Kmart is hit with bombshell claims it mislead customers about the horrific place it sourced clothing
An Australian-based Uyghur group has filed a lawsuit against the outlet in the Federal Court, seeking to gain documents so they can see whether it knowingly sourced stock from suppliers who used forced labour from those in the ethnic group.
In its ethical sourcing statement, Kmart said it aimed to provide products that respected human rights according to its ethical sourcing code which committed to abiding by international standards, including guidelines set out in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
The lawsuit filed by the Australian Uyghur Tangritagh Women's Association claims Kmart included on its 2024 and 2025 factory lists two suppliers with links to the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region.
It said this region in China's west has been well- documented for 'systemic state-sponsored forced labour and other atrocities against Uyghur and other Turkic Muslim people '.
The group wants proof from Kmart that it has abided by its ethical sourcing promises regarding these suppliers and whether its public statements have been misleading or deceptive.
Kmart must ensure it is not profiting off forced labour in China, association president Ramila Chanisheff said.
'We're demanding answers from Kmart so we know whether its actions live up to its words about addressing forced labour risks in its supply chain,' she said.
The retailer risks a legal claim that it breached Australian Consumer Law by misleading and deceptive conduct if documents show it had failed to monitor the risk of it using forced labour in its supply chain.
Maurice Blackburn principal lawyer Jennifer Kanis said the firm was using this first-of-its-kind case to bring real accountability to Australian retailers.
'Kmart tells customers that it supports ethical sourcing and the protection of human rights - but we know there are credible links between two of its factories and suppliers and the use of Uyghur forced labour in Xinjiang,' Ms Kanis said.
Human Rights Law Centre associate legal director Freya Dinshaw said the case highlighted the weaknesses in Australia's laws when members of the public are left to take companies to court on suspicions of modern slavery.
Unlike the United States, Australia has not banned imports of products made in the Xinjiang region, instead opting for a transparency approach which requires businesses to report annually on their actions to identify and address slavery risks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Aussie foodies rejoice as top burger chain Grill'd launches in COLES
Aussie burger lovers will soon be able to bring one of the country's most popular takeaway meals into their own kitchens - without the price of dining out. For the first time, Grill'd is launching its burger patties in supermarkets, teaming up with Coles to sell a range starting at $8 for a two-pack. The move comes as cost of living pressures continue to bite, with many Australians cutting back on takeaway and cooking more at home. Customers can buy three varieties of Grill'd patties in Coles stores nationwide from Wednesday, August 6. Patties available in the range include the Signature Beef ($8 for two), Premium Wagyu Burgers with Caramelised Onion ($10 for two), and a family-sized four-pack of Signature Beef ($12.50, in selected stores). The range will also be discounted by $1 for the first four weeks. Coles experts found that more than half of shoppers want to recreate their favourite restaurant meals in their own kitchens, with 'a familiar taste' being the top driver of what ends up on the plate. While the price is a fraction of what you'd pay for a full burger and sides in-store, Grill'd says the patties are made to the same quality standards you'd expect in their restaurants, with premium Aussie beef and no chef skills required. Fans are already calling for more of their restaurant favourites to hit the shelves. 'We just need the herb mayo now,' one wrote. 'Please release the sweet chilli mayo! I beg,' another wrote. Others have their eyes on side orders. 'Oh my god, I need the chicken bites next, please,' one wrote. Grill'd Founder and Managing Director, Simon Crowe, said he was excited to bring the brand to the supermarket aisle, giving more Australians the opportunity to enjoy the burgers. 'For over two decades, Aussies have loved coming into Grill'd restaurants for healthy burgers that taste good and do good. This next chapter in our story is very exciting as we take our products into people's homes,' he said. 'Having our burgers available nationally at Coles allows us to take the next big step in our mission: to make our healthy, delicious burgers accessible to all Australians.' With Aussies increasingly looking for ways to enjoy their favourite foods without the restaurant bill, it seems this might be one kitchen shortcut that will have plenty of shoppers rushing to the meat aisle.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
China's cyber-abuse scandal: is the government unwilling to crack down on exploitation of women online?
