Bad news for Indians going to US as Trump administration takes big decision on visa
Visa Integrity Fee: The One Big Beautiful Bill has come as a shocker for the Indian traveller who is planning to go to the United States. Under the bill, the US visa will become 2.5 times more expensive from 2026. The American government will charge USD 250 from people visiting the country as an integrity fee, which will be non-refundable. These developments are going to affect Indian students and IT professionals who go to the US for study and job purposes. Additionally, the fee can be changed every year based on the inflation rate.
It is worth mentioning that earlier, getting an American visa was not that difficult for students, IT professionals, and tourists. Also, it didn't affect the pocket that much. But after the implementation of the 'One Big Beautiful Bill', travelling to America is going to a burden on pocket for travellers. United States President Donald Trump has passed the new law on July 4, promising to make 'America great again'. Under this law, a new fee will be applicable from 2026 – 'Visa Integrity Fee'. How Much Is Visa Integrity Fee?
The Visa Integrity Fee is a new fee of USD250 (approx Rs 21,400), imposed by the Trump administration. This fee will come in force from nest year, 2026 and will be non-refundable in nature. Notably, the fee is not static, which means it can be changed every year depending on the inflation rate. A new visa integrity fee has increased the cost of some visas from Rs 16,000 to over Rs 40,000. Who Will Have To Pay The Visa Integrity Fee?
According to the law, the person who is issued a non-immigrant visa will have to pay this fee. It will be collected by the Department of Homeland Security. US-based immigration consulting company Fragomen said that the Visa Integrity Fee is part of a major reform in travel-related fees. This includes a USD24 fee on I-94, a USD13 cost in the Visa Waiver Program and a USD30 EVUS tax imposed on Chinese citizens.
As per the law, the person who is issued a non-immigrant visa will have to pay this fee. The fee will be collected by the Department of Homeland Security. US-based immigration consulting company – Fragomen – stated that the new Visa Integrity Fee is part of a major reform in travel-related fees. The fee structure includes- USD24 fee on I-94, a USD13 cost in the Visa Waiver Program and a USD30 EVUS tax imposed on Chinese citizens. It will mostly affect non-immigrant visa holders.
Will be applicable on tourist and business visas (B-1/B-2).
Students studying in America will have to pay this fee.
Professionals going to the US for jobs will have to pay this fee.
Individuals with Exchange Visitor Visa (J) will also have to pay this fee.
Diplomatic visa holders (A and G categories) will be exempted. How Much More Expensive Will The US Visa Be Now?
Currently, US B-1/B-2 visa fees are USD185. A significant price increase is scheduled for 2026. Visa fee – USD185 (Rs 15000)
Visa Integrity Fee – USD250 (approx Rs 21,400)
I-94 fee- USD24 (Rs 2,000)
ESTA fee- USD13 (approx Rs 1200)
Total fee- USD472 (approx Rs 40,000)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
20 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Over 20 states sue Trump over $6.8 billion frozen funds for after-school, summer programmes
More than 20 states have sued US President Donald Trump over the freezing of about $6.8 billion in funding for after-school, summer programmes and other programmes. The states have argued that the Donald Trump administration has violated the US Constitution by not considering Congress's sole authority over spending. (Bloomberg) Attorney generals or governors from 24 states and the District of Columbia sued the Trump administration in federal court in Providence, Rhode Island. They argued that the US department of education and the office of management (OMB) and Budget brought chaos to schools across America by freezing funding for six programmes approved by Congress. North Carolina Attorney General Jeff Jackson told ABC News, "This is plainly against the law." He went on to explain from a legal standpoint that this is "against the Constitution, against the Impoundment Act. This is not a hard case". According to the Impoundment Control Act, 1947, Congress must note and review the executive branch withholdings of budget authority. This requires the President to report any such withholdings to Congress. ALSO READ | 20 US states sue Trump administration over sharing of medical aid data with deportation officials While the Trump administration has been going after Ivy League universities head-on, freezing millions and billions of dollars in funding, the freeze also extended to the money used to support migrant farm workers and their childrens' education, recruitment and training of teachers, English proficiency learning and academic enrichment, besides the after-school and summer programmes. The lawsuit filed against Trump said that his administration was legally