logo
Why the Trump Justice Department is demanding the University of Virginia president resign

Why the Trump Justice Department is demanding the University of Virginia president resign

Time of India4 hours ago

Trump DOJ demands UVA president resign over DEI policy investigation. (AP Photo)
In a move described by legal experts as highly unusual, the US Justice Department under President Donald Trump has privately demanded the resignation of University of Virginia (UVA) President James E.
Ryan as a condition for resolving a civil rights investigation into the university's diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices.
According to a report by The New York Times, the demand was issued several times in recent weeks by Gregory Brown, the Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, who is also a UVA graduate and previously sued the university as a private lawyer. The pressure is part of a broader campaign led by the Trump administration to dismantle DEI initiatives in higher education institutions across the country.
Push to reshape higher education through federal influence
The Justice Department has told UVA officials that hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funding are at risk due to what the department alleges is the university's failure to comply with federal civil rights law. According to The New York Times, the department claims that President Ryan has not dismantled UVA's DEI programs and has misrepresented the university's efforts to comply with executive orders issued by the administration.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya
IC Markets
Mendaftar
Undo
This is the first known instance in which the federal government has tied the outcome of a civil rights investigation to the removal of a university leader. Legal scholars told The New York Times that such tactics are more commonly associated with corporate investigations involving serious wrongdoing, rather than with educational institutions.
Behind the resignation demand: politics, DEI, and Trump's agenda
President Trump's administration has increasingly focused on reshaping the ideological direction of US universities, which it views as bastions of liberal thought.
The push against DEI efforts is part of a broader initiative that began with an executive order targeting such programs across federal agencies, schools, and private companies. The order did not define DEI practices clearly, resulting in inconsistent institutional responses.
President Ryan, who became UVA's ninth president in 2018, has emphasized diversity and service as central to the school's mission. He previously served as dean of the Harvard Graduate School of Education and has been praised for his commitment to inclusive academic environments.
However, these values have put him at odds with conservative alumni and Republican-appointed board members, who accuse him of promoting a 'woke' agenda, as reported by The New York Times.
Ties to America First Legal and conservative pressure
Much of the political momentum behind this pressure campaign has been attributed to America First Legal, a group founded by Trump adviser Stephen Miller. The group accused UVA of merely rebranding its DEI programs and called on the Justice Department to 'hold UVA accountable.'
Attorney Megan Redshaw, representing the organization, stated in a release quoted by The New York Times, 'Rebranding discrimination does not make it legal.
'
Justice Department civil rights chief Harmeet K. Dhillon, who attended UVA Law School alongside Ryan, has also been directly involved in the negotiations, according to The New York Times. Discussions have included members of the university's oversight board, several of whom were appointed by Republican Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin.
A broader strategy targeting elite institutions
This move fits a larger pattern. The Trump administration has already stripped billions in federal funding from elite universities, including Harvard, and has initiated investigations through multiple federal agencies. The case of UVA is seen as a new frontier—targeting not only DEI practices but also university leadership itself.
A UVA spokesperson declined to comment on President Ryan's status, as reported by The New York Times. The Justice Department also did not respond to media inquiries.
Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's Big, Beautiful Bill sparks panic among MAGA voters: ‘We'd lose everything'
Trump's Big, Beautiful Bill sparks panic among MAGA voters: ‘We'd lose everything'

Time of India

time14 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trump's Big, Beautiful Bill sparks panic among MAGA voters: ‘We'd lose everything'

