logo
The pro-Palestine students caught up in Trump's war on liberal universities

The pro-Palestine students caught up in Trump's war on liberal universities

The National20-05-2025
Live updates: Follow the latest on Israel-Gaza Badar Khan Suri, a Georgetown University researcher detained because of his views on Gaza, has been released from custody in Texas after a judge ruled the US government overstepped by arresting him in March. A US district judge made the much-anticipated decision on Wednesday. Mr Suri was released on bond and will be able to return to Virginia. "After months of sorrow, loss, and pain, when I saw my kids, it was like an oasis in the desert, and in their arms I found my life again. It was a surreal experience," he said shortly after his release. Since President Donald Trump took office on January 20, his administration has turned a critical eye on students, scholars and professors expressing sympathy for Palestinians amid the continuing Israel-Gaza war. Non-citizens in the US on visas have been detained and threatened with deportation by federal authorities. Some are student protest organisers, others have simply written in support of Palestine. In Mr Suri's case, his marriage to someone who had expressed support for Palestine was sufficient for the government to arrest him. Pro-Palestinians are also being targeted by groups using artificial intelligence to expose them and report them to authorities. The State Department reportedly hasn't ruled out using AI to help it revoke the visas of international students accused of supporting Hamas, again, often without due process or a nuanced interpretation of what demonstrators may have said or done. The State Department has not provided current figures on how many visas it has revoked. In March, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said at least 300. Here is a look at some of the most prominent cases. Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University graduate who was a leader in campus pro-Palestine protests last year, is being held in an immigration detention centre in Louisiana. He was arrested in New York on March 8, with video showing agents from the Department of Homeland Security taking him into custody without a warrant, handcuffing him and forcing him into an unmarked car. Shortly after his detention, Mr Trump wrote that Mr Khalil was a 'radical foreign pro-Hamas student'. Despite his legal team's arguments that Mr Khalil's right to free speech was violated and that he was apprehended without due process, Judge Jamee Comans disagreed. She said the government had demonstrated sufficiently Mr Khalil's presence in the US could have 'potentially serious foreign policy consequences', therefore the case met the legal threshold for deportation. Late last month, federal immigration authorities denied Mr Khalil's request for temporary release from detention to attend the birth of his first child. He has filed an appeal to try to prevent his deportation and the case remains under adjudication. Authorities in Vermont apprehended Mohsen Mahdawi on April 14. A student, Mr Mahdawi has been an outspoken critic of Israel's military campaign in Gaza and organised campus protests. He cofounded the Palestinian Student Union at Columbia with Mr Khalil. The State Department and Department of Homeland Security deemed Mr Mahdawi 'removable' under the Immigration and Nationality Act. It also said his actions could have 'serious adverse foreign policy consequences and would compromise compelling US foreign policy interest'. He spent 16 days in detention until US District Judge Geoffrey Crawford raised doubts over the State Department's rationale for the arrest and detention. 'The two weeks of detention so far demonstrate great harm to a person who has been charged with no crime,' the judge said. Mr Mahdawi could still be deported depending on how things unfold in court, with US authorities appealing the Vermont judge's decision. He plans on starting his master's degree at Columbia beginning in the autumn. On March 25, Tufts University student Rumeysa Ozturk was on her way to meet friends and break fast during Ramadan when masked agents surrounded her and took her into custody near her home in Massachusetts. The Department of Homeland Security accused Turkish student Ms Ozturk, 30, without providing evidence, of 'engaging in activities in support of Hamas', the Gaza-based Palestinian militant group designated a foreign terrorist organisation by the US government. Ms Ozturk, who is also a Fulbright Scholar, last year co-wrote an opinion piece in a student newspaper criticising Tufts's response to student calls to divest from companies with Israel ties and to 'acknowledge the Palestinian genocide'. A federal judge on March 28 stopped her deportation after Ms Ozturk's lawyers filed a lawsuit saying her detention infringed her right to free speech and due process. After spending six weeks in a Louisiana detention centre, Ms Ozturk's legal team secured a major victory by convincing a judge to order her release on the grounds US federal authorities had not provided evidence to justify her arrest. It is expected the Trump administration will challenge the ruling. On March 17, Badar Khan Suri, an Indian citizen studying at Georgetown University in Washington DC, was arrested at his Virginia home by the Department of Homeland Security. Department officials claimed Mr Suri 'has close connections to a known or suspected terrorist, who is a senior adviser to Hamas', and that Mr Rubio had determined that the scholar's activities 'rendered him deportable'. His lawyers have so far successfully argued for a lack of due process and charges to justify his deportation. In the weeks since his initial detention, demonstrators have gathered on Georgetown's campus in support of Mr Suri and the university's dean Joel Hellman issued a lengthy statement explaining his concern over the arrest and detention. As noted above, Mr Suri was released on bond on May 14.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

