Greens say they followed the rules, call debates commission 'dishonest'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Observer
37 minutes ago
- National Observer
Convoy sentencing part of a fraught judicial history around protest
Tamara Lich emerged from the Ontario Court of Justice in downtown Ottawa on Thursday afternoon, walking past throngs of journalists, right wing media personalities and dedicated supporters brandishing signs. The two-day sentencing hearing for Lich and Chris Barber — two of the 'Freedom Convoy's' main organizers — saw their supporters from the Ottawa Valley and even as far as Alberta gather both outside and inside the courthouse to sing the praises of these controversial figures. Inside the courtroom, with roughly 60 observers and journalists on day one, the mood was mellow and restrained, save for a smattering of snickers when the Crown attorney said this case is not about political views. The spectacle provided an opportunity for Pierre Poilievre and the Conservative Party of Canada to reaffirm their loyalty to the far-right segment of their base. 'The Crown wants 7 years prison time for the charge of mischief for Lich & Barber,' Poilievre posted on X, two days before the sentencing hearing began. 'How is this justice?' 'This is political vengeance, not actual justice,' wrote deputy Conservative Leader Melissa Lantsman. As Lich and Barber await their sentences, expected to be announced on Oct. 7, these statements and many more like them continue to ricochet through the conservative media ecosystem. Ezra Levant, founder of Rebel News, showed up at the Ottawa court to cover the two-day hearing; so did right-wing influencers like Right Blend and Dacey Media. Those who couldn't make it in person posted from afar. 'Canada is turning into a banana republic,' the Pleb Reporter posted from Montreal. 'The left are cheering for dictator style punishments for light dissent. A protest where no violence occurred. Please wake up Canada.' Canada's National Observer obtained an internal report by the CSIS spy agency on 'Climate Change and Terrorism.' The majority of the document — some 90 per cent of the text — focuses on threats posed by environmentalists. Transport Canada has estimated that the Convoy movement cost Canadians $3.9 billion in lost trade due to the convoy-affiliated border blockades that spread across the country in February 2022. The protests cost the city of Ottawa over $36 million, mostly on policing. That figure doesn't include the cost to businesses forced to close for weeks, or the harm done to some 12,000 residents of Ottawa's Centretown whose homes were bombarded by the noise of semi-trucks honking their horns in synchronized 10-minute blasts, loud and long enough to cause permanent hearing damage. 'It's really hard to describe how fucked up those horns were,' Paul Champ, the lawyer who filed the injunction that ultimately forced an end to the honking — but not the occupation — told Canada's National Observer. 'They had a schedule. Four hundred semi-trucks pulling down all together. It was dystopian.' Champ was initially reluctant to get involved. 'I believe really deeply in protest, and it doesn't matter what issue you're protesting. You should have the right to be out there. There's lots of reasonable reasons to disagree with certain COVID measures and given how significant the impact was on people's life, people should protest,' he said. He also felt protest leaders shouldn't be held responsible for the actions of a few bad actors, like those who defecated on residents' lawns or sent fireworks bouncing off apartment walls. But the damage done by the horns, along with the serial harassment of businesses and residents alike for wearing masks (at a time when mask-wearing was mandated for public indoor spaces to prevent COVID's spread), changed his mind. 'It's important to distinguish between the issues that the people were protesting and the manner in which they were protesting,' Champ said. 'They were honking those horns because they were trying to make living downtown extremely difficult. And they were doing that to put pressure on the government … they were kind of holding the people of downtown Ottawa hostage.' For the Conservative Party to become the movement's champion without acknowledging any of those harms spoke volumes, Champ added. Poilievre famously brought donuts to members of the Convoy during the blockades, and described them as 'bright, joyful, and peaceful Canadians championing freedom over fear.' 'Poilievre never spoke out about how miserable it was for the people who have young kids, for the elderly, people with disabilities, the shelters that are downtown, all the business people — he just didn't give a crap because he's exploiting it for political gain.' That strategy created an enormous new base for Poilievre in 2022, almost overnight. 