Alleged arsonist charged over fire at Australian synagogue
Angelo Loras, 34, appeared in the Melbourne Magistrates' Court Sunday charged with arson, endangering life and property damage. He was also charged with possessing a 'controlled weapon' on Saturday when he was arrested. The charge sheet does not say what that weapon was.
The Sydney resident did not enter a plea or apply to be released on bail. Magistrate John Lesser remanded Loras in custody to appear in court next on July 22.
Flammable liquid was ignited at the door of the East Melbourne Synagogue, also known as the East Melbourne Hebrew Congregation, on Friday night as 20 worshippers shared a Shabbat meal inside.
The congregation escaped without harm via a rear door and firefighters contained the blaze to the entrance area of the 148-year-old building.
It was the first of three apparent displays of antisemitic violence across the city on Friday and early Saturday morning.
Authorities have yet to establish a link between incidents at the synagogue and two businesses.
Antisemitism blamed for attacks on businesses
Also in downtown Melbourne on Friday night, around 20 masked protesters harassed diners in an Israeli-owned restaurant.
A restaurant window was cracked, tables were flipped and chairs thrown as protesters chanted 'Death to the IDF,' referring to the Israel Defense Forces. A 28-year-old woman was arrested at the scene and charged with hindering police.
Police are also investigating the spray-painting of a business in Melbourne's northern suburbs and an arson attack on three vehicles attached to the business before dawn on Saturday. The vehicles had also been graffitied.
Police said there were antisemitic 'inferences' at the scene. The business had also been the target of pro-Palestinian demonstrations in the past year.
Political leaders condemn antisemitism
Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke met with Jewish leaders at the damaged synagogue on Sunday.
Burke told reporters that investigators were searching for potential links between the three incidents.
'At this stage, our authorities have not drawn links between them. But obviously there's a link in antisemitism. There's a link in bigotry. There's a link in a willingness to either call for violence, to chant violence or to take out violent actions. They are very much linked in that way,' Burke said.
'There were three attacks that night and none of them belonged in Australia. Arson attacks, the chanting calls for death, other attacks and graffiti — none of it belonged in Australia and they were attacks on Australia,' Burke added.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called on the Australian government to 'take all action to deal with the rioters to the fullest extent of the law and prevent similar attacks in the future.'
'I view with utmost gravity the antisemitic attacks that occurred last night in Melbourne, which included attempted arson of a synagogue in the city and a violent assault against an Israeli restaurant by pro-Palestinian rioters,' Netanyahu said in a statement on Saturday.
'The reprehensible antisemitic attacks, with calls of 'death to the IDF' and an attempt to attack a place of worship, are severe hate crimes that must be uprooted,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
7 hours ago
- Arab News
Why Israeli settler violence against Palestinians is surging in the West Bank
LONDON: It began with an incident of the type that has become all too familiar in the West Bank, and yet has lately been overlooked by global media coverage distracted by the wars in Gaza and Iran. On June 25, a force of about 100 of Israeli settlers, many of them masked, descended on the Palestinian West Bank town of Kafr Malik, 17 kilometers northeast of Ramallah. It wasn't the first time the town had been attacked, but this time was different. Emboldened by right-wing ministers in Israel's coalition government, settlers across the West Bank have become increasingly aggressive toward their Arab neighbors. Kafr Malik, which sits close to an illegal settlement established in 2019, has been attacked again and again. But this time, the consequences went beyond harassment, beatings, and the destruction of property. Accounts of what happened vary, but the basic facts are clear. In what The Times of Israel described as 'a settler rampage,' the attackers threw stones at residents and set fire to homes and cars. Men from the town formed a cordon to protect their families. In the words of a statement issued by the Israeli army, which until this point had not intervened, 'at the scene, friction erupted between Israeli civilians and Palestinians, including mutual stone-throwing.' The Israel Defense Forces then opened fire on the Palestinians, killing three men and wounding seven more, adding to a toll of more than 900 Palestinians killed in the West Bank and East Jerusalem since Oct. 7, 2023. Five of the settlers were detained and handed over to the police. No charges have been forthcoming. Daylight attacks like these have become increasingly commonplace in the West Bank, and routinely go unnoticed by the international community. Attention was drawn to this one in part thanks to Saudi Arabia's Foreign Ministry, which issued a statement denouncing 'the continued violence perpetrated by Israeli settlers, under the protection of the occupation forces, against Palestinian civilians, including the attacks in the village of Kafr Malik.' A statement released by Israeli human rights organization Yesh Din, which monitors settler violence in the West Bank, also condemned the latest violence. 