Hurriyat 'irrelevant', Kashmiris must move on, find place for themselves within India: Bilal Lone
"Hurriyat conference has lost relevance because we could not act," he said, adding, "so the concept of Hurriyat may have been good at that time...but when we visualise Hurriyat today, it is non-functional and somewhere, Hurriyat has faltered, no doubt about that."
Lone was equally critical of Pakistan's role and said, "We have heard many statements but nothing has come out (of it)," and added that "Pakistan should help Kashmir in soothing things here, rather than creating fissures out here."
He dismissed the idea that Pakistan would ever "get" Kashmir through force, calling it a "very silly suggestion."
To illustrate his point, Lone cited a recent escalation of tensions along the border that saw a 48-hour war-like situation.
"Not even an inch moved at the border," he said.
Lone said that Kashmiris must now move on.
"We need to come out of this mess, whether it is with or without Pakistan, we have to come out of this," he stated.
He expressed a deep sense of regret over the separatist movement's failures, saying, "The Hurriyat Conference had got a lot of opportunities, we faltered somewhere. And we could have got something for our people, but we couldn't. That's the reality, let's be honest about it."
In a candid admission of past failures, Lone said his shift towards mainstream politics is born not out of political expediency, but a personal conviction to pursue a "genuine political process."
Reflecting on his journey, Lone said, "I have no regrets being on the other side of the fence, but the only regret, which is a very big one, is that we could not do anything. Much could have been done, but we could not", and summarised his change of heart with a Hindi adage: "dair aaye durust aaye (better late than never)."
Addressing his move from separatist to mainstream politics, Lone said he is not in the race for any position like a chief minister or MLA, but is instead motivated by a desire to pay back his people.
"I think I need to pay it back. So for me, it is a payback time," he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
CM Saini slams Mamata, says no place for Bangladeshi infiltrators in Haryana
Gurugram Police had earlier said that eight Bangladeshi nationals had been detained as part of an ongoing drive to identify illegal immigrants, who will be deported soon. 'There is no place for Bangladeshi infiltrators in Haryana; they are being taken out from the state (deported) as quickly as possible,' Saini said in a post on X in Hindi. Chandigarh, Jul 26 (PTI) Amid a drive in Gurugram district to identify illegal immigrants, Haryana Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini on Saturday asserted that there is no place for Bangladeshi infiltrators in the state, as he slammed West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee for her 'sympathy towards those who breach the country's security'. Mamata Banerjee on Thursday alleged that poor Bangla-speaking workers from West Bengal were being harassed, detained and even pushed into Bangladesh by authorities in certain BJP-ruled states, dubbing the incidents as acts of 'linguistic terror'. 'West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee's sympathy toward those who breach the country's security is not only unfortunate but also against national interests. It is utterly deplorable that a chief minister, driven by appeasement and vote-bank politics, stoops so low as to compromise the country's security,' Saini said in his post. He adde, 'No compromise against India's unity, sovereignty and Constitution is acceptable in Haryana or anywhere in the country. For us, the nation's interest will always be paramount.' In a strongly-worded post on X on Thursday, Banerjee accused the governments in Haryana and Rajasthan of unleashing 'tortures and tortures (sic)' on Bengali-speaking citizens, and questioned what the BJP was trying to prove through such actions. 'Have been increasingly receiving reports of detentions and atrocities on our Bengali-speaking people from different districts of West Bengal in Gurgaon, Haryana. West Bengal police is receiving these reports from Haryana police in the name of requests for identity searches,' she said in her post. On Saturday, while referring to a report by New York-based Human Rights Watch (HRW), Banerjee strongly criticised the alleged deportation of Bangla-speaking Muslims from India without due process, calling it a 'shame' for the country. She claimed the HRW report stated that such deportations have been taking place systematically in the BJP-ruled states of Assam, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Odisha and Delhi, following a directive by the Ministry of Home Affairs, government of India. PTI CHS VSD ARI ARI This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
Reports on officials, religion, protests land journalists in trouble; those in towns most impacted, finds study
Reporting on public officials, religious matters, and protests were the three most common reasons for which a journalist in India faced criminal charges, a study, co-authored by the National Law University (NLU), Delhi, has found. The study said that journalists from small cities and towns, or those who reported for local publications, in Hindi or other regional languages, were most impacted, and their cases often did not receive national or international media attention. The other two authors of the report are TrialWatch, an initiative of the Clooney Foundation for Justice, and Human Rights Institute at Columbia Law School. The report, 'Pressing Charges: A Study of Criminal Cases Against Journalists Across States in India', was based on an analysis of 423 criminal cases registered against 427 journalists covering a total of 624 incidents of 'criminalisation of journalists' in relation to their work from 2012-2022. At least 40% of the journalists covered in the dataset were arrested, the study found. 