Viewpoint: How I got duped by luxury dupes
BRITAIN – My journey into the fun house of fakes began, as so many things do these days, on TikTok.
Like many men, I had been content carrying a tote bag or backpack.
Then my algorithm introduced me to Love Luxury, a designer consignment store in London offering previously owned Hermes bags.
This wasn't about saving money, exactly. A Birkin with a retail price of around US$12,000 (S$15,500) – already an egregious amount of money – could be resold for twice or three times its original price.
I found the extreme wealth both revolting and fascinating. I gobbled up clips of people playing the so-called Hermes Game – in which Birkin seekers tithe tens of thousands of dollars to Hermes boutiques in the hope that they might be offered the chance to buy one of their sought-after bags.
My TikTok For You page soon became nothing but unboxings and reviews of other luxury brands, including Chanel, Dior, Bottega Veneta and Loewe. I began to lust after these designer goods, imagining which ones were right for me.
Except that I am not rich, and neither are my parents or anybody I am likely to date.
Besides, surely such sums would be better spent on the deposit for a house. But the overwhelming deluge of bag content made me desperate for the luxury my lacklustre bank balance would never permit.
Then my algorithm served me up handbag dupes and replicas, imported from China. Buying them felt like an act of rebellion against the luxury brands that help enforce class division.
But I couldn't stop. Buying dupe after dupe quickly became a destabilising obsession – on account of platforms that incentivise everything but stopping.
When I came across a video about the viral Walmart Birkin – or Wirkin – I saw a way to participate in a world that had enthralled me.
While we don't have Walmart in Britain, I found one on an online marketplace called OnBuy. I bought it for US$61. It took nearly a month to arrive from China.
When it did, I was delighted. I doubted it was anything close to an authentic Birkin, but it was soft and smelled like real leather, not plastic.
I took it out that night to meet friends, showing it off like a child with a new toy. They passed it around, surprised by how luxe it felt and giggling over the idea that I was now cosplaying as an uber-wealthy fashionista.
Carrying this bag allowed me to escape into the fantasy of unachievable wealth. I felt like someone who no longer struggled to pay the rent.
In 2019, the sale of counterfeit goods accounted for 2.5 per cent of world trade, worth a total of US$464 billion.
On Reddit, there is a robust subculture of dupe hunters. The counterfeits they seek not only democratised access to designer bags, but were also symbols of resistance against the apparent greed of companies like Chanel and LVMH, which over the past six years have vastly increased prices and scored growing profits.
Next, I bought a dupe of Bottega's intricately woven Andiamo bag, then a fake Coach bag, then a faux Acne Studios tote, another pretend Birkin (burgundy, size 35), a counterfeit Goyard Saint Louis in green and a dupe of a delightfully slouchy Songmont crossbody.
If real, they would have cost me over US$37,000. Instead, I was out only around US$400. That may not seem like much to some (how fortunate), but for me, it was about half a month's rent.
I took on debt. I told myself I could afford the bags by spreading the cost with Klarna, a buy-now-pay-later programme, despite each additional purchase and the subsequent partial payments pushing me further into overdraft.
I have spent hours and hours scrolling Chinese e-commerce platforms such as DHgate and AliExpress, coveting fakes for sale.
I've messaged sellers about the leather used on their replicas of Loewe's signature Puzzle bag (authentic: US$3,500; dupe: US$90).
I've stayed up until 4am reading user reviews of The Row's more structured Margaux bag (authentic: US$5,500; dupe: just over US$100).
Whenever I ordered something, I compulsively tracked my package from China to Britain.
When it arrived, I'd tear open the many layers of packaging and smell the bag, caress the leather and examine the hardware.
Though I had no reason to, I would leave the house with it, eager to take it on its debut outing. I've carried a Birkin to the supermarket, filling it with produce for dinner that evening, and worn my Andiamo, empty aside from some lip balm and a book, to the pub.
Friends and family began to express their concern at the number of bags I was ordering.
'I think it's important that you stop,' my friend Kate texted me. I agreed, but each night, social media led me back to the bags.
A few weeks later, only after my friend Jonathan mentioned that he found the hyper-consumerism I was engaged in distasteful, I really took pause.
I looked back on the previous months and saw someone in the grips of an obsessional spiral.
By chasing the dopamine hit that came with securing the next bag or gobbling up TikToks, I wasn't able to see my addictive and destructive behaviours or the way that debt would only continue to mount.
