Key US-China trade talks set for Monday in London
LONDON - Top U.S. and Chinese officials will sit down in London on Monday for talks aimed at defusing the high-stakes trade dispute between the two superpowers that has widened in recent weeks beyond tit-for-tat tariffs to export controls over goods and components critical to global supply chains.
At a still-undisclosed venue in London, the two sides will try to get back on track with a preliminary agreement struck last month in Geneva that had briefly lowered the temperature between Washington and Beijing and fostered relief among investors battered for months by U.S. President Donald Trump's cascade of tariff orders since his return to the White House in January.
"The next round of trade talks between the U.S. and China will be held in the UK on Monday," a UK government spokesperson said on Sunday. "We are a nation that champions free trade and have always been clear that a trade war is in nobody's interests, so we welcome these talks."
Gathering there will be a U.S. delegation led by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, and a Chinese contingent helmed by Vice Premier He Lifeng.
The second-round of meetings comes four days after Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping spoke by phone, their first direct interaction since Trump's January 20 inauguration.
During the more than one-hour-long call, Xi told Trump to back down from trade measures that roiled the global economy and warned him against threatening steps on Taiwan, according to a Chinese government summary.
But Trump said on social media the talks focused primarily on trade led to "a very positive conclusion," setting the stage for Monday's meeting in London.
The next day, Trump said Xi had agreed to resume shipments to the U.S. of rare earths minerals and magnets. China's decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets upended the supply chains central to automakers, aerospace manufacturers, semiconductor companies and military contractors around the world.
That had become a particular pain point for the U.S. in the weeks after the two sides had struck a preliminary rapprochement in talks held in Switzerland.
There, both had agreed to reduce steep import taxes on each other's goods that had had the effect of erecting a trade embargo between the world's No. 1 and 2 economies, but U.S. officials in recent weeks accused China of slow-walking on its commitments, particularly around rare earths shipments.
"We want China and the United States to continue moving forward with the agreement that was struck in Geneva," White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt told the Fox News program "Sunday Morning Futures' on Sunday. "The administration has been monitoring China's compliance with the deal, and we hope that this will move forward to have more comprehensive trade talks."
The inclusion at the London talks of Lutnick, whose agency oversees export controls for the U.S., is one indication of how central the issue has become for both sides. Lutnick did not attend the Geneva talks, at which the countries struck a 90-day deal to roll back some of the triple-digit tariffs they had placed on each other since Trump's inauguration.
That preliminary deal sparked a global relief rally in stock markets, and U.S. indexes that had been in or near bear market levels have recouped the lion's share of their losses.
The S&P 500 Index, which at its lowest point in early April was down nearly 18% after Trump unveiled his sweeping "Liberation Day" tariffs on goods from across the globe, is now only about 2% below its record high from mid-February. The final third of that rally followed the U.S.-China truce struck in Geneva.
Still, that temporary deal did not address broader concerns that strain the bilateral relationship, from the illicit fentanyl trade to the status of democratically governed Taiwan and U.S. complaints about China's state-dominated, export-driven economic model.
While the UK government will provide a venue for Monday's discussions, it will not be party to them but will have separate talks later in the week with the Chinese delegation. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
32 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump defends Bondi amid backlash over Epstein files
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox FILE PHOTO: U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi speaks to the media, in the Press Briefing Room at the White House in Washington D.C., June 27, 2025. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno/File Photo U.S. President Donald Trump defended Attorney General Pam Bondi on Saturday amid backlash against her from some of Trump's supporters over how the Justice Department handled the investigation into the death of accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and his alleged clientele. Trump said "nobody cares about" Epstein, and that more time or energy must not be wasted on his case, as he tried to unite his base of supporters in a nearly 400-word post on Truth Social. "What's going on with my "boys" and, in some cases, "gals?" They're all going after Attorney General Pam Bondi, who is doing a FANTASTIC JOB! We're on one Team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening," Trump said. In a joint memo released on Monday, the FBI and Justice Department said there was no evidence to support a number of long-held conspiracy theories about Epstein's death in federal custody in 2019 and his alleged clientele. Conservative influencers from Laura Loomer to Elon Musk have criticized Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel for their findings, which came months after Bondi pledged to reveal major revelations about Epstein, including "a lot of names" and "a lot of flight logs." U.S. media, including Fox News and NBC News, have reported that FBI deputy director Dan Bongino has clashed with Bondi over the issue and is considering stepping down. Patel and Bongino, a former conservative podcaster, both previously made statements before working at the FBI about a so-called client list and often suggested that the government was hiding information about Epstein from the American public. