
Agility Amid Market Shifts: Leading With Holistic Solutions In 2025
Mike Vietri is Chief Distribution Officer for AmeriLife, a national leader in distributing and marketing insurance and financial solutions.
getty
Change isn't slowing down. If anything, it's speeding up. And in 2025, we're dealing with more than just new rules or regulations. We're seeing big shifts in what consumers expect, how products perform and where market demand is headed.
I've seen firsthand how staying ahead of those shifts can be the difference between barely keeping up and breaking through. When you give your teams the tools to respond early—whether that means adjusting to new product trends or helping clients rethink their financial goals—they start moving with confidence, not hesitation.
Here are a few things we've done that might help you do the same.
It's one thing to tell your team to adapt; it's another to teach them how. That's why we've emphasized education—not just generic training, but real-time, practical learning that helps people stay sharp when the market starts to move.
Take annuities, for example. When the momentum started to shift from Fixed Indexed Annuities (FIAs) to Multi-Year Guaranteed Annuities (MYGAs), we saw it coming. Instead of sitting back and watching, we doubled down on helping our producers understand how to use laddered solutions to meet client needs in the new environment. That shift gave them a strategic edge, not just a reaction.
The same goes for cross-selling. We didn't just encourage it; we taught our producers how to identify client needs outside the obvious. Helping clients starts with seeing their full financial picture, not just stacking products on a shelf.
If you're trying to build a more responsive team, this is where I'd start. Help them read the market. Help them connect the dots for their clients. The more they understand the "why" behind a shift, the better they'll be at turning it into a win.
There's no shortage of tools out there. But if your team isn't using them to spot trends, move faster or improve conversations with clients, you're not getting much return.
We've invested in tech that makes life easier—platforms that help producers track what clients care about and tools that give them insight into where the market's headed next. What truly matters isn't the platform itself but how it helps your team pivot, adapt and serve with greater precision.
In my view, technology should help you move with purpose. The goal isn't to chase trends or check a digital transformation box. It's to give you the speed and insight to make better decisions faster. When you can act before the competition sees the shift coming, you can gain real ground.
There's no shortage of M&A activity in this industry. But the partnerships that work—the ones that drive value—are those that feel like extensions of your mission, not just your balance sheet.
We've had the most success when we focus on strategic fit. Does this partnership give us better tools? Reach new clients? Help us serve more holistically? If the answer is yes, we move forward.
If you're clear about your long-term goals, you won't get distracted by flashy opportunities that may not help you grow. In a cautious market, thoughtful expansion can still be the smartest play in the book.
The last few years have made one thing very clear: You can't rely too heavily on any one channel, product or market. At AmeriLife, we've worked hard to build out both our health and wealth offerings, and it's made a difference. When one side slows, the other usually picks up. That balance helps us keep moving forward even when the market gets shaky.
But it's not just about what you offer—it's how fast you can adapt. The teams that are trained to shift gears when needed—not panic, but actually adjust—are the ones that keep winning.
If you're trying to build something resilient, I'd say this: Spread out your risk and make sure your team has the confidence and support to change course when the market demands it.
When things are uncertain, the worst thing you can do is go quiet. People need clarity. They need direction. And, sometimes, they just need to know someone's paying attention.
We've always tried to be upfront with our teams, clients and partners. When regulations start to shift or the market gets turbulent, we hold calls and meetings. We share what we know, what we don't and what we're doing about it.
That kind of communication does more than reduce anxiety. It builds trust. It reminds people they're not navigating things alone and keeps everyone focused on what they can control. You don't need all the answers to be a good communicator. You just need to show up, be honest and keep showing up.
Things are changing. They always are. But if I've learned anything, it's that the strongest teams aren't the ones waiting for certainty but rather those that act with purpose when things are still unclear.
Whether you're focused on educating your team, investing in tech, expanding thoughtfully or communicating with more intention, take the steps now. Don't wait until the dust settles.
