PepsiCo bottler Varun Beverages opts to expand reach as competitors in soft-drinks market engage in price war
'Strong double-digit volume growth in India with margin expansion should allay investor concerns around Reliance's Campa, a key positive in Q1," analysts at Jefferies India said in a report on 30 April, referring to the competitor's disruptive pricing. 'Although Q2CY25 is quite important from a seasonality perspective."
India Ebitda margin rose 111 basis points (bps) due to operational efficiencies aided by volume growth. VBL's consolidated revenue increased 29% in Q1CY25, encouraging it to guide for a double-digit growth for CY25. This despite rivals splurging on campaigns in the ongoing Indian Premier League cricket tournament and sweetening trade margins.
Nuvama Institutional Equities noted that Tata Consumer has re-indexed retailer margins in its NourishCo business to match the competition. Coca-Cola highlighted double-digit volume growth in Q1CY25, led by strong performances from Coca-Cola and Thums Up, although it reported a drop in non-alcoholic ready-to-drink beverages.
'Coca-Cola saw over 180 million servings during the Maha Kumbh Mela festival, which in our view would have helped the industry growth rate," Nuvama's analysts said.
Reliance Consumer has announced new plants in Bihar and Assam to ramp up its manufacturing and distribution footprint.
Against this backdrop, VBL coped by doubling down on expanding its outlet coverage and cold-chain infrastructure. Its mantra: deepen market penetration and sharpen the product mix. It believes rising competition is expanding the overall category, reiterating that with only 4 million of India's 12 million FMCG outlets covered, distribution remains a key growth lever.
VBL's energy and hydration categories grew over 100% in Q1CY25. Value-added dairy, a new engine, also grew at 100%+, albeit on a smaller base. Smaller packs—though costlier to make—helped lift realisation per case, which rose 1.8% in India but stayed flat in the overseas markets.
On the flipside, VBL's consolidated gross margin fell to 54.6%, down 171 basis points year-on-year. Higher volumes from South Africa hurt as a large part of sales there came from owned brands that have lower margins. Plus, overall water costs have been shifted into direct costs, while the rising share of carbonated soft drinks and smaller pack sizes pushed up the cost of goods sold.
The Ebitda margin drop of 20 bps to 22.7% was much smaller in Q1CY25. VBL continues to hold firm on its India Ebitda margin floor of 21%. The management said that while inflation and product-mix shifts could pressure the margin temporarily, its backward integration, improved scale and focus on operational efficiency give it confidence in defending profitability—even in an aggressive market.
VBL has a capex plan of
₹
3,100 crore for this year. It is adding four plants, including the Bihar and Meghalaya sites set to go live in May.
Meanwhile, South Africa remains a work in progress. Volumes rose 13% year-on-year over the trailing 12 months, and Pepsi's contribution improved from 15% to 20%. It is trimming loss-making SKUs. The South Africa business Ebitda margin improved from 10% at acquisition to 14% but is still much lower.
VBL shares fell 2% on Wednesday after the results as investors weighed the near-term pressures. Jefferies cut its earnings per share estimates by 7-9% on moderation in its assumptions on growth in the international segment and lower margin assumptions.
Even so, with the market offering enough growth potential, VBL's bet on reach may well pay off if execution is healthy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
7 hours ago
- Business Standard
Coca-Cola, Bhartiya family likely to consider listing HCCB in India
American beverage major Coca-Cola Company and its local partner, the Bhartiya family, may look at listing Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages (HCCB) in India and will not hold a majority stake in the bottling company in the next five years, according to a source in the know. The source said, as per the plan, going forward, the Bhartiya family becomes the reference and controlling shareholder of the business. 'They are not, by any means, a passive financial investor or a passive strategic investor, and that's not what Coca-Cola Company was looking for here,' the source said. On HCCB possibly going for a listing in the coming years, the source added, 'There's certainly been no explicit confirmation of the intention to proceed with an IPO, but that's an obvious possibility.' In December last year, the Jubilant Bhartia Group, through Jubilant Beverages, announced that it would acquire a 40 per cent stake in Hindustan Coca-Cola Holdings—the parent company of the local bottling companies—at a valuation of Rs 12,000 crore. While Coca-Cola still remains the majority shareholder, the Atlanta-based beverage major's strategy is to refranchise its bottling operations globally as part of its asset-light model across the world. Rothschild & Co advised Coca-Cola on this transaction, which concluded this month. 'We started the process of reaching out to a number of potential Indian family partners that we thought would be fit-for-purpose partners in late 2023 and conducted a competitive process. What was initially a competitive process among several of those eventually led, in September 2024, to an exclusive dialogue with the Bhartiya family, which led to the signing of the transaction,' Akeel Sachak, partner and global head of consumer, Rothschild & Co, said at a roundtable. He added that one of the things that distinguished the Bhartiya family from other suitors was their success as a franchise partner of a major American brand, Domino's. While talking about trends emerging in the consumer space, multiple Indian industrial houses and conglomerates are keen to expand in the broader consumer sector, Subhakanta Bal, managing director, Rothschild & Co India, said. 'We are beginning to see multiple family offices that are wanting to tap into the kind of potential that, let's say, the broader Indian consumer sector offers. The recent paints transaction that just got announced (JSW acquired AkzoNobel's India business), or some of the largest families who have deployed significant amounts of capital into essentially what are new sectors or sunrise sectors, and we're beginning to see that,' Bal added.
