logo
Pacific land force leaders seek ‘positional advantage' against China

Pacific land force leaders seek ‘positional advantage' against China

Yahoo15-05-2025
Top generals in the Pacific are aiming to create 'positional advantage' using a combination of land forces and maritime assets to counter Chinese military aggression in the region.
Some units, such as the Japanese Self-Defense Force, are positioned inside the first island chain around China. While others, such as the Australian Defence Force and Armed Forces of the Philippines, are farther out but plan to use terrain as they monitor Chinese military maneuvers.
Leaders from those three militaries discussed their respective roles alongside the head of U.S. Army Pacific, Gen. Ronald Clark, on Wednesday at the Association of the U.S. Army's annual Land Forces Pacific conference in Honolulu, Hawaii.
Lt. Gen. Roy Galido, commanding general of the Philippine Army, said changes in the operational environment, in part due to modern technologies, have 'radically altered the definition of key terrain.'
Army task forces 'centerpiece' for deterring China: INDOPACOM boss
Some of that is more ships and boats coming under the control of traditional land forces, while other influences include longer-reaching fires that can hold Chinese ships at bay.
Ultimately, though, Clark said, it will take a combination of those nations and others to effectively contain Chinese military action in the region.
'It's not just about the United States Army, it's not just about our joint force, it's about our allies and partners,' Clark said.
Gen. Yasunori Morishita, chief of staff for Japanese Ground Self-Defense Forces, said he sees Japan's location as a key block to Chinese expansion.
For Lt. Gen. Simon Stuart, chief of the Australian Army, ongoing, daily campaigning is key to winning the competition phase of any potential conflict, which leaders hope will ultimately deter conflict overall.
Stuart pointed to recent acquisitions of ships and light vehicles that his country has approved as ways to 'achieve sea denial and kill ships from the land, dominate key and vital terrain' in the littoral regions, those areas of the sea close to land.
Following Australia's 2023 defense review, the country began looking to acquire lighter, smaller vehicles for moving in and around littoral zone land features, Defense News previously reported.
At the same time, the Australian military will acquire 28 new ships for its land forces to facilitate that maneuver, the most it's had since the end of World War II.
Other review recommendations include an enhanced long-range strike capability for multiple domains of warfare. Planners also expect to field a fully enabled and integrated amphibious combined arms land system and a mobile, joint expeditionary theater logistics system, Defense News reported.
On the strike side of the house, the review also recommended acquiring more M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems, or HIMARS, and including local weapons manufacturing to ensure stock levels.
Adding the HIMARS and the Precision Strike Missile, or PrSM, will give the Australian military greater land and maritime target reach, according to a Journal of Advanced Military Studies article published last fall. The Australian Army will acquire 42 HIMARS, the article notes.
Japan, meanwhile, has built a new amphibious unit and launched its first such ship for the unit in November, U.S. Naval Institute reported.
The maritime asset is key for the island nation to resupply its long island chain. The first ship, the JS Nihonbare, has similar capabilities to the U.S. Army's Runnymede-class large landing craft, according to USNI.
Ultimately, the unit will contain 10 such vessels, four of which will be in the Nihonbare class, two 3,500-ton transport vessels and four maneuver support vessels.
Elsewhere, the Philippine Army is actively training with U.S. Marines and Army assets, adopting an antiship strike capability of its own and facilitating U.S. strike platforms in their region through recent exercises such as Balikatan and Valiant Shield, officials said.
The Maritime Key Terrain Security Operation recently concluded following an experiment with stand-in force concepts that deployed 'low-signature, light-weight formations to various islands in the Batanes and Babuyan Island chains to rehearse Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations, test sensing capabilities, and simulate securing and defending key maritime terrain,' according to a Marine release.
The event included the simulated use of the Marines' newest weapon, the Navy-Marine Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System, or NMESIS, which deployed onto Batan Island.
'Walking off the C-130 with NMESIS onto that island was one small step for a Marine, and one giant leap for U .S.-Philippine-delivered sea denial capabilities,' said Col. John G. Lehane, commanding officer of the 3rd Marine Littoral Regiment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wall Street Bets on U.S. Graphite as China Faces 160% Tariffs
Wall Street Bets on U.S. Graphite as China Faces 160% Tariffs

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Wall Street Bets on U.S. Graphite as China Faces 160% Tariffs