If you do it right, you won't just make it through the next wave of change. You'll be better positioned, more trusted and more capable on the other side.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Tax Bill Hits Senate With GOP Torn by Competing Demands
(Bloomberg) -- Senate Majority Leader John Thune is rushing to meet President Donald Trump's July 4 deadline for pushing through his massive tax and spending bill, but first he has to work through a list of approximately eight Republican senators who have expressed opposition to portions of it. Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined Sprawl Is Still Not the Answer Mapping the Architectural History of New York's Chinatown Sao Paulo Pushes Out Favela Residents, Drug Users to Revive Its City Center Within the next two days, he needs to find a way to appease most of them. The South Dakota Republican has one of the least enviable jobs in Washington in the coming hours — trying to knit a compromise between factions of his party: one side pushing for more spending cuts in the legislation and senators who are threatening to withhold their support unless there is more funding for health benefits, renewable energy subsidies and other priorities. Thune can afford to lose only three his 53 members in the chamber, with Vice President JD Vance breaking the tie. Trump is closely watching the talks, quick to issue a harsh social media broadside to anyone who criticize his signature tax-cut legislation. Just ask North Carolina Senator Thom Tillis, one of two Republicans who voted against a late-night Saturday procedural vote to begin debate on the legislation. Trump unleashed a series of scathing posts, threatening to primary Tillis. The president took personal swipes, calling him a 'talker and complainer, NOT A DOER!' before also getting in a jab at Rand Paul, the other GOP senator to oppose the vote to advance the bill. Tillis on Sunday announced he wouldn't be running for reelection, a decision that unshackles him from any need to show fidelity to Trump to preserve his political career. He's indicated he's likely to oppose the bill. Paul has said he is also likely to vote 'no' on the legislation based on the price tag and the inclusion of a $5 trillion debt ceiling increase. If both Tillis and Paul remain in opposition, Thune can only lose one more. Polls show that Americans are wary of the bill. A recent Pew Research survey found that 49% of Americans oppose the bill, while 29% supported it. Some 21% weren't sure what to think. Republicans in Congress broadly support the $4.5 trillion worth of tax cuts in the package, which extend the 2017 tax cuts and create new breaks for tipped and hourly workers, along with seniors and car buyers. But the $1.2 trillion worth of spending cuts have created numerous problems. Moderates including Tillis, Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska are pushing to scale back cuts to Medicaid benefits, warning that those reductions could come at a great political cost if millions of Americans lose health coverage as a result of the bill. Some 11.8 million people could lose access to insurance benefits over the course of a decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office's most recent estimate. Murkowski and Tillis have also called to slow down planned phaseouts of solar, wind and other renewable energy credits that have spurred job creation in their states. Those asks are in direct opposition to demands from Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and others to bake in more Medicaid cuts in a bid to shrink the overall price tag of the bill. He says Rick Scott of Florida, Mike Lee of Utah and Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming will join with him to back an amendment to include faster health coverage cuts during an a marathon voting session slated to start late Sunday or early Monday. Trump has not delved into the details of the legislation. Instead, the president has pushed for speed, demanding that Congress deliver the bill to him by July 4. The House will also need to vote on the Senate-passed version before it can go the president's desk to be signed into law. Meeting the July 4 deadline is ambitious — but possible if Republican leaders can successfully navigate thorny fights. Senators are expected to remain in the Capitol Sunday into Monday for an overnight voting session. Final passage of the bill could come sometime Monday if Thune is able to cut deals with enough senators for passage. The House then will need to vote on the Senate package. That likely means Speaker Mike Johnson will have to wrangle House Republicans to support the Senate package. Several members have already signaled they aren't satisfied with aspects of the bill, but any further changes likely mean missing Trump's July 4 deadline and risking his ire. America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Apple Test-Drives Big-Screen Movie Strategy With F1 ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
FedEx Corporation (FDX): Keep An Eye On Global Tensions, Warns Jim Cramer
