logo
The director accused of taking $55m from Netflix – and blowing it on crypto and cars

The director accused of taking $55m from Netflix – and blowing it on crypto and cars

Yahoo20-03-2025
It is commonplace in Hollywood today for television series and films to be commissioned at far too large a budget for them to enjoy the success that their producers and studios will hope for. Very occasionally, someone sees the light and pulls the plug on the unfinished product before it can run up even higher bills, with no chance of return. Yet the case of the director Carl Rinsch, who has been arrested for allegedly defrauding Netflix of $11 million, is something else.
With the exception of Die Hard and Predator film-maker John McTiernan, who eventually ended up being imprisoned as a result of the awful behind-the-scenes shenanigans on his dire 2002 remake of Rollerball, Hollywood directors do not generally blur the line between personal liability and artistic investment. Yet Rinsch has been indicted for taking money that was intended to fund a Netflix sci-fi television series named White Horse, and instead spending on it a wide range of luxury items.
The indictment has been made public, and it makes for eye-popping reading, as well as a Gatsbyian insight into how the rich – or would-be rich – live. Rinsch is said to have spent money that he received from Netflix on 'a number of extremely risky purchases of securities, including call options on a biopharmaceutical company' (which the indictment drily notes 'were not successful'), as well as significant cryptocurrency investments. Yet he didn't stint on his own personal comforts either, apparently.
The indictment lists the various purchases that he made during the time that he was employed to work on the show, and they are significant. They include nearly $2 million on credit card bills, nearly $400,000 for accommodation at the Four Seasons hotel and various rental properties, 'approximately $3,787,000 on furniture and antiques, including approximately $638,000 to purchase two mattresses and approximately $295,000 on luxury bedding and linens', millions of dollars on cars, watches and clothing, and, hilariously, over $1 million on lawyers who were hired to sue Netflix for even more money.
Were Rinsch an A-list director, or even someone with proven previous success, then he might have felt justified in asking for some of these extravagant luxuries. Yet his career, to date, is an undistinguished one that inadvertently shines a light on how many streaming companies are wasting vast amounts of money in pursuit of projects that may well never come to fruition, as long as some A-list star names are attached.
That Rinsch had been making up fantastical stories from a young age – claiming that his father was a spy and that he grew up in Africa, whereas in fact he was the son of an insurance executive and he came of age in San Fernando Valley in California – did not bode well for what came next.
The director came to prominence in 2010 when his short film The Gift, about a KGB agent delivering a mysterious present, won the Bronze Award at the Cannes Lions awards, along with the newly-created Film Craft Lion for Special Effects. This launched Rinsch, who had been directing advertisements for Mercedes and Heineken for the prestigious Ridley Scott Associates company, into the big leagues, and he was linked to some of the highest-profile projects going, including a remake of the Seventies classic Logan's Run and an Alien prequel.
When it was announced in 2009 that he would instead be entrusted by Universal with 47 Ronin, a samurai epic to star Keanu Reeves, the film industry title Variety archly noted that 'it is unusual to see a first-timer entrusted to helm a film with a large budget and tentpole aspirations.'
47 Ronin was intended to be a cross between Gladiator, 300 and The Last Samurai, harnessing the star power of Reeves, the then-popular 3D format and respected Japanese actors including the future Shogun star Hiroyuki Sanada. When Rinsch was handed a $175 million budget, The Hollywood Reporter called it 'a large-scale, downright risky' gamble.
According to reports, filming did not go well, not least because Rinsch insisted on shooting scenes twice, once in Japanese and once in English. Speaking to The Wrap, those involved in the production described it as a 'nightmare', and Rinsch was removed from the film's editing process, after a series of expensive reshoots were designed to make Reeves (the only A-list star in the production) more prominent.
Such was the potential for embarrassment, The Wrap reported, the final post-production process was personally overseen by Universal chief Donna Langley – even as the budget ballooned to a rumoured $225 million. It was estimated that 47 Ronin would have needed to make around $500 million at the box office just to break even; in the event, it struggled to take over $150 million, making it one of the biggest flops in Hollywood history.
It even flopped in Japan, where local audiences were discomfited by the casting of Reeves and the undue prominence of a white, American star in what should have been their story. It received dire, bemused reviews, and although a straight-to-Netflix sequel, Blade of the 47 Ronin, was eventually released in 2022, Rinsch and Reeves were no longer involved.
Usually, when a film-maker is deemed responsible for such an egregious flop, it spells the end of their career. There is a reason why the expression 'director jail' is commonly used in the industry, although, to date, only McTiernan has actually spent time in real jail. Rinsch returned to his previous career directing commercials, and under normal circumstances, he would not have been heard from again.
Yet he had sufficiently impressed Reeves while the two were working together for the actor to contribute funds to a series of short films that Rinsch had developed with his Uruguayan fashion designer and model wife Gabriela Rosés, revolving around an AI-generated species named 'Organic Intelligent'. It was potentially visionary and far-reaching in its ideas and implications, and returned Rinsch to the sci-fi projects that he had wished to begin his career with. These self-funded shorts were filmed in Kenya, to avoid American labour laws, and Rinsch was a demanding presence on set, at one point filming for 24 hours straight. But when he had six short episodes ready, studios sat up and took notice.
