Walmart warns of a slower 2025. That's a bad sign for America's economy
Shoppers flooded to Walmart for groceries and clothing last year. But 2025 will be trickier for the retail giant as inflation ticks back up and Trump's tariffs kick in.
Walmart said Thursday that its sales and profit growth will slow this year. The forecast sent its stock tumbling as much as 8% during pre-market trading.
Walmart said sales will grow by up to 4% this year and profit will grow up to 5.5%. But that was short of investor expectations.
Walmart (WMT) is the largest retailer in the United States and a bellwether for consumer spending. Its projected slowdown is a signal for the rest of the retail industry that 2025 will be a rockier year.
David Silverman, a senior director at Fitch Ratings, expects 'retail choppiness to continue in 2025,' given a recent dip in consumer sentiment, particularly for lower-end consumers and tariffs, he said in a note to clients Thursday.
To be sure, Walmart's business is strong and consumers are 'resilient,' the company said. But it acknowledged it will have to navigate tariffs and manage other challenges.
Walmart's outlook 'assumes a relatively stable macroeconomic environment' but 'acknowledges that there are still uncertainties related to consumer behavior and global economic and geopolitical conditions,' Walmart finance chief John David Rainey said on a call with analysts.
Walmart will be able to handle tariffs better than most companies because it can apply its size and scale to muscle down prices with suppliers. Smaller companies have less leverage and may have to raise prices for consumers, economists say.
Still, in an interview with CNBC, Rainey said Walmart 'is not going to be completely immune' from tariffs.
Americans are showing signs of concern about the economy. Most adults nationwide, 62%, feel President Donald Trump has not gone far enough in trying to reduce the price of everyday goods, according to new CNN polling.
Consumer prices rose 0.5% last month from December — the fastest pace in more than a year — as energy and food costs continued to bite. Egg prices have soared as a result of a deadly avian flu.
Walmart said that it expects normal inflation this year of 1% to 2%, despite the rise in egg prices.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Trump does UN's job on world stage, leads on peace while secretary-general earns more at anti-US body
Following President Donald Trump's successful brokering of a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, India and Pakistan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda, critics say the U.N. secretary-general, António Guterres, could do well to follow Trump's lead as a peacemaker. However, as American taxpayers still continue to pay billions to the United Nations, and while Trump outshines Guterres on the world stage, Guterres' base salary is more than the commander in chief's. At $418,348, Guterres earns a higher base salary than President Donald Trump while running a body accused of anti-American bias, corruption and waste. Hugh Dugan, former National Security Council special assistant to the president and senior director for International Organization Affairs, told Fox News Digital, "Frankly, we put [Guterres] on this plateau as being on par with a pope or head of state, when, in fact, he's really an employee, and he's the country club manager, not the father of the bride, but he's calling all the shots when it comes to the ceremony and who sits where. "You flatter him right away," Dugan said, when comparing Guterres with Trump, "when in fact he is one of the president's employees – in fact, the employee of all the heads of state. And to outearn [him]… is really indicative of managerial capture of the organization and of the Deep State U.N. on the books." The spotlight on the salaries and perks comes at a time when the world body is facing serious financial constraints. Not including expenses and extras, Trump receives some $18,348 less than Guterres at $400,000. The presidential extras include a $50,000 expense allowance and other benefits. Guterres' salary, provided to Fox News Digital by his spokesperson Stephane Dujarric, only includes his salary and multiplier. It does not include the considerable array of other benefits that Guterres enjoys. In an email to Fox News Digital, Dujarric said the "Net base salary as of Jan 2025 – $238,375 per year (reference resolution 58/265 adjusted in accordance with the same procedures as those applicable to staff in the Professional and higher categories). "Post adjustment as of February 2025 – $179,973 per year. Adjustments to salaries are based on geographic locations." The spokesman later confirmed to Fox News Digital that the U.N. chief's salary was $418, 348. Those earnings do not include some of the lavish extras he gets, such as a plush Manhattan residence and a personal chauffeur. While the U.S. doesn't directly pay the salary of the secretary-general, it does continue to fund around a quarter of the organization's budget, and critics continue to question outlays that they believe harm U.S. interests. Just last month, U.S. Chargé d'Affaires Dorothy Shea issued a veiled warning to the world body upon vetoing an anti-Israel draft resolution at the U.N. Security Council. "Engaging in this performative process at a time when serious questions are being asked about the utility of the U.N., its funding and use of resources is shameful. This council should not be used in this way. This council must hold itself to a higher standard." A senior Republican congressional staffer who works on international organizations complained, "United Nations officials are the ultimate global elites. They earn lavish salaries and live in lavish New York penthouses, paid for largely with American taxpayer money. A large number of the U.N. organizations they lead are controlled by China. When they're not in New York, they spend their time and resources traveling all over the world attacking America and American allies. "The work of DOGE isn't done yet, and one step needs to be cutting off these officials from U.S. taxpayer money."
