Pro-Palestine activist arrested in Belgium after attending protest
Mohammed Khatib, the 35-year-old European coordinator for Samidoun, a global Palestinian prisoner solidarity network, was arrested on April 21 after attending a daily protest demanding an end to Israel's genocide against Palestinians in Gaza.
Every evening, dozens of people, some sporting keffiyehs, gather on the steps of the former stock exchange in Brussels to drape a Palestine flag down the steps and chant slogans of solidarity in English, Arabic and French.
A police presence is usual, but Khatib felt uneasy when he noticed an officer photographing him
He left about 7:30pm (17:30 GMT) and was stopped nearby for what he called a 'spontaneous' ID check by local police.
He was arrested and taken in a police van to a central station. About 30 supporters gathered outside, chanting, 'Free our comrade!' before being dispersed by riot police about 10pm (20:00 GMT).
Khatib was then transferred to a nearby station. He was questioned without a lawyer and released about 5am (03:00 GMT).
Khatib said he spent hours waiting in a cell before being asked for a few minutes about an incident in April 2024 during which he was attacked with a knife. There was also a brief trip to the hospital for nonurgent medication.
'They were doing anything they could to keep me,' Khatib told Al Jazeera.
The Brussels Public Prosecutor's Office told Al Jazeera: 'Mohammed Khatib was arrested as part of an investigation into events that took place in April 2024. He was released after questioning.'
A Palestinian refugee born in the Ein El Hilweh camp in Lebanon in 1990, Khatib fled to Belgium alone at age 19, claimed asylum and co-founded Samidoun one year later in 2011. Campaigning for the rights of Palestinians incarcerated in Israel is his sole occupation.
Samidoun's stance on Israel-Palestine has led to Khatib being designated as a 'serious' security threat by the Coordination Unit for Threat Analysis (CUTA), an independent body that reports to Belgium's justice and interior ministries.
Khatib said officers on April 21 justified the arrest initially with the CUTA designation.
It marked the second time he has been arrested. In October 2023, he was arrested at a demonstration after refusing to stop waving a Palestine flag.
The latest detention was 'nothing in terms of what we are facing', he said, referring to efforts in some Western nations to curtail the pro-Palestine movement.
Samidoun called the arrest 'a form of state harassment targeting a prominent leader, not only of Samidoun, but of the growing movement against the ongoing genocide in occupied Palestine'.
'It's hard not to see it in that light,' refugee and immigration lawyer Benoit Dhondt told Al Jazeera. 'A lot of people are living in a state of schizophrenia because of how invisible the genocide in Gaza is being made in Europe.'
Meanwhile, 'disproportionate policing of the pro-Palestine movement makes it very difficult to understand what is actually happening,' he said.
The author and journalist David Cronin wrote in The Electronic Intifada: 'If the Belgian authorities enjoy any success in muzzling Mohammed Khatib and Samidoun, then we have to ask: Who is next? All Palestine solidarity campaigners are at risk.'
In May last year, police used water cannon and tear gas to disperse a peaceful protest outside the Israeli embassy in Brussels under instructions from Mayor Boris Dillies, who said the demonstration was unauthorised. An open letter signed by Amnesty International described the measure as 'contrary to international law'.
Earlier that month, police had arrested about 40 protesters when a demonstration at the US embassy went overtime.
In a report on the state of the right to protest published in July, Amnesty noted that administrative arrest 'is increasingly used to prevent people from participating in protests' in Belgium.
Human rights and immigration lawyer Helene Crokart told Al Jazeera that arrests 'are not isolated incidents' and 'sometimes amount to outright intimidation'.
On October 15, then-State Secretary for Migration and Asylum Nicole De Moor, a Christian Democrat, announced a procedure to strip Khatib, who she called a 'hate preacher', of asylum.
'Even if someone has already been recognised as a refugee but that person turns out to be an extremist, recognition can be withdrawn,' she stated.
On the same day, the United States and Canada blacklisted Samidoun, deeming it a 'sham charity' and accusing it of raising funds for the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, a designated 'terrorist' organisation.
Samidoun denied the allegation.