'Under the auspices of (the) government and (with) military backing, settler violence in the West Bank continues and becomes more deadly by the day,' it said. 'This is what ethnic cleansing looks like.' In the wake of the attack on Kafr Malik, Hussein Al-Sheikh, deputy to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, also laid the blame for settler violence on the Israeli government. 'The government of Israel, with its behavior and decisions, is pushing the region to explode,' he posted on X. 'We call on the international community to intervene urgently to protect our Palestinian people.' The 'sad truth,' said Ameneh Mehvar, senior Middle East analyst at the independent conflict data organization ACLED, 'is that this feels like deja vu, the same story repeating again and again. 'Although it's not a new story, what is new is that settler violence is now increasing, with settlers becoming increasingly emboldened by the support that they're receiving from the government. 'There is a culture of impunity. They don't fear arrest, they don't fear prosecution, and they don't fear convictions. In the few cases when settlers are charged with an offense, less than three percent end in conviction.' In November, Israel's new defense minister, Israel Katz, announced that settlers would no longer be subject to military 'administrative detention orders,' under which suspects can be held indefinitely without trial. The orders remain in force for Palestinians, of whom, according to the Palestinian Prisoners' Society, more than 1,000 remain detained, without charge or trial. On July 3, figures released by the UN children's fund, UNICEF, revealed that between Oct. 7, 2023, and June 30 this year, at least 915 Palestinians, including 213 children, have been killed in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. More than 9,500, including 1,631 children, have been injured. Reflecting the recent Israeli military activity in the area, 77 percent of child killings in 2025 have been in the northern governorates of the West Bank, with the highest number of fatalities — 35 percent of the total — in Jenin. According to figures compiled by ACLED, among the dead are 26 Palestinians killed in West Bank incidents involving settlers or soldiers escorting or protecting settlers. Settlers have killed around a dozen people, while five more have died at the hands of 'settlement emergency squads' — civilians armed by the Israeli government in the wake of the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas-led attack on southern Israel. Seven were killed by the IDF, which intervened after arriving at scenes of violence initiated by settlers — exactly what happened at Kafr Malik. In addition, ACLED recorded more than 820 violent incidents involving settlers in the first six months of 2025 alone — a more than 20 percent increase compared to the same period last year. 'This means that this year is on track to become one of the most violent years for settler violence since ACLED began its coverage in Palestine in 2016,' said Mehvar. Demonstrating just how emboldened settlers have become, many have clashed with units of the IDF in a series of incidents that began with the attack on Kafr Malik. The settlers, who had been trying to establish an illegal outpost on Palestinian land near the village, turned on the soldiers, accusing the commander of being 'a traitor.' According to the IDF, they beat, choked, and hurled rocks at the troops, and slashed the tyres of a police vehicle. Later that same evening, an army patrol vehicle in the vicinity was ambushed and stoned. The soldiers, who at first didn't realize that their attackers were fellow Israelis, fired warning shots, one of which wounded a teenager, prompting further settler violence. According to IDF reports, gangs of settlers tried to break into a military base in the central West Bank, throwing rocks and spraying pepper spray at troops, while in the Ramallah area an IDF security installation was torched. These events have come as a shock to Israeli public opinion. In an editorial published on July 1, The Jerusalem Post condemned 'the growing cancer of lawbreakers in (the) West Bank,' which 'must be cut out, before it's too late.' It added that the 'aggression by certain Jewish residents of Samaria (the Jewish name for the central region of the West Bank) against Palestinians' had been 'overlooked during the past 20 months amid the hyperfocus on the Israel-Hamas war and the plight of hostages and then the lightning war with Iran,' but 'it can't be ignored — or swept under the rug — any longer. 'These fringe elements within the Jewish population … are not just terrorizing Palestinians — itself an affront — but they have no qualms about directing their violence against their fellow Israelis serving in the IDF.' But singling out the extremist settlers for condemnation overlooks the reality that they have been encouraged and emboldened by the actions of ministers within the Israeli government, said Mehvar. On May 29, defense minister Katz and finance minister Bezalel Smotrich authorized the construction of 22 new settlements and 'outposts' in the West Bank. They made no secret of the motive. The new settlements 'are all placed within a long-term strategic vision,' they said in a statement. The goal was 'to strengthen the Israeli hold on the territory, to avoid the establishment of a Palestinian state, and to create the basis for future development of settlement in the coming decades.' It was telling that the new settlements will include Homesh and Sa-Nur, two former settlements that were evacuated in 2005 along with all Israeli settlements in Gaza. Last year, the Knesset repealed a law that prevented settlers returning to the areas. 