With 47% ownership, Able Global Berhad (KLSE:ABLEGLOB) insiders have a lot riding on the company's future
Able Global Berhad's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
The top 9 shareholders own 50% of the company
Institutional ownership in Able Global Berhad is 17%
This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality.
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Able Global Berhad (KLSE:ABLEGLOB), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 47% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
So it follows, every decision made by insiders of Able Global Berhad regarding the company's future would be crucial to them.
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Able Global Berhad.
Check out our latest analysis for Able Global Berhad
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Able Global Berhad. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Able Global Berhad, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Able Global Berhad. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Able Global Berhad's case, its Top Key Executive, Keng Ng, is the largest shareholder, holding 12% of shares outstanding. Mia Goh is the second largest shareholder owning 9.8% of common stock, and Swee Goh holds about 9.6% of the company stock. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Swee Goh is also a Member of the Board of Directors, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 9 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Able Global Berhad. Insiders have a RM220m stake in this RM471m business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
With a 32% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Able Global Berhad. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
It seems that Private Companies own 4.1%, of the Able Global Berhad stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Able Global Berhad better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Able Global Berhad .
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
—
Investing narratives with Fair Values
A case for TSXV:USA to reach USD $5.00 - $9.00 (CAD $7.30–$12.29) by 2029. By Agricola – Community Contributor
Fair Value Estimated: CA$12.29 · 0.9% Overvalued
DLocal's Future Growth Fueled by 35% Revenue and Profit Margin Boosts By WynnLevi – Community Contributor
Fair Value Estimated: $195.39 · 0.9% Overvalued
Historically Cheap, but the Margin of Safety Is Still Thin By Mandelman – Community Contributor
Fair Value Estimated: SEK232.58 · 0.1% Overvalued
View more featured narratives
—
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Singapore security firm rebuts viral claim staff face sack for not staying home while on sick leave
SINGAPORE, June 29 — Singapore security firm Certis has clarified that it does not dismiss employees simply for not being at home while on medical leave, after internal WhatsApp messages about its medical leave policy circulated online and drew public attention. The messages, which were first reported by Mothership on Friday, said that workers could receive a warning letter if they were found to be away from home during medical leave without a valid reason. 'If they are not at home, they should share their 'live' location or conduct a video call with their manager to ensure their safety and well-being,' one message allegedly read. Employees were also instructed to update their residential addresses to avoid potential disciplinary action, while another message encouraged officers to 'share their pinned location' if they were not at home. A warning within the messages noted that 'any non-compliance identified may result in disciplinary action, which could include termination'. In response to Channel News Asia's queries, Certis said yesterday that termination is not automatic and disciplinary steps are taken only in 'clear and substantiated cases of abuse of medical leave, after a fair and thorough process'. 'We do not terminate employees solely because employees are not at home when on medical leave,' the company reportedly said. It added that managers may check in on staff who are on medical leave — particularly those on extended leave — and that these visits may include 'small care gestures'. Certis also emphasised that it trusts the majority of its staff to use medical leave responsibly, but has put in safeguards to ensure the system is not abused. 'Certis holds our officers to high standards of professionalism and integrity,' the company said. 'We take a firm stance against any wilful breach of company policy and will not hesitate to take disciplinary action where warranted, as we fulfil our commitment towards partners, customers, and the community whom we strive to protect and safeguard.'
