Foreign prisoners to be deported earlier under law change
The move will apply to foreign criminals subject to the early removal scheme, when prisoners are serving fixed-term sentences.
It will mean prisoners with no right to stay in the UK could be deported after serving 30% of their sentence, instead of 50% currently.
Those serving sentences for terror-related offences are excluded from the scheme.
According to the Ministry of Justice, foreign offenders make up around 12% of the prison population and removing them from the country earlier could free up around 500 jail cells a year.
A prison place costs on average £54,000, the department added.
Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said: 'With prisons close to bursting, I'm clear we shouldn't be giving bed and board to foreign criminals with no right to be here.
'These changes will get more of them on planes out of the country much sooner, saving taxpayers' money and keeping our streets safe as part of our Plan for Change.
'This Government's message is crystal clear – if you come here and break our laws, you'll be sent packing in record time.'
The window to deport foreign nationals from 18 months before the end of their jail term has also been increased to 48 months.
Once deported, offenders are banned from re-entering the UK and any attempt to return will re-activate their original prison sentence.
The move comes after the Government agreed to implement a raft of reforms following an independent sentencing review by former justice secretary David Gauke.
The new legislative measures were among the recommendations.
Criminals could also be eligible for deportation earlier after sentencing reforms yet to be introduced into legislation.
The changes being introduced on Wednesday, if approved by Parliament, are expected to come into force by September.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
42 minutes ago
- The Independent
Watch live: Starmer faces Badenoch at PMQs after Labour's welfare bill passes second reading
Watch live as Sir Keir Starmer faces Kemi Badenoch at PMQs on Wednesday (2 July), hours after MPs voted to pass the prime minister 's watered-down welfare bill. The bill, which would see changes made to personal independence payment (PIP) and the health-related element of universal credit, went to a crunch vote on Tuesday evening. It passed its second reading by 335 ayes to 260 noes, a majority of 75, with 49 Labour MPs voting against the welfare cuts, which they believe could push people further into poverty. On Monday, in a bid to convince rebel MPs to back the changes, the PM watered down his original welfare plans to minimise the impact on existing claimants. He will likely take a grilling from the opposition leader, who slammed the bill as a 'total waste of time'. Writing on X, Ms Badenoch said: 'It effectively saves £0, helps no one into work, and does NOT control spending. It's pointless." Sir Keir, who is fresh off facing his largest Commons rebellion to date, could also see backlash from opposing Labour MPs.
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Federal judge blocks Trump administration from ending temporary legal status for many Haitians
NEW YORK — A federal judge in New York on Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from ending temporary legal status for more than 500,000 Haitians who are already in the United States. District Court Judge Brian M. Cogan in New York ruled that moving up the expiration of the temporary protected status, or TPS, by at least five months for Haitians, some of whom have lived in the U.S. for more than a decade, is unlawful. The Biden administration had extended Haiti's TPS status through at least Feb. 3, 2026, due to gang violence, political unrest, a major earthquake in 2021 and several other factors, according to court documents. But last week, the Department of Homeland Security announced it was terminating those legal protections as soon as Sept. 2, setting Haitians up for potential deportation. The department said the conditions in the country had improved and Haitians no longer met the conditions for the temporary legal protections. The ruling comes as President Donald Trump works to end protections and programs for immigrants as part of his mass deportations promises. The judge's 23-page opinion states that the Department of Homeland Security 's move to terminate the legal protections early violates the TPS statute that requires a certain amount of notice before reconsidering a designation. "When the Government confers a benefit over a fixed period of time, a beneficiary can reasonably expect to receive that benefit at least until the end of that fixed period," according to the ruling. The judge also referenced the fact that the plaintiffs have started jobs, enrolled in schools and begun receiving medical treatment with the expectations that the country's TPS designation would run through the end of the year. Manny Pastreich, president of the Service Employees International Union Local 32BJ, which filed the lawsuit, described the ruling as an "important step" but said the fight is not over. "We will keep fighting to make sure this decision is upheld," Pastreich said in a statement. "We will keep fighting for the rights of our members and all immigrants against the Trump Administration – in the streets, in the workplace, and in the courts as well. And when we fight, we win." DHS did not immediately respond to an email from The Associated Press requesting comment. But the government had argued that TPS is a temporary program and thus "the termination of a country's TPS designation is a possibility beneficiaries must always expect." Haiti's TPS status was initially activated in 2010 after the catastrophic earthquake and has been extended multiple times, according to the lawsuit. Gang violence has displaced 1.3 million people across Haiti as the local government and international community struggle with the spiraling crisis, according to a report from the International Organization for Migration. There has been a 24% increase in displaced people since December, with gunmen having chased 11% of Haiti's nearly 12 million inhabitants from their home, the report said. In May, the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to strip Temporary Protected Status from 350,000 Venezuelans, potentially exposing them to deportation. The order put on hold a ruling from a federal judge in San Francisco that kept the legal protections in place. The judge's decision in New York also comes on the heels of the Trump administration revoking legal protections for thousands of Haitians who arrived legally in the U.S. through a humanitarian parole program.