From Apollo 11 to Artemis: Why Nasa's legacy is under threat
From Apollo 11 to Artemis: Why Nasa's legacy is under threat

The National

time4 hours ago

  • The National

From Apollo 11 to Artemis: Why Nasa's legacy is under threat

Fifty-six years after Neil Armstrong 's historic first step on the Moon, Nasa is leading the drive to send astronauts to the lunar surface once more, though it is feared at the expense of its own scientific programmes. The agency is marking Moon Day on July 20, the anniversary of the famous Apollo 11 landing, as it navigates a period of transition without a Senate-confirmed administrator. While US President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' secures funding for Artemis, Nasa's flagship Moon exploration programme, the White House spending plan slashes the budget for the agency's Earth science, astrophysics and planetary research divisions by nearly half. Scientists and space policy experts told The National that the US is sacrificing some of its most ambitious scientific projects to keep the lunar return on track. Dr Gordon Osinski, an Earth sciences professor at the Western University in Ontario, Canada, and a geology team member for Artemis III, said he is concerned about the long-term effect these cuts could have. 'While Artemis II appears to be on schedule for a spring 2026 launch, I am concerned about US budget cuts, the big exodus of senior Nasa employees and what this means for returning humans to the surface of the Moon in the Artemis III mission,' he said. Some Nasa employees are set to hold a protest on Moon Day in Washington DC in a bid to save the agency's science divisions. "We're fighting for science, engineering and exploration," the protest website reads. "Tell Congress to push back on the 2025 Presidential Budget Request that cuts Nasa science by 47 per cent, Stem education by 100 per cent, and Nasa's full budget by 25 per cent." Artemis boost but science takes hit The Trump administration has made crewed exploration a centrepiece of its space agenda. The 'Big Beautiful Bill', signed into law on July 4, features billions of dollars in additional funding for the Space Launch System, Orion capsule and Lunar Gateway projects. But the White House's proposed budget cuts would reshape programmes in favour of crewed exploration, slashing funding for climate monitoring satellites, planetary missions such as the Mars Sample Return and major space telescopes in development. Dr Dimitra Atri, scientist at NYUAD, said current space policy lacks the clarity and consistency that helped propel the Apollo missions. 'The public's relationship with space exploration has changed dramatically since Apollo's collective wonder in 1969,' he said. 'Today's achievements, while technically sophisticated, struggle to capture that same imagination, especially when delays and setbacks dominate headlines. 'Apollo went from [US president John F] Kennedy's 1961 announcement to lunar landing in eight years, while Artemis has spent over a decade working to return astronauts to lunar orbit, something we accomplished 50 years ago with far less capabilities.' Nasa has been a global leader in explorative space science for decades, responsible for some of the most ground-breaking missions in history. The Hubble Space Telescope, for example, revolutionised astronomy by capturing deep-space images that reshaped our understanding of the universe. Nasa's fleet of Mars rovers, including Spirit, Opportunity, Curiosity and Perseverance, uncovered evidence of past water activity and potential habitability on the Red Planet. The James Webb Space Telescope, launched in 2021, is offering unprecedented views of the early universe and distant exoplanets. On Earth, the Terra and Aqua satellites have played a key role in monitoring climate change. Rising global competition While Nasa deals with the reshaping of its programmes, other countries are making steady progress with their Moon plans and scientific space missions. China completed the first lunar far side sample return with its Chang'e-6 mission and is planning a crewed Moon landing before 2030. Fifty-four countries are part of the US-led Artemis Accords, an international agreement on peaceful and transparent lunar exploration. Dr Osinski said Moon Day should remind the world of the value of international co-operation and science-driven exploration. 'Moon Day is an excellent way to focus the world's attention on the past, present and future of lunar exploration,' he said. 'While its date is based on the first US landing on the surface of the Moon, it has grown to represent much more than this and to be a global celebration. 'International collaboration is key to space exploration and so Moon Day can provide some sorely needed inspiration and an example of the good that can come about when countries work with each other, not against.' Shift to commercial space Nasa's increasing reliance on commercial partners is also shaping how it now approaches exploration. SpaceX's Starship is central to Artemis III's landing plan and Axiom Space is developing the new generation of lunar spacesuits. Dave Barnhart, chief executive of California space infrastructure company Arkisys, said the rise of commercial space is a natural evolution, one that can benefit science in the long run. 'Nasa was the pioneer to create the environment for commercial cargo to the ISS, which is now leading to development of commercial space stations,' he said. 'Likewise, they contracted several companies to lead new vehicle development and test flights to the Moon, which has encouraged true investment.' He said that even if Nasa's scientific leadership weakens in the short term, global and private-sector collaboration could generate even greater returns. 'We are going to gain far more than just what one government organisation could apply to the problems,' he said.

