Lanarkshire parents reminded they could be eligible for extra payments over school holidays
National advice agency Advice Direct Scotland is urging households to check if they qualify for support before schools break up for the summer later this month.
Lanarkshire parents are being reminded that they could be eligible for extra payments over the school holidays to cover the cost of meals for their children.
National advice agency Advice Direct Scotland is urging households to check if they qualify for support before schools break up for the summer later this month.
Households normally eligible for free school meals during term time should automatically start receiving payments of £2.50 or £4.80 per day, per child, during the holidays, depending on the child's age and where they live.
While exact holiday dates vary by council, a household with two children could be entitled to between £150 and £288 over the course of the six-week summer break.
Those who have not yet applied for free school meals, or who might start claiming benefits over the holidays due to a change in circumstances, are being urged to take action.
All children in P1 to P5 at schools run by local councils currently receive free school lunches during term time, regardless of their family circumstances. Children in P6 and above continue to qualify only if they come from low-income households.
Over the summer and other holidays, support is available to those who normally receive free school meals.
Payments are set at £2.50 per day, per child, for each weekday during the holidays, excluding weekends.
This means summer payments will be around £75, £126, or £144 per child, depending on the rate and school stage.
To qualify, people must be in receipt of one of the following benefits:
Universal Credit (where monthly earned income is not more than £850)
Income Support
Income-based Job Seeker's Allowance
Income-based Employment and Support Allowance
Support under Part VI of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999.
Rebecca Fagan, benefit and welfare information officer at Advice Direct Scotland, said: 'With the summer holidays approaching fast, it's crucial that families know about the support available to help provide healthy meals for their children.
'Many Scots are facing financial difficulties due to the cost-of-living and energy crises and will be worried about holiday-related expenses on top of rising bills.
'For families with children eligible for free school meals, payments are available throughout the summer, so we encourage anyone who might benefit to apply now.
'Remember, once your application is approved, payments will start promptly and will also be available during other school holidays.
'If you're unsure about your eligibility or need help applying, our team at advice.scot offers free, confidential support to everyone, regardless of personal circumstances.'
Advice.scot provides free, practical advice and information on any topic, including access to benefits and whether households are claiming all the support they are entitled to.
And did you know Lanarkshire Live had its own app? Download yours for free here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Concessions to welfare reforms to be revealed after Labour backbench rebellion forces government retreat
Changes to welfare reforms, forced on the government by rebel Labour MPs, are being revealed today ahead of a crucial vote. The original bill restricted eligibility for the personal independence payment (pip) and cut the health-related element of universal credit (UC). The government, which insisted welfare costs were becoming unsustainable, was forced into a U-turn after 126 Labour backbenchers signed an amendment that would have halted the bill at its first Commons hurdle. While the amendment is expected to be withdrawn, after changes that appeased some Labour MPs, others are still unhappy and considering backing a similar amendment to be tabled today. 2:59 Here are the main changes to the UC and pip bill: • current pip claimants will keep their benefits; stricter eligibility requirements will only apply to new claims from November 2026 • a review of the pip assessment, which will have input from disabled people • existing recipients of the health-related element of UC will have their incomes protected in real terms Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said in a statement that the legislation now aims to deliver a "fairer, more compassionate system" ahead of the second reading and vote on Tuesday. "We must build a welfare system that provides security for those who cannot work and the right support for those who can. Too often, disabled people feel trapped, worried that if they try to work, they could lose the support they depend on. "That is why we are taking action to remove those barriers, support disabled people to live with dignity and independence, and open routes into employment for those who want to pursue it. "This is about delivering a fairer, more compassionate system as part of our Plan for Change which supports people to thrive, whatever their circumstances." On Saturday, Sir Keir Starmer said fixing the UK's welfare system was a "moral imperative". The government claimed cuts to sickness and disability benefits would shave £5bn off the welfare bill and get more people into work. The Resolution Foundation believes the concessions could cost as much as £3bn, while the Institute for Fiscal Studies warned that the changes make tax rises more likely. Health Secretary Wes Streeting told Sky News that welfare bill changes have put Labour in a much better position ahead of tomorrow's vote. On Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips, Mr Streeting said: "There were things that we didn't get right, we've put right, and there'll be a debate about future amendments and things, I'm sure, as it goes through in the usual way." On the same programme, shadow work and pensions secretary Helen Whately repeatedly refused to say whether the Conservatives would back the bill, but would review the proposals after the minister's statement later. "We have said that if there are more savings that actually bring the welfare bill down, if they'll get more people into work, and if they commit to using the savings to avoid tax cuts in the autumn, which looks highly unlikely at the moment, then they have our support." The Liberal Democrats plan to vote against the bill and have called for the government to speed up access-to-work decisions to help people enter the workforce.