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Government looking at enhancing laws around vaping to tackle issue of drug-laced vapes in Singapore Singapore Why the vape scourge in Singapore concerns everyone Singapore I lost my daughter to Kpod addiction: Father of 19-year-old shares heartbreak and lessons Singapore Organised crime groups pushing drug-laced vapes in Asia including Singapore: UN Singapore Prison school to NUS: At 36, former drug abuser finds it's never too late to get a degree Singapore Bland and boring? Some hospitals seek help from big names to enhance food menus for patients Asia Patriotism, peace and pain: The politics behind China's World War II narrative World US slaps 30% tariffs on EU and Mexico; EU warns of countermeasures Monday's memo on Epstein concluded that after reviewing more than 300 gigabytes of data, there was "no incriminating client list" nor was there any evidence that Epstein may have blackmailed prominent people. The memo also confirmed prior findings by the FBI which concluded that Epstein died by suicide in his jail cell while awaiting trial, and not as a result of a criminal act such as murder. Epstein's death while imprisoned in New York's Metropolitan Correctional Center has ignited controversy for years. Expectations for key revelations in his case grew when, in February, Fox News asked Bondi whether the Justice Department would be releasing Epstein's client list, and she said, "It's sitting on my desk right now to review." On Tuesday at the White House, Bondi walked that comment back, telling reporters that she was referring to the entire Epstein "file" along with other files pertaining to the assassinations of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. "That's what I meant by that," she said. REUTERS
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump calls for Maga base to end ‘Epstein Files' obsession
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox US President Donald Trump has denied allegations that he was named in the files or had any direct connection to the financier. WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump urged his political base on July 12 to stop attacking his administration over files related to notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, a case that has become an obsession for conspiracy theorists. Mr Trump's Department of Justice and the FBI said in a memo made public last week there was no evidence that the disgraced financier kept a 'client list' or was blackmailing powerful figures. They also dismissed the claim that Epstein was murdered in jail, confirming his death by suicide at a New York prison in 2019, and said they would not be releasing any more information on the probe. The move was met with incredulity by some on the US far-right – many of whom have backed Mr Trump for years – and strident criticism of Attorney-General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel. 'What's going on with my 'boys' and, in some cases, 'gals?' They're all going after Attorney General Pam Bondi, who is doing a FANTASTIC JOB!' Mr Trump said July 12 in a lengthy post on his Truth Social platform. 'We're on one Team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening. We have a PERFECT Administration, THE TALK OF THE WORLD, and 'selfish people' are trying to hurt it, all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein,' he added, referring to his 'Make America Great Again' movement. Many among the Maga faithful have long contended that so-called 'Deep State' actors were hiding information on Epstein's elite associates. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Government looking at enhancing laws around vaping to tackle issue of drug-laced vapes in Singapore Singapore Why the vape scourge in Singapore concerns everyone Singapore Organised crime groups pushing drug-laced vapes in Asia including Singapore: UN Singapore I lost my daughter to Kpod addiction: Father of 19-year-old shares heartbreak and lessons Singapore Prison school to NUS: At 36, former drug abuser finds it's never too late to get a degree Singapore Bland and boring? Some hospitals seek help from big names to enhance food menus for patients Asia Patriotism, peace and pain: The politics behind China's World War II narrative World US slaps 30% tariffs on EU and Mexico; EU warns of countermeasures 'Next the DOJ will say 'Actually, Jeffrey Epstein never even existed,'' furious pro-Trump conspiracy theorist Alex Jones tweeted after last week's move. 'This is over the top sickening.' Far-right influencer Laura Loomer called for Mr Trump to fire Ms Bondi over the issue, labeling her 'an embarrassment'. But on July 12, Mr Trump came to the defence of his attorney-general, suggesting that the so-called 'Epstein Files' were a hoax perpetrated by the Democratic Party for political gain, without specifying what benefits they hoped to attain. He struck an exasperated tone in his admonishment of his supporters. 