Denise Richards alleges estranged husband "threatened to kill" her
Denise Richards alleges estranged husband "threatened to kill" her

Khaleej Times

time4 hours ago

  • Khaleej Times

Denise Richards alleges estranged husband "threatened to kill" her

Actor Denise Richards has accused her estranged husband, Aaron Phypers, of domestic abuse and claimed that he also "threatened to kill" her. Richards, according to People magazine, has been granted a temporary domestic violence restraining order against Phypers. In her legal statement, Richards said she endured repeated abuse during their six-year marriage, including violent physical attacks and death threats. Richards further claimed that he also hacked her devices and owned at least "eight unregistered guns". "Aaron would frequently violently choke me, violently squeeze my head with both hands, tightly squeeze my arms, violently slap me in the face and head, aggressively slam my head into the bathroom towel rack, threaten to kill me, hold me down with his knee on my back to the point where I would have to plead with him to get off me so that he would not kill me, and hack into my laptop and phone to download all of my text messages," Richards alleged in her report. "Aaron regularly threatened to 'break my jaw' and would cry, beg me to stay, and promise to get help -- none of which ever happened." She also alleged that Phypers threatened to kill her and himself if she ever went public. "He has repeatedly threatened to kill himself and me if I reported him to the police, among his other threats of harm to me and himself if he is reported for his abuse to anyone," she said in the court documents obtained by People. Richards also described a July 4 incident in which Phypers was "within two inches" of her face and "screamed degrading profanities". He also grabbed her arms and dragged her to the floor, causing her to land "hard on the stairs," which resulted in "immense pain". Soon after Richards' allegations, Phypers shared a statement with People denying all the accusations. "I want to address recent rumors and speculation that have surfaced regarding my relationship with my wife, Denise Richards," he said in a statement. "Let me be unequivocally clear: I have never physically or emotionally abused Denise — or anyone. These accusations are completely false and deeply hurtful. Denise and I, like many couples, have faced our share of challenges, but any suggestion of abuse is categorically untrue. I have always tried to approach our marriage with love, patience, and respect. I ask for privacy as we navigate personal matters, and I hope that the public and media will refrain from spreading harmful and baseless claims," the statement read. A court hearing regarding the restraining order is scheduled for August 8.

Trump insists Iran's nuclear sites destroyed amid reports some survived bombing
Trump insists Iran's nuclear sites destroyed amid reports some survived bombing

The National

time6 hours ago

  • The National

Trump insists Iran's nuclear sites destroyed amid reports some survived bombing

President Donald Trump has insisted that US bombing of Iranian nuclear plants "completely destroyed" the sites after a report said some had largely survived. On his Truth Social platform, Mr Trump reaffirmed his frequent claim that "all three nuclear sites in Iran were completely destroyed and/or obliterated". He said it would "take years to bring them back into service and, if Iran wanted to do so, they would be much better off starting anew, in three different locations". US bombs and missiles targeted Iran's nuclear programme on June 22, hitting the uranium enrichment plant at Fordow, south of Tehran, as well as sites in Isfahan and Natanz. The attacks, carried out at the same time as an Israeli campaign against Iranian nuclear and military infrastructure, were billed by Washington as a knockout blow to Tehran's years-long covert effort to build nuclear weapons. Iran insists it has not tried to weaponise its civilian nuclear power programme. Despite Mr Trump's claims of total success, several US media outlets have reported leaked intelligence suggesting a hazier picture. The latest to cast doubt was an NBC News report on Friday, quoting a military damage assessment that said only one of the three sites had been destroyed, and even then not in its entirety. Two other sites were deemed to be repairable and potentially able to resume uranium enrichment within "the next several months", NBC reported, citing five current and former US officials aware of the analysis. NBC also reported that the Pentagon had prepared an option to inflict far greater damage on Iran's atomic set-up through a bombing campaign lasting for weeks – not the one-night operation chosen by Mr Trump. The report, citing one current and one former official, said the US President had rejected the more comprehensive attack plan due to fears of casualties and entanglement in the conflict.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store