How a 77-year-old Manson follower has Newsom in familiar bind
The Board of Parole Hearings, whose members were appointed by the governor, voted Friday to grant parole to Krenwinkel, the state's longest-serving female prisoner. The board had ruled against her 14 times before recommending parole in 2022, but Newsom vetoed her release, saying she had not shown 'sufficient insight' into her crimes.
The governor gave a similar explanation in 2022 for vetoing the parole of another Manson follower, Leslie Van Houten, whose release had been approved five times by the parole board since 2016 but blocked each time by Govs. Jerry Brown and Newsom.
But a state appeals court ruled in 2023 that Newsom had failed to justify his conclusions that Van Houten, 73, lacked sufficient understanding of her actions and could still be dangerous after 54 years in prison. She was freed after the governor decided not to appeal the ruling.
'The only factor that can explain this veto (of Van Houten's parole) is political optics, and California law does not allow governors to veto people's parole because it will look bad,' said Hadar Aviram, a professor at UC College of the Law San Francisco and author of the 2020 book 'Yesterday's Monsters: The Manson Family Cases and the Illusion of Parole.'
And she said the same thinking will most likely affect Newsom's upcoming decision on Krenwinkel, once the parole board's decision becomes final in 120 days.
'What does he think people have an appetite for in this political reality?' Aviram asked, noting California voters' approval last November of Proposition 36, which increased some sentences for drug crimes. 'It costs him nothing to oppose (her release). In the worst-case scenario, the court overrules him again and she gets out.'
Manson ordered seven of his followers, including the 21-year-old Krenwinkel and two other young women, to kill nine people in three gruesome attacks in the Benedict Canyon area of Los Angeles in July and August 1969.
During her trial, Krenwinkel admitted chasing Abigail Folger, heiress of the Folger coffee family, and stabbing her 25 times in the home of actress Sharon Tate, another murder victim, and then helping to kill grocery store executive Leno Bianca and his wife, Rosemary, and using their blood to scrawl 'Death to pigs' on a wall.
Convicted of seven murders, Krenwinkel was sentenced to death along with Manson and three others in 1971. But the sentences were reduced to life with the possibility of parole after the California Supreme Court overturned the state's death penalty law in 1972.
The voters passed a new law in 1977 making capital crimes punishable by death or life in prison without the possibility of parole, but those sentenced under the earlier law, including Krenwinkel, remained eligible for parole. Another ballot measure, approved by the voters in 1988, authorized the governor to veto decisions by the parole board.
In prison, Krenwinkel has a clean disciplinary record, earned a college degree and has taken part in community-service programs, working to support other inmates with mental illnesses. At her 2022 parole hearing, she said that after dropping out of school and becoming an infatuated member of Manson's so-called family at age 19, 'I allowed myself to just start absolutely becoming devoid of any form of morality or real ethics.'
In a statement released by Krenwinkel's lawyers, Jane Dorotik, a former inmate and now part of the support group California Coalition for Women Prisoners, said, 'Those of us who served time with her came to know her as a thoughtful, gentle, and kind person – someone deeply dedicated to creating a safe, caring environment.'
Relatives of the murder victims have not been persuaded.
'I beg the board to consider parole for Patricia Krenwinkel only when her victims are paroled from their graves,' Anthony Demaria, a nephew of victim Jay Sebring, testified at one of her hearings.
And Patrick Sequeira, a prosecutor in the murder cases, told the board that if Krenwinkel 'truly understood her crimes and the horrific nature of it, she wouldn't be here at a parole hearing. She would just accept a punishment.'
Not so, said her lead attorney, Keith Wattley, executive director of UnCommon Law, an Oakland-based firm that represents inmates seeking parole.
'Pat has fully accepted responsibility for everything she did, everything she contributed to, every twisted philosophy she embraced and endorsed and, most importantly, every life she destroyed by her actions in 1969,' Wattley said in a statement after the board's latest decision.
'Now it's the Governor's turn to show that he believes in law and order when the law requires a person's release despite public outcry.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
24 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Newsom hits back at Joe Rogan's vaccine accusations: ‘I've got receipts'
California Gov. Gavin Newsom forcefully defended his pandemic record this week, pushing back against pointed questions from podcast host Joe Rogan during an appearance on the ' Shawn Ryan Show. ' The Democrat, a frequent target of conservative media, joined host and former U.S. Navy SEAL Shawn Ryan for a wide-ranging interview on Monday, July 14. At one point, Ryan relayed a message from Rogan, the popular podcaster who has challenged Newsom's decision to mandate COVID-19 vaccines for schoolchildren and accused the governor of bowing to pharmaceutical industry pressure. 'Motherf—er!' Newsom exclaimed upon hearing Rogan's name, before clarifying that he remains a fan of the polarizing podcast host. 'He ain't a fan of mine, but I'm a Joe Rogan fan. No bulls—.' Newsom noted that Rogan has refused to invite him to be a guest on 'The Joe Rogan Experience.' Ryan then read Rogan's question aloud, echoing claims that have not been substantiated by health authorities: 'Who will be held accountable for mandating COVID-19 vaccines for children, which were unnecessary and ineffective, and who will take responsibility for the unprecedented increases in myocarditis and cancer cases among them?' 'I've signed some of the most progressive laws against Big Pharma in the country. So I have receipts on that,' he said. 'So, no one should suggest that it was about doing the bidding of Big Pharma — quite the contrary.' The governor defended California's early, aggressive approach to the pandemic, noting that it closely followed guidance from the Trump administration. He also pointed out that Florida, often cited by critics as a less restrictive alternative, shut down bars and restaurants before California did. Newsom said that although it's easy to pass judgment 'in hindsight,' that 'at the time, none of us knew what we were up against, including the president of the United States, who I worked very closely with. … We were all up against something none of us had any experience on.' He acknowledged some missteps, such as the closure of outdoor spaces, and said an independent review of California's pandemic response is due next month.