President Trump's proposed $3.8 trillion tax cut bill, dubbed his "big, beautiful bill," is sparking alarm among his supporters due to potential Medicaid cuts. These cuts, estimated to impact millions, could jeopardize healthcare access for vulnerable populations, including children and individuals with disabilities. Concerns are mounting as families fear losing essential support for life-saving treatments. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Voters Who Re-Elected Donald Trump Now Sound the Alarm A Missouri Mother's Plea: 'This Isn't a Luxury' Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads CBO Warns That Cuts Could Impact Millions Some Republicans Express Quiet Concern FAQs As US president Donald Trump champions his latest legislative push, a sweeping $3.8 trillion in tax cuts, he calls his 'big, beautiful bill', now panic is quietly taking hold in the very communities that helped re-elect him in 2024 election, as per a of the main concerns is deep cuts to Medicaid that many Trump voters say could cost them their homes, their health care, and even their loved ones, according to the Stitch Snitches those voicing out their concerns is Courtney Leader, a 36-year-old mother from Missouri, a deep-red state where Trump defeated former vice president Kamala Harris by 18 points, according to the report. Leader isn't a political operative or an activist, but she's just a mom trying to keep her daughter, Cyrina, alive, as per the Stitch Snitches READ: California's AB5 Law under fire, nail techs sue state over worker classification – what the law states? She explained that, 'This is not a luxury,' adding, 'I do not have my daughter enrolled on Medicaid so we can have fancy things. I have her enrolled so we can keep her alive and keep her at home, which I think is the best option for her,' as quoted in the relies on a specialised feeding formula that costs over $1,500 a month, which is more than the family's mortgage and grocery bills combined, and without Medicaid, Leader says there's no way they could cover the cost, according to the Stitch Snitches asked, 'Who's going to protect us when they can't get paperwork done in time and we lose coverage for a month or two?," and added, "I'm worried that the red tape is going to affect our Medicaid because of just the oversight burdens. And that as a result, I'm going to lose my daughter, because she's lost coverage before,' as quoted in the has even written a letter to communicated about her concerns to Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Missouri), a Trump supporter and key defender of the bill, she pleaded with him to consider the human cost, saying, 'Without Medicaid, we would lose everything — our home, our vehicles, and eventually, our daughter,' quoted Stitch READ: Pokrovsk in peril? Tensions surge as 111,000 Russian troops gather near Ukraine's frontline hotspot The concern comes as the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that Trump's proposed bill could push 16 million Americans off Medicaid by 2034, according to the report. While Trump and Republican leaders insist the cuts only target 'waste, fraud, and abuse,' the CBO's analysis highlighted that the vulnerable populations—including children, seniors, and people with disabilities, will be directly impacted if the bill becomes law in its current form, according to the to the Stitch Snitches report, the proposed Medicaid cuts have also led to concern among some GOP senators, who fear that millions of constituents could lose a $3.8 trillion tax cut package that also includes significant cuts to programmes like Medicaid and food families, especially those with children, elderly, or disabled members, depend on Medicaid for life-saving care. Cuts could mean losing coverage or access to services, as per the report.

Rwanda, DR Congo sign peace deal in U.S. after rebel sweep
Rwanda, DR Congo sign peace deal in U.S. after rebel sweep