required to release the funds to the states by July 1, Reuters reported. Instead, the education department notified them on June 30 that the funds would not be released under those programmes as per the deadline, citing the change in administration as its reason. At the time, an OMB spokesperson reportedly said, "ongoing programmatic review" of education funding and said initial findings showed what he termed as a misuse of grant funds to "subsidize a radical leftwing agenda." The department also raised objections to the grant money being used to support scholarship for immigrant students and LGBTQ-themed lessons. The Democratic-led states said that the freeze has resulted in cancellations of summer school and after-school programmes and the halting of other initiatives, with little time for schools to fill in the gaps in their budget. ALSO READ | Trump administration sues California over transgender athletes in schools The states have argued that the Trump administration has violated the US Constitution by not considering Congress's sole authority over spending and went against the federal administrative law by freezing funds without any logical explanation. They also said that the administration failed to abide by the Impoundment Control Act, which prevents the executive branch from single-handedly refusing to spend funds approved by Congress unless certain procedures are followed. Jackson further told ABC News, "If the courts don't act promptly, the consequences will be dire." He warned that districts face the threat of immediate harm as the school year is nearing. The North Carolina Attorney General said that the massive effect of the pause could also result in the firing of about 1,000 educators in the district. "Everybody knows when it comes to juvenile crime, you want a safe place for teenagers to be able to go, to be able to keep them out of trouble," Jackson said, adding that elimination of after-school programmes across the US has never been considered a "good idea". ALSO READ | 12 states sue Donald Trump administration in trade court to stop tariff policy Alabama State Superintendent of Education Eric Mackey said that this will affect the students with the "greatest need". He told ABC News, "The loss of funding for those rural, poor, high poverty school districts, is just going to be, you know, more fuel for the fire that makes it more difficult to educate children in those communities." Christy Gleason, executive director of Save the Children Action Network, which provides after-school programming for 41 schools in rural areas of Washington and across the South, where the school year is set to begin as soon as August, said, "Time is of the essence." "It's not too late to make a decision, so the kids who really need this still have it," she added.
Hindustan Times
24 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Plots near airports see 84–118% appreciation in four years, outshine apartments: Report
Plot values in cities anchored by major airports, such as Delhi, Mumbai, Bengaluru, and Hyderabad, have witnessed higher growth, appreciating by 84–118% over the last four years. This has outpaced apartment price growth in the same areas, which ranged between 45–93%, according to a report by Square Yards. housing micro-markets near both existing and upcoming airports, particularly in Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Navi Mumbai, and Greater Noida, have seen a sharp rise in property values. (Representational photo)(File photo) The report highlights that housing micro-markets near both existing and upcoming airports, particularly in Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Navi Mumbai, and Greater Noida, have seen a sharp rise in property values, driven by improved connectivity, expanding employment hubs, and major infrastructure developments. The growth is especially pronounced in airport-linked corridors, where demand for plots has surged ahead of apartment demand. The report said that property price growth in airport-led corridors has consistently outperformed citywide averages for both apartments and residential plots. Overall housing micro-markets near existing and upcoming airports in Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Navi Mumbai and Greater Noida have seen sharp appreciation in prices by 70-120% in the last four years, as per the the report Jet Set Growth - Airports Fuelling Property Market Expansion in India', which studied the airport-driven impact on property price trends in select key major cities and regions, such as Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Navi Mumbai, and Noida and Greater Noida (including Yamuna Expressway). Property prices surge in real estate markets near airports In Noida and Greater Noida, apartments along the Yamuna Expressway connecting the twin cities to the upcoming Noida International Airport, saw apartment rates range between Rs. 7,000–9,000 per sq ft, witnessing the growth at 90% between FY21 and FY25. The rest of Noida