logo
People are using slurs we thought we left in the 70s

People are using slurs we thought we left in the 70s

The Nationala day ago
Celebrating its 10th birthday a few weeks ago, it looked back on real achievements reflecting this country's embrace of a more progressive future. Thanks to its efforts, LGBTQ school pupils are able to feel more recognised in our education system.
TIE has expanded from an organisation campaigning against the prejudice and bullying faced by [[LGBT]]Q pupils to one with its own staff creating resources and training for teachers on behalf of the Scottish Government.
At the heart of its success is a deep friendship between a young gay man and an older, straight trade unionist, which sparked the energy needed to power real change.
READ MORE: Labour's governing fiasco shows Scots the urgency of independence, says John Swinney
That friendship was rightly celebrated at TIE's 10th birthday party, but the smiles were tinged with an unease over a rise in right-wing rhetoric, which has more recently threatened to undermine some of the advances TIE has made.
The National talked to TIE founders Jordan Daly and Liam Stevenson about their work, their friendship, their achievements, and the difficult challenges which lie ahead.
THE BIRTH OF A FRIENDSHIP
Jordan: I was 19 when I first met Liam, and an undergraduate student at the University of Glasgow. I was about a year out of school, and it was just after the independence referendum. So like most people of my age, that was the first seismic political event [we had experienced].
I think the thing that struck Liam and I was the Radical Independence Campaign's slogan 'Another Scotland is Possible'. A lot of the discussions around the referendum for me were very much about another Scotland that looks after vulnerable communities, that prioritises and enhances equality and addresses inequality.
I was really engaged by the referendum but none of my close friends were very politically engaged.
One of my mum's friends told me about this guy who was involved in politics and was organising a food bank fundraiser.
When I contacted him, Liam and I clicked very quickly. We were both passionate about issues related to poverty. It was the start of a very fast friendship.
Liam: My activism at that time was trying to promote the message of what an independent socialist Scotland could look like, and what people should be striving for.
After the agonising defeat in 2014 I remember thinking that this isn't done; there's going to be another go at this in the future. For me, this was about a better Scotland. It was about an opportunity to try and wipe the slate clean and ask what would a new country look like, and how do we start going about building that?
After the referendum I accepted a random friend request from Jordan on Facebook. Back then I was really self-conscious, even more so than I am now. I was 36 years old, a petrol tanker driver and a trade unionist. But I wasn't university educated. I firmly believed that was a huge barrier for me.
(Image: Danny Lawson)
I had never read all these books. My political outlook and worldview have been shaped by my life, not by books. So when I met this impressive, bright, young guy, I'm thinking, this is going to be interesting. Jordan and I just clicked. Although there was a massive age gap, we had a lot in common: how we viewed the world, and what we thought a better world would look like.
I'm not a religious guy. I'm not a spiritual guy. But when I look back, I am absolutely convinced that we've been put together for a purpose.
Jordan: I was the first out gay person that Liam had as a friend. I often describe Liam, in a joking way, as the kind of GI Joe stereotype of masculinity. He's got the shaved head, he's quite buff … if you were to draw a masculine man from Scotland, you would draw Liam.
I used to say to him, 'you're the kind of person that I would cross the street to avoid, because I would have expected that someone that looked like you might be homophobic towards me.' But I was making stereotypical assumptions. What I found in Liam as a friend was someone who was deeply empathetic and understanding and prepared to stand up for me. I remember going down to Liam's house one night for a drink and having conversations which in hindsight led to TIE.
THE ORIGINS OF TIE
Liam: I always admired most those people that were confident enough to be authentic and live their lives with their true identity. There were no out gay people in my school.
When I initiated some conversations with Jordan about what school was like for him, I was completely dumbfounded.
Jordan: If my objective was to do well in my exams and go to university, then I had a successful education. The challenging aspect for me was the extent of how normalised homophobia was from early on. I heard the word gay all the time. I heard words like lesbian all the time. But I heard them in the playground, and I heard them as insults and jokes and slurs. There was never any sensible education about what gay or lesbian meant.
