China bans Wells Fargo banker from leaving the country
Chinese authorities said Monday the exit ban placed on Wells Fargo executive Chenyue Mao is part of a criminal investigation.
'Ms. Mao Chenyue is involved in a criminal case being handled by Chinese authorities, who have lawfully imposed exit restrictions on her,' Guo Jiakun, a spokesperson for the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said Monday following a regular press conference.
It's not clear the target of the criminal case, nor how Mao is believed to be linked to it.
'According to Chinese law, the case is under investigation, and Ms. Mao is temporarily unable to leave the country and is obligated to cooperate with the investigation,' the spokesperson for China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said. 'During the investigation, the authorities will ensure that her legal rights are protected.'
Mao has been employed by Wells Fargo since 2012, according to her LinkedIn profile.
Born in Shanghai and based in Atlanta, Mao leads Wells Fargo's international factoring business and advises multinational companies on cross-border capital strategies, according to FCI, a global network of companies formerly known as the Factors Chain International. Mao was recently elected to be the chairwoman of FCI.
'We are closely tracking this situation and working through the appropriate channels so our employee can return to the United States as soon as possible,' Wells Fargo told CNN in a statement.
Wells Fargo has since suspended all travel to China, according to The Wall Street Journal, which first reported news of Mao being blocked from leaving the country. The bank declined to comment further on the incident.
An automated response on Monday from Mao's email indicates she is overseas.
'Traveling international on business with time difference, may delay in responses, will respond as soon as I'm able to,' the automated response said.
News of the exit ban placed on the Wells Fargo banker comes as a Chinese American man working for the Commerce Department has been prevented from leaving the country, according to the Washington Post.
The Commerce Department employee, working in the agency's Patent and Trademark Office, was visiting family in China several months ago and failed to disclose on his visa application that he worked for the US government, the Post reported.
The Commerce Department referred CNN's inquiries to the US State Department. The State Department did not respond to a request for comment on the Commerce employee or the Wells Fargo banker.
The State Department currently has a 'level 2' travel advisory for China, indicating Americans should 'exercise increased caution' when traveling to Mainland China due to 'arbitrary enforcement of local laws, including in relation to exit bans.'
The incidents are likely to raise concern in C-Suites and among boards of directors about the risks of visiting China.
'This has everyone jittery again, nervous about traveling,' Sam Stein, president of the US-China Business Council, told CNN in a phone interview on Monday.
Stein, who previously worked as a US diplomat in China and advised companies on China matters at the law firm Covington and Burling, said Western companies are often in the dark about the reasons behind exit bans imposed by China.
'This could have a chilling effect on executive travel to China – unless China can be more transparent,' Stein said. 'China has a small window. Now is the time to come out and explain the circumstances where someone can be placed on an exit ban. China really needs to step up.'
Jiakun, the Chinese Ministry of Finance spokesperson, stressed that both Chinese citizens and foreigners 'must abide by' Chinese law while inside the country.
'This is an individual judicial case, and China will continue to welcome people from all countries to visit and do business, while upholding their rights in accordance with the law,' the spokesperson said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why markets are tuning out new US–China trade headlines
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent will be meeting with Chinese officials next week to extend trade talks past the August 12 deadline (the deadline for other countries is August 1). Meanwhile, markets (^GSPC, ^IXIC, ^DJI) continue to brush off fresh trade headlines. Yahoo Finance Reporter Josh Schafer joins Morning Brief to explain why markets want action, not vague promises. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Morning Brief here. Josh, um, we do have these new trade headlines this morning that in theory should be positive ones for the market with Treasury Secretary Scott Beson saying he's gonna meet with Chinese counterparts in Stockholm next week, next Monday and Tuesday, to talk about uh further negotiating, maybe extending past an August 12th deadline. That's the different deadline for China. And you know, if this headline had dropped maybe even a month ago, we would have seen maybe more of a positive reaction in the markets. We did. Gradually. So what we're seeing this morning, it seems to be really just a continuation of a recent trend that we've sort of been following and writing a bit about over the past month or so, which is markets just aren't moving that much on trade deal headlines, on trade news, whether it be Trump sending a letter or some news like we're getting this morning. So the team over at Goldman Sachs, David Costin and his equity strategy team actually analyzed how the S&P 500 has been reacting to different headlines. You can see in the top there, so the S&P 500 is in green, a basket of tariff risk related stocks is in purple. Of course, that tariff risk related bucket has moved a lot more over the past couple months, right? You can see that big 11% move, 11% drop on Liberation day. But what's interesting to point out here is the bottom two categories. So tariff letters, and then also other information that came out on July 13th. You saw the tariff basket only move 1% on one of those, 0% on the next one, the S&P 500 basically didn't move on either of those days either. So what we're learning right now, it seems to be at least from what the market's telling us, is the talk of deals and sort of this abstract nature of we're not really sure what's happening is no longer moving the market. If you do think what moved the market out of China a couple weeks ago, it was Nvidia, perhaps being cleared to sell those H20 chips again, right? Some tangible fundamental news that we can understand how it would help the company. But the high-level broad stroke, we're planning on speaking, we're maybe getting closer to a deal. That just isn't impacting the markets the way it was in April and in May. Related Videos Bessent Calls for Review of Fed's Building Renovations 'Magnificent 7' stocks, US dollar falls, ether nears $4k: Takeaways Markets are strong, but a 'trigger' could create volatility soon S&P 500 eyes new record, Opendoor skyrockets, Bruker plummets Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Microsoft knew of SharePoint server exploit but failed to effectively patch it