Forbes
43 minutes ago
- Forbes
D-Wave Quantum Stock Down 28% From Peak As Google And IBM May Prevail
D-Wave Quantum Computing's share price is up 46% this year. But can the company's technology scale faster than what IBM and Google are promising? D-Wave Advantage2 Kent Kallberg D-Wave Quantum shares are up 46% in 2025 with help from a 509% pop in first quarter revenue. However, the stock has lost 28% of its value since peaking last month at $19.76. IBM and Google use a different gate-based technology which could scale to much larger market opportunities than D-Wave's annealing approach does. Nevertheless, quantum computing's future looks bright. D-Wave Quantum stock has risen 46% in 2025. While that sounds good, the stock has lost 28% of its value since peaking in May. Does this represent a buying opportunity? The bull case for D-Wave is based on a 509% increase in revenue in the first quarter abetted by a new business model in which the company sells is so-called annealing-based computers to organizations. The bear case is competition from giants such as IBM and Google which promise a larger market opportunity for their gate-based approach to quantum computing. If these companies deliver on their promise, D-Wave risks being more of a niche company. D-Wave is optimistic about its future due to the value its products offer companies. 'What is currently available is what customers want,' D-Wave Vice President of Quantum Technology Evangelism Murray Thom told me in a June 17 interview. 'We are the sixth generation of quantum computing currently available in 42 countries giving 99.9% sub-second response time. Companies can use quantum computing to build applications and achieve concrete ROI,' he added. MIT sees opportunity ahead in quantum computing — if key problems are solved. 'There are breakthroughs in quantum computing,' MIT research affiliate Elif Kiesow told me in a June 17 interview. 'IBM expects to launch its fault tolerant QC in 2029. QC is capable of useful computing it can carry information and doesn't lose information. You can't talk about qubit counts without talking about error rates which are outlined in chapter 10 of the Quantum Index Report 2025,' which Kiesow co-authored. Will D-Wave enjoy expectations-beating growth or will other technologies prevail? Read on for my thoughts. Why D-Wave Sees A Bright Future D-Wave sees a bright future. In the first quarter of 2025, the company's high revenue growth and improved margins helped propel its stock up significantly. Underlying this growth is a fundamental shift in customer behavior – from renting access to D-Wave's quantum computers to buying them from the company, noted my May Forbes post. The company's 509% revenue increase resulted from the $12.2 million sale of a quantum computing system to Germany's Jülich Supercomputing Centre. Selling a quantum computer system differs radically from providing quantum-computing-as- service, explained D-Wave CEO Alan Baratz, noted my Forbes post. More organizations want to buy D-Wave's machines. How so? 'Three other super computing centers want to own our systems,' Baratz told me in a March 27 interview. That could be because D-Wave's systems are proving measurable business value. NTT Docomo is using the technology to optimize cell tower resources — reducing the time to accomplish this optimization from 25 hours to minutes and enabling the cellphone services provider to increase by 15% the number of cell phone calls it can process per tower, Baratz explained. In May, D-Wave reported strong customer interest in the company's products. 'We're seeing a very, very healthy sales pipeline,' D-Wave Chief Financial Officer John Markovich said in a May 8 investor conference call. Since the prospects include 'a fair number of larger organizations, including a number of Forbes Global 2000 companies,' he added, the potential revenue from these companies is significant despite a longer sales cycle than is required for D-Wave QCaaS business. D-Wave sees its annealing approach to QC as superior to IBM and Google's gate-based QC technology. 'We do annealing,' Thom told me. 'We use quantum effects to perform calculations that are too hard for classical computers. We use the resources of the quantum effect to move between better solutions more quickly. We plan for moving from good to better solutions.' D-Wave sees a significant flaw in the gates-base approach. 'An alternative QC solution — gates — uses quantum to store interim solutions more effectively,' he explained. QCs are imperfect. If there is an error causing a loss of the quantum state, a classical computer can take over the solution-finding process. 'When the superhighway closes, you take the off ramp to a side road (classical),' Thom added. Annealing is able to recover from such an error more quickly. 'This allows the QC to relax so it can return to its quantum state. With annealing, you can continue solving the problem from the point of loss; with gates, you have to start back from the beginning,' he concluded. D-Wave is also excited about QC and artificial intelligence. 