'The reality is that there have been so many incidents of violence, either by the army or by settlers, for a long time,' said Yair Dvir, spokesperson for Israeli human rights organization B'Tselem, the Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories. 'There is a state of permanent violence in the West Bank, which is happening all the time, and it's part of the strategy of the apartheid regime of Israel, which seeks to take more and more land in the West Bank,' he told Arab News. He accused the government of pursuing a policy of ethnic cleansing against the whole of Palestine. 'And of course, it has used the war in Gaza to do the same also in the West Bank,' he added. Keeping up with the unchecked proliferation of illegal outposts and settlements in the West Bank is extremely difficult because of the sheer pace and number of developments. In November 2021, B'Tselem published a report revealing there were 280 settlements, of which 138 had been officially established by the state. In addition there were 150 outposts, often referred to as 'farms,' not officially recognized by the state but allowed to operate freely. Settlers had taken over vast areas in the West Bank, to which Palestinians had little or no access, B'Tselem reported in 'State Business: Israel's misappropriation of land in the West Bank through settler violence.' Some land had been 'officially' seized by the state through military orders declaring an area 'state land,' a 'firing zone,' or a 'nature reserve.' Other areas had been taken over by settlers 'through daily acts of violence, including attacks on Palestinians and their property.' The two methods of land seizure are often directly linked. 'Settler violence against Palestinians serves as a major informal tool at the hands of the state to take over more and more West Bank land,' said the report. 'The state fully supports and assists these acts of violence, and its agents sometimes participate in them directly. As such, settler violence is a form of government policy, aided and abetted by official state authorities with their active participation.' The report concluded that, in 2021, settlements in the West Bank were home to more than 44,000 settlers. But today, said Dvir, the figure is closer to 700,000. 'There has been a huge increase in the establishment of new outposts all over the West Bank in the past couple of years, even though all the settlements and outposts are illegal under international law,' he said. 'According to Israeli law, only the outposts are illegal, but they still get funding and infrastructure and, of course, are defended by the Israeli authorities.' Mehvar fears the growth in officially sanctioned settlements is bound to see settler violence increase. 'There have always been attacks, but they were usually carried out at night, by a few individual criminals,' she said. 'But more and more we are seeing attacks in broad daylight, often in the presence of Israeli security forces, coordinated by settlers said to be communicating and organizing on WhatsApp groups. 'If more settlements are built, deep inside Palestine, not only will it make any hope of a Palestinian state almost impossible, but with so many settlers living in close proximity to Palestinian communities it will also make violence a lot more likely.'
Al Arabiya
15 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Three found guilty over UK arson attack ordered by Wagner on Ukraine-linked businesses
Three men were found guilty on Tuesday over an arson attack on Ukraine-linked businesses in London which British officials said was ordered by Russia's Wagner mercenary group and was the latest malign activity on behalf of Moscow in the UK. Last year's blaze at an industrial estate in east London targeted two units including one for a company which delivered packages to Ukraine including satellite equipment from Elon Musk's Starlink. Prosecutor Duncan Penny told London's Old Bailey court at the start of the trial last month that the arson was organized by Dylan Earl, 21, who had pleaded guilty to aggravated arson and a charge under the National Security Act. Earl's guilty plea to preparing conduct for acts which endangered life made him the first person to be convicted under the National Security Act, introduced last year to tackle hostile activity by foreign states. Penny said Earl was 'knowingly acting at the behest of the Wagner Group', banned as a terrorist organization, and 'knew he was acting against Ukrainian, and for Russian interests'. Nii Kojo Mensah, 23, Jakeem Rose, 23, and Ugnius Asmena, 20, denied a charge of aggravated arson but were convicted by a jury at London's Old Bailey court. Paul English, 61, was cleared of the same charge. Dmitrijus Paulauskas, 23, and Ashton Evans, 20, denied two counts of knowing about terrorist acts but failing to disclose the information. Evans was convicted of one charge and cleared of a second, while Paulauskas was acquitted of both acharges.