The Hindu

timean hour ago

  • The Hindu

Rwanda, DR Congo sign peace deal in U.S. after rebel sweep

Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo signed a peace agreement on Friday (June 27, 2025) in Washington to end fighting that has killed thousands, with the two countries pledging to pull back support for guerrillas — and U.S. President Donald Trump boasting of securing mineral wealth. "Today, the violence and destruction comes to an end, and the entire region begins a new chapter of hope and opportunity," Mr. Trump said as he welcomed the two nations' Foreign Ministers to the White House. "This is a wonderful day." The agreement comes after the M23, an ethnic Tutsi rebel force linked to Rwanda, sprinted across the mineral-rich east of the DRC this year, seizing vast territory including the key city of Goma. The deal — negotiated through Qatar since before Mr. Trump took office — does not explicitly address the gains of the M23 in the area torn by decades of on-off war but calls for Rwanda to end "defensive measures" it has taken. Rwanda has denied directly supporting the M23 but has demanded an end to another armed group, the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), which was established by ethnic Hutus linked to the massacres of Tutsis in the 1994 Rwanda genocide. The agreement calls for the "neutralisation" of the FDLR, with Rwandan Foreign Minister Olivier Nduhungirehe saying the "irreversible and verifiable end to state support" to the Hutu militants should be the "first order of business." The process would be "accompanied by a lifting of Rwanda's defensive measures," Nduhungirehe said at a signing ceremony at the State Department. But he added, "We must acknowledge that there is a great deal of uncertainty in our region, and beyond, because many previous agreements have not been implemented." His Congolese counterpart, Therese Kayikwamba Wagner, highlighted the agreement's call for respecting state sovereignty. "It offers a rare chance to turn the page, not just with words but with real change on the ground. Some wounds will heal, but they will never fully disappear," she said. The agreement also sets up a joint security coordination body to monitor progress and calls vaguely for a "regional economic integration framework" within three months. Trump takes credit Mr. Trump has trumpeted the diplomacy that led to the deal, and started his White House event by bringing up a journalist who said he deserved the Nobel Peace Prize. Speaking to reporters earlier on Friday (June 27, 2025), Mr. Trump said the United States will be able to secure "a lot of mineral rights from the Congo." The DRC has enormous mineral reserves that include lithium and cobalt, vital in electric vehicles and other advanced technologies, with U.S. rival China now a key player in securing the resources. Mr. Trump said he had been unfamiliar with the conflict as he appeared to allude to the horrors of the 1994 Rwanda genocide, in which hundreds of thousands of people, mostly Tutsis, were killed in just 100 days. "I'm a little out of my league on that one because I didn't know too much about it. I knew one thing — they were going at it for many years with machetes," Mr. Trump said. The agreement drew wide but not universal praise. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called the deal "a significant step towards de-escalation, peace and stability" in the eastern DRC and the Great Lakes region. "I urge the parties to honour in full the commitments they have undertaken in the Peace Agreement... including the cessation of hostilities and all other agreed measures," Mr. Guterres said in a statement. The landmark agreement was also praised by the chairman of the African Union Commission. Mahmoud Ali Youssouf, who witnessed the signing of the deal in Washington, "welcomed this significant milestone and commended all efforts aimed at advancing peace, stability, & reconciliation in the region," a statement said. But Denis Mukwege, a gynecologist who shared the 2018 Nobel Peace Prize for his work to end the DRC's epidemic of sexual violence in war, voiced alarm about the agreement, saying it effectively benefited Rwanda and the United States. The deal "would amount to granting a reward for aggression, legitimizing the plundering of Congolese natural resources, and forcing the victim to alienate their national heritage by sacrificing justice in order to ensure a precarious and fragile peace," he said in a statement ahead of the signing. Physicians for Human Rights, which has worked in the DRC, welcomed the de-escalation but said the agreement had "major omissions," including accountability for rights violations.

California slashes spending: New budget scales back immigrant healthcare to tackle $12 Billion deficit - GOP says fiscally irresponsible
California slashes spending: New budget scales back immigrant healthcare to tackle $12 Billion deficit - GOP says fiscally irresponsible

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

California slashes spending: New budget scales back immigrant healthcare to tackle $12 Billion deficit - GOP says fiscally irresponsible

California governor Gavin Newsom (AP) California governor Gavin Newsom on Friday signed a $321-billion budget that rolls back several progressive initiatives, including a major healthcare expansion for low-income undocumented immigrants, in a bid to bridge a $12-billion budget deficit. This marks the third consecutive year that America's most populous state has been forced to cut or delay programmes backed by Democratic leaders amid declining revenues and economic uncertainty. The budget was passed by lawmakers earlier in the day following a consensus between Newsom and legislative Democrats. However, the budget agreement could be void if lawmakers fail to pass related housing legislation by Monday. That bill is aimed at making it easier to build housing across the state. Despite the cuts, state leaders say the budget protects critical safety net programmes. The deficit will be managed primarily through the use of state reserves, internal borrowing from special funds, and delayed payments, rather than by introducing new taxes. 'It's balanced, it maintains substantial reserves, and it's focused on supporting Californians,' Newsom said in a statement. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo The state also faces looming risks from potential federal policy changes, including those related to tariffs and immigration enforcement, which could cut state revenues by as much as $16 billion, Newsom warned in May. Senate president pro tempore Mike McGuire acknowledged the difficult decisions involved in finalising the budget. 'We're not going to please everyone, but we're doing this without any new taxes on everyday Californians,' he said. Republican lawmakers criticised the budget process, saying they were excluded from negotiations and that the plan fails to address long-term fiscal sustainability. 'We're increasing borrowing, we're taking away from the rainy day fund, and we're not reducing our spending,' said Republican senator Tony Strickland. 'This budget also does nothing about affordability in California.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store