'Japan Tobacco is using it to do drug discovery more effectively,' he explained. Another client is saving thousands of scheduling hours using D-Wave's services. 'Paddison Food Group is using QC to schedule employees in a grocery stores,' he told me. 'Currently that is being done by senior people. It is hard to train others to produce a high quality schedule. QC makes it easier to schedule and save 50,000 hours of annual scheduling time which enables senior people to spend more time training younger ones and opens the imagination for new ideas,' added Thom. Why Ibm And Google May Surpass D-Wave IBM, Google and others could surpass D-Wave. 'Customer growth and recurring revenue remain weak for D-Wave, while peers are landing larger, multi-year contracts and integrating into cloud ecosystems.' according to SeekingAlpha. 'Given limited adoption, relentless dilution, and existential technology risk, I expect QBTS to underperform quantum peers and tech indices over the next 12-24 months,' SeekingAlpha wrote. Gate-based quantum platforms are surpassing D-Wave's annealing approach. How so? IBM, Google, and IonQ 'are scaling qubit counts and lowering error rates at a pace that is compressing the available headroom for annealing-only systems. IBM's publicly detailed roadmap targets fault-tolerant machines with thousands of logical qubits by 2029, while Google's latest Willow chip advances the company's own million-qubit ambitions later in the decade,' reported SeekingAlpha . Theoretically, these platforms can do more than annealers. Gate-based platforms can 'execute algorithm families such as Shor's and Grover's that annealers cannot, opening far larger addressable markets in cryptography, quantum chemistry and machine learning,' added SeekingAlpha . Meanwhile, D-Wave's operating losses make the company dependent on selling stock. 'Less than two weeks ago the company filed for an additional $400 million shelf registration, signaling that equity issuance will remain a primary liquidity lever,' noted SeekingAlpha . Does D-Wave's $12.2 million Julich contract represent a new wave of even larger deals or is it unlikely to recur? Investors may wish to consider the possibility of annealing targeting a smaller opportunity. 'If the gate-based cohort crosses the million-qubit threshold with effective error correction, annealing risks being crowded out of research budgets and customer mindshare, D-Wave could become a boutique optimization tool rather than a broadly useful platform,' concluded SeekingAlpha . MIT expresses guarded optimism for QC. 'People need to understand whether QC is useful for what they want to achieve,' Kiesow said. 'Which issues are you trying to solve? QC can be good at solving complex problems and try to solve them faster. It can do simulations. QC could pose a potential threat to encryption because it can search so many options at once to crack the encryption,' she added. Moreover, MIT expects hybrid computing systems combining QC and classical computers. 'Companies will use a hybrid version with classical and QC for optimization problems,' she said. While QC could be used to train large language models more efficiently, MIT does not see it being used for consumer-related applications. 'A cloud-like system is the most popular way,' she explained. 'QC could be used to speed up large language model training. We are working on QC versions that won't need super-cooling to make it more efficient and sustainable. Consumer-related services are not the focus of the industry,' she concluded. Although D-Wave's price target implies roughly 19% upside, according to TipRanks , I think the company's second quarter earnings report will reveal whether the company is really on a roll. If D-Wave's Q2 report reveals expectations-beating growth and prospects, the shares will keep rising. Otherwise, the company's share price could keep falling. In short, it seems too early to identify clear QC winners and losers. Nevertheless, there is growth potential in the industry so perhaps a diversified portfolio of stocks — including IonQ — could be a prudent way to bet on that potential.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Quantum Threat: Bitcoin's Fight To Secure Our Digital Future
Will Bitcoin lead the fight against quantum computing to secure our digital future? Leeor Shimron Crypto thrives on cutting-edge technology, but quantum computing could challenge the cryptographic foundations that keep Bitcoin secure. As quantum advancements accelerate, concerns about risks to Bitcoin's blockchain are growing, but the threat extends far beyond crypto. Banking, payments, communications, and other critical industries face similar vulnerabilities, making quantum resilience a global imperative. Could Bitcoin developers, incentivized by a $2 trillion honey pot, lead the charge in pioneering quantum-resistant protections? Let's explore the quantum landscape, assess its impact on Bitcoin and society, and examine the proactive steps being taken to safeguard our digital future. The Quantum Leap: Where We Stand Today Quantum computing is no longer science fiction. Unlike classical computers, which process bits as 