Hindustan Times
10 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump, Coke and the Sugar Cartel
President Trump is pressing Coca-Cola to make its U.S. soft drinks with cane sugar instead of high-fructose corn syrup, and on Tuesday the company said it will launch Mr. Trump's preferred version as a new product this fall. Consumers will decide if it succeeds, but if Mr. Trump wants to help, he could dismantle U.S. sugar protectionism that gives corn syrup a cost advantage. This episode is a collision between MAGA-style economics and populist nutrition. Scientific authorities generally say there isn't a big health difference between corn syrup and sugar, and the important thing is not to chug too much of either. A soda isn't carrot juice, no matter the sweetener. Yet Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has called corn syrup 'a formula for making you obese and diabetic.' He's a man of the left who blames America's health problems on big corporations. Soda aficionados also say they can taste the difference, which is what Mr. Trump seemed to cite. 'I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so,' he wrote on Truth Social. 'This will be a very good move by them—You'll see. It's just better!' Having ended the Ukraine and Gaza wars, Mr. Trump apparently has the time to tell soda makers what to put in their bottles. Coca-Cola's statement was that it plans to sell 'an offering made with U.S. cane sugar,' but as a 'complement' to its existing U.S. lineup. In other words, corn syrup isn't being phased out. Since it's cheaper, that's no surprise. The federal government props up sugar prices to the benefit of U.S. producers, particularly but not exclusively in Florida, by meddling in markets with a complicated tariff-quota system. 'In 2022, U.S. wholesale refined sugar prices were more than double the world price,' the Government Accountability Office said in 2023. Its report cited estimates that U.S. sugar producers get a protectionist windfall of $1.4 billion to $2.7 billion a year. But sugar users 'lose an estimated $2.5 billion to $3.5 billion of consumer benefit,' making it a net loss. Also, high U.S. sugar prices are another incentive for confectioners and food manufacturers to set up shop elsewhere. It's classic protectionism: The government gives concentrated benefits to sugar producers. The costs are borne by everybody, but they are diffuse. The program is a net loss for the country, but the subsidized industry becomes influential and will spend money in politics to preserve its take. The downstream jobs that never get created because of the protectionist policies don't have anyone to stand up for them, because they don't exist. By the way, Mr. Trump is threatening to levy a new 50% tariff on imports from Brazil. What does the U.S. buy from there? Cane sugar.
NDTV
13 hours ago
- NDTV
Coca-Cola Confirms Launch Of Cane Sugar Coke In US After Push From Donald Trump
Coca-Cola is set to launch a new cane sugar variant of its soft drink in the United States. The announcement comes shortly after former US President Donald Trump claimed he had urged the company to return to using real cane sugar in its beverages. Trump, known for his preference for Diet Coke, which is sweetened with aspartame, has publicly pushed for the change. Coca-Cola had originally used cane sugar in all its drinks, but switched to high-fructose corn syrup in 1984 due to rising sugar prices, according to Fortune. In its second-quarter earnings report released on July 22, 2025, Coca-Cola confirmed it would introduce a cane sugar version of Coke in the US this autumn. "As part of its ongoing innovation agenda, this fall in the United States, the company plans to launch an offering made with US cane sugar to expand its Trademark Coca-Cola product range," the company said. "This addition is designed to complement the company's strong core portfolio and offer more choices across occasions and preferences," reported People magazine. Trump had earlier posted on his Truth Social account: "I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so. I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them - You'll see. It's just better!" Cane sugar Coca-Cola, commonly referred to as "Mexican Coke", is already available in parts of the US through imports from Mexico, where it is bottled in glass and made using traditional sweetening methods. Trump's comments have drawn mixed reactions, including criticism from the US corn industry. John Bode, President and CEO of the Corn Refiners Association, issued a statement on July 16, 2025, saying: "Replacing high fructose corn syrup with cane sugar doesn't make sense. President Trump stands for American manufacturing jobs, American farmers, and reducing the trade deficit." "Replacing high fructose corn syrup with cane sugar would cost thousands of American food manufacturing jobs, depress farm income, and boost imports of foreign sugar, all with no nutritional benefit," he added. Coca-Cola's new launch aims to provide consumers with more options to suit their taste and ingredient preferences.
