Food Quality And Safety Will Suffer If Meat Inspection Service Is Privatised As Govt Proposes
The Government wants to privatise its high-quality meat inspection service ignoring the impact it will have on food quality and safety in announcements being made to meat inspectors.
The Ministry for Primary Industries is proposing to allow meat processing companies to carry out more of their own meat inspection work with reduced oversight from AsureQuality, the Government's meat inspection service. AsureQuality employs some 650 meat inspectors who carry out meat inspection on 27 million animals at 65 meat processing facilities every year.
Hundreds of highly qualified and experienced AsureQuality meat inspectors could face the axe, with many forced to transfer to the private sector with lower wages and poorer conditions.
"This is all about privatising a trusted and valuable service which ensures New Zealand consumers can buy safe, high-quality meat with confidence," said Fleur Fitzsimons, National Secretary for the Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi.
"The work of meat inspectors ensures that disease and defects in products are identified and that meat is fit for human consumption.
"Independent meat inspectors are more rigorous because they have no vested interest in the end product and will not cut corners to increase company profits. Our overseas markets and consumers here at home will miss out if we lose the independence of our meat inspection services.
"This is just more of the same deregulation agenda we are seeing across health and other parts of the public service.
"History tells us who wins from deregulation, business. This proposal is all about boosting the profits of meat companies while dismantling a proven, efficient and independent government owned service that keeps New Zealanders safe from diseased and contaminated meat.
"Meat inspectors also play a critical role in underpinning New Zealand's global reputation for excellence in all we export.
"Why put all that at risk?
"The Government's priorities are again clear - it scrapped pay equity, making underpaid women pay for tax cuts for business in the Budget and it's doing the same here, forcing meat inspectors to take a cut in wages to boost the bottom line of meat companies.
"This government has no shame in its reckless pursuit of ideology over the consequences for New Zealanders as we again fail to learn the lessons from the past."
Note
The Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi is Aotearoa New Zealand's largest trade union, representing and supporting more than 95,000 workers across central government, state-owned enterprises, local councils, health boards and community groups.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
24 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Why you need a Will now more than ever
This article was prepared by Holland Beckett and is being published by the New Zealand Herald as advertorial. In today's evolving financial and legal landscape, having a valid Will in place has never been more critical for New Zealanders. The absence of a Will can lead to unnecessary delays, stress, and cost for families. One of the most overlooked reasons to have a Will is KiwiSaver. Many people assume their KiwiSaver balance will automatically pass to their partner or next of kin on death, but that's not how it works. KiwiSaver funds are held solely in the name of the individual and do not pass by survivorship (think, property held as joint tenants). Instead, they must be dealt with as part of the person's estate, and if there is no Will, this creates delays and uncertainty in accessing those funds. With the recent Government budget injecting more incentives and support into KiwiSaver, balances are likely to grow significantly over time. Another relevant factor is the probate threshold. Currently, assets over $15,000 will require a grant from the Court. This threshold is due to increase to $40,000 in the near future, to better reflect current asset values. In real terms, the threshold is easily exceeded - especially when you consider KiwiSaver. Without a Will, for which the court can grant 'probate', family members must apply for 'letters of administration' which can be slower and more complex, particularly when family dynamics are tense. At the same time, more New Zealanders are choosing to own property as tenants in common rather than joint tenants – especially in blended families or where people wish to protect their children's inheritance from a new partner. This structure allows each party to leave their share of the property to whomever they choose, provided they have a Will to specify that. In this situation, a Will should complement any Contracting Out Agreement (or 'Pre Nup'). Many family trusts are now being wound up or simplified because of changes in trust law, compliance costs, ageing/migrating settlors and international beneficiaries (giving rise to tax implications). As assets come out of a trust and revert to personal ownership, they become part of a person's estate and must be carefully dealt with by their Will. Overseas properties, investments and digital assets can be challenging to deal with if someone passes without a Will (or Wills) to reflect what should happen to assets in other countries. Having a Will is no longer just about passing on the family home – it's about ensuring some thought is given to the increasing complex assets and arrangements of the modern estate. With the right guidance, a complicated situation can have a clear and manageable solution. The key is to decide what you want to achieve, and get a Will drafted to reflect that.
Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
Ferry Privatisation Would Be A Disaster
The Maritime Union of New Zealand (MUNZ) says suggestions of privatisation of the new Cook Strait Interislander ferries would be a dangerous step backwards. The proposals were contained in a cabinet paper presented to the Government earlier this year and obtained by media under the OIA. Maritime Union of New Zealand National Secretary Carl Findlay says past privatisation of strategic transport infrastructure had caused great harm to our national supply chain. He says the ideological push for privatization will be coming from the extreme right in the Government represented by the ACT Party. Mr Findlay says New Zealand's rail network, including the ferries, had been sold off to overseas corporates in the 1990s by a right wing National Government. "What followed was a textbook case of corporate raiding, where assets were stripped for short-term profit, maintenance was run into the ground, and workers paid with their lives due to shocking health and safety breaches.' 'The taxpayer was then forced to spend millions to buy back the asset and start the long process of fixing it up.' Mr Findlay says it is essential for a New Zealand owned, public ferry operator to be on the Cook Strait for economic security and supply chain resilience. He says the Cook Strait is our 'blue highway', an essential extension of State Highway 1 and the Main Trunk Line. 'We believe the Minister of Rail, Winston Peters, who has spoken at length about the failures of past privatisations, will not allow the Government to be swayed by ACT style agendas.' Mr Findlay says the ferry replacement process has already been a fiasco, with the decision of Finance Minister Nicola Willis to cancel the iRex project creating years of delays and a billion dollar cost to New Zealand. He says there are many other opportunities for private operators to enter into other coastal shipping services, and the Government should be supporting this goal. 'For the Cook Strait, our focus should be on investing in a modern, reliable, and publicly-owned ferry fleet that is fit for the 21st century and serves all New Zealanders.' The Maritime Union of New Zealand represents seafaring and catering crews on both Cook Strait ferry operators.
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
Increased Accountability For Jobseeker Support
Minister for Social Development and Employment From today, people getting Jobseeker Support will need to reapply every 26 weeks (six months), instead of just once a year, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. 'This previously signalled change increases accountability, while also improving opportunities for jobseekers,' Louise Upston says. 'Reapplying for their benefit more often makes sure people receiving Jobseeker Support engage with MSD more regularly. Frontline staff are then able to check people are doing everything they can to find a job and prepare for work, while getting the right kind of support from MSD to make that happen. 'It also gives MSD another opportunity to assess people's eligibility and make sure they understand what they need to do to stay on track with their obligations while receiving a benefit. 'We know getting back into work produces better outcomes for people and their families. Reapplying for Jobseeker Support every 26 weeks instead of 52 is a realistic expectation, as part of the Government's initiatives to actively support people off welfare and into employment. 'Having to apply only once a year was a significant gap and didn't help either jobseekers or the MSD staff working with them.' Changes have also been made to the reapplication process to make it easier for many people reapplying. If they've recently interacted with MSD about their job search, for instance, they may be able to complete their reapplication online without needing an appointment. 'The improved reapplication process means less time repeating information and more time focusing on support to overcome barriers to work,' Louise Upston says. Notes: For people already getting Jobseeker Support on 1 July 2025, the date they will need to reapply depends on when their benefit was last granted and their situation. Some clients will reapply at 52 weeks from when their benefit was last granted where they are current subject to annual income charging, and then every 26 weeks after that. 26-week reapplications were introduced as a part of the suite of changes made by the Social Security Amendment Act 2025.