San Francisco Chronicle
4 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
To counter Texas, Newsom suggests special election to gerrymander California
SACRAMENTO — Gov. Gavin Newsom on Tuesday said he's thinking about calling a special election to gerrymander California's congressional districts to counter similar efforts in Texas. Newsom's comments come after Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced plans for the Republican-dominated Texas Legislature to draw new congressional maps in a special legislative session. Texas, like other states, redrew its maps after the 2020 census. New map-drawing normally wouldn't happen until the next census in 2030 absent a successful lawsuit forcing a state to redo them. But the New York Times has reported Trump's political advisers are pushing for Texas to redraw its maps ahead of the midterms to be more favorable to Republicans. Texas, the second-most populous state, could theoretically tip the balance of power in favor of Republicans if it can find a way to redraw its maps to give its party a further advantage in the state. Republicans hold 25 of the 38 congressional districts in Texas. California, the most populous state, is the only state with more congressional seats. Democrats hold 43 of California's 52 seats. It's currently much easier for Republicans who control the Texas Legislature to redraw their districts to favor their party than a similar move would be for Newsom. That's because California voters in 2010 gave the power to draw congressional districts to an independent redistricting commission. Though Democrats dominate California government, they do not dominate the redistricting commission. By law, the commission comprises five Democrats, five Republicans and four commissioners not affiliated with either party. Changing the state law creating the independent redistricting commission would require voter approval, which Newsom said he's considering. He said he's talked to state lawmakers about putting a measure on the ballot and calling a special election asking voters to approve it. 'I think we will win that,' Newsom said on the liberal podcast Pod Save America. 'I think people understand what's at stake in California.' A statewide special election would be costly — the last one in 2021 cost $200 million in public money. And the 2010 law giving the independent commission power to draw congressional districts was popular. More than 60% of voters supported the law. Newsom also suggested another possible avenue, which would involve interpreting state law as allowing the Legislature to create its own maps in between the post-census redistricting that the independent commission does every 10 years. It's not clear whether such a move would hold up in court. Currently, Republicans hold 220 seats in the House compared with Democrats' 212, a number that shrunk in recent months after three Democrats died in office, leaving vacancies. But that majority will be tough for the GOP to hold in the midterms, when a president's party typically has trouble retaining seats. Newsom said he thinks that redistricting should be done by independent commissions across the country. But he argued that Republicans are not playing fair by trying to redraw the maps. 'These guys are playing by a different set of rules,' he said. 'From my perspective, if we're gonna play fair in a world that is wholly unfair, we may have the higher moral ground, but the ground is shifting from underneath us.'
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Gavin Newsom Calls Trump a ‘Son of a B-tch'
About a month after National Guard troops and federal officers on horseback descended on MacArthur Park, where children at a summer day camp were reportedly present, California Gov. Gavin Newsom slammed Donald Trump for deploying the U.S. military to Los Angeles. 'They're sitting there on horses with American flags, running through soccer fields, scaring kids in the middle of the day at a summer camp. For what? Just toughness,' Newsom said on The Shawn Ryan Show. 'It's a weakness masquerading as strength.' Newsom then slammed Trump, whose administration's ICE raids have devastated many small businesses, particularly those within large immigrant communities. 'That's what I don't like about this son of a bitch,' said the governor. 'He calls me 'Newscum.' How do I explain that to my kid? Now, I have my kids' friends calling my kids 'Newscum.' That I get, because I was called that in seventh grade, but not by a 79-year-old.' He added: 'Model better goddamn behavior.' Last month, Trump mobilized thousands of National Guard troops to L.A. amid anti-Immigrations and Customs Enforcements (ICE) protests in Los Angeles without the request or consent of city and state officials. Newsom has remained vehemently critical of the president, lambasting Trump for inciting chaos, using valuable resources, and militarizing city streets. In a ruling against the Trump administration on Friday, a federal judge temporarily blocked federal agents from using racial profiling to make indiscriminate immigration arrests. For the past month, agents have conducted raids in public and at workplaces across Southern California, showing up at Home Depots, restaurants, and car washes and arresting Spanish-speaking day laborers on immigration charges. 'Justice prevailed today,' wrote Newsom on social media following the ruling. 'The court's decision puts a temporary stop to federal immigration officials violating people's rights and racial profiling. California stands with the law and the Constitution — and I call on the Trump Administration to do the same.' More from Rolling Stone How Texas Bullied Big Banks Into Dropping Their Climate Commitments What Trump Has Said About Jeffrey Epstein Over the Years House Republicans Block Release of Epstein Files Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence Solve the daily Crossword