Combined with existing tariffs, the 93.5% preliminary anti-dumping tariffs the U.S. Commerce Department announced this week on anode-grade graphite imported from China, targeting nearly $350 million in goods, promises to deal a major blow to battery producers. It would bring the tariffs to 160% on the notion that Chinese graphite is being sold in the U.S. below fair market value. And it gets worse than that for some Chinese producers. China's Huzhou Kaijin New Energy Technology and Shanghai Shaosheng Knitted Sweat, specifically, will face even higher duties exceeding 700%. The final determinations will be announced by December 5, 2025. The latest tariffs stem from a petition filed in December by the American Active Anode Material Producers for alleged violations of anti-dumping regulations, and the impact on the American EV battery supply chain will likely be significant. The United States imported ~180,000 metric tons of graphite in 2023, with two-thirds coming from China. According to a recent report by the International Energy Agency (IEA), the U.S. graphite supply chain remains highly vulnerable to supply disruptions, with the energy agency calling for urgent diversification efforts. The IEA has projected that graphite will remain the most widely used anode material in lithium-ion batteries over the next five years, with silicon expected to gradually gain ground after latest tariffs on graphite are expected to escalate tensions between the two countries, with the U.S. EV sector already feeling the heat after Beijing imposed export restrictions on certain critical minerals and battery technologies. In December 2024, China implemented export restrictions on several critical minerals, including gallium, germanium, antimony, and graphite, primarily targeting the U.S. This action is seen as a response to increased tariffs and trade tensions with the US. The ban has significant implications for various industries globally, particularly those reliant on semiconductors, electronics, and renewable energy technologies. The cost implications of the tariffs will also be significant. According to Sam Adham, Head of Battery Materials at CRU Group, battery costs could increase by roughly $7/kWh once the tariffs take effect, effectively cutting ~20% of tax credits under the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). 'I think this is going to change behaviors and sourcing strategies of battery manufacturers in the United States,' Michael O'Kronley, chief executive officer at Novonix, told Bloomberg. 'The cost of graphite imported from China is going to go up. This ruling essentially is going to accelerate some of those discussions we have with manufacturers.' That's the reason why major EV players such as Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) and Panasonic have lobbied hard against the tariffs, citing an insufficient domestic supply chain to meet their quality and volume needs. Back in May, analysis from the International Council on Clean Transportation projected that U.S. battery production would decline by ~75% by 2030 to 250 GWh and EV sales by 40% under the Trump administration. According to the report, Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill', which he signed into law earlier this month, could eliminate 130,000 potential jobs in the EV sector by 2030, the majority being in battery manufacturing. Previously, companies had announced a total of 128 U.S. facilities for battery manufacturing in the country thanks to generous credits under the 2022 IRA, with more than half yet to begin construction. Not surprisingly, TSLA took a hit, falling 3% after the tariffs were announced, while stocks of non-Chinese graphite producers soared: Shares of Canada's Northern Graphite Corporation (OTCQB:NGPHF) have doubled; Australian graphite miner, Syrah Resources Ltd. (OTCPK:SYAAF), have surged nearly 40%, Novonix Ltd. (OTCPK:NVNXF), an Australian-listed graphite producer with a plant in Chattanooga, Tennessee, jumped 21%, Canada's Nouveau Monde Graphite (NYSE:NMG) gained 23% while South Korea's POSCO Holdings Inc. (NYSE:PKX) gained 5%. Interestingly, Northern Graphite is one of the companies that lobbied for the tariffs on Chinese graphite. Northern Graphite engages in the development and production of graphite and other minerals in Canada and Namibia. Meanwhile, Wall Street is bullish about the U.S. graphite sector, saying the tariffs will encourage companies like Tesla to buy their graphite from U.S. producers. 'The U.S. is likely to be promoting the development of its own graphite industry by forcing domestic battery makers to switch suppliers,' said Eugene Hsiao, head of China equity strategy at Macquarie Capital, as reported by Bloomberg. 'Thus upstream suppliers of Chinese graphite anodes are more likely to be impacted.' That shift is expected to hit Chinese suppliers hard, particularly those who have long dominated the synthetic and natural graphite anode markets with low-cost exports. According to trade data, over 65% of U.S. graphite imports in 2023 originated from China, with companies like BTR New Energy, Shanghai Shanshan, and Huzhou Kaijin heavily exposed. With anti-dumping duties pushing effective tariff rates to as high as 160% (and over 700% for certain producers) the cost advantage that underpinned Chinese market share is rapidly eroding. Analysts expect many of these upstream firms to lose access to U.S. buyers unless they shift production offshore or absorb significant margin compression. Beijing's December 2024 export restrictions on graphite further complicate the picture, heightening uncertainty for Chinese exporters already navigating increased geopolitical and cost pressures. By Alex Kimani for More Top Reads From this article on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Groups in Canada Fight for Access to Forbidden Chinese EVs
Groups in Canada Fight for Access to Forbidden Chinese EVs

Miami Herald

time5 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Groups in Canada Fight for Access to Forbidden Chinese EVs