'Pierre took a principled stance which hurt him politically when it mattered the most. This is how he earned my loyalty,' the Pleb Reporter posted on Monday. Courting the Convoy vote brought Poilievre within a hair of becoming prime minister, but ultimately backfired spectacularly. It cost him not only the election but also the parliamentary seat (Carleton, which abuts downtown Ottawa) he had held for 21 years. Judging by their engagement with this week's sentencing of Lich and Barber, however, Poilievre and the Conservatives still view their Convoy following as crucial to the party's future. In return, right-wing influencers such as The Pleb Reporter, Right Blend and others were quick to thank Poilievre for speaking up about the sentencing this week, marking the first time many of them have mentioned the Conservative leader since he lost the election. If any doubts remained about whether the two groups still feel they need each other, this week should put them to rest. Who does the state fear more? This chapter of the Freedom Convoy's legal travails also revives deeper questions about which protest groups are seen as threats by Canadian authorities, and which are not. Canada's National Observer obtained an internal report by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) spy agency entitled ' Climate Change and Terrorism: From Threat Multiplication to Radicalization.' The report was produced in July 2024, two years after the Freedom Convoy. It includes a brief mention of 'the Freedom Movement' under a one-paragraph sidebar labeled 'Climate denialists and the Culture Wars.' Here, the report briefly acknowledges that climate denial is merging with other conspiracy theories to 'drive acts of serious violence or terrorism.' Among the hybrids identified are 'conspiracy theories about government attempts to restrict individual freedoms (e.g. 'climate lockdown').' But the majority of the document — some 90 per cent of the text — focuses on threats posed by environmentalists. 'In Canada, a significant increase in the frequency or severity of extreme weather is likely to drive radicalization to violence and increase the threat from environmentally focused terrorists in the medium to long term,' the report states. It further predicts the 'increased use of extreme weather events in propaganda by violent extremists to radicalize and recruit new supporters, notably by assigning blame for climate-driven disasters on specific groups (migrants, politicians, industries, etc.).' Headings that follow include 'Eco-terrorism,' 'Violent fringes of the environmental movement,' and 'Eco-Fascists.' CSIS did not reply to queries about this report from Canada's National Observer. Asked whether the organization views eco-radicals as a greater threat to national security than right-wing groups like the Freedom Convoy, a spokesperson wrote by email: 'CSIS's 2024 Public report — available online — provides a detailed overview of how CSIS views the current global threat environment.' That report, however, only mentions 'climate change' once in passing, without naming any specific related threats. It says nothing about eco-terrorism, climate denialism or the Freedom Convoy. James Turk, director for the Centre for Free Expression, reviewed the document. The CSIS Integrated Threat Assessment Centre is a specialized organization whose job is to look at the rise in terrorism and other threats, so it makes sense the report doesn't dwell on the 'culture wars' and climate denial, he said in an interview with Canada's National Observer. But viewing the environmental movement through the lens of terrorism creates an environment where the discussion shifts from how to limit radicalization rather than how to limit the damages of climate change, he said. 'Let's prevent the problem rather than figure out how we're going to police the outcome if we don't remedy the problem,' Turk said. Who's scarier, eco-terrorists or right-wing radicals? It's common for protesters from all ideological backgrounds to feel unjustly persecuted by police. But for all the complaints from Conservatives and Freedom Convoy members over their rough treatment at the end of their blockade, the Convoy's start was marked by an unusual level of police cooperation. 'The big question was why the police did not enforce any laws for that particular group,' said Joao Velloso, a professor of criminology at the University of Ottawa. When truckers started pulling into downtown Ottawa, he noted, police didn't even hand out tickets for illegal parking. 