Germany banned Samidoun in 2023, alleging it celebrated the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led attacks in southern Israel. Khatib said, 'Some Palestinians were distributing baklava in the street. And we were there with the Samidoun flag.'
Khatib has also been banned from entering Switzerland for 10 years, which occurs only when an individual poses what is considered a 'concrete' threat to national security, according to a Swiss government spokesperson. He was not permitted to enter the Netherlands for a university talk in October.
During the October 2023 attacks, 1,139 people were killed and more than 200 were taken captive into Gaza. Since then, Israel's latest war on Gaza has killed more than 52,000 people, including more than 17,000 children, in the besieged enclave. Israel has justified the onslaught as an attempt to crush Hamas.
According to a CUTA spokesperson, Samidoun is classified as an 'extremist' organisation, which 'is not a criminal offence'.
'We are more interested in keeping an eye on the leadership, the members, what they do and say, how they disrupt public order and what group they are potentially targeting,' the spokesperson said.Belgium's right-wing government, appointed in February, is markedly more sympathetic to Israel than its predecessor.
Prime Minister Bart De Wever of the New Flemish Alliance party said Belgium would not arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu despite an International Criminal Court (ICC) warrant for his arrest on charges of crimes against humanity. Four months earlier, then-Liberal Premier Alexander De Croo stated the opposite.
The coalition headed by De Wever intends to 'ban dangerous radical organisations such as Samidoun due to their ties to terrorism or for spreading antisemitism', according to official documents.
But a ban would likely take a long time to implement because Belgian positions depend on European Union and United Nations Security Council decisions.
De Moor's successor, Anneleen Van Bossuyt, supports the initiative to revoke Khatib's refugee status. Such a decision is made independently by the commissioner general for refugees and stateless persons and must rely on proof of a serious crime.
A decision to strip someone's status may be appealed, but once finalised, the immigration office could issue an order for a person to leave the country.
The case depends on material that authorities said they are not sharing, even with Khatib.
Dhondt warned of a 'chilling effect' on freedom of expression.
The government is using Khatib's case as a 'propaganda tool' to demonstrate strong policies on 'extremism', he said, even though it 'can't really say why [Khatib poses any threat]'.
Khatib denies all allegations of hate speech.
'If they had something they could use against me, I would not be sitting here. I would be in prison.
'The goal of this intimidation is to silence the movement, to make an example of us and say, 'If you do the same, this is your future'. We will fight this.'
Khatib has previously called for Israel to be 'dismantled' and said, 'We do not call Hamas's attack in Israel a terror attack. We call it justified resistance.'
Seen as hardline positions by some, mainstream activists have distanced themselves from Samidoun but urged Brussels to uphold freedom of expression.
The Human Rights League, a nonprofit organisation that has criticised Belgian authorities for allowing the transit of arms to Israel, does not wholly endorse Khatib's views but 'reiterates the need to protect freedom of expression, including for statements that 'offend, shock or disturb', according to the European Court of Human Rights'.
'While the positions defended by Mohammed Khatib and Samidoun can undeniably be described as radical, … to our knowledge they have never been prosecuted for any criminal offence (including for anti-Semitic statements) nor have they caused any public disorder,' the rights group said in a 2024 report.
The group linked Khatib's case to other measures, such as local bans on keffiyehs and other pro-Palestine symbols and the temporary suspension of decisions on Palestinian asylum applications. The report concluded that the lack of a decision on revoking Khatib's refugee status suggests insufficient evidence against him.
The Union of Progressive Jews in Belgium last year denounced a 'smear campaign' against Khatib.
