
Federal appeals court wrestles with Trump effort to fight hush money conviction
'It seems to me that we got a very big case that created a whole new world of presidential immunity,' US Circuit Judge Myrna Pérez, who was nominated to the bench by President Joe Biden, said at one point during oral arguments. 'The boundaries are not clear at this point.'
At issue is whether Trump can move his state court case on 34 counts of falsifying business records to federal court, where he hopes to argue that prosecutors violated the Supreme Court's immunity decision last year by using certain evidence against him, including testimony from former White House Communications Director Hope Hicks.
'The scope of a federal constitutional immunity for the president of the United States should be decided by this court and the Supreme Court, not by New York state courts,' said Jeffrey Wall, a former acting US solicitor general who is representing Trump in the case. 'Everything about this cries out for federal court.'
The Supreme Court's decision last year granted Trump immunity from criminal prosecution for his official acts and barred prosecutors from attempting to enter evidence about them, even if they are pursuing alleged crimes involving that president's private conduct.
Without that prohibition on evidence, the Supreme Court reasoned, a prosecutor could 'eviscerate the immunity' the court recognized by allowing a jury to second-guess a president's official acts.
And so, the underlying question is whether prosecutors crossed that line by including the testimony from Hicks and former executive assistant Madeleine Westerhout, as well as a series of social media posts Trump authored during his first term criticizing the hush money case.
The three-judge panel of the New York-based 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals, all appointed by Democratic presidents, asked probing questions of both sides and it wasn't clear after more than an hour of arguments how they would decide the case. The judges pressed the attorney representing Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg on why the Supreme Court's decision last year didn't preclude the evidence at issue in the case.
'The Supreme Court used very broad language in talking about evidentiary immunity,' noted Circuit Judge Susan Carney.
Bragg's office has countered that it's too late for federal courts to intervene. That's because Trump was already convicted and sentenced. Prosecutors have also argued that the evidence at issue wasn't the kind the Supreme Court was referring to. Hicks may have been a White House official when she testified, they said, but she was speaking about actions Trump took in a private capacity.
'The fact that we are now past the point of sentencing would be a compelling reason to find no 'good cause' for removal,' said Steven Wu, who was representing Bragg.
Federal officials facing prosecution in state courts may move their cases to federal court in many circumstances under a 19th century law designed to ensure states don't attempt to prosecute them for conduct performed 'under color' of a US office or agency. A federal government worker, for instance, might seek to have a case moved to federal court if they are sued after getting into a car accident while driving on the job.
Wu analogized Trump's argument to a postal worker who commits a crime on the weekend and then confesses to his boss at work on Monday. The confession, even though it happened in a post office, doesn't suddenly convert the content of the conversation to an official US Postal Service action.
'The criminal charges were private and unofficial conduct,' Wu said.
Trump was ultimately sentenced in January without penalty.
He had been accused of falsifying a payment to his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, to cover up a $130,000 payment Cohen made to adult-film star Stormy Daniels to keep her from speaking out before the 2016 election about an alleged affair with Trump. (Trump has denied the affair.)
US District Judge Alvin Hellerstein, nominated to the bench by President Bill Clinton, denied Trump's request to move the case to federal court – keeping his appeals instead in New York courts. Trump, who frequently complained about the New York trial court judge in his case, Juan Merchan, has said he wants his case heard in an 'unbiased federal forum.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Man who was assaulted near Oregon Convention Center MAX station dies from injuries
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) — The man who was on Thursday died from his injuries on Friday, Portland police announced. 'The Multnomah County District Attorney's office is actively involved in this investigation and will consider any appropriate criminal charges,' officials said. Officers responded to the Convention Center's TriMet MAX Station just before 6 a.m. on Thursday and say the area of NE Holladay Street between Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd. and Second Avenue was blocked for several hours. When officers responded, they found a man with serious, life-threatening injuries. He was transported to the hospital, and his current condition is unknown. The suspect was identified as Jordan T. Christ, 30. He was booked in the Multnomah County Detention Center and charged with second-degree assault — though additional charges are expected. 'The investigation revealed that the assault was a punch to the victim's head and did not involve a weapon. Investigators have no reason to believe that the suspect and the victim knew each other,' police said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Sorry, This Epstein Stuff Isn't Going to Hurt Trump
Donald Trump's political obituary has been written more times than anyone could hope to count without the resources of a large data processing center. The 'Access Hollywood' tape in 2016, impeachments in 2019 and 2021, the specter of Gov. Ron DeSantis in 2022, a conviction on felony crimes last year: In these and many other instances, reports of Mr. Trump's political demise have been greatly, perhaps even desperately, exaggerated. Now we are being told that Mr. Trump's conspiracy-deflating about-face on the subject of Jeffrey Epstein — the financier and sexual predator whose suicide in jail and supposed client list Mr. Trump now dismisses as 'pretty boring stuff' — presents a grave threat to his support. I think this is rather unlikely. Give it a week or a month or a year, and I suspect that all of it, including any unsealed grand jury transcripts, will be forgotten by nearly everyone except his political opponents. There are two popular misconceptions about the sort of conspiracy theories that swirl around the MAGA movement, both of which lead people to overestimate the risk Mr. Trump is taking in backing away from these narratives. One mistake is thinking that such theories are the exclusive province of flat-earth kooks, rather than a default rhetorical tool of any political opposition. Critics of Bill Clinton accused him of smuggling cocaine through an Arkansas airport when he was governor of the state and insinuated that he and his wife were involved in the death of the White House aide Vince Foster. Opponents of George W. Bush claimed that he stole the 2004 election with the help of rigged electronic voting machines and that he invaded Iraq to benefit Halliburton, the oil services company for which Dick Cheney had served as chief executive. Barack Obama was said to be a Kenyan by birth and ineligible for the presidency. To many of Mr. Trump's detractors during his first term, he was a Kremlin asset. Conspiratorial thinking is popular not because people are credulous or insane but because it is a graspable idiom, comparable to myth, for expressing aspirations, anxieties and feelings of hopelessness in the face of vast structural forces that would otherwise resist deliberation. In the case of Mr. Epstein, these theories — that he used his sex ring to blackmail politicians and other powerful people, that he was an Israeli intelligence operative — reflect a widely shared sense of elite betrayal and institutional inertia. For many Americans, such stories have far more explanatory power than, say, a primer on neoliberalism by Wolfgang Streeck. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Fire at Palm Springs mobile home park damages 5 mobile homes; one person hospitalized
A large fire that broke out at the Ramon Mobile Home Park in Palm Springs Saturday, July 19 damaged five homes and resulted in one being person being transported to a hospital, Palm Springs Fire said. The fire at the mobile home park southwest of the intersection of Ramon Road and Sunrise Way was first reported around 3:20 p.m. The agency said the first firefighters arrived about five minutes later to find multiple mobile homes and palm trees fully engulfed in fire. The fire also produced a large plume of smoke that could be seen from miles around. A press release issued by Palm Springs Fire Saturday night stated that "firefighters mounted an aggressive offensive attack, successfully containing the blaze and preventing further spread within the mobile home community." By 4:30 p.m., the fire appeared to be fully controlled. The release stated that the person taken to hospital was also treated for smoke inhalation but did not elaborate further on their condition or if they were a resident of the mobile home park. The cause of the fire was still being investigated. A bystander on the scene told a Desert Sun reporter everyone impacted made it out of the burning structures. This article originally appeared on Palm Springs Desert Sun: Fire breaks out at Ramon Mobile Home Park in Palm Springs Solve the daily Crossword