That was my primary school experience. Everyone in my generation who grew up with that, hearing this really casual, normalised homophobic language and having it addressed, we all went into secondary school thinking that casual homophobia was acceptable.
Like any form of prejudice, it often starts with everyday language and escalates into more serious behaviours. It was probably about six months or so into my first year of high school that the bullying started. A group of boys that just assumed that I was gay decided to bully me for it.
Bullying is hard to speak to a staff member about, because you're worried about consequences and that it will make things worse. You're not quite sure how the school will react.
Liam: All this was absolutely surprising to me. I was shocked and disappointed.
I started looking online and pulling up data from surveys of young people in schools across the United Kingdom. I realised this was still a real problem. A homophobic culture was emanating in schools, which were failing to protect young people who were potentially lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender.
Jordan: I think the friendship with Liam helped me process some of what I had experienced at school. He was the first person that I really opened up to and spoke to. Even some of my family members didn't know about how serious things had become for me at school.
What I learned from Liam was that solidarity, support and friendship can come from quite unlikely sources. I think that was a really important lesson for me.
At school I learned about racism and how dangerous it could be, I learned about sexism and the unequal treatment of women and misogyny, the Suffragettes and Emmeline Pankhurst. And I learned about religious discrimination.
And I remember saying to Liam, why couldn't I have also learned about the introduction and repeal of Section 28 [legislation which banned discussion of homosexuality in schools], or the Stonewall uprising, or LGBT history that I ultimately had to learn for myself when I left school? Why couldn't we have learned about that at school?
Liam: I think it was me who first suggested creating an organisation to tackle this. I had no idea about the enormity of the task that was ahead of us. Had I known then what I know now, I wouldn't have put my shoes on.
Jordan showed me a documentary, How To Survive A Plague, about the Aids epidemic. One of the things that struck me was that we've structured our society in a way that made these people feel shame instead of being immensely proud of the community to which they belong.
That gave me the absolute urgency to say we need to be teaching young people this, because we need to give young people that confidence to know that just because you're gay or bi or lesbian or trans, you shouldn't be ashamed. You should be proud of that because you come from a really rich tapestry of resistance, people fighting literally for their lives.
TIE: THE FIRST STEP
Liam: The first-ever donation to the TIE campaign came from my branch of petrol tanker drivers at Unite. I didn't ask for it. Another member asked for it. Jordan was crying when they gave us 500 quid to produce a booklet to send to every MSP in the country containing stories of people who had a really difficult time at school. That donation was very important to me.
Jordan: We were talking about things we could do and I said I learned at school about petitions. We found out that the Scottish Parliament would accept petitions from the public. So the very first thing we did was to draft up a petition calling for LGBT education to be included on the school curriculum.
Liam: We walked Buchanan Street asking people to sign the petition. Our first press coverage was an interview with The National.
Jordan: I wasn't quite sure what people's responses would be, but it was really positive. A lot of people were surprised LGBTQ education wasn't already happening. People assumed that education was up to speed with the modern world.
THE NEXT STEPS
Jordan: I remember the first time we gave evidence at the Scottish Parliament. I had only ever been there on a school trip when I was in primary seven. Liam had never been there. Both of us were terrified.
We were only supposed to be there for 15 minutes. They extended the session to an hour, and I remember being quite emotional at the end of it.
The petition ended up getting rejected on a technicality. We don't have a statutory curriculum in Scotland, so they couldn't include it.
Liam: I think we were supposed to have just gone away after the petition was rejected. When I was asked for a statement on the petition being closed, I said: 'That's a setback, nothing more.' And that was the spirit that we adopted. We went away. We thought about a new strategy and came back with it.
THE FIRST BIG SUCCESS
Liam: When the door opened for us to speak to government officials, they asked us how to progress. Jordan and I, always the pragmatists, said: 'We need a working group with every stakeholder in education on it, because we need to get it right first time.' It reported in 16 months with 33 recommendations.
