Exclusive: BlackRock-led group set to invest in $10 billion Aramco Jafurah infrastructure deal
The agreement would be the latest in a series of financial arrangements, akin to borrowing, that allow Gulf oil producing countries to raise money to diversify their economies while promising investors a stable revenue stream.
The two people said the latest transaction was expected to be similarly structured to two Aramco infrastructure deals in 2021, including one in which BlackRock invested in Aramco's gas pipeline networks, allowing the Saudi company to generate funds.
Aramco kept control of the underlying infrastructure while the investors earned tariffs from the oil firm for the use of the pipelines.
Both sources spoke on condition of anonymity because the talks are private. They did not say when the deal might be finalised. Aramco and BlackRock declined to comment.
The $100 billion Jafurah project, potentially the biggest shale gas project outside the United States, is central to Aramco's ambitions to become a major global player in natural gas and to boost its gas production capacity by 60% by 2030 from 2021 levels.
The Jafurah assets underpinning the deal include gas pipelines and a gas processing plant, one of the sources said.
Aramco has long been the biggest source of the kingdom's revenues. Saudia Arabia has been seeking to diversify its economy as oil prices have come under pressure from global economic uncertainty that could further reduce demand.
They have also been depressed by increased output from the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, led by Saudi Arabia, which is striving to boost market share.
Earlier this month, Reuters reported that Aramco was seeking to sell up to five gas-fired power plants to raise funds.
PREVIOUS DEALS
In 2021, BlackRock and EIG were among investor groups that took stakes in companies that leased usage rights in Aramco's gas and oil pipeline networks. The groups leased them back to Aramco for a 20-year period in two separate deals, helping the Saudi company to raise nearly $28 billion.
Described as lease and leaseback transactions by Aramco at the time, they were structured as a form of borrowing, Robin Mills, chief executive of consultancy Qamar Energy told Reuters.
"The pipeline deals were basically a securitisation" and not a sale of the asset, whose ownership remained with Aramco, Mills said.
In those deals the groups took 49% stakes in subsidiaries Aramco Oil Pipelines and Aramco Gas Pipelines, in which Aramco retains 51% stakes. The subsidiaries receive a tariff from Aramco for flows of crude and natural gas, backed by minimum commitments on throughput.
The deals followed other transactions in the region, including Abu Dhabi's ADNOC sale of minority stakes in the companies owning the leasing rights to its oil and gas pipelines.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
18 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Newcastle's Alexander Isak offered £600,000-a-week tax-free deal by Al-Hilal
Alexander Isak has been offered a staggering £600,000-a-week tax-free deal by Al-Hilal in Saudi Arabia with further lucrative bonuses on top. The Newcastle striker is open to leaving St James' Park and Liverpool, who are long-term admirers, are keeping an eye on the situation. Isak has not travelled to Asia with his Newcastle teammates for the club's pre-season tour, officially because of a minor muscle injury, and is assessing his options. They include Al-Hilal, who reached the Club World Cup quarter-finals, losing to Fluminense, and want to make a grand statement by signing Isak – one of the most coveted players on the market. Al-Hilal, who are managed by Simone Inzaghi, are prepared to sweeten the package for the striker with bonuses if he were to win the league and/or the Asian Champions League and top the scoring charts. Isak has been unsettled by the transfer talk and he did not play for Newcastle in the friendly at Celtic last Saturday. The club have no desire to sell him and the fans would surely take the dimmest of views of their Saudi owners if they were to let him go to Al-Hilal. Like Newcastle, Al‑Hilal are owned by Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund. Liverpool would not be able to match the personal terms that Al‑Hilal have proposed and it is unclear whether they would be able to afford the fee; Isak is valued at about £120m. Liverpool have signed another striker – Hugo Ekitiké, for £79m from Eintracht Frankfurt – and spent heavily in other areas, most notably the £116m package for the midfielder Florian Wirtz from Bayer Leverkusen. Their other big deals have been for Milos Kerkez (£40m from Bournemouth), Jeremie Frimpong (£29.5m, Leverkusen) and Giorgi Mamardashvili (£25m, Valencia). Sign up to Football Daily Kick off your evenings with the Guardian's take on the world of football after newsletter promotion When sales are factored in, chiefly those of Jarell Quansah (£30m to Leverkusen), Caoimhín Kelleher (£12.5m to Brentford) and Trent Alexander-Arnold (£10m to Real Madrid), Liverpool's net transfer spend stands at £235.5m. It is possible they could raise further funds by selling Darwin Núñez, Harvey Elliott and even Luis Díaz, although they have maintained the Colombian is not for sale. Isak is contracted to Newcastle until 2028.