'It's quite scary that police can decide to not enforce any laws. That's quite dangerous for democracy.' Images of police officers shaking hands and taking selfies with protesters emerged not just from Ottawa, but also from other convoy blockades throughout the country, like the one in Coutts, Alberta, where some of the protesters were later found to have been stockpiling assault weapons. Each of these groups was blocking critical infrastructure, collectively inflicting billions of dollars of damage on the national economy. This paints a stark contrast to the treatment given to environmental and Indigenous protesters who target infrastructure. During the Fairy Creek protests against old growth logging on Vancouver Island in 2021, RCMP officers were filmed tearing the masks off protesters before spraying them point blank in the face with pepper spray — tactics a judge later declared illegal — for blocking a logging road. Two years before that, during the Wet'suwet'en protests against BC's Coastal GasLink pipeline, RCMP dispatched snipers ahead of a militarized arrest of Indigenous protesters and journalists, generating international headlines. It is hard to compare how various protest groups are treated because with all the different factions and protest methods it's rarely an apples to apples comparison. For example, the 'Freedom Convoy' protests were exceptional because the protesters utilized huge hard-to-remove trucks, which he says may have thrown a spanner in the police response in Ottawa. While Turk emphasized it's 'hard to generalize' which groups are perceived and treated as a bigger threat by the state, overall, 'people who see themselves as defenders of the environment have been treated more harshly than people who are promoting the exploitation of the environment,' Turk said. In Canada, property rights and trespass law 'are used to justify harsh treatment of many progressive protests' including ones that interfere with logging, pipelines and energy infrastructure or advocate for Palestinian solidarity, he said. Many environmental, climate and land defender movements go against the status quo — anchored by the political, economic, legal and corporate landscape in Canada — and are therefore likely to be perceived as a threat, Turk added, nodding to the immense power and influence of fossil fuel lobby groups both in Canada and the US. Powerful lobby groups influence the political agenda and seek to shape views on national threats, whether it pertains to war or climate change — and right now, it appears fossil fuel interests are shaping the narrative, Turk said. 'When we talk about who we're afraid of, we're afraid of the left,' said Meaghan Daniel, a Montreal lawyer who has defended activists and Indigenous protest movements across the country. Daniel has roots in activism herself, and was deeply involved in the left-wing G20 protests in Toronto in 2010, where 1,100 people were arrested in the largest mass arrest in Canadian history. The police chief in charge of that operation, Bill Blair, was later put in charge of CSIS and the RCMP as public safety minister. 'For a long time we've seen extensive surveillance and infiltration of far-left groups, but we didn't see that [with the Freedom Convoy],' Daniel said. ''We didn't even see the acknowledgement of far-right groups until about a decade after the G20.' That helps explain why authorities were caught 'flat-footed' by Convoy groups in 2022, when they seized critical infrastructure all across the nation with almost no effort to prevent them until it was too late. 'I think they were really surprised at the existence of far-right extremist organizing.' Even after all levels of government awoke to the scale of the threat, the way police finally ended the Convoy protests was far more peaceful than similar actions against major left-wing acts of civil disobedience. Almost no arrests were made, and in the end only three people were criminally charged. During the Wet'suwet'en protests, RCMP arrested 74 people in four separate raids. At Fairy Creek, the number of arrests once again surpassed 1,100 and many were prosecuted. 'If you look at all the mass incarceration events, they're almost entirely left-wing,' Daniel said. At the same time, Daniel agrees that the Crown's recommendation of 7 and 8 year jail terms for Lich and Barber, respectively, is far longer than typical for protest organizers. 'I don't want to see a huge, long jail sentence happening,' she said. 'Aggressive policing only ends up radicalizing people. Whenever forceful removal of a protester happens, usually that protester in turn doesn't become more compliant and trusting of the state. The opposite happens.'