I was skimping on my food shopping, taking on extra work and avoiding social situations where I knew I would have to spend money.
I put off going to the dentist. I was out of control, like someone possessed, spending far beyond my means.
I felt foolish. These bags had been tarnished by my new-found shame.
I deleted TikTok, as well as the apps for the Chinese marketplaces, but by then, it was too late: The rest of my social media accounts were flooded with handbag content.
On YouTube, my home page was a solid wall of influencers doing bag hauls from China. Almost every Instagram story I watched was followed by a luxury brand or retailer offering designer bags for sale. I was even pushed targeted ads while reading the news.
I began to see this all for what it was: a symbiotic network of influencers, social media, e-commerce platforms and digital advertising – all designed to capitalise on my inability to regulate myself.
How do you endure life online when that life consists of constantly being sold things?
While the obvious answer is to log off, how feasible is that, really? These social media platforms are designed to extract not only our time but also, increasingly, our money – whether we can afford it or not.
I can't entirely absolve myself, though. By buying these bags, I was chasing the illusion of status or happiness.
While I self-soothed, I was still complicit in voracious consumerism. There was nothing radical or rebellious about it. I was still entranced by the lure of luxury brands, eager to be a part of their club.
I had been duped by the dupes. NYTIMES
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
27 minutes ago
- Business Times
Apollo wins bid for Singapore's US$1 billion private credit fund
[SINGAPORE] Apollo Global Management won the mandate to manage Singapore's US$1 billion private credit fund targeting local high growth enterprises, according to a government portal for procurement website. The Ministry for Trade and Industry and Enterprise Singapore in March introduced the US$1 billion Private Credit Growth Fund, which aims to provide non-dilutive customised financing for high-growth local enterprises, according to a statement then. It will announce more details about the fund by the third quarter, the statement said. The Private Credit Growth Fund, first introduced in the government's budget speech in February, is among Singapore's initiatives as it seeks to boost its presence in the burgeoning US$1.7 trillion private debt space. This follows the Monetary of Authority of Singapore's initiative from March, when it had sought public feedback on a proposed regulatory framework targeting the asset class. The framework aims to grant retail investors access to the private market with proper safeguards in place. Adding onto the city state's private market ambitions, Singapore's sovereign wealth fund Temasek Holdings in December said it had set up a private credit platform with an initial portfolio of about S$10 billion, consisting of direct investments and credit funds. Meanwhile, Temasek's unit SeaTown Holdings International last year raised US$1.3 billion for its second private credit fund. The firm actively lends to companies across Asia Pacific, such as to Vietnamese conglomerate Vingroup JSC's units Vincom Retail JSC and Vinfast Auto. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
31 minutes ago
- Business Times
Couche-Tard's failed bid for 7-Eleven parent sparks debate over M&A in Japan
[TOKYO] Alimentation Couche-Tard's decision to walk away in frustration from an attempted acquisition of Seven & i Holdings set off a debate in Tokyo as to what lessons foreign companies with ambitions for M&A should draw. The bid was audacious from the start. A takeover of the group behind 7-Eleven convenience stores – one of Japan's most recognisable brands – would have been the largest by a foreign entity in the country's history. Moreover, the founding Ito family members were so opposed to the deal that they turned to one of their archrivals to try and block it. Still, the Japanese government, which has been pushing for companies to take a more investor-friendly approach, did not raise strong political opposition, even though Seven & i had sought greater protection under a law that could have scuttled a deal. While Couche-Tard, a Canadian group, placed the blame squarely on intransigence from Seven & i's management, the failure of the deal runs counter to the broader trend in the investing landscape, according to Nicholas Smith, a strategist at CLSA. 'Seven & i is just an obstructive character in an ongoing success story,' said Smith. 'Activist trades and shareholder proposals are on fire. Private equity sees Japan as one of the most attractive markets in the world and is hiring aggressively. Management can't afford to relax one bit.' Stephen Dacus, the new chief executive officer of Seven & i, now has to prove that the Japanese retailer can grow and boost its efficiency on its own. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Its shares fell 9 per cent on Thursday (Jul 17) after Couche-Tard walked away from the bid. Seven & i plans to sell its superstore business for US$5.4 billion, and is proposing a two trillion yen (S$17.3 billion) share buyback and a listing of its US business. Its rejection of the deal is a sign of more aggressiveness in Japanese firms, said Jesper Koll, expert director at Monex Group. 