
The pro-Palestine students caught up in Trump's war on liberal universities
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
4 hours ago
- The National
From Apollo 11 to Artemis: Why Nasa's legacy is under threat
Fifty-six years after Neil Armstrong 's historic first step on the Moon, Nasa is leading the drive to send astronauts to the lunar surface once more, though it is feared at the expense of its own scientific programmes. The agency is marking Moon Day on July 20, the anniversary of the famous Apollo 11 landing, as it navigates a period of transition without a Senate-confirmed administrator. While US President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' secures funding for Artemis, Nasa's flagship Moon exploration programme, the White House spending plan slashes the budget for the agency's Earth science, astrophysics and planetary research divisions by nearly half. Scientists and space policy experts told The National that the US is sacrificing some of its most ambitious scientific projects to keep the lunar return on track. Dr Gordon Osinski, an Earth sciences professor at the Western University in Ontario, Canada, and a geology team member for Artemis III, said he is concerned about the long-term effect these cuts could have. 'While Artemis II appears to be on schedule for a spring 2026 launch, I am concerned about US budget cuts, the big exodus of senior Nasa employees and what this means for returning humans to the surface of the Moon in the Artemis III mission,' he said. Some Nasa employees are set to hold a protest on Moon Day in Washington DC in a bid to save the agency's science divisions. "We're fighting for science, engineering and exploration," the protest website reads. "Tell Congress to push back on the 2025 Presidential Budget Request that cuts Nasa science by 47 per cent, Stem education by 100 per cent, and Nasa's full budget by 25 per cent." Artemis boost but science takes hit The Trump administration has made crewed exploration a centrepiece of its space agenda. The 'Big Beautiful Bill', signed into law on July 4, features billions of dollars in additional funding for the Space Launch System, Orion capsule and Lunar Gateway projects. But the White House's proposed budget cuts would reshape programmes in favour of crewed exploration, slashing funding for climate monitoring satellites, planetary missions such as the Mars Sample Return and major space telescopes in development. Dr Dimitra Atri, scientist at NYUAD, said current space policy lacks the clarity and consistency that helped propel the Apollo missions. 'The public's relationship with space exploration has changed dramatically since Apollo's collective wonder in 1969,' he said. 'Today's achievements, while technically sophisticated, struggle to capture that same imagination, especially when delays and setbacks dominate headlines. 'Apollo went from [US president John F] Kennedy's 1961 announcement to lunar landing in eight years, while Artemis has spent over a decade working to return astronauts to lunar orbit, something we accomplished 50 years ago with far less capabilities.' Nasa has been a global leader in explorative space science for decades, responsible for some of the most ground-breaking missions in history. The Hubble Space Telescope, for example, revolutionised astronomy by capturing deep-space images that reshaped our understanding of the universe. Nasa's fleet of Mars rovers, including Spirit, Opportunity, Curiosity and Perseverance, uncovered evidence of past water activity and potential habitability on the Red Planet. The James Webb Space Telescope, launched in 2021, is offering unprecedented views of the early universe and distant exoplanets. On Earth, the Terra and Aqua satellites have played a key role in monitoring climate change. Rising global competition While Nasa deals with the reshaping of its programmes, other countries are making steady progress with their Moon plans and scientific space missions. China completed the first lunar far side sample return with its Chang'e-6 mission and is planning a crewed Moon landing before 2030. Fifty-four countries are part of the US-led Artemis Accords, an international agreement on peaceful and transparent lunar exploration. Dr Osinski said Moon Day should remind the world of the value of international co-operation and science-driven exploration. 'Moon Day is an excellent way to focus the world's attention on the past, present and future of lunar exploration,' he said. 'While its date is based on the first US landing on the surface of the Moon, it has grown to represent much more than this and to be a global celebration. 'International collaboration is key to space exploration and so Moon Day can provide some sorely needed inspiration and an example of the good that can come about when countries work with each other, not against.' Shift to commercial space Nasa's increasing reliance on commercial partners is also shaping how it now approaches exploration. SpaceX's Starship is central to Artemis III's landing plan and Axiom Space is developing the new generation of lunar spacesuits. Dave Barnhart, chief executive of California space infrastructure company Arkisys, said the rise of commercial space is a natural evolution, one that can benefit science in the long run. 'Nasa was the pioneer to create the environment for commercial cargo to the ISS, which is now leading to development of commercial space stations,' he said. 'Likewise, they contracted several companies to lead new vehicle development and test flights to the Moon, which has encouraged true investment.' He said that even if Nasa's scientific leadership weakens in the short term, global and private-sector collaboration could generate even greater returns. 'We are going to gain far more than just what one government organisation could apply to the problems,' he said.