It helped that Rinsch's work coincided with the mid-2010s boom in streaming content, and there was competition between several of the biggest services, including Amazon Prime and Netflix, to take Rinsch's shorts and turn them into a big-budget series. Eventually Netflix prevailed, after Amazon believed they had reached an informal agreement, and, at the end of 2018, Rinsch and Rosés signed an enviable deal.
For a 13-episode series of short films, totalling between 110 and 120 minutes in length, they would be commissioned to make the series with a cost of over $60 million, under the name Conquest or 'White House', complete with Reeves as an investor. It attracted a well-known cast, including British actress Harriet Walter, and would, had matters gone well, given Rinsch a second chance at an A-list career. He was given final cut, and he and Rosés were 'locked for life' into any sequels or spin-off opportunities. Lest we forget, this was also a time when short-form filmmaking was believed to be the future of streaming content; Jeffrey Katzenberg's now-defunct Quibi had just launched to great fanfare.
Unfortunately, matters did not go well. Netflix, for unfathomable reasons, chose to ignore Rinsch's various eccentricities, which included his failing to have completed scripts for the remaining episodes. He instead suggested that he had thought up the entire story in his head, and he would communicate this information to the actors, crew and special effects department as and when it was required.
It also did not help that Scott Stuber, who had recently joined Netflix's film department, had been one of the producers on 47 Ronin, and was therefore well placed to let the company know about the debacle that had ensued on that film. For unfathomable reasons he did not, and chaos ensued.
Not a single further episode was completed, despite filming in locations that included Budapest, São Paulo and Montevideo. A well-sourced 2023 piece from the New York Times suggested that 'He claimed to have discovered Covid-19's secret transmission mechanism and to be able to predict lightning strikes.'
The director had to make an outright denial that he had mental health issues, saying in an Instagram post that the Times article would 'discuss the fact that I somehow lost my mind … (Spoiler alert) … I did not.' His marriage collapsed, amidst allegations that he had punched holes in walls and had accused Rosés of hiring a hitman to kill him. And Netflix, bizarrely, kept on sending Rinsch more and more money to finish the show, eventually taking their outlay to $55 million: only $6 million less than the sum originally agreed.
By the time that Rosés went to the streaming company to inform them that her soon-to-be-ex husband was doing a credible impersonation of Colonel Kurtz in Apocalypse now, Netflix realised that they had wasted their money. They accordingly pulled the plug on the project, announcing that 'after a lot of time and effort, it became clear that Mr. Rinsch was never going to complete the project he agreed to make, and so we wrote the project off.'
When they asked for the money to be returned, he refused to do so, claiming instead that the millions of dollars spent on cars and furniture were production expenses for the series, and that the money that he had made out of his investments ('Thank you and god bless crypto,' he was said to have remarked online after making $27 from the cryptocurrency Dogecoin) were a result of his financial acuity, rather than the company's misspent investment.
This will now be for the courts to decide. Certainly, it seems unlikely that Conquest, White House or whatever it should have been called will ever see the light of day, and Netflix's investment, whether in whole or part, looks equally unlikely to be recovered. Nonetheless, Rinsch's arrest and indictment mean that this fascinating insight into what really goes on behind the scenes at some of the industry's biggest streaming companies – and how its unfettered talent behaves – will only become more compelling as time goes on.
This Halle Berry sci-fi picture, announced as part of a multiple Netflix film deal with the actress in 2020, was completed in 2021, but was said to require 'significant' reshoots in order to render it releasable. After sitting on it until 2024, and apparently being confused by the idea that the child actors in the film would have aged, thus making these reshoots difficult, Netflix simply announced that The Mothership would be cancelled altogether. As a sweetener, Berry's film The Union, with Mark Wahlberg, was released by the streaming company last summer, to an indifferent reception.
Warner Brothers' CEO David Zaslav is not one of the most popular men in Hollywood, and amidst the myriad reasons for this, his decision to scrap several of their pictures and write their cost off against tax was seen as a triumph of bean-counting over creativity. The highest-profile example of this was the already completed Batgirl, which would have starred Leslie Grace as the eponymous heroine alongside superhero veterans Michael Keaton and J.K Simmons and newly Oscar-winning Brendan Fraser as the baddie, to be directed by Bad Boys filmmakers Adil El Arbi and Bilall Fallah. Described by anonymous sources as 'a huge disappointment' and cheap-looking, the decision simply to can the film altogether was still regarded as unprecedented, and a potential indicator of worrying developments to come in the industry.
Nancy Meyers, esteemed director of The Holiday and Something's Gotta Give, may well be the queen of aspirationally designed Hollywood rom-coms but her planned next foray into the genre, the Michael Fassbender-Scarlett Johansson-starring Paris Paramount, was canned after the already extravagant $130 million budget – with a considerable amount already invested in pre-production - looked as if it would rise upwards to $150 million, at Meyers' behest. While it would have been intriguing to see Hollywood's most intense leading man in a light-hearted rom-com, alas we shall never get the opportunity.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Golfing great Jack Nicklaus among lengthy list of cameos in new 'Happy Gilmore 2' film
Golfing great Jack Nicklaus among lengthy list of cameos in new 'Happy Gilmore 2' film