recorded Rs. 9,000–11,000 per sq ft with a strong but comparatively lower 79% growth, it said. Residential plot values along the Yamuna Expressway stood at Rs. 65,000–70,000 per registering 94% growth over FY21–FY25. The rest of Noida saw prices between Rs. 90,000–1,10,000 per sq yd, growing at a slower pace of 45% during the same period. In Bengaluru's North Bengaluru areas located close to the Kempegowda International Airport, apartment prices range between Rs. 11,000–13,000 per sq ft, recording a 69% growth between FY21 and FY25. In contrast, the rest of the city saw prices between Rs. 13,000–15,000 per with a lower growth of 48%, it noted. Also Read: Noida International Airport: Here's how the upcoming airport is likely to impact Yamuna Expressway's real estate market Plot prices in North Bengaluru were in the range of Rs. 68,000–72,000 per sq yd, registering a remarkable 118% growth over FY21–FY25. The rest of Bengaluru witnessed prices between Rs. 80,000–85,000 per sq yd, growing at 93%, the report noted. In areas close to the upcoming Navi Mumbai International Airport, apartment prices in the Panvel region stood at Rs. 10,000–12,000 per sq ft, growing by 74% from FY21 to FY25. Comparatively, the rest of Navi Mumbai commanded higher prices of Rs. 19,000–21,000 per sq ft but saw only 45% growth. Panvel's plotted land rates on an average ranged from Rs. 80,000–85,000 per sq yd, reflecting a solid 93% increase. In other parts of the city, plot prices were higher at Rs. 1,10,000–1,30,000 per sq yd, but with a relatively slower growth of 58% over the same period, the report said. "Micro-markets anchored by airports are witnessing significantly faster property price appreciation compared to other parts of the same city," Square Yards said in a statement. 'Airports are among the most influential enablers of economic growth, urban transformation, and real estate development. In India, cities anchored by major airports, such as Delhi, Mumbai, Bengaluru, and Hyderabad, have demonstrated sustained residential growth, driven by improved connectivity, increase in employment hubs, and large-scale infrastructure investment. This impact is even more visible in micro-markets located near airports,' said Tanuj Shori, CEO and founder, Square Yards.
India Today
25 minutes ago
- India Today
24 states sue Trump administration over $6.8 billion education funding freeze
An administrative fight is heating up over the Trump team's decision to block over $6 billion in education grants. More than 20 states have filed a lawsuit to restore funding for after-school programs, summer camps, and other learning opportunities, mostly for students from low-income major program affected is the 21st Century Community Learning Centres initiative. This program helps about 1.4 million children by offering free tutoring, enrichment activities, and childcare through organisations such as Boys & Girls Clubs, the YMCA, and public areas are particularly suffering from the freeze. Republican congressional districts are home to 91 of the 100 school districts that receive the most funding from these grants, according to a report by the left-leaning think tank New America. States like Georgia, Florida, West Virginia, and California are home to a large number of these districts. The Trump administration says the pause on funding is to make sure that the programs match the president's priorities. The Office of Management and Budget mentioned concerns about how the money is being used, including whether the programs support undocumented immigrants or LGBTQ+ CLOSURES WITHOUT FUNDSAcross the country, local organisations are struggling to keep their programs running. In Rhode Island, the state government had to step in with emergency money to keep summer camps open. But other groups say they may not be able to survive much Boys & Girls Club of America, which has 926 clubs, warned that some of their locations might start closing within weeks if the funding isn't released. The YMCA and Save the Children have also said that many of their centres are at risk."Time is of the essence," said Christy Gleason from Save the Children Action Network. Her organisation supports after-school programs in 41 rural schools across Washington state and the southern US, where school begins as early as some Republican officials are worried. Georgia schools superintendent Richard Woods, a Republican, said, "I deeply believe in fiscal responsibility, which means evaluating the use of funds and seeking out efficiencies, but also means being responsible — releasing funds already approved by Congress and signed by President Trump."Many fear that if the delay continues, working parents will lose valuable support, and children will miss out on safe and enriching spaces after school. Programs like these offer not only learning but also meals, supervision, and Gleason added, "It's not too late to make a decision so the kids who really need this still have it."- EndsWith inputs from APTune InMust Watch