Khaleej Times
4 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Denise Richards alleges estranged husband "threatened to kill" her
Actor Denise Richards has accused her estranged husband, Aaron Phypers, of domestic abuse and claimed that he also "threatened to kill" her. Richards, according to People magazine, has been granted a temporary domestic violence restraining order against Phypers. In her legal statement, Richards said she endured repeated abuse during their six-year marriage, including violent physical attacks and death threats. Richards further claimed that he also hacked her devices and owned at least "eight unregistered guns". "Aaron would frequently violently choke me, violently squeeze my head with both hands, tightly squeeze my arms, violently slap me in the face and head, aggressively slam my head into the bathroom towel rack, threaten to kill me, hold me down with his knee on my back to the point where I would have to plead with him to get off me so that he would not kill me, and hack into my laptop and phone to download all of my text messages," Richards alleged in her report. "Aaron regularly threatened to 'break my jaw' and would cry, beg me to stay, and promise to get help -- none of which ever happened." She also alleged that Phypers threatened to kill her and himself if she ever went public. "He has repeatedly threatened to kill himself and me if I reported him to the police, among his other threats of harm to me and himself if he is reported for his abuse to anyone," she said in the court documents obtained by People. Richards also described a July 4 incident in which Phypers was "within two inches" of her face and "screamed degrading profanities". He also grabbed her arms and dragged her to the floor, causing her to land "hard on the stairs," which resulted in "immense pain". Soon after Richards' allegations, Phypers shared a statement with People denying all the accusations. "I want to address recent rumors and speculation that have surfaced regarding my relationship with my wife, Denise Richards," he said in a statement. "Let me be unequivocally clear: I have never physically or emotionally abused Denise — or anyone. These accusations are completely false and deeply hurtful. Denise and I, like many couples, have faced our share of challenges, but any suggestion of abuse is categorically untrue. I have always tried to approach our marriage with love, patience, and respect. I ask for privacy as we navigate personal matters, and I hope that the public and media will refrain from spreading harmful and baseless claims," the statement read. A court hearing regarding the restraining order is scheduled for August 8.


The National
6 hours ago
- The National
Trump insists Iran's nuclear sites destroyed amid reports some survived bombing
President Donald Trump has insisted that US bombing of Iranian nuclear plants "completely destroyed" the sites after a report said some had largely survived. On his Truth Social platform, Mr Trump reaffirmed his frequent claim that "all three nuclear sites in Iran were completely destroyed and/or obliterated". He said it would "take years to bring them back into service and, if Iran wanted to do so, they would be much better off starting anew, in three different locations". US bombs and missiles targeted Iran's nuclear programme on June 22, hitting the uranium enrichment plant at Fordow, south of Tehran, as well as sites in Isfahan and Natanz. The attacks, carried out at the same time as an Israeli campaign against Iranian nuclear and military infrastructure, were billed by Washington as a knockout blow to Tehran's years-long covert effort to build nuclear weapons. Iran insists it has not tried to weaponise its civilian nuclear power programme. Despite Mr Trump's claims of total success, several US media outlets have reported leaked intelligence suggesting a hazier picture. The latest to cast doubt was an NBC News report on Friday, quoting a military damage assessment that said only one of the three sites had been destroyed, and even then not in its entirety. Two other sites were deemed to be repairable and potentially able to resume uranium enrichment within "the next several months", NBC reported, citing five current and former US officials aware of the analysis. NBC also reported that the Pentagon had prepared an option to inflict far greater damage on Iran's atomic set-up through a bombing campaign lasting for weeks – not the one-night operation chosen by Mr Trump. The report, citing one current and one former official, said the US President had rejected the more comprehensive attack plan due to fears of casualties and entanglement in the conflict.