Like in the U.S., Canadian car buyers see a carefully curated group of brands and vehicles on dealers' lots, thanks to safety regulations, trade relations, and a whole host of other factors. Many have pressed the Canadian government to relax those rules as tariff pressure builds, and now, an EV advocacy group has joined the fight. Daniel Breton, head of Electric Mobility Canada, said, "Right now, Transport Canada is saying, well, we have to change the bumpers and we have to change the headlights and this and that for safety reasons, which, as far as I'm concerned, is total B.S." He continued to say that, "If the car is good enough to be driving on European roads, where you can drive much faster than here, don't come and tell me that they're not safe enough to be driven in Canada." Groups in Canada are looking for ways to keep more affordable vehicles flowing into the country as its trade relations with the U.S. have soured over tariffs and other actions. Breton and others feel that allowing vehicles from Europe, China, and elsewhere would strengthen trade relations and help more Canadians afford new cars. That said, our northern neighbors tend to buy larger vehicles like trucks and SUVs, similar to their American counterparts, making it riskier for automakers to invest in smaller new models for the country. Small vehicle sales in Canada are far below those of SUVs and trucks, but Breton said there is a place for the vehicles in the market. Breton wants the Canadian government to reconsider its 100 percent tariff on Chinese imports, and the public seems to be behind him. A recent poll showed that 70 percent of Canadians are in favor of allowing EVs approved for European roads into the country, and 5 percent said they'd like to see the 100 percent tariff dropped to the 35 percent level European countries impose. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

H-1B visa: Trump administration signals major change for controversial foreign-worker program
H-1B visa: Trump administration signals major change for controversial foreign-worker program

Miami Herald

time5 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

H-1B visa: Trump administration signals major change for controversial foreign-worker program

The administration of President Donald Trump plans to change the criteria for awarding the controversial H-1B visa, intended for foreign workers with specialized skills, and heavily used by Silicon Valley technology companies. But the nature of the change remains unclear. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services on Thursday notified the federal Office of Management and Budget of a proposed rule involving a "weighted selection process" for the visa. The brief notification did not describe how the selection process would change if the rule were adopted. Citizenship and Immigration Services did not immediately respond to questions. Under Trump's first term, federal authorities dramatically boosted scrutiny of H-1B applications, and nearly doubled application denials, to one out of four applications in 2018. At the end of that term, his administration imposed a rule that made allocation of H-1B visas salary based, scrapping the lottery used to award visas. The rule was withdrawn by Trump's successor, former President Joe Biden. How long it may take for the rule to take effect is unclear. The proposal is to be reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget, then get sent back to Citizenship and Immigration for publication in the Federal Register, which typically triggers a public-comment period. Finalization would require a review of the comments, submission of a final rule to the budget office, and publication of the final rule in the Federal Register with an implementation date. Some 600,000 foreign workers hold the H-1B, and each spring, 85,000 new H-1B visas are issued by lottery, most of them going to tech giants and staffing firms. Last year, Google received approval for some 5,300 new and continuing H-1Bs, according to federal government data. Meta received nearly 5,000 approvals, Apple close to 4,000, Intel about 2,500 and Oracle more than 2,000. While the tech industry pushes to expand the annual cap on new visas, arguing that they need the boost in order to secure the world's top talent, critics point to data suggesting the visa is widely used to undercut wages, and to cases where H-1B holders replaced U.S. workers. Related Articles • Melania Trump mocked for getting 'Einstein visa' in House hearing • Fremont company accused of employing Chinese workers illegally, discriminating against non-Chinese employees • H-1B visa: East Bay company agrees to fine over alleged discrimination against U.S. workers • The State Department is looking to revoke some Chinese student visas. How many in the Bay Area are at risk? Long a flashpoint in America's immigration debates, the H-1B sparked renewed controversy late last year as Trump was preparing to take office. Florida conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer, a high-profile Trump supporter, assailed employment of Indian tech workers in the U.S. High-level public spats and angry punditry ensued, launching the H-1B into a sudden spotlight and exposing schisms over immigration inside Trump's Make America Great Again movement. Bay Area venture capitalist and Trump tech adviser David Sacks, along with Trump's former "government efficiency" adviser Elon Musk and Trump himself all backed the visa. Musk, after blowback from the right wing - including a threat to "rip your face off" by influential former Trump adviser Steve Bannon - said the visa needed fixing. Sacks called for unity and argued against expanding the H-1B program. Unemployment data for new graduates of U.S. colleges has also upped scrutiny of the H-1B, and criticism by advocates for U.S. workers. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York in February reported unemployment rates of 7.5% for computer engineering graduates and 6.1% for computer science grads. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store