Africa's richest country to boost continental trade ties after U.S. 30% tariff hit
South Africa is pursuing alternative markets to mitigate impacts of newly imposed US tariffs.
President Cyril Ramaphosa plans to scale up trade missions and enhance export programs.
The tariffs threaten over 100,000 jobs in export-driven industries within South Africa.
South Africa is strategising to tap into alternative markets to mitigate the impact of the United States' 30% tariffs on its exports.
'In the coming months, we will be scaling up our trade missions into new markets in Africa and beyond,' President Cyril Ramaphosa said.
The government also plans to expand its National Exporter Development Programme, which aims to increase the number of export-ready businesses, according to Bloomberg.
Pretoria had been negotiating for months to avert the tariff hike, proposing to buy U.S. liquefied natural gas and pledging $3.3 billion in investments into American industries. But those overtures fell short.
On Thursday, President Donald Trump slapped a 30% tariff on imports from South Africa, the steepest in sub-Saharan Africa, as part of a broader wave of new levies under his revamped global trade agenda.
Economic impact
South African Trade Minister Parks Tau called the tariff escalation a direct threat to the country's export-driven sectors, particularly automotive manufacturing, agro-processing, steel, and chemicals.
Last month, Central Bank Governor Lesetja Kganyago cautioned that tariffs could endanger over 100,000 jobs in South Africa's automotive and agricultural industries.
Already burdened with one of the world's highest unemployment rates and sluggish economic growth, South Africa's fragile economy now faces an added threat from the newly imposed tariffs.
The United States stands as South Africa's second-largest bilateral trading partner, trailing only China, with trade between the two nations totalling $8.8 billion last year, according to data from the South African Revenue Service.
According to South African officials, trade negotiations were entangled with political frictions, most notably Washington's disapproval of South Africa's affirmative action policies, its land reform agenda, and its decision to bring a genocide case against Israel, a close U.S. ally, before the International Court of Justice.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ether Suddenly On A Tear
After years in the shadow of Bitcoin, Ether a cryptocurrency tied to the Ethereum blockchain is suddenly on a tear as both retail and institutional traders pile into digital assets. Bloomberg's Isabelle Lee has more on the story. Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Former Obama adviser quips that Trump is ‘combing Fox News' for new Labor Stats chief after firing
After Donald Trump's pledge to nominate a new Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner in the next few days, former Obama adviser David Axelrod joked that the president is 'probably combing Fox News' for a replacement. Following a weak jobs report Friday that found not only did the U.S. economy add only 73,000 jobs in July but that the 258,000 fewer jobs were created in the previous two months, the president announced that he had axed the chief labor statistician Erika McEntarfer. 'I believe the numbers were phony, just like they were before the election, and there were other times,' the president told reporters over the weekend when pressed on his decision. Since then, Trump has repeatedly and baselessly claimed that the jobs report 'was RIGGED' and that McEntarfer – who was appointed by his predecessor Joe Biden – had manipulated the numbers to make him 'look bad.' While the president has faced some criticism from Republican lawmakers for firing McEntarfer, who was overwhelmingly confirmed by the Senate last year, White House officials were tasked over the weekend with justifying and defending Trump's rash move. Their efforts were met with mockery and ridicule from cable news outlets and editorial boards. The Wall Street Journal labeled the president's economic adviser the 'bureau of labor denial' while Morning Joe host Joe Scarborough claimed that Trump's aides had to 'put on their Baghdad Bob hat this weekend because there was no justification for' the firing. Axelrod, who now works as a CNN senior political commentator, took a decidedly snarky tone over the news that Trump would soon offer up a replacement for McEntarfer. Sharing a New York Times article that noted the president had told reporters he'd announce a new BLS commissioner 'over the next three or four days,' Axelrod tweeted Sunday: 'He's probably combing Fox News right now for a qualified replacement.' Of course, Axelrod – who served as a senior advisor to former President Barack Obama and helped run his two presidential campaigns – was referencing Trump's penchant for using the conservative cable giant to staff up his administration. Trump created a revolving door between Fox News and the White House during his first term in office, and his second term has seen roughly two dozen former Fox News employees take on roles in the administration – with several of them filling Cabinet-level jobs. Axelrod wasn't the only one who jokingly suggested that the president would look for a loyalist to lead the Bureau. George Conway, the former GOP lawyer who has become a leading anti-Trump critic in recent years, created a fake White House press release announcing that the president had named former Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg to be the next Labor Stats chief. Weisselberg pleaded guilty to charges of grand larceny, criminal tax fraud and falsifying business records in 2022. He also later pleaded guilty to perjury charges for lying under oath in a New York civil trial. In his newsletter, The Atlantic contributing writer Derek Thompson argued that Trump was waging a war against reality, adding that weak job growth wasn't 'the only inconvenient statistic that the Trump administration has tried to suppress in its first seven months.' As Thompson pointed out, the administration has also dismissed scientists in charge of vaccine evaluations at the CDC and gotten rid of experts who put together national climate assessments so insurance companies can gauge risk, not to mention the firing of McEntarfer. In a wild post on Truth Social Monday morning, Trump claimed that he was the victim of 'FAKE' numbers that were meant to hide the economic success of his tariff policies. 'Last weeks Job's Report was RIGGED, just like the numbers prior to the Presidential Election were Rigged. That's why, in both cases, there was massive, record setting revisions, in favor of the Radical Left Democrats,' he wrote. 'Those big adjustments were made to cover up, and level out, the FAKE political numbers that were CONCOCTED in order to make a great Republican Success look less stellar!!! I will pick an exceptional replacement. Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAGA!'
