US tech lobby flags Korea's map data ban as unfair trade barrier
As US President Donald Trump has pledged to rectify unfair trade practices against the US and directed the USTR to investigate such matters, speculation is growing over whether Washington will pressure Seoul on the issue in upcoming bilateral tariff negotiations.
In its submission to the USTR on March 11, the CCIA mentioned Korea multiple times.
'Exporting map data requires approval from the Korean government. To date, Korea has never approved the exporting of map data, despite numerous applications by international suppliers," the association's comment read.
'Korea's restrictions on the export of map data continue to disadvantage foreign providers that offer apps and services that rely on map-based functions — such as traffic updates and navigation directions — from fairly competing against their Korean rivals,' it further argued.
Estimating that Korea accounts for about 1.6 percent of total US digital service exports, the CCIA asserted that these regulations threaten about $130.5 million in annual revenue for American mapping service providers operating in the Korean market.
Google previously requested permission from the Korean government to export high-precision map data. However, the government has denied such requests, citing national security concerns.
The IT company made similar appeals in 2007 and 2016, both of which were rejected due to fears that the combination of maps and satellite imagery could expose military installations and other sensitive sites.
The CCIA also criticized Korea's Cloud Security Assurance Program, saying that it acts as a market barrier for US cloud service providers. CSAP is a certification system ensuring the security of cloud computing services, serving as a prerequisite for supplying cloud services to public institutions.
Furthermore, the CCIA highlighted that Korea's regulatory framework requires major US online content providers to bear responsibility for network performance, forcing them to pay significant fees to Korean telecom operators.
Regarding platform regulations, the CCIA claimed that Korea is modeling its legislative efforts after the European Union's Digital Markets Act, which poses considerable barriers for US companies. The association also noted that some proposed laws appear to grant preferential treatment to Chinese firms over their American counterparts.
"The CCIA's position was recently released, and since it is an internationally sensitive issue, various aspects still need to be reviewed. As of now, the government has no official stance to announce," said an official from the National Geographic Information Institute.
The Trump administration has previously designated Korea as an unfair trade partner on multiple occasions, applying pressure through tariff-related measures.
The US is set to announce new reciprocal tariffs on April 2, considering various nontariff barriers. Ahead of this decision, the USTR is gathering industry opinions on regulations imposed by foreign governments that American businesses find unjust.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
2 hours ago
- Korea Herald
North Korea bars Western influencers from trade fair tour
North Korea has barred Western influencers from joining a delegation of tourists to an international trade fair in October, a China-based tour operator told AFP on Monday. Diplomatically isolated North Korea has welcomed sporadic groups of international visitors in recent months, including hundreds of foreign athletes in April for the first Pyongyang International Marathon in six years. China has historically been the biggest diplomatic, economic and political backer of North Korea, which remains under crippling international sanctions. Travel agency Young Pioneer Tours (YPT) said on Saturday it would take a group of foreign tourists on a trip to the authoritarian state from October 24 to November 1. However, the tour would not be open to journalists, travel content creators or influencers, the company said on its website. YPT co-founder Rowan Beard told AFP the curbs on creators were "a specific request from the North Korean side". "We anticipate that once the country officially reopens, there may be stricter scrutiny or limitations on influencers and YouTubers joining tours," Beard said. The company had "no visibility" on when Pyongyang would restart official media delegations, he said. Several online influencers have shared slickly produced videos from inside North Korea in recent months. Chad O'Carroll, founder of specialist website NK News, said many influencers tend to have larger audiences than professional journalists, but "they are normally working without editors and tend to gain extra views through sensationalist-style content". "North Korean authorities likely see few benefits and major risks with allowing social media influencers to visit the country, given what we saw earlier this year," O'Carroll told AFP. "The result is a community of potential visitors who, in DPRK authorities' minds, are not likely to produce content that is favourable to state interests," he said, using North Korea's official name. The YPT tour, priced at 3,995 euros ($4,704), will depart from the Chinese capital Beijing and take in the Pyongyang Autumn International Trade Fair, North Korea's biggest international business exhibition. Participants will have a "unique chance" to stroll through more than 450 trade booths exhibiting machinery, information technology, energy, pharmaceuticals, consumer goods and household items. YPT also said the Pyongyang Chamber of Commerce would "hold a VIP presentation for us for an in-depth overview and insights into the (North Korean) economy". The itinerary also includes major sights in Pyongyang as well as the first Western visit in more than five years to Mount Myohyang, which boasts a museum of lavish gifts presented to former North Korean leaders. Chinese people used to make up the bulk of foreign tourists and business visitors to the isolated nuclear nation before it sealed its borders during the Covid-19 pandemic. However, numbers have not rebounded despite Pyongyang's post-pandemic reopening, a trend that some analysts have attributed to Beijing's anger at North Korea's explicit support for Russia's invasion of Ukraine. (AFP)
Korea Herald
3 hours ago
- Korea Herald
GM Korea's labor dispute intensifies over possible walkout, facility sale tensions amid US tariff woes