National Observer
37 minutes ago
- National Observer
Ottawa warned early in new year of wheels wobbling on $100 billion EV strategy
The federal government was warned early in 2025 that its $100 billion electric vehicle strategy was in danger of being run off the road by slowing North American EV sales and the economic mayhem sown by US President Donald Trump's tariffs on Canada, a newly released document reveals. François-Philippe Champagne, then federal minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, was sent a briefing note on Jan. 10 by his deputy minister, Philip Jennings, that flagged 'a decline in expectations' among EV makers that imperiled the plan's progress. 'The slowdown in growth has contributed to delays, modifications, or scaling back of planned investments' in the auto sector despite tens of billions of dollars in investments having already been announced, Jennings said in the document obtained by Canada's National Observer through an access to information and privacy request. The briefing note was delivered to Champagne only weeks after he told CNO that critics of the government's embattled EV strategy lacked 'vision and ambition.' Champagne was named Minister of National Revenue in a cabinet shuffle after the Liberals won the April federal election that also saw Mélanie Joly take over the Industry, Science and Economic Development portfolio. Developing an EV industrial ecosystem from mining critical minerals used in vehicle batteries to new assembly lines for electric vehicles would give Canada a competitive advantage in a global industry 'for decades to come — but not overnight,' Champagne said in December. Joly's office told Canada's National Observer that it 'recognizes the sector's concerns and is continuing to engage meaningfully with industry stakeholders to address and alleviate challenges' linked to US tariffs, though no specific action plan was outlined in its response. 'Despite short-term policy fluctuations, the long-term trajectory for EV adoption remains strong,' says Dunsky Energy analyst Lindsay Wiginton 'Our government is working to ensure EVs are made in Canada, so Canadian workers benefit from the growth and jobs in this industry," said a spokesperson. Canada's EV plans going flat? A total of $46.1 billion in investments across the Canadian EV supply chain was announced by automakers including Honda, Volkswagen, GM and Ford from October 2021 to April last year. Federal and provincial governments pledged $52.5 billion in incentives, tax breaks and other support, according to Canada's Parliamentary Budget Officer, which provides economic analysis to the government. But dark skies have threatened the EV strategy and long-term future of auto manufacturing in Ontario as the Canada-US trade war drags on. In April, GM shuttered its CAMI assembly plant in Ingersoll, Ont., where it builds an electric delivery van. GM expected to reopen the plant at 'half capacity' in the fall. Ford and Stellantis, which cited tariffs as a major factor in a $3.7 billion loss in the first half of 2025, have also suspended or delayed EV production in Canada. Some 40,000 EVs have been produced to-date in Canada, which in 2024 imposed a 100 per cent tariff on imports of Chinese EVs to protect the domestic industry. China made 12.4 million electric cars last year, accounting for 70 per cent of global EV output, according to the International Energy Agency. Battery makers have hit speed bumps too. A planned $7 billion EV manufacturing plant in Saint-Basile-le-Grand and McMasterville, Que, collapsed after Swedish battery maker Northvolt declared bankruptcy in March. The Quebec government lost a $270 million investment in the project. More recently, trouble emerged at the $5 billion NextStar EV battery factory being built by Stellantis and South Korea's LG Energy in Windsor, Ont. Several Canadian contractors have filed lawsuits alleging millions of dollars in unpaid work at the plant, which has received $15 billion in federal and provincial incentives, according to media reports. Jennings said in his briefing note that slowing EV purchases had 'created doubt in the trajectory of [future] sales'. Trump's executive orders soon after taking office to scrap Biden-era EV targets and tax credits, along with the end of federal EV incentives in Canada, have 'added uncertainty' in the market, the note said. 'In the long-term these impacts on their own are unlikely to jeopardize the prosperity of the automotive sector in Canada, but they depend on the electrification plans of the manufacturer and the health of the sector overall, including the impact of potential U.S. policies and tariffs,' Jennings said. EV transition 'unstoppable' The federal government should stick to its long-term plan for an EV supply chain in Canada because the global shift to EVs is 'unstoppable,' said Matthew Fortier, CEO of Accelerate, a Toronto-based zero-emissions vehicle industrial alliance. There are signs of 'underlying momentum' for Canada's EV industry, said Lindsay Wiginton, managing consultant at research house Dunsky Energy. She noted many analysts have a positive global EV outlook, including projections that a quarter of all cars sold in 2025 will be electric. That growth is 'driven in large part by the continued decline in lithium-ion battery costs that is helping to bring more affordable EV models' to market, she said. 