said this shift exposes their 'double standards' on Aadhaar's role in electoral reforms. Speaking to ANI, Patra said, 'The way the Opposition and the Congress are opposing the Aadhar Card, it shows their double standards. When PM Modi spoke about Aadhaar in the Parliament and said that if there are to be no middlemen, then Aadhaar is required... The Opposition and the Congress spoke against the PM.' 'In 2022, when the government decided to link Aadhaar with the voter card, Congress took the matter to the Supreme Court, arguing that Aadhaar is solely for identification purposes and that linking it with the voter card was inappropriate. Today, they are saying that voting rights and citizenship should be decided based on Aadhaar. This reflects the double standards of the Congress,' he added. Reacting to the same court order, Congress Rajya Sabha MP Jairam Ramesh stated that the Election Commission of India's (ECI) 'spin' on 'no stay' being given has been clearly 'exposed' by the Supreme Court. Ramesh, the General Secretary in charge of Communications for Congress, posted a picture of the order on X, stating that Page 7 of the order clearly indicated that any requested no stay of the petitioners. He then said that deliberately 'misleading' headline management does not befit a Constitutional authority. Meanwhile, All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) chief Asaduddin Owaisi welcomed the top court's decision while hitting out at 'ECI sources' for misrepresenting the court's order. He criticised the claims made by EC sources that the constitutional body accepts Aadhar as per page 16 of the Special Intensive Revision, while also informing about the EPIC number being 'pre-printed' on the enumeration forms being meted out. On Thursday, the Supreme Court allowed the Election Commission to continue with its exercise of conducting a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar. A bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Joymalya Bagchi did not stay the SIR process but asked the ECI to consider allowing Aadhaar, ration cards, and electoral photo identity cards as admissible documents to prove voter identity during the SIR of electoral rolls being undertaken in Bihar. 'We are of the prima facie opinion that in the interest of justice, the Election Commission will also include documents like Aadhaar, Ration Card, Voter ID card, etc. It is for the ECI to decide whether it wants to accept the documents or not, and if it does not, then provide reasons for its decision, which shall be sufficient to satisfy the petitioners. Meanwhile, petitioners are not pressing for an interim stay,' the bench stated in its order. In its order, the top court noted that the timeline for the process is very short since elections in Bihar are due in November. The apex court posted for hearing on July 28 the pleas challenging ECI's move to conduct SIR of electoral rolls in Bihar and asked the poll panel to file its affidavit within one week. During the hearing, the bench opined that Aadhaar should be included within the list of documents permissible as an ID proof. The apex court was hearing a batch of pleas challenging the Election Commission of India's move to conduct the SIR of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar. The petitions challenging the ECI decision were filed by RJD MP Manoj Jha, the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), PUCL, activist Yogendra Yadav, Trinamool MP Mahua Moitra, and former Bihar MLA Mujahid petitions sought a direction to quash the ECI's June 24 directive, which requires large sections of voters in Bihar to submit proof of citizenship to remain on the electoral rolls. The petition also raised concerns over the exclusion of widely held documents like Aadhaar and ration cards, stating that this would disproportionately affect the poor and marginalised voters, especially in rural Bihar. Meanwhile, All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) chief Asaduddin Owaisi welcomed the top court's decision while hitting out at 'ECI sources' for misrepresenting the court's order. He criticised the claims made by EC sources that the constitutional body accepts Aadhar as per page 16 of the Special Intensive Revision, while also informing about the EPIC number being 'pre-printed' on the enumeration forms being meted out. (ANI)