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Voting begins on Trump's ‘big beautiful bill'
Senate Republicans are furiously working Saturday to advance their final version of President Trump's 'big beautiful bill,' setting the stage for a marathon weekend session they hope meets the commander-in-chief's July 4 deadline. Senate members are expected to take a procedural vote to kick off debating the revised, 940-page multi trillion-dollar bill, released late Friday that makes Trump's 2017 tax cuts permanent, ends taxation on tips and overtime, boosts border security funding and scraps green-energy tax credits passed during the Biden administration. But Sen. Ron Johnson (R- Wisconsin) already told Fox News's 'Fox & Friends Weekend' that he will vote 'no' on the bill. Advertisement 'President Trump, his goal in the Senate was to make the Big Beautiful Bill even better. I'd like it much better,' he said Saturday. 'Right now, I'm not going to vote for a motion to proceed today. We just got the bill. I got my first copy about 1:23 in the morning, this morning.' President Trump speaks in the Oval Office on June 27. Getty Images The megabill is expected to raise the debt ceiling by roughly $5 trillion in order to cram all the provisions in. Advertisement The latest version includes a vast majority of the policies the House narrowly approved in May, but also includes changes to programs such as Medicaid and reducing federal spending for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Republicans from states with large rural populations have long opposed a reduction in state tax revenue for Medicaid providers including rural hospitals. The newly released legislation delays that reduction and includes $25 billion to support rural Medicaid providers from 2028 to 2032. The bill raises the cap on federal deductions for state and local taxes to $40,000 with an annual 1% inflation adjustment through 2029, after which it would fall back to the current $10,000. The bill would also phase the cap down for those earning more than $500,000 a year. With a 53-47 majority in the upper chamber, the GOP can only afford to lose three votes and still pass the package with a tie-breaking ballot cast by Vice President JD Vance. Advertisement A version of it passed the House by a single vote May 22. But the lower chamber will have to vote on the bill again after the Senate finalizes its changes to it Trump had been hoping the bill would pass both chambers and reach his desk for signing by July 4. 'The Great Republicans in the U.S. Senate are working all weekend to finish our 'ONE, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL,'' the president posted on his Truth Social on Friday. GOP momentum screeched to a halt Thursday as the Senate's 'parliamentarian,' Elizabeth MacDonough — the 'referee' of the chamber who ensures proposed legislation abides by the rules — threw out line items that would have eliminated health-care coverage for non-citizens. With Post wires.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
This week in Trumponomics: Dueling Fed chairs
When it comes to the Federal Reserve, President Trump can't get no satisfaction. He wants the Fed to cut interest rates, and it continually declines to do so. He mused about firing Fed Chair Jerome Powell earlier this year, but the Supreme Court quashed that idea. He routinely trolls Powell anyway, to no effect. So now Trump says he may choose a replacement for Powell months before Powell's term expires in May 2026. Powell would stay in his job until next May, while the 'shadow chair' offered a kind of alternative view of what the central bank's monetary policy could be, or would be once Powell was gone. That might telegraph to markets that lower rates and looser monetary policy are coming once Powell exits. Read more: How the Fed rate decision affects your bank accounts, loans, credit cards, and investments Like much of what Trump does, the idea is unprecedented and jarring. The Fed is the most powerful financial institution in the world, fully able to move markets and drive the direction of the economy. Investors parse every word the Fed chair utters, looking for signs of future action. Two voices saying contradictory things about Fed policy couldn't possibly be helpful. But is the idea really that crazy? Corporations do CEO succession planning all the time, and it's actually considered mismanagement if they don't plan for the departure of key executives. Warren Buffett said in May that he finally plans to step down as CEO of Berkshire Hathaway at the end of this year, with longtime