Villa Maria adds fatal cancer warning label on bottles sold in Ireland
'Consumers will likely take note of the new labels in Ireland as it's a significant change across all alcoholic products but it's too soon to understand the ongoing impact on purchasing decisions.'
Photos of Villa Maria wines featuring the warning labels were sent to advocacy groups in New Zealand by Alcohol Action Ireland, as it rallies support to stave off an alcohol industry lobbying effort to stall the labels.
Sheila Gilheany, chief executive of Alcohol Action Ireland, wrote to alcohol harm reduction groups in New Zealand warning of a 'severe threat to Ireland's alcohol health information labelling regulations'.
Gilheany told RNZ that Ireland's alcohol industry had opposed the cancer warning labels and was now using fears about trade tariffs to call for a delay.
Irish media now expect the Government to defer the introduction of cancer warning labels until 2029.
Gilheany welcomed Villa Maria's acceptance of Ireland's labelling law and said winemakers from Australia and Spain had also been early adopters.
'They are assuming that the government is not going to turn its back on its own law. Why should it? But at the same time, we can see the pressure that the various sectors of the industry are placing on the government here in Ireland and seeking to have it postponed.'
Ireland had about 1000 alcohol-related cancers every year and one in eight breast cancer cases were linked to alcohol but awareness of those risks was low, she said.
Governments had to 'face down the lobbying' both locally and internationally, Gilheany said.
'We know that when Ireland goes ahead with this measure, particularly around the cancer warnings, it is likely that other nations will follow suit.'
Global push for warning labels
Dozens of health groups recently wrote to British Prime Minister Keir Starmer urging him to follow Ireland's lead.
The letter was co-ordinated by the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) which is calling for 'clear, plain, distinct and mandatory' cancer warning labels rather than ambiguous language such as 'drink responsibly'.
In January 2025, the US surgeon general said alcohol was a leading preventable cause of cancer and alcohol products should carry a warning label like cigarettes do.
Virginia Nicholls, executive director of the New Zealand Alcohol Beverages Council, said the industry did not support cancer warning labels.
'The level of health risk associated with alcohol is more complicated than a label can convey,' she said. 'Labelling does not take into account the difference between responsible and hazardous drinking. The best place to get information on any health concerns is from your doctor.'
Labels may raise awareness but did not change behaviour and called for policies to 'target the minority of people who are hazardous drinkers and not the large majority of Kiwis who are responsible drinkers'.
Nicholls said cancer risk was low when drinking at 'moderate levels' and claimed there were 'benefits of moderate alcohol consumption' including reduced risk of heart attacks, ischaemic strokes and diabetes.
But in a 2023 statement, the World Health Organisation said, 'when it comes to alcohol consumption, there is no safe amount that does not affect health'.
'There are no studies that would demonstrate that the potential beneficial effects of light and moderate drinking on cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes outweigh the cancer risk associated with these same levels of alcohol consumption for individual consumers.'
The WHO says alcohol was classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer decades ago. 'This is the highest risk group, which also includes asbestos, radiation and tobacco.'
Lisa Te Morenga, co-chair of Health Coalition Aotearoa, said New Zealanders were being kept in the dark.
'Most New Zealanders don't really realise that alcohol is a carcinogen,' she said. 'So while the Irish are having their awareness raised, our consumers are missing out.'
Act's Nicole McKee, the minister responsible for alcohol policy, is working on reform of the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act. She said her focus was on 'regulatory relief' to make business easier for retailers and hospitality venues and also on reducing alcohol-related harm.
'I have not yet received any advice regarding cancer warning labels on alcohol products,' she said. 'Cabinet has yet to make any decisions regarding any reforms.'