FedEx Corporation (NYSE:FDX) is one of the . FedEx Corporation (NYSE:FDX) is one of the biggest freight and logistics companies in the world. Its shares are dependent on global and American economic performance. Year-to-date, FedEx Corporation (NYSE:FDX)'s shares have lost 16.5% on the back of a devastating 19% drop in the aftermath of the Liberation Day tariffs. Cramer's previous comments about the company have discussed how its business-to-business operations are failing to perform. However, despite this, the CNBC host prefers FedEx Corporation (NYSE:FDX) over its rival UPS. Cramer also likes the firm's CEO. His latest remarks urged viewers to keep an eye on President Trump's anger towards Spain and how it could affect global logistics companies like FedEx Corporation (NYSE:FDX): 'I wanna keep an eye on that, because I know that a company like FedEx, I mean cross border's really, really huge.' A driver unloading packages from a van for a time-critical delivery. Here's what Cramer said after FedEx Corporation (NYSE:FDX)'s latest earnings results: 'Third loser, freight transportation. Truckers can't seem to make their numbers. The railroad stocks can't get any momentum. FedEx showed you how hard this business is when they reported last night. Their business-to-business service has been stuck in neutral, even as the business-to-consumer side is okay, but FedEx hasn't been able to make the Street's numbers. I think we've got some opportunity here, though. FedEx has cut its capital expenditures and chopped its expenses. It's a coiled spring. I like coiled springs, but understand that it won't spring until we see how the tariffs shake out, because so much of the business involves import-export. Until then, spring stays coiled.' While we acknowledge the potential of FDX as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US Senate pushes ahead on Trump tax cuts as nonpartisan analysis raises price tag
By Bo Erickson and Phil Stewart WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Senate version of President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill will add $3.3 trillion to the nation's debt, about $800 billion more than the version passed last month by the House of Representatives, a nonpartisan forecaster said on Sunday. The Congressional Budget Office issued its estimate of the bill's hit to the $36.2 trillion federal debt as Senate Republicans sought to push the bill forward in a marathon weekend session. Republicans, who have long voiced concern about growing U.S. deficits and debt, have rejected the CBO's longstanding methodology to calculate the cost of legislation. But Democrats hope the latest, eye-widening figure could stoke enough anxiety among fiscally-minded conservatives to get them to buck their party, which controls both chambers of Congress. The Senate only narrowly advanced the tax-cut, immigration, border and military spending bill in a procedural vote late on Saturday, voting 51-49 to open debate on the 940-page megabill. Trump on social media hailed Saturday's vote as a "great victory" for his "great, big, beautiful bill." In an illustration of the depths of the divide within the Republican Party over the bill, Senator Thom Tillis said he would not seek re-election next year, after Trump threatened to back a primary challenger in retribution for Tillis' Saturday night vote against the bill. Tillis' North Carolina seat is one of the few Republican Senate seats seen as vulnerable in next year's midterm elections. He was one of just two Republicans to vote no on Saturday. Trump wants the bill passed before the July 4 Independence Day holiday. While that deadline is one of choice, lawmakers will face a far more serious deadline later this summer when they must raise the nation's self-imposed debt ceiling or risk a devastating default on $36.2 trillion in debt. 'We are going to make sure hardworking people can keep more of their money,' Senator Katie Britt, an Alabama Republican, told CNN's State of the Union on Sunday. HITS TO BENEFITS Senator Mark Warner, a Democrat from Virginia, said this legislation would come to haunt Republicans if it gets approved, predicting 16 million Americans would lose their health insurance. "Many of my Republican friends know ... they're walking the plank on this and we'll see if those who've expressed quiet consternation will actually have the courage of their convictions," Warner told CBS News' "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan." The legislation has been the sole focus of a marathon weekend congressional session marked by political drama, division and lengthy delays as Democrats seek to slow the legislation's path to passage. Top Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer called for the entire text of the bill to be read on the Senate floor, a process that began before midnight Saturday and ran well into Sunday afternoon. Following that lawmakers will begin up to 20 hours of debate on the legislation. That will be followed by an amendment session, known as a "vote-a-rama," before the Senate votes on passage. Lawmakers said they hoped to complete work on the bill on Monday. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, the other Republican "no" vote, opposed the legislation because it would raise the federal borrowing limit by an additional $5 trillion. "Did Rand Paul Vote 'NO' again tonight? What's wrong with this guy???" Trump said on social media. The megabill would extend the 2017 tax cuts that were Trump's main legislative achievement during his first term as president, cut other taxes and boost spending on the military and border security. Representative Michael McCaul, however, warned that fellow Republicans who do not back Trump on the bill could face payback from voters. "They know that their jobs are at risk. Not just from the president, but from the voting -- the American people. Our base back home will not reelect us to office if we vote no on this," McCaul also told CBS News. Senate Republicans, who reject the CBO's estimates on the cost of the legislation, are set on using an alternative calculation method that does not factor in costs from extending the 2017 tax cuts. Outside tax experts, like Andrew Lautz from the nonpartisan think tank Bipartisan Policy Center, call it a "magic trick." Using this calculation method, the Senate Republicans' budget bill appears to cost substantially less and seems to save $500 billion, according to the BPC analysis. If the Senate passes the bill, it will then return to the House of Representatives for final passage before Trump can sign it into law. The House passed its version of the bill last month. (Writing by Phil Stewart; Editing by Scott Malone and Chris Reese)