0s or 1s, quantum computers use quantum bits, or qubits, which can exist in multiple states simultaneously due to superposition and entanglement. This enables quantum machines to tackle complex problems, like cracking cryptographic codes, at unprecedented speeds. As of mid-2025, quantum computing is still in its adolescence. Google's Willow chip, a 105-qubit processor, made waves in 2024 by reducing error rates, a critical step toward scalable quantum systems. IBM is pushing for a 1,000-qubit chip by 2026 and aims for a million-qubit system by the early 2030s. Other players, like PsiQuantum, Intel, and QuEra Computing, are advancing, with PsiQuantum targeting a million-qubit photonic chip within a similar timeframe. These companies, alongside academic and government initiatives, are driving progress, but we're far from the millions of fault-tolerant qubits needed to break robust cryptographic systems like Bitcoin's. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) estimates that quantum computers capable of threatening current cryptographic standards won't emerge until the 2030s at the earliest. Significant hurdles in error correction and hardware stability remain, keeping practical, large-scale quantum computers a decade or more away. The Risk to Bitcoin: Cracking the Cryptographic Code Bitcoin's security rests on two cryptographic pillars: the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) for securing wallets and SHA-256 for mining and transaction integrity. These are rock-solid against classical computers, but quantum algorithms like Shor's and Grover's pose theoretical threats. Shor's algorithm could exponentially speed up factoring large numbers and discrete logarithm problems, potentially allowing a quantum computer to derive private keys from public keys. This would compromise Bitcoin wallets, particularly older Pay-to-Public-Key (P2PK) and reused Pay-to-Public-Key-Hash (P2PKH) addresses that expose public keys. A 2022 Deloitte study estimated that 25% of Bitcoin's supply (roughly 4 million BTC, worth over $500 billion at current prices) could be vulnerable. Dormant wallets, like those attributed to Bitcoin's pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto, are especially at risk due to exposed public keys. Grover's algorithm, while less severe, could halve SHA-256's security strength, potentially giving quantum-equipped miners an edge in solving proof-of-work puzzles. This could centralize mining power, threatening Bitcoin's decentralized ethos, though the network's difficulty adjustment would likely mitigate short-term disruptions. A worst-case 'Q-Day' scenario, where a quantum computer cracks ECDSA en masse, could flood the market with stolen Bitcoin, eroding trust and potentially crashing its price. Experts like Jameson Lopp, CTO of Casa, warn that such an event could be catastrophic, though it remains a remote possibility. Timeframe: A Decade of Breathing Room? Bitcoin has time to prepare. Current quantum computers, like Google's Willow, are nowhere near the estimated 13–300 million qubits needed to crack ECDSA in a practical timeframe. IBM's roadmap suggests a few thousand qubits by 2033, still orders of magnitude short. Most experts peg the quantum threat to Bitcoin as at least a decade away, likely into the 2030s or beyond, given the engineering challenges of building fault-tolerant systems. However, some optimistic projections suggest Bitcoin could face risks within five years if quantum advancements dramatically outpace expectations. This view, driven by claims like Google's Craig Gidney's estimate of breaking RSA with fewer qubits, is a minority opinion and considered unlikely for Bitcoin's stronger ECDSA cryptography. More immediate is the 'harvest now, decrypt later' threat, where adversaries collect encrypted data today, like transaction data from dormant wallets, for future decryption, adding urgency to securing vulnerable addresses. Mitigation Strategies: Building a Quantum-Resistant Bitcoin The Bitcoin community is proactively addressing these risks. Here are the key strategies: Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC): NIST has been standardizing quantum-resistant algorithms since 2016, with lattice-based cryptography (e.g., Dilithium, Falcon) and hash-based signatures (e.g., SPHINCS+, Lamport) as frontrunners. These rely on mathematical problems quantum computers struggle to solve. NIST has been standardizing quantum-resistant algorithms since 2016, with lattice-based cryptography (e.g., Dilithium, Falcon) and hash-based signatures (e.g., SPHINCS+, Lamport) as frontrunners. These rely on mathematical problems quantum computers struggle to solve. Soft Forks and Hybrid Models: Transitioning Bitcoin to PQC will likely involve a soft fork to introduce quantum-resistant signatures, such as Schnorr-based schemes with enhanced security. Proposals like QuBit, introduced by Bitcoin developer Hunter Beast, aim to integrate post-quantum public keys. Hybrid approaches, combining classical and quantum-resistant cryptography, could ensure backward compatibility during the transition. Transitioning Bitcoin