Sky News
3 hours ago
- Sky News
Concessions to welfare reforms revealed after Labour backbench rebellion forces government retreat
Changes to welfare reforms, forced on the government by rebel Labour MPs, are being revealed today ahead of a crucial vote. The original bill restricted eligibility for the personal independence payment (pip) and cut the health-related element of universal credit (UC). The government, which insisted welfare costs were becoming unsustainable, was forced into a U-turn after 126 Labour backbenchers signed an amendment that would have halted the bill at its first Commons hurdle. While the amendment is expected to be withdrawn, after changes that appeased some Labour MPs, others are still unhappy and considering backing a similar amendment to be tabled today. 2:59 Here are the main changes to the UC and pip bill: • current pip claimants will keep their benefits; stricter eligibility requirements will only apply to new claims from November 2026 • a review of the pip assessment, which will have input from disabled people • existing recipients of the health-related element of UC will have their incomes protected in real terms Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said in a statement that the legislation now aims to deliver a "fairer, more compassionate system" ahead of the second reading and vote on Tuesday. "We must build a welfare system that provides security for those who cannot work and the right support for those who can. Too often, disabled people feel trapped, worried that if they try to work, they could lose the support they depend on. "That is why we are taking action to remove those barriers, support disabled people to live with dignity and independence, and open routes into employment for those who want to pursue it. "This is about delivering a fairer, more compassionate system as part of our Plan for Change which supports people to thrive, whatever their circumstances." On Saturday, Sir Keir Starmer said fixing the UK's welfare system was a "moral imperative". The government claimed cuts to sickness and disability benefits would shave £5bn off the welfare bill and get more people into work. The Resolution Foundation believes the concessions could cost as much as £3bn, while the Institute for Fiscal Studies warned that the changes make tax rises more likely. Health Secretary Wes Streeting told Sky News that welfare bill changes have put Labour in a much better position ahead of tomorrow's vote. On Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips, Mr Streeting said: "There were things that we didn't get right, we've put right, and there'll be a debate about future amendments and things, I'm sure, as it goes through in the usual way." On the same programme, shadow work and pensions secretary Helen Whately repeatedly refused to say whether the Conservatives would back the bill, but would review the proposals after the minister's statement later. "We have said that if there are more savings that actually bring the welfare bill down, if they'll get more people into work, and if they commit to using the savings to avoid tax cuts in the autumn, which looks highly unlikely at the moment, then they have our support." The Liberal Democrats plan to vote against the bill and have called for the government to speed up access-to-work decisions to help people enter the workforce.
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
MPs slam ‘nonsensical' ISA that could affect Universal Credit
The Treasury Committee warned Universal Credit recipients may be disproportionately affected by the account Launched in 2017, Lifetime ISAs offer a significant incentive for savers aged 18 to 40 by providing a 25% bonus annually, but they can only use the funds for a first home or retirement, with a 25% charge for other withdrawals. MPs have suggested that the complexity of the account might be leading to poor financial choices, prompting the Treasury Committee to call for reforms or at least a warning for certain savers. One particular issue highlighted by the report is the potential penalty for benefit recipients since unlike other pension products, Lifetime ISAs are counted when assessing Universal Credit eligibility. This could mean savers who need help at any point in the future might not be eligible for it and also won't be able to access their funds because of the w ithdrawal criteria. According to PA, the Committee's report stressed: "If the Government is unwilling to equalise the treatment of the Lifetime ISA with other Government-subsidised retirement savings products in universal credit assessments, Lifetime ISA products must include warnings that the Lifetime Isa is an inferior product for anyone who might one day be in receipt of Universal Credit. "Such warnings would guard against savers being sold products that are not in their best financial interests, which might well constitute mis-selling." The report also criticised the withdrawal charge, especially since it does not only reclaim the 25% government bonus but also deducts an additional 6.25% from a person's original savings. "Several witnesses described that loss of 6.25% as a 'withdrawal penalty'," it remarked. In the financial year 2023/2024, there were 1.3 million open Lifetime ISA accounts with 99,650 unauthorised withdrawals incurring this charge. In stark contrast, a mere 56,900 Lifetime ISA holders managed to utilise their savings for purchasing their first home, and no eligible account holder has reached pensionable age yet. The committee suggested these figures may demonstrate that Lifetime ISAs fall short of their purpose. They projected that the annual bonuses are set to cost the Treasury around £3 billion over the forthcoming five years. Additionally, the committee highlighted another hiccup: savers can only use their funds towards a first home purchase if the property costs no more than £450,000, a cap increasingly difficult to meet due to soaring house prices. Nonetheless, the report cautioned that many lose out on their savings due to "lack of understanding", which could unfairly prevent prospective home buyers from stepping onto the property ladder. Dame Meg Hillier, chairwoman of the Treasury Committee, stated: "The committee is firmly behind the objectives of the Lifetime Isa, which are to help those who need it onto the property ladder and to help people save for retirement from an early age. The question is whether the Lifetime Isa is the best way to spend billions of pounds over several years to achieve those goals." She added: "We know that the Government is looking at Isa reform imminently, which means this is the perfect time to assess if this is the best way to help the people who need it. We are still awaiting further data that may shed some light on who exactly the product is helping." She concluded by saying: "What we already know, though, is that the Lifetime Isa needs to be reformed before it can genuinely be described as a market-leading savings product for both prospective home buyers and those who want to start saving for their retirement at a young age."