'Our dataset revealed that reporting on public officials was the most common reason journalists faced charges, the basis for charges in 147 incidents. The second most common reason was for reporting on religious matters – 99 times, while the third most common was reporting on protests – 79 times. Significantly, in over 100 incidents, the charges related to the reporters' alleged conduct while reporting, instead of what they were reporting on,' the report said. The criminal charges most frequently invoked against journalists were offences related to public tranquility, criminal intimidation and insult, promoting enmity, defamation, offences against public servants, and offences relating to religion. G.S. Bajpai, vice-chancellor, NLU, told The Hindu that the growing trend of invoking criminal laws against journalists raises serious constitutional concerns. 'This report reveals that journalists, particularly from smaller towns, are increasingly being targeted through penal provisions. While it is true that journalists must uphold professional standards and exercise due responsibility in their reporting, the data emerging from this study points to a troubling pattern of criminalisation. Such developments do not bode well for the health of a constitutional democracy, where freedom of the press is a foundational pillar,' he said. The report said that a journalist's experience of the justice system differed based on location and status. 'While journalists in major metropolises were arrested in 24% of the total incidents recorded in such cities, this figure increased to 58% for journalists in small cities/towns. This, in turn, was linked to journalists' access to justice. In 65% of the incidents involving journalists from major metropolises, they secured interim protection from arrest, while the corresponding figure for small-town journalists was a mere 3%. This can potentially be explained by the fact that this relief was most often granted by the Supreme Court, which has a single seat in Delhi,' the report added. It was highlighted in the study that out of 244 cases for which data were available, more than 65% cases had not reached any conclusion as of October 30, 2023. 'In fact, the police had not even completed their investigation in 40% of the cases for which we had relevant data. And only 16 cases (6%) saw a concluded trial — ending in conviction or acquittal,' the report said. The registration of the case had harsh impacts on journalists and their loved ones which included the possibility of arrest, intimidation by the police or politicians, as well as social stigma. The report highlighted that cases against journalists in India do not, however, always take the same course. 'For instance, while defamation charges, which are prosecuted privately rather than by government authorities, were more common against journalists in larger cities and against investigative journalism, offences against public servants were more common in smaller towns and were invoked in relation to journalists' on-ground news-gathering activities,' it said. Journalists working in Hindi and other regional languages suffered from a similarly adverse ratio in relation to counterparts working in English, the study said. 'Our data suggests that while the process is the punishment, the pain it inflicts may be proportional to the accused's distance from the national capital,' it further said.
Scroll.in
7 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Supreme Court declines to extend stay on release of ‘Udaipur Files'
The Supreme Court on Friday declined to extend the stay on the release of the Hindi film Udaipur Files, which is reportedly based on the 2022 killing of Udaipur tailor Kanhaiya Lal, reported The Indian Express. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi told the petitioners to approach the Delhi High Court to challenge the Union government's order, which allowed the film to be released with six cuts, according to Live Law. The film was scheduled to be released on July 11. The Delhi High Court had stayed the release on June 10 and directed the Union government to examine the film's content. The Centre recommended that the film should be released with a disclaimer, The Indian Express reported. 'You first go to the High Court, the other side is satisfied with the central government order,' PTI quoted the bench as saying on Friday. 'So, please go to the High Court, why waste our time.' The Supreme Court also clarified that it was not commenting on the merits of the case and said that it was the High Court's domain. It requested the High Court to take up the matter on Monday. In June 2022, Lal, a tailor, was killed in Rajasthan's Udaipur for purportedly sharing a social media post in support of suspended Bharatiya Janata Party Spokesperson Nupur Sharma. She had made disparaging remarks about Prophet Muhammad during a television debate in May 2022. The assailants and several other persons accused in the matter were arrested by the Rajasthan Police. A video showed two men claiming responsibility for the killing of Lal as they brandished the cleavers used in the murder. The murder case was investigated by the National Investigation Agency and the persons accused in the matter were charged under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act. The trial is underway in a Special NIA Court in Jaipur. The High Court had stayed the release of Udaipur Files while hearing a batch of petitions, including one filed by Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind chief Maulana Arshad Madani, seeking a ban on the film. The petitioners had alleged that the film is communally provocative and vilifies the Muslim community. A day before the order, the Supreme Court had heard a writ petition filed by Mohammed Javed, one of the eight persons accused in the murder case. Javed argued that the release of the film would violate his right to a fair trial. He had sought that the release of the film be postponed until the trial in the matter concluded. The petitioner also argued that the film, based on its trailer, appeared to be communally provocative. In response, the Supreme Court said that the petition could be mentioned before the appropriate bench when the Supreme Court reopened on July 14 after the summer break. It added that the movie could be released in the meantime.
