July 7 attacks were watershed moment for head of Met's counter-terrorism squad
In 2005 Commander Dominic Murphy had been an officer in Hertfordshire for 12 years and had trained as a bomb scene examiner before the attacks on the transport system that killed 52 people and injured hundreds more.
When he saw the horror unfolding on the television, he 'did that thing that police officers shouldn't really do' and headed to London before he had been officially deployed.
Mr Murphy told the PA news agency: 'I was an officer who could be called into London or some other part of the country to help SO13 (former Met anti-terrorist branch) if they were responding to a terrorist attack, or conduct searches or support them in some way.
'And I remember sitting in the special branch office, which is our intelligence unit in Hertfordshire, and I was watching this unfold on TV, and I did that thing that police officers shouldn't really do.
'I didn't wait to be deployed. I spoke to my line manager and grabbed a car and all my kit and equipment and drove straight down to London to be here as quickly as I could.'
The compassion shown by the officers investigating the bombings and the speed at which they worked inspired him to spend the rest of his career in counter-terrorism.
Mr Murphy said: 'I arrived in our forensic management team.
'These were the officers and staff that were leading the response at the scenes to gather the evidence and recover those that had been unfortunately killed in the incident.
'I arrived to something I would describe as a really high pace of activity, the sort of activity you would expect policing to be doing at a terrible incident like this, but of course, this was on a scale and a type of incident we had never seen.
'I was struck by all of those counter-terrorism officers from SO13 that I met, their professionalism, their commitment to finding who was responsible for this attack, their overwhelming compassion for victims… that compassion extended to how they recovered those that were deceased from the attacks.
'I was struck by the end of that first day to see the professionalism and the pace they were working at.
'I never wanted to work anywhere else.
'I really only ever wanted to work with this group of people who I thought were some of the most impressive people I'd ever seen, and just the way that commitment portrayed itself to their service to the public and the victims was overwhelming for me.
'So I had been a Hertfordshire officer for nearly 12 years at that point, but I never really went back to Hertfordshire.
'I stayed here then, and have been here in counter-terrorism for the rest of my career.'
He specialised in body recovery, and has been deployed abroad to help investigate several atrocities involving British victims or interests, including the 2015 Tunisian beach attacks as well as tragedies in Algeria, Yemen and Sudan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
31 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
UK Trial by Jury Faces Axe for Serious Financial Crime Cases, Judge Says
The UK criminal justice system is set for its biggest shakeup in decades after a government ordered review recommended getting rid of jury trials in complex white collar crime. The jury system has been the mainstay of the UK's justice system for centuries but record high case backlogs, crumbling infrastructure and a shortage of judges and criminal lawyers has forced a rethink.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Instagram wrongly accuses some users of breaching child sex abuse rules
Instagram users have told the BBC of the "extreme stress" of having their accounts banned after being wrongly accused by the platform of breaching its rules on child sexual exploitation. The BBC has been in touch with three people who were told by parent company Meta that their accounts were being permanently disabled, only to have them reinstated shortly after their cases were highlighted to journalists. "I've lost endless hours of sleep, felt isolated. It's been horrible, not to mention having an accusation like that over my head," one of the men told BBC News. Meta declined to comment. BBC News has been contacted by more than 100 people who claim to have been wrongly banned by Meta. Some talk of a loss of earnings after being locked out of their business pages, while others highlight the pain of no longer having access to years of pictures and memories. Many point to the impact it has had on their mental health. Over 27,000 people have signed a petition that accuses Meta's moderation system, powered by artificial intelligence (AI), of falsely banning accounts and then having an appeal process that is unfit for purpose. Thousands of people are also in Reddit forums dedicated to the subject, and many users have posted on social media about being banned. Meta has previously acknowledged a problem with Facebook Groups but denied its platforms were more widely affected. The BBC has changed the names of the people in this piece to protect their identities. David, from Aberdeen in Scotland, was suspended from Instagram on 4 June. He was told he had not followed Meta's community standards on child sexual exploitation, abuse and nudity. He appealed that day, and was then permanently disabled