'Whatever political differences we may have, this threat is intolerable and shakes the very foundations of our democracy.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
32 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
The Best Judge of ‘Real Peace' in the Mideast
The most important thing to note about 'A Hebron 'Emirate' or a Colonial Deception?' (op-ed, July 10) is that the author, Mahmoud Jabari, writes from Geneva. He lives there, while the Palestinians whose peace proposal he criticizes live in Hebron or part time in East Jerusalem. Mr. Jabari claims to have left during the second intifada. That was 20 years ago. Surely those on the ground have a better grip on life there and how to improve it than he. Mr. Jabari writes that his family had long lived in Hebron and 'didn't leave by choice. The violence of the second intifada and the relentless aggression of Israeli settlers made staying impossible.' The area where Mr. Jabari lived, H2, is populated by about 35,000 Palestinians who actually 'didn't leave by choice' and didn't find 'staying impossible.' They're still there.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - GHF is actually feeding Gazans, not letting Hamas extort them — and paying a price
The likelihood of a ceasefire in Gaza could turn on whether Israel meets a core demand of Hamas to stop a successful effort to feed the Palestinian people. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has distributed more than 60 million meals over the last five weeks without interference or diversion. This has severely undercut Hamas's revenue streams, because Hamas has for years stolen humanitarian aid and sold it at high prices, despite the daily struggle of the Palestinian people to meet their basic needs. For Israel, the priority remains unchanged in the aftermath of the October 7, 2023 terror attacks: eliminate Hamas and free the hostages still held in its underground labyrinth. At the same time, however, the world cannot ignore the immense suffering of Gaza's innocent civilians, most of whom are trapped by Hamas's control. Nor can Israel revert to the status quo ante, when Hamas was starving Gazans so it could finance terror. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, of course, has a singular mission: to feed the people of Gaza, safely and directly. It operates with transparency, logistical expertise, a commitment to human dignity, and yes, coordination with the Israeli government. Without that coordination, its food would face the same looting and diversion that plagues other aid organizations who see Israel as an obstacle. For this success, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has been rewarded with cheers from the Palestinian people in Gaza, as well as robust international condemnation from nearly everyone outside of the Trump administration, which has chipped in at least $30 million in support. These critics claim that the foundation violates humanitarian principles by working with Israel. Their statements ignore the facts and focus instead on ideology. What they call 'neutrality' often serves as an excuse to avoid confronting the actions of Hamas, which routinely blocks aid and threatens aid workers. Apparently, if you play by Hamas's rules — accept their fabricated statistics, their propaganda, and their theft of aid — you are considered 'legitimate' by much of the legacy media. But if you challenge that system by delivering aid efficiently, securely, and without Hamas' interference, you become the villain. Even worse, Hamas has now turned its violence against Palestinian civilians for working with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Recently, Hamas attacked a bus of Palestinian foundation volunteers. According to regional reports, a Hamas unit killed or detained dozens of aid workers. Its operatives have also attacked American aid workers with explosives packed with ball bearings then before retreated into crowds of aid seekers, all in the hope of drawing fire and creating an international incident. Despite the violence, the United Nations has remained nearly silent. The European Union has offered no meaningful condemnation. Some affiliated agencies have continued to question the foundation's mission while ignoring the violence. Only the U.S. has led with clarity in its condemnations. The U.N., the International Red Cross and other captains of civil society insist on a sacrosanct neutrality that is effectively moral blindness. There are good and evil in this world. Feeding starving civilians is good; stealing the aid and murdering the people who feed them is evil. People of faith should recognize that the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is delivering help where others have failed and doing so in the face of violence and death-threats. It deserves our support, not our suspicion. The values behind this work are not abstract. They reflect the deepest commitments of the Judeo-Christian tradition: charity, mercy and human dignity. While the ceasefire negotiations are underway, the UN, EU and international aid organizations should publicly pledge to work with GHF. If they will not assist, they should at least stop obstructing those who will. The time for moral equivocation has passed. Congress will soon hold hearings on the delivery of humanitarian aid in Gaza, too. Lawmakers should examine not only the work the foundation has done, but also the failure of other agencies to condemn or confront Hamas. If these groups continue to undermine the foundation or turn a blind eye to violence against its staff, American policymakers should reconsider how humanitarian dollars are allocated. Those who cannot condemn terror should not be trusted to address suffering. The tools of compassion are challenging the forces of cruelty. Feeding the hungry is a sacred duty and now, thanks to the foundation, the people of Gaza are enjoying reliable access to food. Hamas's opposition to feeding Palestinians must be understood. Aid organizations failing to fulfill their mission to bring aid to the people need to be named. And those who place bounties on their heads must be condemned and isolated. In a conflict filled with gray zones, this is a line the world must be willing to draw. Rabbi Abraham Cooper is a senior leader with the Simon Wiesenthal Center and chairman emeritus of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