'The issue is not that this is old-style Japan protectionism, quite the opposite,' he noted. 'This is actually an injection of energy and competitive spirits into a Japan-led management team that is actually very international.' The history of attempted takeovers of marquee Japanese companies by outsiders is mixed. KKR, CVC Capital Partners and Blackstone walked away from a buyout of Toshiba after meeting stiff resistance from management. Concerns about the valuation, complexity and political nature of the deal were all headwinds that eventually resulted in a consortium led by a domestic fund prevailing. Hon Hai Precision Industry, better known as Foxconn, pulled off a deal in 2016 to take a controlling stake in Japanese electronics maker Sharp for 389 billion yen. The Taiwanese electronics contract manufacturer had pursued the Japanese company for years. Foxconn founder Terry Gou had lobbied Japanese lawmakers, co-opted banks and sweetened its offer to outmanoeuvre a Japanese government-backed bidder. 'The implications of today's news will only be understood a year from now, and will hinge on whether management succeeds in accelerating group reforms and turning around the situation in both Japan and the US,' said Michael Jacobs, an investment analyst at T Rowe Price Japan on Thursday. Unsolicited offers have quite often met strong resistance regardless of where the prospective buyers come from. Japanese motor maker Nidec made an unsolicited bid for Makino Milling Machine, shocking many Japanese companies that had never imagined they could become a takeover target by a Japanese firm. Nidec, like Couche-Tard, withdrew the bid earlier this year due to strong opposition. In another closely watched case, Taiwan's Yageo made a takeover bid for Shibaura Electronics, prompting a counterbid from Japanese rival Mineba Mitsumi. Others argued that the failure of the Couche-Tard deal had nothing to do with the nationalities or cultures of the companies involved. The issue was simply money, and Couche-Tard's 6.8 trillion yen bid was not enough. 'Seven & i did what any US company would do,' said James Halse, CEO and chief investment officer at Senjin Capital. 'It was up to Couche-Tard to put in a knockout offer.' BLOOMBERG

AsiaOne
an hour ago
- AsiaOne
China says successful US trade talks make return to tariff war unnecessary, World News
BEIJING — China wants to bring its trade ties with the US back to a stable footing, its commerce minister said, adding that recent talks in Europe showed there was no need for a tariff war while urging the US to act in a manner befitting of a superpower. Commerce Minister Wang Wentao told reporters on Friday (July 18) that the "ups and downs" in the two countries' relationship underscored their economic interdependence. Asked about the United States specifically, Wang said: "Major countries should act like major countries. They must shoulder their responsibilities," adding that China would protect its national interests. China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with the United States, after Beijing and Washington reached a preliminary deal last month to end weeks of escalating tit-for-tat tariffs. If no deal is reached, global supply chains could face renewed turmoil from duties exceeding 100 per cent. Wang said negotiations in Geneva and London earlier this year demonstrated there was no need to return to a trade war. "Practice has proven that through dialogue and consultation, with leadership and communication at the highest levels, we can properly manage contradictions and resolve our differences," he said. "We will continue to strengthen dialogue and communication, deepen consensus, reduce misunderstandings, enhance co-operation, to jointly put China-US economic and trade relations back on track to achieve healthy, stable and sustainable development." China's rare earths exports rose 32 per cent month-on-month in June, customs data showed on Monday, in a sign that agreements struck last month in London to free up the flow of the metals were possibly bearing fruit. Chipmaker Nvidia will also resume selling its H20 AI chips to China, Chief Executive Jensen Huang said at an event in Beijing this week, a move US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said was also part of negotiations on rare earths. Wang said on Friday that he had met Huang the previous day, describing the meeting as evidence that "as the dust settles, everyone has come to the conclusion — especially the US side — that forced decoupling is impossible." Wang said the current overall tariff level imposed by the US on China was "still high" at 53.6 per cent. Analysts have said that additional duties exceeding 35 per cent will probably wipe out Chinese manufacturers' profit margins. "Both sides have come to understand that they need each other, as lots of the goods and services that we exchange are irreplaceable, or at least difficult to exchange in the short-term," Wang said. "China does not want a trade war, but it is not afraid of one," he reiterated. [[nid:720356]]