on Instagram and his associated Facebook and Facebook Messenger accounts. David found a Reddit thread, where many others were posting that they had also been wrongly banned over child sexual exploitation. "We have lost years of memories, in my case over 10 years of messages, photos and posts - due to a completely outrageous and vile accusation," he told BBC News. He said Meta was "an embarrassment", with AI-generated replies and templated responses to his questions. He still has no idea why his account was banned. "I've lost endless hours of sleep, extreme stress, felt isolated. It's been horrible, not to mention having an accusation like that over my head. "Although you can speak to people on Reddit, it is hard to go and speak to a family member or a colleague. They probably don't know the context that there is a ban wave going on." The BBC raised David's case to Meta on 3 July, as one of a number of people who claimed to have been wrongly banned over child sexual exploitation. Within hours, his account was reinstated. In a message sent to David, and seen by the BBC, the tech giant said: "We're sorry that we've got this wrong, and that you weren't able to use Instagram for a while. Sometimes, we need to take action to help keep our community safe." "It is a massive weight off my shoulders," said David. How can you keep your child safe online? What is AI and how does it work? Faisal was banned from Instagram on 6 June over alleged child sexual exploitation and, like David, found his Facebook account suspended too. The student from London is embarking on a career in the creative arts, and was starting to earn money via commissions on his Instagram page when it was suspended. He appealed after feeling he had done nothing wrong, and then his account was then banned a few minutes later. He told BBC News: "I don't know what to do and I'm really upset. "[Meta] falsely accuse me of a crime that I have never done, which also damages my mental state and health and it has put me into pure isolation throughout the past month." His case was also raised with Meta by the BBC on 3 July. About five hours later, his accounts were reinstated. He received the exact same email as David, with the apology from Meta. He told BBC News he was "quite relieved" after hearing the news. "I am trying to limit my time on Instagram now." Faisal said he remained upset over the incident, and is now worried the account ban might come up if any background checks are made on him. A third user Salim told BBC News that he also had accounts falsely banned for child sexual exploitation violations. He highlighted his case to journalists, stating that appeals are "largely ignored", business accounts were being affected, and AI was "labelling ordinary people as criminal abusers". Almost a week after he was banned, his Instagram and Facebook accounts were reinstated. When asked by BBC News, Meta declined to comment on the cases of David, Faisal, and Salim, and did not answer questions about whether it had a problem with wrongly accusing users of child abuse offences. It seems in one part of the world, however, it has acknowledged there is a wider issue. The BBC has learned that the chair of the Science, ICT, Broadcasting, and Communications Committee at the National Assembly in South Korea, said last month that Meta had acknowledged the possibility of wrongful suspensions for people in her country. Dr Carolina Are, a blogger and researcher at Northumbria University into social media moderation, said it was hard to know what the root of the problem was because Meta was not being open about it. However, she suggested it could be due to recent changes to the wording of some its community guidelines and an ongoing lack of a workable appeal process. "Meta often don't explain what it is that triggered the deletion. We are not privy to what went wrong with the algorithm," she told BBC News. In a previous statement, Meta said: "We take action on accounts that violate our policies, and people can appeal if they think we've made a mistake." Meta, in common with all big technology firms, have come under increased pressure in recent years from regulators and authorities to make their platforms safe spaces. Meta told the BBC it used a combination of people and technology to find and remove accounts that broke its rules, and was not aware of a spike in erroneous account suspension. Meta says its child sexual exploitation policy relates to children and "non-real depictions with a human likeness", such as art, content generated by AI or fictional characters. Meta also told the BBC a few weeks ago it uses technology to identify potentially suspicious behaviours, such as adult accounts being reported by teen accounts, or adults repeatedly searching for "harmful" terms. Meta states that when it becomes aware of "apparent child exploitation", it reports it to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) in the US. NCMEC told BBC News it makes all of those reports available to law enforcement around the world. 'There is a problem': Facebook and Instagram users complain of account bans Facebook and Instagram get rid of fact checkers Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Court reforms proposed to ‘reduce risk of total system collapse'