-RNZ
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Risks identified with Gumboot Friday's 'fee-for-service' model
Mental Health Minister Matt Doocey says the programme is meeting expectations. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Gumboot Friday's youth counselling initiative has had its $6m annual contract renewed , despite health officials identifying ongoing risks that practitioners could bill for services of poor quality or not delivered. Mental Health Minister Matt Doocey said the programme was meeting expectations, with more than 10,000 young people receiving free counselling in its first year, and the government was "backing Gumboot Friday to deliver more". A partially-redacted briefing to the Minister dated 30 May, released by the Health Ministry on Wednesday - along with [ other documents - noted "ongoing risk through this arrangement that practitioners invoice I Am Hope for services and do not deliver them". Some sections of the document were blanked out, citing the need to preserve "confidentiality of advice tendered by Ministers and officials". The briefing - which recommended the contract be renewed with some changes - noted the risk of non-delivery was no different to other "fee for service" arrangements. It said the charity had "significantly improved and streamlined some of its processes since the contract was developed". These included spot checking, auditing, client surveys and an electronic system to pick up "any unusual invoicing". "To date, I Am Hope [the parent charity of Gumboot Friday] has identified two practitioners that have departed from the agreed procedures and has removed them from the platform." In total there were more than 700 qualified counsellors registered on the platform. In the same section, entitled "Delivery Risks", Health Ministry officials wrote there was also a risk that Gumboot Friday's practitioners could "act unprofessionally" or fail to deliver quality service. A Ministry of Health weekly report said I Am Hope had "enhanced" its vetting process to include mandatory police checks for all practitioners registered before October 2024, and updated its Practitioner (Policies) Handbook in March. The charity now used CV Checker to speed up its verification process, but had limited ability to "scrutinise practice" since client and practitioner sessions had to remain private and confidential. All practitioners were members of professional associations, and the Ministry had not been advised of any complaints to date. Gumboot Friday and I Am Hope were working on evaluations of service delivery and the experiences of young people, while the Ministry was preparing an evaluation framework. In a preface to the documents, the Health Ministry said demographic information from I Am Hope's platform may have produced "potential double counting" of clients, as individuals reappeared across months. "It nevertheless provides additional information about the groups that are engaged in Gumboot Friday." The 30 May briefing said the Gumboot Friday service was "operationally different" to the original design. It recommended some changes to the contract, including increasing the number of sessions and clients, and removing some performance measures "which divert resources and create barriers to maximum performance". The officials advocated for scrapping the monthly limit of $500,000 (to allow for higher demand in some months) and current measures of reporting on wait times, which were not being consistently recorded as some young people contacted counsellors directly rather than going through the website. The original contract required Gumboot Friday to ensure most people could receive services "within 24 to 48 hours of seeking support with 3 to 5 days as a maximum wait time for the first meeting with the person" and provide monthly reporting of wait times. The latest report showed the average wait time for young people across January and February this year was 9.04 days, with 186 young people waiting more than five days. That was up from 5.78 days in November and December. "This increase was in part due to the holiday period in January 2025, however, the longer wait times persisted into February. I Am Hope has highlighted to practitioners the importance of responding promptly to service requests." The briefing also suggested the government could consider funding emergency and crisis referrals, and providing more cash to support evaluation and "verification activities".
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
Gumboot Friday secures Government funding through 2026 for mental health
'Over the next 12 months, the organisation will be looking at how it can scale up and encourage even more young people to access free counselling.' The Government last year committed $24 million over four years to the Gumboot Friday initiative. The Government last year committed $24 million over four years to the Gumboot Friday initiative, which was founded by mental health advocate Mike King. That was despite pressure from Labour at the time, who called on the Government to pause its funding of I Am Hope/Gumboot Friday following King's controversial comments on alcohol. 'Alcohol is not a problem for people with mental health issues. It's actually the solution to our problem, until you come up with a better solution,' King said at the time. The Drug Foundation rejected that, saying alcohol was 'really unhelpful during times of mental distress'. Mental Health Minister Matt Doocey. Photo / Mike Scott In November last year, Doocey responded, saying while he disagreed King was entitled to have his own opinion on alcohol's association with mental health, and he would not be asking the advocate to rein in his comments. On Thursday, Doocey said in the first 12 months of Government funding, Gumboot Friday had been able to deliver more than 30,000 free counselling sessions. 'They have supported more than 10,000 young New Zealanders who might not otherwise have access to timely support. The counselling service's procurement process had run into difficulties before. Last October, the Auditor-General criticised the Government's 'unusual and inconsistent' process in giving $24 million to King's initiative. The Government had announced the I Am Hope foundation would receive $6m a year for four years to provide counselling services to 5 to 25-year-olds, as part of the coalition agreement. But RNZ revealed health officials had struggled to find a way to make the contract compliant with public procurement rules, and ended up invoking a special 'opt-out' clause. Auditor-General John Ryan wrote to the director-general of health then, saying the process was 'unusual and inconsistent'. – RNZ
RNZ News
2 days ago
- RNZ News