Los Angeles Times
6 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
America's best idea is under fierce attack
The 1st Amendment, and the separation of church and state, America's best idea, is at risk as never before. The notion that church and state should be discrete entities was unprecedented when the founders decided to embark on what one historian has called the 'lively experiment' of disestablishment. The founders were well aware of the Wars of Religion and the English Revolution, conflicts largely over religious differences. In addition, as the founders surveyed the religious diversity in the colonies — from Puritans and Baptists in New England to Quakers, Jews, Dutch Reformed Protestants and Presbyterians in the Middle Colonies to more Baptists in the South and Anglicans, Catholics and even Muslims throughout — they realized that designating any one faith or denomination as the American religion would be contentious. So the founders chose the road not traveled. The 1st Amendment, drafted by James Madison and ratified in 1791, said 'Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion' while guaranteeing free exercise for all. Another way to understand this unique configuration is economic. As Adam Smith predicted in his 1776 brief for free-market capitalism, 'The Wealth of Nations,' religion will thrive if the government refuses to intervene or favor one faith over another. American history has more than vindicated Smith's prediction. Religion has flourished in the United States as nowhere else precisely because the government has stayed out of the religion business. But the corollary is also true. Religious factionalism has not impeded the functions of government. In other words, the 1st Amendment has worked remarkably well. As Thomas Jefferson noted in 1808: 'We have solved, by fair experiment, the great & interesting question Whether freedom of religion is compatible with order in government, and obedience to the laws[.] & we have experienced the quiet as well as the comfort which results from leaving every one to profess freely & openly those principles of religion which are the inductions of his own reason, & the serious convictions of his own inquiries.' Others noticed as well. 'Half the wars of Europe, half the internal troubles that have vexed European states,' James Bryce, an Oxford University historian, observed in 1893, 'have arisen from theological differences or from the rival claims of church and state. This whole vast chapter of debate and strife has remained virtually unopened in the United States.' The United States has survived numerous attempts to jettison the 1st Amendment. During the Civil War, an organization called the National Reform Assn. sought to amend the Constitution with a revised preamble: 'We, the people of the United States, humbly acknowledging Almighty God as the source of all authority and power in civil government, the Lord Jesus Christ as the Ruler among the nations, His revealed will as the supreme law of the land, in order to constitute a Christian government, and in order to form a more perfect union… .' The group took its proposal all the way to the White House, where Abraham Lincoln wisely temporized, averring that 'the work of amending the Constitution should not be done hastily.' Other attempts include those proposed by the Christian Amendment Assn., which emerged during the Cold War. Members of Congress failed to pass that amendment, but they did add 'under God' to the Pledge of Allegiance in 1954 and replaced E pluribus unum ('out of many, one') with 'One Nation Under God' as the national motto in 1956. More recent attempts to eviscerate the wall of separation between church and state have focused not so much on constitutional amendments as on incremental attacks by way of legislation, with the collusion of the judiciary. The posting of the Ten Commandments in public schoolrooms in Louisiana and Texas and, more important, the use of taxpayer money for religious education represent clear violations of the establishment clause of the 1st Amendment. Ever since the 19th century, using public money for religious education was a bright line separating church and state. The so-called Blaine amendments, named for James Blaine, speaker of the House of Representatives, senator, secretary of State and Republican nominee for president in 1884, were adopted by 37 states. The amendments originated in anti-Catholic fervor, but their prohibition of public support for religious schools was constitutionally axiomatic for nearly a century. That seems quaint now, as red states rush to dole out taxpayer-funded vouchers so parents can send their children to religious schools at public expense. Sadly, Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' provides tax-credit funding for religious education, and the majority on the Supreme Court is complicit in efforts to undermine the separation of church and state. If only the Supreme Court had half as much deference for the 1st Amendment as it does for the 2nd Amendment, we'd be in much better shape. As Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote in her final Supreme Court opinion on church-state matters, 'Those who would renegotiate the boundaries between church and state must therefore answer a difficult question: Why would we trade a system that has served us so well for one that has served others so poorly?' Randall Balmer, one of the expert witnesses in the Alabama Ten Commandments case, teaches at Dartmouth College. His latest book, 'America's Best Idea: The Separation of Church and State,' will be released Aug. 5.