Reducing the number of jury trials and resolving more cases outside of court are among 'fundamental' reforms to the court system proposed to 'reduce the risk of total system collapse'. Sir Brian Leveson has unveiled plans to shake up the structure of courts and reclassify offences on Wednesday in a bid to cut the record-high backlog where some cases are listed for 2029. It comes as the crown court backlog in England and Wales has passed 75,000 cases for the first time, rising to 76,957 at the end of March. Sir Brian's recommendations have been modelled to save approximately 9,000 sitting days in the crown court each year from some of the main changes, such as by diverting cases to magistrates' courts or to the proposed Crown Court Bench Division for trials to be heard by judges. Juries would be reserved to hear the most serious cases, and defendants would receive a 40% discount on their sentence if they plead guilty at the earliest opportunity. Sir Brian also called for a greater use of cautions or unpaid work to divert more cases away from court. The former senior judge told reporters he does not 'rejoice' in the recommendations, but added: 'I do believe that they are absolutely essential if we are to prevent our system from collapse.' Sir Brian, chairman of the independent review of the criminal courts, said: 'It is well recognised that justice delayed is justice denied, but the record and rising court backlog means victims, witnesses and defendants are waiting months, sometimes years, for cases to come to trial – unable to move on with their lives. 'This situation is simply unacceptable.' Reacting to the proposed changes, the Victims' Commissioner Baroness Newlove said for victims, proposals such as sentence discounts will 'feel like justice diluted once again', but added the reforms were 'necessary'. 'There is no credible alternative, but even this may fall short of what's truly needed,' she said. In the report Sir Brian warned that 'the reality of criminal courts which are no longer effective is already beginning to materialise'. He said the proposed reforms take a 'proportionate approach to trial processes while maintaining a right to a fair trial'. He added: 'These are not small tweaks but fundamental changes that will seek to make the system fit for the 21st century.' Either way, offences with a maximum custodial sentence of two years or less, such as possession of drugs, bike theft and voyeurism, could face lower penalties of 12 months imprisonment or less. Defendants in cases for offences including assault of an emergency worker, stalking and possessing an indecent photograph of a child would also no longer have the right to choose a jury trial. A new Crown Court Bench Division, made up of two magistrates and a judge, would have powers to deal with all either way offences such as fraud, child abduction, sexual assault and violent disorder. A judge would decide whether a defendant's case would be sent to the new court, or to the crown court with a jury. The review report published on Wednesday made up the first part of Sir Brian's recommendations, with a second report focusing on court efficiency expected to be published later this year. Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said ministers will now consider the recommendations and will respond ahead of legislating changes in the autumn. The Lord Chancellor said: 'I have already lifted courts funding to record levels, funding 4,000 more court sitting days than under my predecessors. 'But swifter justice requires bold reform, and that is what I asked Sir Brian Leveson to propose. 'As part of our Plan for Change, I will do whatever it takes to bring down the backlog and deliver swifter justice for victims.' The review comes as ministers accepted the majority of recommendations from the independent sentencing review to curb overcrowding in jails in the long-term. Responding to the report, Law Society for England and Wales president, Richard Atkinson, said the creation of the new division in the crown court on its own will not solve the backlog, and warned the Government should not cherry-pick the recommendations. 'Without sustained long-term investment in the system dealing with both demand on the courts and the capacity of the courts, the Government will simply be shifting the Crown Court backlog to the Magistrates' Court backlog and creating another backlog in the new division.' National chair of the Magistrates' Association, Mark Beattie, said magistrates were 'ready and willing' to support the changes to reduce pressure off crown courts. 'Magistrates are critical for our justice system. They handle over 90% of criminal cases and without them, the system would quickly grind to a halt. 'But their capacity is not unlimited and, if the proposed Criminal Court Bench Division is implemented, there will need to be more magistrates.' He added the reforms would expect to need more than 20,000 magistrates, rising from the current 14,600. Meanwhile, chairwoman of the Bar Council, Barbara Mills KC, rejected the need to curtail the right to a trial by jury, arguing that juries represent society and a fundamental part of the system. The representative body for barristers said the reform should be piloted with a clear end date to review it.