'For years, it's Epstein, over and over again,' he said. 'Let's... not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about.' The US president called for Mr Patel and Ms Bondi to instead focus on what he terms 'The Rigged and Stolen Election of 2020', which Mr Trump lost to Mr Joe Biden. The Republican has repeatedly perpetuated unfounded conspiracy theories about his loss being due to fraud. He called for the FBI to be allowed to focus on that investigation 'instead of spending month after month looking at nothing but the same old, Radical Left inspired Documents on Jeffrey Epstein. LET PAM BONDI DO HER JOB - SHE'S GREAT!' Mr Trump, who appears in at least one decades-old video alongside Epstein at a party, has denied allegations that he was named in the files or had any direct connection to the financier. 'The conspiracy theories just aren't true, never have been,' said FBI Director Patel on July 12, hours before Mr Trump's social media post. Not everyone, however, seemed to be on the same page. US media reported that Mr Dan Bongino – an influential right-wing podcast host whom Mr Trump appointed FBI deputy director – had threatened to resign over the administration's handling of the issue. AFP
Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
Patriotism, peace and pain: The politics behind China's World War II narrative
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox A girl looking at an image of corpses in a pond at the Museum of the War of Chinese People's Resistance Against Japanese Aggression in Beijing on July 8. In a dark museum hall, a seven-year-old girl stared intently at a black-and-white image of corpses strewn haphazardly in a pond, part of a slideshow depicting the atrocities committed by Japanese soldiers in Nanjing during World War II. The next slide showed a close-up of a dead toddler. The girl blinked and turned away. 'No, I don't worry that my daughter will have nightmares from such gory photos,' her father Zhao Fei told The Sunday Times. 'She needs to know what terrible things the Japanese did to us, so that one day, if our country needs her, she will step up.' Asked whether he meant that if there is a war, he would want his daughter to take up arms, he replied emphatically: 'Yes, of course. Boy or girl, we must all do our part.' Mr Zhao had travelled with his daughter from Jinan city in Shandong province, some 400km away, to Beijing specifically to visit the newly reopened Museum of the War of Chinese People's Resistance against Japanese Aggression. China officially counts its anti-war efforts as starting from 1931, when the Japanese invaded its north-eastern territories. The museum was established in 1987 at the site of the 1937 Marco Polo Bridge incident, which marked the beginning of Japan's full-scale invasion of China. The museum exhibition is one of a series of events China is organising to mark the 80th anniversary of its 'victory against Japan and fascism'. The commemoration will culminate in a military parade at Tiananmen Square on Sept 3 , which Russian President Vladimir Putin is expected to attend and US President Donald Trump has reportedly been invited to. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World US slaps 30% tariffs on EU and Mexico; EU warns of countermeasures Singapore S'pore shows what's possible when digital innovation is matched with purpose: UK foreign secretary Singapore Casual racism should be tackled by getting more people to understand it is not acceptable: David Neo Asia Fuel was cut off during take-off: Preliminary report on Air India crash Singapore Pulling back the curtain: A backstage look at the 2025 NDP show segment Singapore $3 cashback for hawker centre meals and shopping at heartland stores with DBS PayLah initiative Singapore Body of 62-year-old man recovered from waters off East Coast Park Asia Aerobridge hits Qantas plane at Sydney Airport, damaging engine, delaying flight Hatred of Japanese militarism, commitment to peace, and love for the motherland have long been three recurring themes in China's narrative of World War II. They reflect Beijing's self-image of the country as a peace-loving nation that has risen from a century of humiliation, partly inflicted by Japan. But there are also times in which these themes do not fit with the realities of the present. The hatred many Chinese feel towards Japanese militarism is rooted in undeniable historical trauma. Historians may debate the exact number of people killed in the 1937 Nanjing Massacre, or whether tales of soldiers who leapt off a cliff rather than surrender were overly glorified. But the tragic truth remains: Japan's 14-year invasion of China resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians. Japanese troops engaged in systematic torture, rape, biological warfare and the destruction of entire villages. The Beijing museum devotes a hushed chamber to the martyrs, their names a silent roll call of sacrifice. When Japanese politicians, bowing to right-wing pressure, visit the Yasukuni Shrine that honours convicted war criminals among others, or allow textbooks to whitewash wartime atrocities, it deepens a lingering belief among some Chinese that justice was never fully served, and that Japan does not deserve forgiveness. But when historical pain is repeatedly inflamed, such as by social media commentators eager to stoke outrage for clicks, it risks hardening into a nationalism that no longer targets militarism alone, but expands to vilify the Japanese people more broadly. On Sept 18, 2024, the anniversary of Japan's invasion of north-eastern China, a Chinese