Al Arabiya
16 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Australia's Mushroom Trial Ends in a Guilty Verdict. Why Erin Patterson Did It Remains a Mystery
The high-profile case of the so-called Death Cap Mushroom Cook is likely to remain a topic of conversation across Australia for years to come. For more than two months, the triple-murder trial has gripped the public's attention with details of how Erin Patterson murdered three of her estranged husband's relatives by deliberately serving them a lunch of poisonous mushrooms. It is no surprise that on Tuesday–the day after the guilty verdict was delivered by the court in Victoria–media websites, social media, and podcasts were scrambling to offer analysis on what motivated her. Newspaper headlines described Patterson, 50, as a coercive killer with narcissistic characteristics. 'Cold, mean, and vicious,' read one. Strict Australian court reporting laws prohibit anything that might sway jurors in a trial. Some news outlets had saved up thousands of words awaiting the verdicts: scrutiny of Patterson's past work history, behavior, and psyche. The coverage tried to explain why the mother of two meticulously planned the fatal lunch and lured three people she said she loved to their deaths. Any certain answer, for now, remains a mystery. She faces life in jail, with sentencing to come at a later date. No motive. After a nine-week Supreme Court trial in the state of Victoria, it took the jury six days to convict Patterson. She was guilty of murdering her parents-in-law, Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson, by serving them a lunch of beef Wellington pastries laced with poisonous mushrooms. She was also convicted of attempting to murder Heather's husband, Ian Wilkinson, who survived the meal at Patterson's home in the rural town of Leongatha in 2023. Patterson denied the charges and gave a defense that she had no reason to murder her 'beloved' elderly in-laws. But the jury disagreed and rejected her claim that the inclusion of toxic mushrooms in the meal was a terrible accident. Prosecutors failed to offer a motive for Patterson's crimes and weren't required to. 'People do different things for different reasons. Sometimes the reason is obvious enough to others,' prosecutor Nanette Rogers told the jury. 'At other times, the internal motivations are only known by the person themselves.' But Rogers gave hints. At one point, the prosecutor had Patterson read aloud scathing messages she'd sent, which highlighted past friction with her in-laws and tension with her estranged husband, who had been invited to the lunch but didn't go. 'You had two faces,' Rogers said. Patterson denied it. She had a dilemma. With guilty verdicts but no proven reason why, Australian news outlets published avid speculation Tuesday. 'What on earth was Erin Patterson's motive?' The Australian newspaper's editorial director, Claire Harvey, asked in a column. Harvey pointed at rifts in the killer's relationship with her estranged husband. Chris Webster was the first medical doctor to speak to Patterson after her four lunch guests had been hospitalized and testified in the trial. He told reporters Tuesday that he became convinced she deliberately poisoned her victims when she lied about buying the foraged mushrooms she had served from a major supermarket chain. 'She had a dilemma, and the solution that she chose is sociopathic,' Webster told Nine Network television. Displayed no emotion. The outpouring of scorn for Patterson reflects a national obsession with the case and a widespread view that she wasn't a sympathetic figure. It was an opinion Australians were legally required not to express in the media or online before the trial ended to ensure a fair hearing. But newspapers now don't have to hold back. Under the headline 'Death Cap Stare,' The Age reported how the 'killer cook' didn't flinch as she learned her fate but stared at the jury as they delivered their verdict. Melbourne's Herald Sun newspaper's front page screamed: 'COOKED,' labeling Patterson 'Evil Erin' and a 'Cold-Blooded Killer.' During the trial, Patterson chose to testify in her own defense, a tactic considered risky in the Australian justice system and one which most observers said didn't serve her well. She joked awkwardly at times and became combative with the prosecutor. Journalist John Ferguson, who won a Melbourne Press Club award for breaking the story of the fatal lunch, said Patterson often cried or came close to tears during her trial. But when she was convicted, she displayed no emotion, he noted. 'What the court got on Monday was the full Erin. Cold, mean, and vicious,' Ferguson wrote in The Australian Tuesday. Drama series, documentary, and books. The verdicts also prompted an online frenzy among Australians, many of whom turned citizen detectives during the trial. By late Monday, posts about the verdicts on local Reddit pages had drawn thousands of comments laced with black humor, including memes, in-jokes, and photographs taken at local supermarkets where pre-packaged beef Wellington meals were discounted. Fascination about the case will linger. A drama series, documentary, and books are planned, all of them likely to attempt an answer to the question of what motivated Patterson. Her lawyers now have twenty-eight days to lodge any appeal bid.
