Engineers unlawfully detained in Equatorial Guinea released
'Their release follows a pardon from the president of Equatorial Guinea, for which the families are extremely grateful. This brings an end to a harrowing ordeal of anguish, uncertainty and unwavering efforts by many to secure their freedom,' the families said in a statement.
In July 2024, the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention found that their imprisonment was arbitrary, unlawful and in breach of multiple international human rights obligations.
The UN also, at the time, called for their immediate release.
'We are overwhelmed with relief and joy. The last two years and four months have been unimaginably painful for both of our families. Today, we are finally able to say: Frik and Peter are safely back home,' said family spokespersons Shaun Murphy and Francois Nigrini.
The families thanked everyone who worked tirelessly behind the scenes, including the engineers' employer SBM Offshore, the South African and UK governments, international diplomatic partners, parliamentarians, legal teams, Hostage International and other civil society organisations and the media.
'Their return home is the result of collective efforts over many, many months, and we are deeply grateful to everyone who played a role in securing their freedom.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
3 hours ago
- eNCA
SA lawyer forces US tech giant to name site users
JOHANNESBURG - In a story similar to the Biblical David and Goliath, a South African lawyer and owner of the Digital Law Company has forced a US tech giant to disclose information about explicit content. The lawyer, Emma Sadlier, made WhatsApp, Facebook, and Instagram owner Meta Platforms disclose the information of users posting explicit content of South African schoolchildren. The Digital Law Company discovered over 1,000 explicit posts of children, including videos and photos, published by 30 Meta accounts in just a few days.
The Citizen
7 hours ago
- The Citizen
Reserve Bank and Ibex reach final settlement of R6.3 billion on Steinhoff fraud
Steinhoff imploded in December 2017 when the auditors refused to sign off on the financial statements due to irregularities. The South African Reserve Bank (Sarb) has reached a final settlement with Ibex of R6.3 billion after an extensive and complex investigation into the affairs of Steinhoff International Holdings and people or entities regarding possible contraventions of exchange control regulations. Ibex was formerly known as Steinhoff International Holdings. After its investigation, Sarb took administrative action against certain entities within and associated with the Steinhoff Group, because they did not comply with the exchange control regulations. The discovery of the now well-known accounting irregularities in the Steinhoff Group in December 2017 led to a sharp and immediate decline in the Steinhoff share price on both the Frankfurt and Johannesburg stock exchanges, eroding approximately 90% of the company's market capitalisation. ALSO READ: What we know so far about the secret PwC report on Steinhoff According to the Sarb the Steinhoff Group's external debt exceeded 10 billion euros (approximately R155 billion) at the time. The crisis threatened the Steinhoff Group's continued existence and risked consequences, including forced asset sales or 'fire sales', significant losses to South African and foreign financial institutions and investors and extensive job losses. There was also a risk that it could significantly affect South Africa's reputation as one of the most robust and well-regulated financial markets in the world, Sarb points out. Steps to restructure Steinhoff debt Complex multi-jurisdictional debt restructuring and settlement processes were implemented between 2018 and 2023 to prevent an uncontrolled liquidation and mitigate the financial distress facing the Steinhoff Group. These processes resulted in the Steinhoff Group fully repaying more than R28 billion owed to South African banks in 2018, as well as compensation to other South African investors amounting to approximately R18.5 billion as part of the global settlement, that involved a total settlement value of approximately R29.6 billion at the time and was approved and sanctioned by international and local courts. ALSO READ: Almost R67 million from Steinhoff accused forfeited to the state The Sarb says the Public Investment Corporation (PIC) was one of the main beneficiaries of the global settlement due to its investment in the Steinhoff Group. South African creditors and banks were able to exit and recover all or most of their money, as foreign creditors agreed to a restructuring of their debt and a deferral of their rights. According to the Sarb, these foreign financial creditors granted forbearance of their claims against members of the Steinhoff Group, ultimately to 30 June 2026, to enable the settlement of various other creditors, who were mainly South African, first. Disputes between Ibex and Sarb Various disputes arose between the Ibex Group and the Sarb in early 2023 regarding the Sarb's administrative actions against Ibex Group due to various alleged contraventions of the exchange control regulations revealed by the investigation. The Sarb says these disputes resulted in multiple legal proceedings between the parties, including the intervention of at least one of the Ibex Group's financial