USA Today

time18 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Golfing great Jack Nicklaus among lengthy list of cameos in new 'Happy Gilmore 2' film

Golfing great Jack Nicklaus can add acting to his lengthy list of career accomplishments. In Happy Gilmore 2, Nicklaus is one name on a long list of golfers to make appearances in the latest film by Adam Sandler. Released nearly 30 years after the first movie, Happy Gilmore 2 has made Netflix history with a record 46.7 million views in its first three days on the streaming platform. Nicklaus makes multiple appearances in the film, which features guest spots from everybody from rapper Eminem to Travis Kelce to Nicklaus and a host of golfers from across the years. Christopher McDonald, who plays Gilmore's nemesis Shooter McGavin, gushed about getting to spend time with Nicklaus in an interview for the film that you can see below. In the film, Sandler's titular character goes to a dinner where he spends time with Nick Faldo, Fred Couples, Lee Trevino, Jordan Spieth and Xander Schauffele. Gilmore sits next to Nicklaus, and Sandler discussed the moment in an interview on the Dan Patrick show. "He was amazing," Sandler said in a December interview. "His wife was awesome. In the scene, I sit next to Jack so I got to talk to him and he was so nice to me. It reminded me so much of growing up and what he meant to my dad and what he meant to the whole world." Sandler said hearing Nicklaus' voice on the phone prior to shooting the scene brought out a feeling that would only be duplicated by talking to Johnny Carson.

Roku's new ad-free streaming service Howdy costs $3 — but I'm still scratching my head
Roku's new ad-free streaming service Howdy costs $3 — but I'm still scratching my head

Tom's Guide

time18 minutes ago

  • Tom's Guide

Roku's new ad-free streaming service Howdy costs $3 — but I'm still scratching my head