man fatally stabbed a Japanese schoolboy in front of his mother. Earlier that year, another man tried to attack a Japanese child and his mother, stabbing to death a Chinese school bus attendant trying to protect the pair. The government responded swiftly: Death sentences were handed down to the perpetrators, and viral videos falsely claiming that Japanese schools in China trained spies were taken offline. But the Japanese community in China is rattled. It has seen how hatred of past aggressors can morph into hostility towards innocent civilians today. A second theme in this year's commemorations is China's proclamation of its enduring commitment to peace. The tag line for the Beijing war museum exhibition is: 'Remembering history, honouring the martyrs; cherishing peace and creating a better future.' For Beijing, peace is not only an aspiration, but also a moral high ground that it claims as it rises on the world stage. China often portrays itself as a benevolent power that offers shared development and has never colonised or invaded another country, unlike the Western powers in the past. It is a potent message – especially to the developing countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America that Beijing seeks to rally around under the banner of the Global South. Beijing's claim largely holds true. Compared with Europe or the Middle East, where wars still smoulder in Ukraine and Iran, Asia is relatively peaceful and stable. But some of China's neighbours are not totally convinced by Beijing's pacifist posture. Some South-east Asian countries, like the Philippines and Vietnam, remain wary of China's assertiveness in the South China Sea. Japan is uneasy about Chinese coast guard patrols near the Diaoyu/Senkaku islands over which it has overlapping claims with China. And Taiwan, which Beijing claims as its territory, feels regularly threatened by Chinese military drills. China's moral support for Russia, now three years into its war against Ukraine, has also placed it on shaky moral ground in the eyes of many Europeans. Love for the motherland, or patriotism, is the third element in China's World War II narrative, alongside hatred of Japanese militarism and commitment to peace. The intensity of each of the three themes ebbs and flows over time. This year, patriotism comes across as the strongest theme. President Xi Jinping underscored this when he visited a war museum in Shanxi province on July 7, which marked the 88th anniversary of the start of Japan's full-scale invasion of China. Speaking to the youth gathered at the Shanxi museum, he congratulated them for 'being born in the right time', and urged them to be 'dignified, honourable and proud Chinese', and to 'bravely shoulder the great responsibility of national rejuvenation'. Mr Xi's remarks are best understood when contrasted against a 'century of humiliation' – a narrative drilled into every school child. Over the 100 years from the first Opium War that broke out in 1839 – in which British gunboats forced open Qing dynasty ports – to World War II, when China suffered devastating losses to an Asian country with a much smaller population, one painful lesson endured: Weakness invites aggression. Mr Xi has cast himself as the leader who made China strong. Today's strength is both a source of national pride and a shield against future humiliation. The public is encouraged to feel grateful – for being born into a powerful China, and for having a leader who has delivered that strength. This call for national pride doubles as a rallying cry for unity under the Communist Party of China (CPC). Since the CPC derives some political legitimacy from its war efforts, it has been careful not to give too much credit to the Kuomintang, which some historians argue had borne the brunt of the fighting against Japan during the war. The CPC had fought the Kuomintang, which had ruled China from 1912, to gain control over China in 1949. This may explain why Mr Xi chose to visit the Shanxi museum, the site of the Hundred Regiment Offensive, one of the largest military campaigns against the Japanese led by communist forces. He was not at the July 7 reopening ceremony of the Beijing museum, which stands at the site of the Marco Polo Bridge incident, where Kuomintang troops were on the front line. Back at the Beijing museum, the exhibition concluded with a towering message in red characters on a white wall – clearly intended by curators as the final word: 'The Communist Party of China is the most resolute in defending our people's independence and interests, and the bravest in resisting foreign invasion.' A display at the Museum of the War of Chinese People's Resistance Against Japanese Aggression reminding visitors that the Communist Party of China is the bravest in resisting foreign aggression. ST PHOTO: YEW LUN TIAN China's narrative around World War II is all the more poignant when viewed against the biggest geopolitical challenge it now faces – the United States. Official Chinese commentators often frame the US as seeking to block China's rise. Remarks by some US politicians toying with the idea of regime change have also worried some party leaders. Today's threat does not come in the form of foreign troops, but tariffs, sanctions and tech bans. The battlefield has shifted from trenches to trade; the weapon from gunpowder to semiconductors and rare earths. Drawing from past lessons, Beijing's strategy is: Only strength can keep China safe. And in this new struggle with the US, the ruling party is determined to prove China won't be pushed around again like 80 years ago.