Times
18 minutes ago
- Times
Fears grow about lack of London Stadium naming rights deal
A naming rights deal for the London Stadium looks as elusive as ever after venue chiefs admitted there was 'a significant risk' that no sponsor will be found before 2028. The owners of the stadium, which is occupied by West Ham United for most of the year, have been unable to secure a deal to reduce the venue's losses despite previously claiming one was imminent. The risk of a continuing failure is spelt out in the draft annual report of the London Legacy Development Corporation (LLDC), which owned the stadium until March, when it transferred to be directly under the Greater London Authority. The report also reveals that Lyn Garner, the LLDC's chief executive until March, received a £228,000 payoff for stepping down from the position on top of her £304,000 salary, only to be appointed as the chairwoman of the London Stadium's new board. 'Lyn's full-time role as chief executive of LLDC became redundant after a restructure and she received compensation in line with policy and procedures,' a GLA spokesman said. 'Her role at the London Stadium is part-time and is a non-executive role. Her appointment was made in line with policy and she brings a wealth of skills and experience to leading the London Stadium board.' Five other LLDC executives also received payoffs of between £91,000 and £151,000. In early 2023, Garner told the London Assembly she was 'very confident' that it would finally agree a naming rights deal for the loss-making stadium that year but it never happened. West Ham have to agree to any deal and the club shares any income worth more than £4million a year. Meanwhile, West Ham are still in a dispute with the London Stadium owners over who should pick up the costs of staging matches involving their Women's Super League (WSL) team. The club's 2013 concession agreement to use the stadium — labelled as the 'deal of the century' by one London Assembly member — makes the venue's owners responsible for paying costs such as stewarding, security and electricity, which are thought to be about £100,000 for a Premier League match. West Ham are understood to have offered to pay some of the costs for staging a WSL match there — and make a financial loss in doing so — but that offer has not been accepted by the London Stadium. 'We cannot ask London's taxpayers to subsidise the cost of West Ham putting on these matches,' a London Stadium spokesman said. Plans in place for Lionesses parade The FA has pencilled in a victory celebration in central London for Tuesday should England overcome Spain in the Women's Euro 2025 final on Sunday. The plan is understood to include a parade in the capital with a gathering in or near The Mall for the players to display the trophy, but the FA is keeping its cards close to its chest so as not to distract from preparations for the final in Basel, Switzerland. Top teams to cash in with new TV deal The Premier League's new television deal, which starts next month, will mean 70 more matches a season are shown live — which is likely to mean even more money for the top teams. Clubs are paid a 'facility fee' for every live match they take part in and last season each match was worth £890,000. Liverpool, the champions, earned £24.9million and Ipswich Town, who finished 19th, the minimum figure of £8.9million. Next season, every Premier League match will be live on TV apart from those played at 3pm on Saturday, so that will guarantee a facility fee for all clubs whose games are moved due to them playing midweek fixtures in Europe. The plus side for the smaller clubs is that they should also get more money, but just not as much as the bigger ones. Triathlon trouble World Triathlon's reputation has been dealt a serious blow after the Court of Arbitration for Sport ruled that Uruguay's executive board member, Líber García, breached its anti-corruption policy in the lead up to last year's presidential election. It found that García had implied to Australia's Michelle Cooper, a rival candidate to the eventual winner Antonio Fernández Arimany, that she would lose her place on the board if she did not withdraw from the contest. Britain's candidate for the election, Ian Howard, whose campaign was backed by £12,000 of public funding from UK Sport, told World Triathlon's congress in October: 'We stand at a crossroads, you can choose more of the same and see the reputation of our federation increasingly damaged: unholy alliances, dodgy deals, dirty tricks.' 