Roku just announced Howdy, a new streaming service that's the company's latest foray into the streaming landscape. The service will cost $2.99 a month and is a subscription video-on-demand (SVOD) streaming service, a la Netflix or HBO Max. It aims to offer "ad-free, high-quality entertainment" for "less than a cup of coffee," as Roku founder and CEO Anthony Wood put it in today's announcement. But that wasn't all Wood had to say. "Howdy is ad-free," he continued, "and designed to complement, not compete with, premium services.' After reading through the press release, I agree with Wood — this can't compete with premium services. However, I'm still scratching my head because I'm not sure it can compete with free streaming services either. Currently, there are two types of streaming services focused on delivering you thousands of hours of shows and movies. First, there are services like Netflix and HBO Max, which charge anywhere from $7 to $20+ a month and offer original shows and movies, live sports and deep libraries of content. Then there are free streaming services like Tubi and Pluto TV, which offer deep libraries of shows and movies for free, but instead of charging you a monthly subscription, they make you watch ads. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Howdy appears to sit somewhere in the middle. It charges you money, like Netflix, but it doesn't offer the same variety of content. It offers older, licensed content from partners like Lionsgate, Warner Bros. Discovery and FilmRise, such as 'Mad Max: Fury Road,' 'The Blind Side,' 'Weeds' and 'Kids in the Hall.' There's also mention of some Roku Original titles, which largely consist of reality and unscripted programming. That content mix is on par with what you get with a free streaming service. In fact, Roku already offers a free streaming service that offers most (if not all) of this content: The Roku Channel. As far as I can tell, that makes Howdy just The Roku Channel without ads, which begs the question: Who would pay $3 a month to remove ads from The Roku Channel? The answer I keep coming back to is, nobody. I can't think of anyone who would do this. However ... Amazon does offer similar tiers for its Prime Video streaming service. While you can subscribe to Prime Video a la carte, most people get it included with their Amazon Prime subscription. So, for this argument, let's say it's "free." But it comes with ads. If you want to remove ads, there's a $2.99 fee you can pay to remove ads. Maybe this is Roku's calculus. People do pay to remove ads on Prime Video. Lots of people. So maybe Roku thinks $2.99 is the magic number people will pay to remove ads. If that is the streaming company's calculus, though, I think they've made a grave error. Prime Video offers movies fresh out of theaters, original shows, etc. Think "Reacher" and "The Summer I Turned Pretty." Prime Video is one of those "premium services' that Wood says Howdy is designed to complement, rather than compete with. But it's precisely those premium offerings that convince people to pay to remove ads. At present, there's nothing I've seen that should convince people to say hello to Howdy and add it to their streaming services budget. I certainly won't be paying for it. Malcolm has been with Tom's Guide since 2022, and has been covering the latest in streaming shows and movies since 2023. He's not one to shy away from a hot take, including that "John Wick" is one of the four greatest films ever made. Here's what he's been watching lately:

Netflix's AVATAR: THE LAST AIRBENDER Star Says Seasons 2 and 3 Will Feel 'Very Different' — GeekTyrant
Netflix's AVATAR: THE LAST AIRBENDER Star Says Seasons 2 and 3 Will Feel 'Very Different' — GeekTyrant

Geek Tyrant

time18 minutes ago

  • Geek Tyrant

Netflix's AVATAR: THE LAST AIRBENDER Star Says Seasons 2 and 3 Will Feel 'Very Different' — GeekTyrant

Netflix's live-action Avatar: The Last Airbender is expanding its universe in a big way. With Seasons 2 and 3 currently in production, the show is evolving, and according to star Daniel Dae Kim, fans should expect something very different from what they saw in Season 1. Kim, who plays Fire Lord Ozai, recently spoke with Collider and teased just how much things are shifting behind the scenes. 'We're in the first block of Season 3, and what I can say about the show is that each season grows in scale. If you thought Season 1 was big, wait till you see Season 3, because there is a change in the way we are shooting Seasons 2 and 3 that will make the show very different.' The back-to-back production schedule reflects how seriously Netflix is taking this adaptation. After a solid response to Season 1, the streamer greenlit two more seasons to complete the story arc. Now the creative team is pushing things further, visually and narratively. But it's not just the technical scope that's changing. Kim also spoke about the young cast, saying how rewarding it's been to witness their growth over the course of production. 'What's been really cool about being part of the cast is watching these young actors grow from Episode 1 to now. What they've learned in terms of their technique and what they've learned about who they are has been really nice to watch. 'You hear so many stories about young actors being changed in a negative way by this business. But there's something about the environment of that show where I really feel like these young actors are being nurtured, and I really can't wait to see what they do, not just for Seasons 2 and 3 of our show, but beyond in their careers.' Season 2 will introduce a wave of new characters as the story enters some of the series' most iconic arcs. Miya Cech joins the cast as Toph Beifong, alongside Chin Han as Long Feng, Justin Chien as King Kuei, Amanda Zhou as Joo Dee, Crystal Yu as Lady Beifong, and Kelemete Mispeka as The Boulder. The roster also includes Hoa Xuande as Professor Zei, Lourdes Faberes as General Sung, Rekha Sharma as Amita, Madison Hu as Fei, Dichen Lachman as Yangchen, Dolly De Leon as Lo and Li, Lily Gao as Ura, Terry Chen as Jeong Jeong, Jon Jon Briones as Piandao, and Tantoo Cardinal as Hama. Returning from Season 1 are Gordon Cormier as Aang, Kiawentiio as Katara, Ian Ousley as Sokka, Dallas Liu as Zuko, Elizabeth Yu as Azula, Paul Sun-Hyung Lee as Iroh, and Daniel Dae Kim as Ozai. While Netflix has yet to reveal an official release date for the new seasons, the fact that Season 3 is already filming suggests they're aiming to keep momentum going. I personally wasn't a fan of the first season, so it will be great to see how the storytelling has improved with the next two seasons.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store