Healthworkers want politicians to waive private healthcare while in office
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Labour Party leader Chris Hipkins. Photo: RNZ A group of healthworkers - including specialists, GPs, nurses and paramedics - have signed an open letter to MPs asking them to waive private healthcare during their time in office. Politicians making critical decisions about the public health system system - to cut funding, defer maintenance, or implement restructures - should not be allowed to "insulate" themselves against the consequences, they write. Their prescription? All MPs - and the families of Cabinet ministers - should rely on the public system. The group's spokesperson, Northland cardiologist Marcus Lee, said the public deserved leaders who were so committed to public healthcare that they were willing to stake their family's wellbeing on it. "Essentially we want fair and transparent leadership with integrity. We want people who have skin in the game." The test was whether politicians were "comfortable and confident" enough to rely on the public health system for their families, he said. "If it's good for them, it's good for us. If it's not good enough for them, it shouldn't be good enough for anyone." Some healthworkers say politicians making critical decisions about the public health system system - to cut funding, defer maintenance, or implement restructures - should not be allowed to "insulate" themselves against the consequences. Photo: RNZ The letter asks MPs to consider questions like: Prime Minister Christopher Luxon did not believe having private health insurance meant he was out of touch with the problems besetting the public system . "I think we're well aware of the challenges in the healthcare system, which is why we've put a record amount of investment in," he said. "We inherited again a botched merger that just created a layer of bureaucracy and we've put the money in, we're hiring more people, we've got clarity on the targets. "We're starting to see some stabilisation of those targets and in some cases improvements on those health targets. "But we now need a high performing Health NZ, and that's what we're fixated on." Prime Minister Christopher Luxon did not believe having private health insurance meant he was out of touch. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Labour's health spokesperson Dr Ayesha Verrall said MPs with private health insurance were "betting their own money against the public system". "Ministers of Health should place a bet on the public health system succeeding and meeting New Zealanders' needs. Having private health insurance is a sign that you're not willing to place that bet." Labour's health spokesperson Dr Ayesha Verrall says MPs with private health insurance are "betting their own money against the public system". Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Labour Party leader Chris Hipkins - a former health minister himself - took a less hard-line approach. "I got health insurance 20 or 30 years ago as a union membership benefit and I've kept it since then, although I'm fortunate I haven't really had to use it. "I'm not going to begrudge people who have it, but I want to make sure that if you haven't, you still get the standard of care you deserve." Health Minister Simeon Brown said he did not have private health insurance, but he would not impose that choice on anyone else. "Ultimately there's a large number of New Zealanders who use health insurance, that's a fantastic part of our health system, and ultimately people make individual choices." Brown said his focus was on timely access to quality healthcare for New Zealanders, which included making better use of the private sector. "We will work with private hospitals to unlock capacity, publicly funded [patients] but in private hospitals to speed up access." Finance Minister Nicola Willis and Education Minister Erica Stanford both have private health insurance. Finance Minister Nicola Willis (L) says she has private health insurance but Health Minister Simeon Brown says he doesn't. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Mental Health Minister Matt Doocey does not, saying he is "happy using the public health system". Other National MPs were more coy. Minister of Climate Change, Energy, Local Government and Revenue, Simon Watts: "I won't answer that, it's a personal question." Minister for the Community and Voluntary Sector, Disability Issues, Social Development and Employment, Louise Upston: "That's not a question in the public interest." Bay of Plenty MP Tom Rutherford: "I'm not interested in talking about that. It's not necessary for people to know - I don't go out into the general street and ask people about their health insurance." Green MP Ricardo Menéndez March said it was "quite rich" to see politicians not being worried about the state of the public healthcare system, when they had the means to pay for private insurance or private care . "That is why we are really concerned with the government's flirtation with privatising more of our public healthcare system, which will ultimately see our poorest less able to access basic healthcare." For some Labour MPs, it was a matter of principle. Kelston MP Carmel Sepuloni: "I believe as politicians if we're going to be working to ensure the healthcare system works for everyone, we should be reliant on it too." Nelson MP Rachel Boyack: "My father was a public health chief executive so I've always had a strong belief in the public health system, and that the health system should be available to all New Zealanders, and that includes me as an MP." Mt Albert MP Helen White could understand why some people opted to have it, but it was not for her: "I just think that I should live by my principles. Also I probably couldn't afford it. I know I'm on a decent salary, but it's a lot of money." Mt Albert MP Helen White says she probably couldn't afford health insurance. Photo: RNZ / Simon Rogers Labour MP Ginnie Andersen said health insurance was not in her budget: "By the time I pay my mortgage and my insurance and my rates and feed my children." ACT Party leader David Seymour, who is also the Associate Health Minister, said the healthworkers made "an interesting argument" - but in his view, MPs should come from a broad range of backgrounds. "I don't think you should have to fit into a sort of ideological straight-jacket to do that." The healthworkers behind the letter said MPs who refused to give up their private safety net would be revealing "exactly what they really think about our healthcare system". "We'll be watching to see who has the courage to put their family where their policies are." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