'Emperor' Infantino Football's international players' union, Fifpro, has accused Fifa and its president, Gianni Infantino, of 'autocratic' leadership. 'Football needs responsible leadership, not emperors,' Fifpro said in a statement after a meeting of 58 national player unions, in response to Fifa announcing an agreement with unrecognised player representatives. Infantino hosted that summit in New York but Fifpro and the English PFA — who have ongoing legal action against Fifa in the European courts — were not invited.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Racing's D-day looms as proposed chief Lord Allen faces ‘sliding doors' moment
Around 80,000 people in Britain are employed in the horse racing industry. At least 1m adults are estimated to have a bet on the horses in any given month of the year. And it is a very fair bet that on the morning of 13 November last year, no more than one in every 1,000 of them had even heard of Lord Allen of Kensington CBE, who was about to be unveiled as the new chair of the British Horseracing Authority, the ruling body of Britain's second-biggest spectator sport. Lord Allen had, after all, had very little recorded contact with the sport of kings over the course of either a glittering business career in broadcasting, his time as a Labour party insider under Ed Milliband's leadership, or a dozen years in the House of Lords. But his lack of a racing background seemed less important than Lord Allen's well-connected position in what had recently become the ruling political party, and his track record with events including London's successful bid for the 2012 Olympics and, more recently, the Invictus Games. Beyond that, he could always learn on the job after assuming his new role on 1 June this year. Lord Allen has had plenty of contact with racing in the eight months' since his appointment was announced, however, which is the main reason why, nearly two months after his scheduled start date, his feet are still not under the BHA chairman's desk. The former chair of several multi-nationals took a long look at the BHA's governance structure, and in particular in the presence of members nominated by racing's various special-interest groups on the Authority's board, and did not like what he saw. He then went away and came back with an alternative vision. As a result, the 68-year-old will be cast in something akin to the Gwyneth Paltrow role on Monday as a sliding-doors drama with significant implications for a billion-pound industry unfolds at the BHA's offices in London. In one version of the story, Lord Allen will finally take over as the most powerful individual in British racing, having persuaded the vested interests and power blocs that currently hold sway on the BHA's board to, in effect, vote themselves into extinction. In the other, it will be a case of he came, he saw, he thought better of it. The first sign that Lord Allen was having second thoughts about his new role came just a few days before his intended start date, when the BHA somewhat sheepishly announced that, seven months after announcing his appointment, the new chair wanted more time to speak to stakeholders, 'to better inform his vision for the sport'. Lord Allen himself has been tight-lipped throughout, in public at least, but his vision, according to well-sourced reports in the Racing Post, includes the removal of stakeholder-nominated members from the BHA board and the division of the Authority into two parts, one entirely commercial in its outlook and the other in charge of rules and regulation. Lord Allen is hardly the first individual to ponder the twisted knot of factional self-interests that pervades every level of the British racing industry and suggest that something needs to be done. Most rational observers, either inside or outside the racing bubble, would probably reach the same conclusion after 10 minutes of consideration. But he is arguably the first to do so before being sucked into racing's political quicksand, where time stands still and a little foot-dragging here or there is more than enough to ensure that meaningful progress is always another a year or two away. A ruling body with a board focused entirely on the long-term health and interests of horse racing as a whole would be a first for