European Leaders Respond to Donald Trump's Tariff Announcement
European leaders on Saturday responded to President Donald Trump's announcement that he would apply a 30 percent tariff on goods from the European Union (EU) effective August 1. In a statement issued midday on Saturday, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen stressed the EU's commitment to "dialogue, stability, and a constructive transatlantic partnership." Leaders in France and Italy also issued statements later in the day, urging both parties to reach a "fair agreement that can strengthen the West as a whole." Trump has relied on tariffs as a means of trying to renegotiate global trade between the United States and its various partners citing disparities in what he calls unfair trade agreements in order to try and strengthen his country's position. However, he has found himself at odds with his allies as they have pushed back against the tariffs despite his claim that these various partners would ultimately seek to make new deals with the U.S. in order to avoid having to face the tariffs. The administration made its boldest move in April with its Liberation Day tariffs, which applied reciprocal measures against trading partners in order to try and drive down protections against vital U.S. trade industries. Trump ultimately backtracked on the measure, saying that he would negotiate deals with all the various partners within 90 days, but only the United Kingdom and Vietnam ultimately agreed to deals within that timeframe. Trump announced the new tariffs in a letter posted on Truth Social shortly before 9 a.m. ET on Saturday, in which he also warned against retaliation, saying that any retaliatory tariff would produce a reciprocal tariff in addition to the base 30 percent he would impose on the EU. With Saturday's letters, Trump has issued tariff conditions on 24 countries and the 27-member EU, the Associated Press reported. The EU issued a response first, writing in a statement: "We take note of the letter sent by U.S. President Trump outlining a revised tariff rate and a new timeline." "Imposing 30 percent tariffs on EU exports would disrupt essential transatlantic supply chains, to the detriment of businesses, consumers and patients on both sides of the Atlantic," the statement continued. "Few economies in the world match the European Union's level of openness and adherence to fair trading practices." "The EU has consistently prioritized a negotiated solution with the U.S., reflecting our commitment to dialogue, stability, and a constructive transatlantic partnership." "We remain ready to continue working towards an agreement by August 1," the statement added. "At the same time, we will take all necessary steps to safeguard EU interests, including the adoption of proportionate countermeasures if required. Meanwhile, we continue to deepen our global partnerships, firmly anchored in the principles of rules-based international trade." French President Emmanuel Macron issued his own response just a few hours afterwards, writing in a post on X, formerly Twitter: "Along with the President of the European Commission, France shares the same very strong disapproval at the announcement of horizontal 30% tariffs on EU exports to the United States from August 1st." "This announcement comes after weeks of intense engagement by the Commission in negotiations with the United States, on the basis of a solid offer made in good faith," he wrote. "With European unity, it is more than ever up to the Commission to assert the Union's determination to resolutely defend European interests." His statement continued: "In particular, this implies speeding up the preparation of credible countermeasures, by mobilizing all the instruments at its disposal, including anti-coercion, if no agreement is reached by August 1st. On this basis, France fully supports the European Commission in the negotiations, which will now intensify, to reach a mutually acceptable agreement by August 1st, reflecting the respect that trading partners like the European Union and the United States owe each other, with their shared interests and integrated value chains." Italy followed France in backing the EU in negotiations, with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's office writing: "We trust in the goodwill of all stakeholders to reach a fair agreement that can strengthen the West as a whole, given that—particularly in the current scenario—it would make no sense to trigger a trade conflict between the two sides of the Atlantic." "The Italian government continues to closely monitor the progress of the ongoing negotiations between the European Union and the United States, fully supporting the European Commission's efforts, which will be further intensified in the coming days," the statement added. "Now, it is crucial to remain focused on the negotiations, avoiding polarization that would make reaching an agreement more difficult." The EU will continue to seek a trade deal on behalf of all member states with the U.S. before the August 1 deadline or face the hefty 30 percent tariff Trump has promised. Related Articles Pope Francis' Funeral Could Turn Into Awkward Diplomatic EventEuropeans Told to Stockpile 72 Hours Worth Of FoodFrance Vows Retaliatory Measures Against Trump Tariffs: 'The Time Has Come'Some Reddit Groups are Banning X Links. Could Europe be Next? 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.