Ruckus over BBA entrance results at MSU
The protest began when NSUI-affiliated student leaders gathered at the BBA building and submitted a memorandum calling for transparency in the result and admission process. The agitation escalated when the protesters threw fake currency notes at programme officials, alleging corruption. The situation turned chaotic with the arrival of the police, who struggled to contain the protesters as they continued to resist law enforcement efforts.
"There were nearly 2,000 students who appeared for the entrance exam, conducted for just 240 seats," said Amar Vaghela, president of NSUI's Vadodara City Unit.
"While the university declared seat numbers of 600 shortlisted candidates for the second round, it has failed to release the marks obtained by all students who took the MCQ-based test."
Vaghela stressed that students have a fundamental right to know their scores. "The lack of transparency has raised serious concerns and suspicions about irregularities and potential malpractices in the admission process," he added.
Responding to the protest, MSU's in-charge vice-chancellor, Professor Dhanesh Patel, who rushed to the scene to defuse tensions, assured students that the university would soon release the individual marks of all candidates who appeared for the examination.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Should I speak in Hindi or Marathi?': Rajya Sabha nominee Ujjwal Nikam says PM Modi asked him this; recalls both 'laughed'
NEW DELHI: Special public prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam on Sunday expressed gratitude after being nominated to the Rajya Sabha, revealing a moment from his conversation with Prime Minister Narendra Modi . Nikam said PM Modi personally called him to share the news and asked, 'Should I speak in Hindi or Marathi?' before switching to Marathi for the rest of the conversation, reports news agency ANI. 'I thank President Droupadi Murmu for nominating me. When I met PM Narendra Modi during the Lok Sabha election campaign, he expressed his faith in me. Yesterday, PM Modi called to inform me about the nomination. He asked whether he should speak in Hindi or Marathi--both of us laughed. Then he spoke to me in Marathi and told me that the President wanted to assign me a responsibility, and he informed me of her decision,' Nikam was quoted as saying to ANI. Nikam said he accepted the offer without hesitation. 'I immediately said yes. I thank the party leadership and also Maharashtra chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis,' he added. Nikam is known for his role in prosecuting high-profile criminal cases, including the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack involving Ajmal Kasab, and the 1993 Bombay blasts . Nikam is one of four individuals nominated to the Rajya Sabha by President Murmu, in recognition of their service in various fields. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The others include former foreign secretary Harsh Vardhan Shringla, Kerala-based social worker and educationist C Sadanandan Master, and historian Meenakshi Jain. The nominations were made under Article 80(1)(a), read with clause (3) of the Indian Constitution. The ministry of home affairs announced the appointments through an official notification, filling vacancies created by the retirement of previously nominated members.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
CPM too opposed changes to Preamble during Emergency, now blaming RSS: Sangh-linked magazine
After RSS general secretary Dattatreya Hosabale's recent remarks questioning the inclusion of the words 'socialist' and 'secular' in the Constitution's Preamble sparked a row, RSS-affiliated magazine Organiser has carried a cover story on the topic. Its focus: CPI(M)'s opposition to the Emergency-era 42nd Amendment that led to the addition of the words to the Preamble. The magazine has also published a sharply worded editorial accusing the Congress and the Left of distorting the legacy of the Emergency and turning the RSS into a political scapegoat. While critics, particularly from the Left and the Congress, labelled Hosabale's remarks an ideological attack on the Constitution, Organiser's cover story by Ganesh Radhakrishnan in its latest issue sought to highlight what it called the CPI(M)'s 'original position' on the matter, one that it claimed closely mirrored the RSS's stand. Citing a 1976 pamphlet the CPI(M) published during the Emergency, the article said the party had explicitly criticised the addition of 'socialist' and 'secular', viewing them as a political manoeuvre by Prime Minister Indira Gandhi to centralise power. The pamphlet, later republished in Malayalam by Chintha Publishers in 2005, warned that the amendment was part of a broader strategy to turn the Constitution into an instrument of one-party rule under Gandhi. The CPI(M)'s alternative proposal of 26 amendments at the time made no mention of 'socialist' or 'secular' either, the Organiser article claimed. According to the article, in a preface to the republished volume, senior CPI(M) leader P Govinda Pillai had opposed the amendments tooth and nail. 'Indira Gandhi wanted to portray that the declaration of Emergency and the constitutional amendments were not an expression of fascist tendencies, but rather, an effort to defeat fascist forces and implement democracy and socialism … These changes were not based on democratic consensus but on political expediency,' Pillai is quoted as saying. The article said Hosabale's recent statements had 'not deviated from its original position even today'. 'The onus now falls upon the CPM to clarify whether its stance has changed,' Radhakrishnan wrote. It also quoted CPI(M) general secretary M A Baby's remarks following Hosabale's statement to make its point. 'RSS's demand to remove socialism and secularism from the Constitution's Preamble is a direct assault on India's core values. RSS always pushed Manusmriti over our Constitution,' Baby said. Building on this, Organiser editor Prafulla Ketkar, in his editorial, accused the Congress and Left of historical revisionism. 'This year marks the fifty years of the dark days of the Emergency… Instead of recognising the personal dictatorial ambitions of Ms Indira Gandhi as the root cause of the Emergency, an attempt is being made to divert the blame to a selfless leader like JP (Jayaprakash Narayan) and a nationalist organisation like RSS,' Ketkar wrote. 'When RSS Sarkaryavah Dattatreya Hosabale spoke about how 'secularism' and 'socialism' were inserted into the Constitution during the Emergency, he was exposing this hypocrisy. Dr Ambedkar was unmistakable when he called out Communists as the enemies of the Constitution while dedicating the final draft to the nation in 1949. Various outfits with allegiance to communism have openly called the Constitution 'bourgeoisie', and most of them vowed to overthrow it someday,' he added. Ketkar accused the Congress of repeatedly trying to undermine constitutional democracy, citing Nehru's First Amendment and the UPA's proposed Communal Violence Bill, and dismissed the CPI(M)'s claims of ideological consistency. While the CPI(M) has yet to officially respond to the Organiser article, the party has maintained in the past that it opposed the Emergency and the way the constitutional changes were carried out, but supports the substantive values of socialism and secularism. The Congress has also repeatedly defended the incorporation of these principles as essential to India's democratic and plural ethos. In his address at a recent event in Delhi at the Dr Ambedkar International Centre, Hosabale said: 'During the Emergency, two words, 'secular' and 'socialist', were added to the Constitution, which were not part of the original Preamble. There was no Parliament, no rights, no judiciary functioning, and yet these words were added. That is why this matter must be discussed.'
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Did FATF just call Pakistan's bluff on terror financing?
Did FATF just call Pakistan's bluff on terror financing? Jayanta KalitaRajesh Sharma Jul 13, 2025, 15:34 IST IST Days after condemning the Pahalgam carnage, the Paris-based intergovernmental body has identified state-sponsored terrorism as a global threat. It also gave details on how groups like Jaish and Lashkar used sham NGOs and digital platforms to raise and move funds In a first, the Paris-headquartered Financial Action Task Force ( FATF ) has turned its attention to state-sponsored terrorism, identifying it as a 'longstanding TF [terrorist financing] threat to international peace and security as well as to the stability of regional financial and political systems'. The latest FATF report vindicates India's longstanding stance by indirectly referencing Pakistan 's role in supporting terrorism. In June, the global money laundering and terrorist financing watchdog condemned the April 22 Pahalgam carnage and said such attacks would not have been possible 'without money and the means to move funds between terrorist supporters'.