An ongoing labor dispute at GM Korea, the South Korean unit of General Motors, has escalated as the union secured the legal right to strike following a breakdown in wage negotiations, sources said Monday, fueling concerns that the American auto giant may scale back its production in South Korea amid the threat of US auto tariffs. According to the sources, the National Labor Relations Commission earlier in the day suspended its mediation of wage negotiations between GM Korea's management and the union, citing deep differences in the positions between the two sides. The suspension legally allows the union to begin collective action, intensifying a standoff already marked by widespread worker opposition to the company's plan to sell GM's South Korean service centers nationwide and unutilized facilities at its plant in Bupyeong in Incheon, west of Seoul. The union has demanded the withdrawal of the asset sale plan as a precondition for the wage negotiations. In a vote carried out last month, 88.2 percent of GM Korea's 6,851 union members voted in favor of a walkout, the highest approval rate for a strike in the union's history. The dispute comes amid mounting anxiety over the possibility that GM could reduce or eliminate its South Korean manufacturing footprint if the United States maintains its 25 percent tariffs on auto imports, part of a policy pledge of US President Donald Trump during his reelection campaign. GM Korea exports approximately 410,000 vehicles annually, with about 85 percent of those shipments headed to the US. On the wage front, the union is demanding a monthly base salary increase of 141,300 won ($103) and a performance-based bonus of 41.36 million won per worker. In contrast, GM Korea's management has defended its restructuring plan, informing employees of its intent to gradually sell the company's service centers and dispose of low-utilization facilities. The company says customer support will continue via its 386 partner service centers in the country and that employees at the affected sites will retain their jobs. A union spokesperson said unless the company withdraws its sale plans, labor will hold internal discussions to raise the intensity of its actions, adding, "We are keeping all options open." (Yonhap)
Korea Herald
3 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Seoul fails to bring Japan's forced labor issue to fore at UNESCO
South Korea has failed to place Japan's failure to address colonial-era forced labor at UNESCO-listed Meiji Industrial Revolution sites on UNESCO's official discussion agenda. The outcome was marked by tense negotiations with Tokyo and behind-the-scenes efforts to rally international support, particularly from the 21-member World Heritage Committee under UNESCO. South Korea initially proposed discussing the issue during the 47th session of the World Heritage Committee held on Monday in Paris. Japan later submitted an amendment to exclude the issue from discussion, which was eventually put to a vote. Of the 21 committee members, there were eight blank ballots, three invalid ballots, seven votes in favor of Japan's amendment to exclude the issue from discussion and three votes against. With a simple majority of six required, Japan's proposed amendment was adopted. The vote followed Seoul and Tokyo's inability to narrow their differences over whether Japan's neglect of its 2015 public commitment to address the history of forced mobilization of Koreans at UNESCO-inscribed sites should be included as an official agenda item at this year's session. "We regret that the necessary votes for the adoption of the agenda were ultimately not secured," the Korean Foreign Ministry said in a statement following the vote. The UNESCO vote marked the first time the longstanding dispute between Seoul and Tokyo over historical issues stemming from Japan's occupation of the Korean Peninsula from 1910 to 1945 was voted on at the committee. During the session Monday, the South Korean government delegation reiterated its position that Japan's failure to fulfill the commitments it made in 2015 — when 23 sites from Japan's Meiji Industrial Revolution were added to UNESCO's World Heritage List — should be discussed with UNESCO. Among the 23 sites, Koreans were forcibly mobilized at seven — including the coal mines on Japan's Hashima Island, also known as Battleship Island. Japan maintained its claim that the issue should be addressed bilaterally between Seoul and Tokyo, not on the UNESCO platform. In 2015, Japan pledged to 'take measures that allow an understanding that there were a large number of Koreans and others who were brought against their will and forced to work under harsh conditions in the 1940s at some of the sites.' Japan also promised to 'incorporate appropriate measures into the interpretive strategy to remember the victims, such as the establishment of an information center.' How vote started South Korea had additional hurdles to clear in raising the issue as an official agenda item at this year's meeting because Japan's upholding its UNESCO pledge was not automatically included on the World Heritage Committee's official agenda. In the resolution adopted in 2023, the WHC did not request a formal SOC report from Japan regarding its fulfillment of the commitments made at the Meiji Industrial Revolution sites. Such a report is a prerequisite for placing the related issue on the committee's official agenda for the following session. The 2023 resolution was adopted at a time when South Korea was not among the 21 members of the World Heritage Committee, but Japan was. In contrast, in past resolutions on the same matter adopted in 2015, 2018 and 2021, the WHC formally requested Japan submit SOC reports. As a result, Japan's failure to uphold its pledge was discussed as an official agenda item. Japan used the 2023 resolution technicality to claim the issue should not be included as an official agenda item at this year's session — a position South Korea firmly rejected. 'The South Korean government finds Japan's argument completely unconvincing,' a Foreign Ministry official said on condition of anonymity. 'While it is true that the 2023 resolution does not state that the update submitted by Japan is subject to review by the World Heritage Committee, there is also no rule that says it cannot be discussed at the committee.' In Seoul's view, a fundamental principle and rule of the World Heritage Committee is that any issue should be brought to the table if a member state believes there is a problem with the implementation of a decision concerning a specific heritage site. 'Therefore, we requested that this matter be added to the provisional agenda so that it could be discussed by the committee,' the official said. The official explained that, 'After months of back-and-forth, the UNESCO Secretariat ultimately agreed and circulated the document listing the item as part of the provisional agenda to member states on June 12.' Provisional agenda items are typically adopted through consensus at the World Heritage Committee session. But in this case, Japan proposed an amendment to exclude South Korea's proposed provisional agenda during the session, effectively nullifying South Korea's original proposal.