By James Pearson LONDON (Reuters) -A security patch released by Microsoft last month failed to fully fix a critical flaw in U.S. tech giant's SharePoint server software that had been identified in May, opening the door to a sweeping global cyber espionage operation. It remains unclear who is behind the ongoing operation, which targeted around 100 organisations over the weekend. But Alphabet's Google, which has visibility into wide swathes of internet traffic, said it tied at least some of the hacks to a "China-nexus threat actor". The Chinese Embassy in Washington did not respond to a Reuters request for comment. Chinese government-linked operatives are regularly implicated in cyberattacks, but Beijing routinely denies carrying out hacking operations. Contacted on Tuesday, Microsoft was not immediately able to provide comment on the patch and its effectiveness. The vulnerability that facilitated the attack was first identified in May at a hacking competition in Berlin organised by cybersecurity firm Trend Micro, which offered cash bounties for the discovery of computer bugs in popular software. It offered a $100,000 prize for "zero day" exploits - so called because they leverage previously undisclosed digital weaknesses - that could be used against SharePoint, Microsoft's flagship document management and collaboration platform. A researcher working for the cybersecurity arm of Viettel, a telecommunications firm operated by Vietnam's military, identified a SharePoint bug at the event, dubbed it 'ToolShell' and demonstrated a method of exploiting it. The researcher was awarded $100,000 for the discovery, according to a post on X by Trend Micro's "Zero Day Initiative". A spokesperson for Trend Micro did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment regarding the competition on Tuesday. Microsoft subsequently said in a July 8 security update that it had identified the bug, listed it as a critical vulnerability, and released patches to fix it. Around 10 days later, however, cybersecurity firms started to notice an influx of malicious online activity targeting the same software the bug sought to exploit: SharePoint servers. "Threat actors subsequently developed exploits that appear to bypass these patches," British cybersecurity firm Sophos said in a blog post on Monday. The pool of potential ToolShell targets remains vast. According to data from Shodan, a search engine that helps to identify internet-linked equipment, over 8,000 servers online could theoretically have already been compromised by hackers. The Shadowserver Foundation, which scans the internet for potential digital vulnerabilities, put the number at a little more than 9,000, while cautioning that the figure was a minimum. Those servers include major industrial firms, banks, auditors, healthcare companies, and several U.S. state-level and international government entities.
Newsweek
4 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Senators Demand Answers as Delta Plans to Price More Tickets Based on What AI Thinks You'll Pay
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Three U.S. senators are demanding answers over Delta Air Lines' planned expansion to use artificial intelligence to set individualized fares — insisting the strategy is fraught with privacy concerns. Sens. Ruben Gallego, Richard Blumenthal and Mark Warner, all Democrats, sent a letter Monday to the Atlanta-based airline seeking additional details of plans to deploy AI-based revenue management technology across 20 percent of its domestic network in a matter of months. "Individualized pricing, or surveillance-based price setting, eliminates a fixed or static price in favor of prices that are tailored to an individual consumer's willingness to pay," the senators wrote to Delta in a letter obtained by Newsweek. "Delta's current and planned individualized pricing practices not only present data privacy concerns, but will also likely mean fare price increases up to each individual consumer's personal 'pain point' at a time when American families are already struggling with rising costs." A Delta Air Lines plane at the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, on April 9, 2025. A Delta Air Lines plane at the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, on April 9, Air Lines President Glen William Hauenstein told reporters during a July 10 earnings call that roughly 3 percent of the airline's domestic ticket prices are already set using AI, with hopes to reach 20 percent by the end of 2025. "So, we're in heavy testing phase," Hauenstein said. "We like what we see. We like it a lot and we're continuing to roll it out. But we're going to take our time and make sure that the rollout is successful, as opposed to trying to rush it and risk that there are unwanted answers in there." Hauenstein also praised Delta's partnership with Fetcherr, an Israel-based tech company that employs AI to process "millions of data points instantly," according to its website. "The convergence of AI, machine learning and real-time data processing completely transforms how airlines approach pricing strategy," a post on dynamic pricing in aviation reads. "Gone are the days of rigid pricing rules and manual adjustments. Welcome to the era of true dynamic pricing, where artificial intelligence can process millions of data points instantly to set the perfect price every time. Welcome to the modern age of AI dynamic pricing." But the approach is problematic, according to Gallego and his Democratic colleagues. Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., arrives for a vote in the Capitol on May 13, 2025. Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., arrives for a vote in the Capitol on May 13, 2025. Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call via AP Images "The implications for individual consumer privacy are severe on their own," they wrote Delta. "Surveillance pricing has been shown to utilize extensive personal information obtained through a variety of third-party channels, including data about a passenger's purchase history, web browsing behavior, geolocation, social media activity, biometric data, and financial status." Customers also have no way of knowing what data and personal information will be collected by Delta and Fetcherr, or how the airfare algorithm will be trained, according to the senators. "Prices could be dictated not by supply and demand, but by individual need," the letter continued. "While Delta has stated that the airline will 'maintain strict safeguards to ensure compliance with federal law,' your company has not shared what those safeguards are or how you plan to protect American families against pricing discrimination in the evolving AI landscape." The senators want a response by August 4, including details about the data Delta uses to train its revenue management system algorithm for setting customized prices for fares or other products, as well as how many passengers per day are currently purchasing fares set or informed by the customized model. Chelsea Wollerson, a Delta spokesperson, said the company had no immediate response to the letter early Tuesday. "There is no fare product Delta has ever used, is testing, or plans to use that targets customers with individualized offers based on personal information or otherwise," the airline told Newsweek in a statement late Monday. "A variety of market forces drive the dynamic pricing model that's been used in the global industry for decades, with new tech simply streamlining this process. Delta always complies with regulations around pricing and disclosures."