creditors. One of these disputes involved the forfeiture of an amount of about R6.3 billion for the benefit of the state, while others concerned the Sarb's blocking and prohibition orders over the Ibex Group's funds and assets that arose as part of the investigation. In line with legal advice and after careful consideration by the Sarb, all the disputes between the Ibex Group and the Sarb were ultimately resolved in a comprehensive settlement. ALSO READ: NPA secures first conviction and sentence in Steinhoff fraud case The Sarb says In concluding the settlement agreement and fully and finally resolving the disputes between them, the Sarb and the Ibex Group considered the public interest, the Sarb's mandate to enforce the exchange control regulations and the importance of enhancing investor confidence in South Africa. They also wanted to promote regulatory certainty by allowing the Ibex Group to settle its contractual obligations to its foreign financial creditors. 'In fulfilling these aims, the Ibex Group forfeited R6.3 billion plus interest of its funds to the state in full and final settlement of the Sarb's enforcement action against the Ibex Group regarding the alleged contraventions,' the Sarb says. Ibex granted permission to wind down and repay creditors In return, the Ibex Group withdrew its legal challenge to the forfeiture. In addition, the Sarb granted the Ibex Group permission to implement and take all steps necessary for the Ibex Group to implement its Dutch court-approved structured winding down process and repay its creditors and operational expenses. By agreement between the Sarb and Ibex Group, the High Court set aside the prohibition orders restricting the Ibex Group's ability to deal with some of its shares in Pepkor Holdings Limited and the Sarb agreed not to take any further administrative or enforcement action against the Ibex Group regarding the alleged contraventions. In addition, the Ibex Group and the Sarb, with the support of the majority of the Ibex Group's current creditors, withdrew all the litigation they instituted, while the Ibex Group and the financial creditors abandoned the judgments obtained in the course of the litigation. 'The Sarb as well as the Ibex Group consider the settlement reasonable, proportionate and justifiable considering the complex and competing interests. 'Considering the long history of the Steinhoff/Ibex matter, the wider ramification of the continued dispute between the Sarb and the Ibex Group for investor appetite for future investments in South Africa and the interests in finality, the Sarb and the Ibex Group consider this final settlement to be in the best interests of South Africa,' the Sarb says.
eNCA
7 hours ago
- eNCA
UN urges UK to repeal 'disproportionate' Palestine Action ban
The United Nationd rights chief on Friday slammed Britain's ban on activist group Palestine Action as a "disturbing" misuse of UK counter-terrorism legislation and urged the government to rescind its move. "The decision appears disproportionate and unnecessary," Volker Turk said in a statement. The ban, introduced under Britain's Terrorism Act 2000, took effect earlier this month after activists from the group broke into an air force base in southern England. Two aircraft were sprayed with red paint, causing an estimated £7.0 million ($9.55 million) in damage. Turk's statement said the ban raised "serious concerns that counter-terrorism laws are being applied to conduct that is not terrorist in nature, and risks hindering the legitimate exercise of fundamental freedoms across the UK". He stressed: "According to international standards, terrorist acts should be confined to criminal acts intended to cause death or serious injury or to the taking of hostages, for purpose of intimidating a population or to compel a government to take a certain action or not." But the ban among other things makes it a criminal offence to be a member of Palestine Action, to express support for the group or wear items of clothing that would arouse "reasonable suspicion" that the person is a member or supporter of the group, Turk pointed out. - Peaceful protest - UK police have arrested at least 200 people during protests, many of them peaceful, over the ban since it took effect, the UN rights office said. Palestine Action itself has condemned its outlawing -- which makes it a criminal offence to belong to or support the group, punishable by up to 14 years in prison -- as an attack on free speech. The UN high commissioner for human rights agreed. The ban, Turk said, "limits the rights of many people involved with and supportive of Palestine Action who have not themselves engaged in any underlying criminal activity but rather exercised their rights to freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association". "As such, it appears to constitute an impermissible restriction on those rights that is at odds with the UK's obligations under international human rights law." The rights chief warned that the government's decision "also conflates protected expression and other conduct with acts of terrorism and so could readily lead to further chilling effect on the lawful exercise of these rights by many people". "I urge the UK government to rescind its decision to proscribe Palestine Action and to halt investigations and further proceedings against protesters who have been arrested on the basis of this proscription," he said.