'Despite short-term policy fluctuations, the long-term trajectory for EV adoption remains strong,' she added. Some auto makers are less optimistic. They want the federal government to drop a mandate for EVs to make up 20 per cent of cars sold in Canada by 2026 and 100 per cent by 2035 – arguing that slowing EV sales and US tariffs have delayed efforts to build an electric vehicle supply chain. Ontario Premier Doug Ford, speaking at a joint press conference on Tuesday with Alberta's Danielle Smith and Saskatchewan's Scott Moe, said: 'We have to get rid of these mandates. The companies won't be able to meet these targets. But let's not stop spending. I am confident that the EV sector will grow eventually.' Environment Minister Julie Dabrusin has been unswayed by their arguments so far, according to media reports. Canada's 'competitive advantages' Fortier said Canada's automotive sector cannot hope to be 'globally relevant in 10-15 years' unless Ottawa focuses on 'competitive advantages that our neighbours don't have' in areas including critical minerals, advanced industrial materials, and EV battery technology. 'If we do that now, Canada can become a necessary part of the continental supply chain, and we can have leverage in the auto sector when EVs are the dominant mode of vehicle production in North America,' Fortier said. The US is by far the biggest market for Canadian-made cars and trucks, with 93 per cent of the $51 billion in vehicles exported in 2023 shipped south of the border, according to the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers' Association, an industry trade body. The US imposed a 25 per cent tariff on Canadian auto makers and parts manufacturers in April, forcing hundreds of job losses in Ontario, the industry's historic heartland. Trump has threatened to raise the tariffs to 35 per cent on Aug 1. A high-profile US-Japan trade deal announced today (Wednesday) will see the US tariff on Japan's auto sector lowered to 15 per cent from 35 per cent. That deal might point to a possible reduction in US tariffs on Canadian car makers, but it is not a long-term solution, Fortier said. 'Any standing tariff on Canadian-made cars is a reminder that we urgently need to develop more negotiating leverage. The way to do this is to build upstream and midstream capacity for the batteries that will power the future of this sector,' he said.
Toronto Sun
3 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
Letters to the Editor, July 25, 2025
Friday letters Photo by Illustration / Toronto Sun WHAT YOU WERE ELECTED TO DO This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Hey, Mark Carney, here's a novel idea. Rather than just meet with the premiers to discuss how you're going to punish Donald Trump over tariffs, which is just going to hurt Canadians, why don't you call or meet with him and negotiate a fair deal for Canada like you were elected to do. Heck, even Japan did that and got a great deal for it citizens. Mark Slobodian York (It seems Canada has put in place the wrong negotiator. Carney is going to have to pivot quickly) TRUMP WASN'T THE PROBLEM With all this talk about the tariff war and how we are led to believe that Trump is the problem, let me remind everyone (especially those with TDS – Trump Derangement Syndrome) that Canada's economy was in the toilet long before Trump even got elected president for the second time and initiated this tariff nonsense. And that, my friends, is because of the cancerous Liberal government here in Canada. Trump isn't helping matters with his tariffs, but the Liberals are 100% at fault here for the abysmal state of our economy. Not to mention the crime. That's a whole other story, and not a good one at that. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Robert Onyskiw Etobicoke (It is worth repeating – Donald Trump being President for the last six months did not put Canada on its current ruinous economic path – that began over a decade ago under Trudeau) UNREALISTIC PLAN Israel has said that the statement by Canada and 24 other nations on the situation in Gaza and the West Bank is 'disconnected from reality.' I would prefer to say that it is unrealistic. It calls for the 'unconditional release' of hostages, as Canada has always proposed in the past. Hamas has always demanded that some Palestinian prisoners in Israeli custody also be released. It is unlikely that it will ever forgo this condition. The proposal by Canada and the other nations is idealistic and unrealistic in light of what we know about Hamas's position. Bruce Couchman Toronto (No deal without all the hostages being released) Sports Toronto & GTA Canada Toronto & GTA World