British racing. Whether Lord Allen can get it across the line, however, is still far from certain. Special-interest groups proliferate in racing for a reason: it is not one sport, one business or even, as racehorse breeders will confirm, a single industry. It is a collection of many different businesses, from five-horse jumping stables to the uber-strings in Newmarket, from glittering venues like Ascot, the stage for Saturday's King George, to small independent tracks like Pontefract and Newton Abbot. Owners, breeders and even jockeys (within reason) can also come in all shapes and sizes. The two biggest racecourse groups – Jockey Club Racecourses and Arena Racing Company (ARC) – also operate with very different business models. JCR's tracks, along with big independents like Ascot, Newbury and Goodwood, have high levels of raceday revenue from attendance. Many of ARC's meetings, by contrast, are staged in front of empty stands to keep off-course betting turnover rolling. ARC's biggest asset is the ownership of its fixtures. It will need a cast-iron guarantee that Lord Allen's 'commercial' ambitions for a body that does not, of itself, have a great deal to sell, will not impinge on that situation. Whether or not Lord Allen's ambitious restructuring might actually come to pass or instead fade swiftly into obscurity may become apparent shortly after the BHA's board meets on Monday. Similar aspirations for a less factional future have come to nothing in the past, but this could be the moment when Gwyneth finally gets onto the train. Four of the five runners in Saturday's King George VI & Queen Elizabeth Stakes at Ascot are closely matched on both ratings and recent form, and the outsider of that quartet, the ultra-dependable Rebel's Romance (4.10), has a better chance to record his first Group One win in Britain than a price of around 5-1 might suggest. Charlie Appleby's gelding has seven top-level wins to his name abroad including two victories in the Breeders' Cup Turf, but finished only third, behind Goliath and the subsequent Arc winner, Bluestocking, in last year's King George. Rebel's Romance was better than the bare result, however, having raced much closer to an unrelenting pace than either of the horses that came past him a furlong out. In a smaller field and a more conventionally-run race, the seven-year-old's class and willingness to battle all the way to the line could be too much for his younger opponents. Ascot 1.40 A wide-open renewal of this Group Three for juvenile fillies, with Fitzella perhaps the pick of the prices at around 5-1 to build on her three-length fourth at Royal Ascot last time. York 2.00 Normal improvement from his first run for 149 days would see Jubilee Walk go close in an ultra-competitive sprint. Ascot 2.20 Royal Dress won with plenty to spare last time and could be a stern opponent for the improving Chantilly Lace. York 2.40 The exciting Almaqam has ground conditions to suit and should follow up his last-time out defeat of the subsequent Prince Of Wales's Stakes winner, Ombudsman. Ascot 3.00 Billyjoh had little chance from his draw over track and trip at the Royal meeting but has a better pitch here and plenty of pace among the high numbers to carry him into the race. Ascot 1.10 Dark Shore 1.40 Fitzella 2.20 Royal Dress 3.00 Billyjoh (nap) 3.35 Bopedro 4.10 Rebel's Romance (nb) 4.45 Kuredu King 5.15 Aramram York 1.25 Golden Palace 2.00 Jubilee Walk 2.40 Almaqam 3.20 Copper Knight 3.50 Chillingham 4.25 Tele Red 5.00 Kisskodi Chester 1.30 Kokinelli 2.10 Oratorical 2.45 Vince Le Prince 3.15 Arabian Cobra 3.45 Aces Wild 4.20 Stash The Cash 4.55 Kodiac Thriller 5.30 Ey Up Its The Boss Newcastle 1.52 Crownthorpe 2.30 Fast Fred 3.08 Beny Nahar 3.40 Sheriff's Court 4.15 Newyorkstateofmind 4.50 Greenlightforgo 5.25 Elettaria 5.55 Poet Windsor 5.45 Desert Treasure 6.15 Startled Lady 6.45 Offiah's Boy 7.15 Lady In Havana 7.45 Lahina Bay 8.15 Rage Of Thunder 8.45 Fancy Dancer Salisbury 6.00 Lost Signal 6.30 Addison Grey 7.00 The Bitter Moose 7.30 Patsy Snugfit 8.00 Twilight Moon 8.30 Alice's Impact York 3.20 The evergreen Copper Knight looks the safest option in this annual sprint for jump jockeys, at a track where he already has seven wins to his name. Ascot 3.35 David O'Meara's Bopedro is in the form of his life at nine years of age and looks big at around 10-1 to register a first win since the summer of 2023.