Jordan: Simultaneously, we were meeting with MSPs and support was really building. The trade union movement was coming out in support; the National Parent Forum of Scotland came out in support.
I remember when we walked into the first working group meeting. [[Education]] Scotland were there. So were the National Parent Forum and the Scottish Catholic [[Education]] Service, the Scottish Human Rights Commission and Cosla. We both had real impostor syndrome.
Liam was still working nightshift as a petrol tanker driver. I was working part-time in a bar at the time. I would finish there at 1am and work in my car outside my house because my little sister had just been born, so I couldn't go in and wake them up.
Liam would be working nightshift and he would have a phone call on his headphones and we'd talk about what we would do, what we could ask for at a working group meeting the next morning.
Nowadays we laugh about conspiratorial ideas suggesting that TIE is a quango that's been propelled along the way and been given all this money. The reality genuinely was two people who had to prove themselves time after time.
Thirty-three quite detailed policy recommendations were agreed unanimously by every stakeholder on that group, which, in hindsight, was a quite remarkable achievement. And those recommendations were then accepted in full by Scottish ministers.
TODAY'S CHALLENGES
Liam: There seems to be a culture just now that has shifted back in time, when it's cool to be cruel again. The rise of the so-called 'manosphere' online and normalisation of hate has had an impact on young people for example. I can remember the 1990s as a young guy growing up, when we were often encouraged to display our masculinity in very different ways from the way we did five years ago, when it was encouraged to be better men and softer, kinder men.
I feel as if things started to shift in a different direction due to some of the influences on social media targeted at specific groups of people. Some of the political narratives that have been introduced and normalised are really distressing.
Jordan: We've had the Me Too movement, which rightly and accurately called out men's violence against women. We had equal marriage. And we had Black Lives Matter. I think that quite a lot of what we're seeing now culturally is the kind of last-gasp backlash to that progress.
That's impacted us as an organisation in that we're seeing US culture war rhetoric imported here. In 2018 it would not have been normal or acceptable to target an education organisation – one that is working on a daily basis to address homophobic bullying in schools, that employs teachers to deliver those education services – to call their staff groomers, and yet that is now a normal experience for us.
Even doing this interview, we have to prepare not only ourselves but our family and staff for the online harassment that will come from that. I think we're seeing LGBT topics and education initiatives like ours being weaponised and misrepresented to distract from decades of consecutive economic failure that have made people's lives harder.
In the United States, we see the impact of that disinformation and false claims such as 'children are being told to transition in schools'.
We had that with Section 28. We've had that censorship. It's dangerous and it's damaging, and I think that we have to be very careful not to give credence to that type of rhetoric, to this idea that there's inappropriate or extreme teaching happening in schools.
The reality of the situation is children are learning about same-sex families alongside lots of other types of families. They're learning about the impact of homophobia that they already see and experience at school, and they're given factual information about historical events.
We have to challenge these false narratives, these lies, with the truth.
Liam: Allyship is also very important, where people who are not members of minorities stand up against those who attack them.
We're currently living in a period in which truth doesn't matter. Before truth has brushed its teeth, the lies are two times around the world. People are using slurs that we thought we left in the 1970s and 1980s and maybe at the start of the 1990s about LGBT people being predators and being paedophiles and being people who can't be trusted to be positive influences around young people.
Some of this stuff leads to people like me and Jordan having rapid response alerts on our properties for the police so that if we dial 999 and give an address, every officer in the vicinity has to drop their stuff and get to a property, because we are viewed by the police as vulnerable to harm simply because we want all children to go to school and to learn in an environment where they're safe, respected and protected.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This hollowing out of politics could see the death of the centre
This hollowing out of politics could see the death of the centre