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
Last-minute welfare concessions will have a 'financial consequence', minister says
The 11th-hour concessions to the government's welfare cuts will have a "financial consequence", a government minister has said, fuelling speculation of tax rises in the autumn. Sent out to defend the government after chaotic scenes in Parliament on Monday night, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden said: "There's definitely a financial consequence to the decision taken last night." He would not be drawn on whether that means tax rises, insisting "all the figures on this will be set out at the budget - this is one moving part of the public expenditure picture". Prime Minister Keir Starmer was forced to abandon a key plank of his welfare reform package after MPs threatened to derail the Bill. The government shelved plans to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip) and any changes will now only come after a review of the benefit. The changes were announced by disability minister Sir Stephen Timms to MPs in the Commons, and came after a first round of concessions offered last week did not seem enough to quell the rebellion. McFadden said it was not unusual for Labour to have issues with votes over welfare reform, saying "there's a history of these issues being difficult for the Labour Party". Despite the last-minute climbdown, 49 MPs still voted against the government, which is higher than the biggest rebellion former Labour MP Tony Blair faced during his first year, when 47 MPs rebelled over the Lone Parent Benefit. The U-turn on Tuesday night also wiped out all of the £5 billion planned savings from the welfare package by 2030, sparking fierce speculation about how Chancellor Rachel Reeves will plug the gap. Ministers have repeatedly insisted Labour will not raise taxes on 'working people', specifically income tax, national insurance or VAT. Reeves also remains committed to her 'iron clad' fiscal rules, which require day-to-day spending to be covered by revenues, not borrowing in 2029/30. The Institute for Fiscal Studies' incoming director Helen Miller, said that "tax rises look increasingly likely" after the government's decision to U-turn once again. 'Since departmental spending plans are now effectively locked in, and the government has already had to row back on planned cuts to pensioner benefits and working-age benefits, tax rises would look increasingly likely." 'This will doubtless intensify the speculation over the summer about which taxes may rise and by how much", Miller said. Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner, who was one of the key figures to broker the 11th-hour deal with backbenchers, told ITV's Lorraine on Wednesday that "welfare reform is always difficult". She denied the scenes in the Commons were embarrassing for the government. "People might see it as chaos, but we've actually got to a better place now," Rayner said. "The process of parliament can look argy-bargy... but that's the way you get to a consensus," Rayner insisted. Rayner sought to reassure people who had been 'scared' about the proposed benefits changes. The deputy prime minister told Lorraine: 'Anyone listening to your show today, they know that there will be no changes to their welfare. 'I want to make sure that people are reassured by that, because a lot of people have been scared about what's going to happen.' Shadow Chancellor Sir Mel Stride said: 'Tax rises are on the way to pay for Labour's mismanagement of the economy. 'Hard-working families will have an agonising summer waiting to hear how Rachel Reeves will claw back the cash to make up for the failings of this weak Prime Minister.' Speaking after the vote, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall insisted the Labour Party is '100% behind' Starmer, despite the rebellion, but acknowledged there were 'lessons to learn'. 'I think people are 100% behind a prime minister that secured the first Labour government in 14 years," she said. 'They were elected on a mandate for change. There are definitely lessons to learn from this process. I certainly will do that, and I'm sure my colleagues will too.'