to PQC will likely involve a soft fork to introduce quantum-resistant signatures, such as Schnorr-based schemes with enhanced security. Proposals like QuBit, introduced by Bitcoin developer Hunter Beast, aim to integrate post-quantum public keys. Hybrid approaches, combining classical and quantum-resistant cryptography, could ensure backward compatibility during the transition. Quantum-Resistant Address Migration Protocol (QRAMP): Conceptual proposals like QRAMP encourage users to move funds from vulnerable P2PK and P2PKH addresses to quantum-safe formats. While still in early discussion and lacking formal implementation, such protocols could protect existing funds, though they may increase transaction sizes and require community consensus. Conceptual proposals like QRAMP encourage users to move funds from vulnerable P2PK and P2PKH addresses to quantum-safe formats. While still in early discussion and lacking formal implementation, such protocols could protect existing funds, though they may increase transaction sizes and require community consensus. Best Practices for Users: Bitcoin holders can reduce risks by avoiding address reuse, using multisignature wallets, and storing assets in cold storage. These practices minimize public key exposure, making wallets harder to exploit even if quantum capabilities emerge. Bitcoin holders can reduce risks by avoiding address reuse, using multisignature wallets, and storing assets in cold storage. These practices minimize public key exposure, making wallets harder to exploit even if quantum capabilities emerge. Community Vigilance: Bitcoin's open-source community is its strength. Initiatives like Project Eleven's Q-Day Prize, offering 1 BTC to anyone who can crack an ECC key using Shor's algorithm, are stress-testing vulnerabilities and accelerating PQC adoption. The Bigger Picture: A Threat to Society's Digital Backbone Quantum computing's impact extends far beyond Bitcoin, threatening the cryptographic systems that underpin modern life. Banking relies on RSA and ECC for secure transactions, from wire transfers to credit card payments. A quantum breakthrough could expose bank accounts and financial systems to fraud, potentially disrupting global markets. Payment networks like Visa and Swift, which process trillions annually, depend on similar cryptography, and a 'Q-Day' breach could halt transactions or erode consumer trust. Communications platforms, such as TLS/SSL for secure browsing, VPNs, and encrypted messaging apps like Signal, face vulnerabilities, risking data breaches or surveillance on an unprecedented scale. Critical infrastructure, including healthcare systems storing sensitive patient data and government networks securing classified information, is equally at risk. The scale of the threat is staggering. The 2023 EY Quantum Approach to Cybersecurity report, citing a Forrester study, estimates a 50%-70% chance that quantum computers could break current cryptographic systems within 5 to 30 years, implying that a majority of global digital transactions relying on asymmetric cryptography (e.g., RSA, ECC) are vulnerable. National Security Memorandum 10 mandates U.S. federal systems transition to PQC by 2035, a timeline Bitcoin developers are likely to align with. Unlike centralized systems, which face bureaucratic delays, Bitcoin's decentralized governance and $2 trillion market cap create unique incentives. This massive 'honey pot' motivates developers to pioneer quantum-resistant solutions, potentially setting a standard for other industries. Projects like QuBit and QRL demonstrate that crypto can lead the way, leveraging open-source collaboration to deploy PQC faster than banks or governments. For investors, quantum risks are on the radar. BlackRock's 2025 filing for its Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) flagged quantum computing as a long-term concern, signaling institutional awareness. Bitcoin's adaptability gives it an edge, but transitioning to PQC could spark debates over block size, transaction throughput, and network upgrades—issues that have historically divided the community. The Path Forward: Preparedness, Not Panic Bitcoin's resilience lies in its ability to evolve. The Y2K crisis showed that tech systems can adapt to existential threats with coordinated effort, and Bitcoin's quantum challenge is no different. The community has a window, likely 10–15 years or even longer, to implement quantum-resistant solutions. Developers are laying the groundwork, and users can take immediate steps to secure assets. The real risk isn't quantum computing but complacency. Bitcoin developers, spurred by a $2 trillion incentive, are uniquely positioned to lead the charge in quantum-resistant cryptography, potentially creating best-in-class protections that banks, payment processors, and governments could emulate. As David Carvalho of Naoris Protocol noted, 'Satoshi gave the world a new monetary system but never said it couldn't evolve.' By embracing PQC, fostering consensus, and staying vigilant, Bitcoin can weather the quantum storm and set a precedent for a quantum-safe digital world.