The Independent

time10 minutes ago

  • The Independent

This hollowing out of politics could see the death of the centre

Voting in the Green Party leadership election opened on Friday, with the result to be declared on 2 September. The contest between Ellie Chowns and Adrian Ramsay, running on a joint ticket, and Zack Polanski has focused to an unusual extent on electoral tactics and the hopes of winning a large number of Commons seats from Labour. Meanwhile, the Corbyn-Sultana party is still taxiing towards the runway for take-off, its passengers talking excitedly about replacing Labour as the main party of the left, either on its own or in alliance with the Greens. There are plenty of reasons for being sceptical of both parties' ambitions, which I will come to in a moment. But there is also a real possibility that Labour support will collapse. I wrote last week about Keir Starmer's 'Macron strategy', by which he presents himself as the alternative to Nigel Farage as prime minister. Thus he would seek to rally disaffected Labour voters tempted to stay at home or defect to other parties, plus Greens, Corbynites, Liberal Democrats and soft Conservatives, by presenting them with a binary choice. But what if that isn't the choice by the time of the next election? What if, just as Reform has overtaken the Tories in the opinion polls, a Green-Corbynite combination overtakes Labour? Peter Kellner, the polling guru, has commissioned research from YouGov into party loyalty. He says the figures 'should terrify both Labour and the Conservatives'. He found that people who intend to vote Reform and Green are much more likely to give a positive reason for their support, such as 'it has the best policy on the issue I feel most strongly about', whereas Labour and Tory voters are more likely to give a negative reason, such as 'it isn't great but it's better than the alternatives'. He concludes: 'The two pillars of the old Labour-Conservative duopoly, family influence and social class, have crumbled, and nothing has replaced them. Stalled living standards add to their plight.' Every day provides more evidence of the gap between the old duopoly and the new parties in enthusiasm and commitment. The trickle of former Tory MPs defecting to Reform could become a flood if Farage, who caught the Ming vase that Starmer dropped, can carry it over the slippery floor for another couple of years. Defections to the Corbyn-Sultana party are not on quite the same scale yet. Six former Labour councillors in Hastings and one Labour councillor in Coventry said on Friday that they will join the new party. But more will follow if the party can gain credibility. As I said, there are reasons to doubt that this will happen. The party's launch has been chaotic. The temporary name, Your Party, does not work at all. Any discussion of the party begins in confusion. 'Your Party…' 'It's not my party…' The 600,000 sign-ups expressing interest make up a relatively small number compared to, say, the six million who signed the 2019 petition to revoke Article 50 and stay in the EU. There are doubts about the wisdom of re-running Jeremy Corbyn's Labour leadership campaign outside the Labour Party. James Matthewson, who was a Labour spokesperson under Corbyn, wrote for the i paper on Friday: 'My warning to the left, especially those young lefties who are still unjaded and have the energy we need to change the world, is: don't be lured into another vanity project.' He thought the idea of Zarah Sultana as a fresh face that would mean a fresh approach was 'far from the truth'. As for the Greens, there is an air of unreality that hangs over the leadership election debate, which has become bitter and personal, at least between Ramsay and Polanski. (Ramsay refused to say he 'liked' Polanski in a radio debate between the two.) Ramsay and Chowns claim to be focused on electoral success, having delivered the quadrupling of seats from one to four last year, while Polanski claims to be more ambitious, calling his approach eco-populism and being willing to do pre-election deals with the Corbyn-Sultana outfit. It may be that climate change – 'the issue I feel most strongly about' – and idealistic disillusionment with a Labour Party governing in bleak times will be enough to break through, but the red-green alliance has nothing yet to match the power of the issue of immigration combined with the charisma of Farage. Of course, Reform's success may not last. Farage may drop the Ming vase. He was forced today to deny speculation about his health, telling The Times that his Tory and Labour rivals were 'spreading these rumours' because 'it's the last card they've got'. But the untrue rumours nevertheless draw attention to the extent to which Reform's advance depends on a single individual. It may be, even if Farage is the leader of the real opposition by the time of the next election, that Starmer's Macron strategy will work. Or it could be, if the Labour vote does collapse, that the Lib Dems prove to be the saviours of pragmatic moderation. Ed Davey's inoffensive army, rather than the Green Corbynites, could fill more of the gap left by Labour's retreat. But I think a Labour collapse is an underestimated possibility.

Pro-Palestine protesters disrupt John Swinney Edinburgh Fringe event
Pro-Palestine protesters disrupt John Swinney Edinburgh Fringe event

Daily Record

time10 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

Pro-Palestine protesters disrupt John Swinney Edinburgh Fringe event

Police officers were called in when event was disrupted several times with the First Minister's security team forced to keep people back. Police have been called in to remove pro-Palestinian protesters from an event with First Minister John Swinney at the Edinburgh Fringe. ‌ Mr Swinney was speaking to comedian Susan Morrison when the event was disrupted five times by six different groups of protesters who held up signs that spelled the word 'genocide'. ‌ As the event went on, tensions rose between the protesters and other members of the crowd, with three police officers called in and the First Minister's security team forced to keep people back from berating Mr Swinney on the stage. ‌ The protesters shouted at the First Minister to stop funding arms companies through the Government's commercial arm Scottish Enterprise, as well as to describe the ongoing crisis in Gaza as a 'genocide'. The First Minister sat quietly during the protests.

Pro-Palestinian protesters disrupt Fringe event featuring First Minister
Pro-Palestinian protesters disrupt Fringe event featuring First Minister

STV News

time10 minutes ago

  • STV News

Pro-Palestinian protesters disrupt Fringe event featuring First Minister

Police have been called in to remove pro-Palestinian protesters from an event with First Minister John Swinney at the Edinburgh Fringe. Swinney was speaking to comedian Susan Morrison when the event was disrupted five times by six different groups of protesters who held up signs spelling the word 'genocide'. As the event went on, tensions rose between the protesters and other members of the crowd, with three police officers called in and the First Minister's security team forced to keep people back from berating Swinney on the stage. Police were called in to remove pro-Palestinian protesters from the event The protesters shouted at the First Minister to stop funding arms companies through the Government's commercial arm, Scottish Enterprise, as well as to describe the ongoing crisis in Gaza as a 'genocide'. The First Minister sat quietly during the protests. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store