deputy Greg Abel taking the job. Buffett and his now deceased partner, Charlie Munger, had been talking up Abel for several years, so shareholders expected and welcomed the news. There's a difference, however, between prudent succession planning and what Trump seems to have in mind. Abel is not going to spend the rest of 2025 going on TV to call out all the mistakes he thinks Buffett might be making and promising to shake things up the moment Buffett is gone. He could make subtle changes over time, but investors broadly expect him to manage Berkshire much as Buffett has. Trump wants regime change at the Fed, not continuity. Whoever he picks will undoubtedly be more dovish than Powell and far more willing to cut rates. Powell and a majority of the Fed's policymakers have been holding off on rate cuts since last December, waiting to see if inflation picks up. Many economists think that's prudent, given that Trump's tariffs are a tax pushing up costs, which could add a full percentage point or more to the inflation rate. The Fed normally raises rates to head off inflation, and cutting rates amid rising inflation can make a price surge worse. Read more: How jobs, inflation, and the Fed are all related Trump seems not to care about the inflationary threat. He may also believe that lower rates will stimulate growth and offset the depressant effect of his tariffs. Trump, in his second term, has also overlooked expertise and staffed the government with loyalists willing to fight all his fights and attack all his enemies with the vigor of Trump Trump's shadow chair would likely be somebody who parrots Trump's claims that Powell is a 'numbskull' and a 'dummy' who doesn't know what he's doing. Every time Powell gives testimony or holds a press conference, the anti-Powell could hold his own public event, rebutting Powell and treating investors to frothy dreams of how much richer they'll get once Powell is out of the way. Maybe the shadow chair will show up at Jackson Hole in August and heckle Powell during his annual economic speech. This all sounds kind of silly, but it may already be affecting markets. After Trump floated the idea of a shadow chair, market expectations changed from two Fed interest rate cuts this year to three, according to the CME Group's FedWatch tool. Changing interest rate expectations can affect stock prices, since lower rates sometimes correlate with higher corporate profits. Frontrunners for the shadow job supposedly include Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, White House economist Kevin Hassett, Fed governor Chris Waller, and former Fed governor Kevin Warsh. Those are all pretty serious people not known for the kind of mudslinging Trump may be looking for. Bessent generally declines to say much about the Fed's current policy, which is exactly what markets expect from a Treasury Secretary. The others have argued for a looser policy, but within the normal confines of respectful disagreement. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is more of a bomb-thrower willing to trash-talk the Fed, a la Trump. He recently posted a tweet explaining 'why President Trump calls Powell a loser,' for anybody wanting a tutorial. But Lutnick is the bad cop to Bessent's good cop, and investors would not find comfort in Lutnick's barroom demeanor if he were in line for the Fed job. If Trump's shadow chair spooked markets, it would be counterproductive. There's also the small problem that the Fed chair isn't a dictator unilaterally deciding whether to cut rates. There are 12 members of the Fed's policymaking committee, each with one vote at each policymaking meeting. The chair can be influential, but not autocratic. Powell isn't even the most hawkish voting member, dead-set against rate cuts. He's more of a moderate lodged between hawks resisting rate cuts and doves who think the Fed should be cutting now or soon. As many analysts pointed out when Trump was talking about firing Powell earlier this year, a new chair would still leave the current policymaking board intact. Even Powell would stay. While his term as chairman expires in 2026, his term as a voting member of the policymaking committee runs to 2028. A shadow chair wouldn't have any voting power until the Senate confirmed him or her to the job next May. The best such a person could do is amplify the chorus of voices vilifying Powell. Maybe that would be good enough for Trump. Rick Newman is a senior columnist for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on Bluesky and X: @rickjnewman. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices.