When Ming* found a hidden camera in her bedroom, she prayed for a reasonable explanation, wondering whether her boyfriend had placed it there to record memories of their 'happy life' together. But hope quickly turned to horror. Ming's boyfriend had been secretly taking sexually exploitative photos of not just Ming and her female friends, but also of other women in other locations, then using AI technology to generate pornographic images of them. After Ming confronted him, he 'begged for mercy' but became angry when she refused to forgive him, Ming reportedly told Chinese news outlet Jimu News. Ming is just one of many women in China who have been covertly photographed or filmed – both in private and public spaces, including toilets – by voyeurs who have then circulated or sold the images online without consent. The sexually explicit pictures – often taken using pinhole cameras hidden in ordinary objects – are then shared online in massive groups. The scandal has left China reeling and raised questions about the government's ability – and willingness – to crack down on such behaviour. One such group on Telegram, an encrypted messaging app, is named 'MaskPark tree hole forum' and reportedly had more than 100,000 mostly male members. 'The MaskPark incident exposes the extreme vulnerability of Chinese women in digital spaces,' Li Maizi, a prominent Chinese feminist now based in New York, told the Guardian. 'What's even more insidious and shocking is the prevalence of perpetrators known to the victims: partners, boyfriends, even fathers committing sexual violence against underage girls.' The scandal has sparked fury on Chinese social media and triggered discussions on the challenges of combating online harassment in the country. Although Chinese regulators have the power to clamp down on sexual harassment and abuse online, the system is currently focused on restricting the flow of information deemed politically sensitive, says Eric Liu, a former content moderator at the Chinese social platform Weibo who is now a US-based editor at China Digital Times. Since the scandal broke, Liu has seen 'large-scale' censorship of the MaskPark incident on the Chinese internet, where posts seen as having a social impact – including feminist content – are often scrubbed by censors. 'If the Chinese government wanted to shut down the groups, they definitely could,' Liu says, referring to previous cases of Chinese authorities infiltrating online spaces overseas. 'The scale of [MaskPark] is massive. I can't think of a similar incident of this scale in recent years. But Liu says he is not surprised. 'There's always been this type of content on the Chinese internet.' In China, those who are found guilty of distributing pornographic content can be sentenced to up to two years in prison, while people who take photos without the subject's consent can be detained for up to 10 days and fined. The country also has regulations protecting people against sexual harassment, domestic violence and cyber-abuse. But advocates say the current legal framework is insufficient. Often the burden falls on victims to gather evidence to build their cases, which can be difficult to do for crimes that take place online, according to Xirui*, a Chinese lawyer in Beijing who specialises in cases of gender-based harm. 'The behaviour itself also needs to meet certain elements of the crime, such as a specified number of clicks and subjective motives,' Xirui says. 'There's also the problem of the statute of limitations, which is only six months for public security cases. Once that's exceeded, the police will not file the case.' The Guardian contacted China's ministry of foreign affairs for comment. Beyond the legal hurdles, victims of crimes of a sexual nature often grapple with shame, which prevents many from speaking out. 'I've seen similar cases where landlords install cameras to spy on female tenants. This type of situation is generally treated as a privacy violation, subject to administrative detention, with victims seeking civil compensations,' Xirui says. To tackle the problem, the government could implement more specialised legislation, improve gender-based training of law enforcement officials and encourage courts to issue guidance that includes examples of relevant cases, the lawyer says. For Li, the recent incident reveals a widespread tolerance and lack of meaningful law enforcement on the issue in China. Rather than tackling the proliferation of sexist and abusive content online, authorities appear more focused on detaining female writers of homoerotic fiction and censoring victims of digital abuse, she says. 'With the rise of deepfake technologies and rapid online circulation of surreptitiously filmed content, women's bodies are being digitally exploited at an unprecedented scale,' Li says. 'But I believe if authorities are truly willing, and invest the necessary resources, it's entirely possible to trace and prosecute these crimes. We need to hold the Chinese government accountable.' * Names have been changed Additional research by Lillian Yang and Jason Tzu Kuan Lu
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Spread-Bet.co.uk Reveals Top Mobile Spread Betting Apps and Brokers for 2025
CAULFIELD NORTH, Australia, August 5, 2025 (EZ Newswire) -- Broker comparison website, opens new tab, announced its latest list of the top spread betting mobile apps and providers. According to research released by in July 2025, Spreadex, opens new tab ranks as the top mobile spread betting provider, followed by Pepperstone, opens new tab in second place and OANDA, opens new tab in third. Spreadex secured the No. 1 spot thanks to its exceptional all-round performance. Reviewers praised its simple navigation and intuitive controls. This was backed up by highly competitive spreads, which beat the industry average on seven of the nine most commonly traded pairs. Justin Grossbard, co-founder of and trading expert, explained why Spreadex performed so well in these tests: 'For traders of all backgrounds, a spread betting app needs to offer three things. These are an intuitive design, a comprehensive range of features, and competitive trading conditions.' 'Spreadex provides all three. It combines an easy-to-use app with advanced charting. At the same time, it offers more than 11,000 spread betting markets, with spreads starting from only 0.90 pips. Considering all this together, it had to be top of the pile overall," added Grossbard. Other high-scoring brokers include Pepperstone, which ranked second. Pepperstone offers some of the best spreads in the market, beating the industry standard for all of the assets tested by the team, including forex pairs as well as UK, U.S., German, Hong Kong, and Australian shares. Pepperstone delivered better-than-average spreads across all of these asset categories. OANDA rounded out the top three, with naming it the best spread betting app for beginners. With stake sizes starting at just £0.01, it offers one of the lowest-risk entry points to the market — an advantage few other brokers match. In total, featured eight apps in its 2025 rankings. CMC Markets, opens new tab was praised for its professional-grade spread betting tools, IG Markets, opens new tab for its extensive product range, and City Index, opens new tab for its seamless integration with MetaTrader 4. FXCM, opens new tab and AvaTrade, opens new tab also made the list, ranking seventh and eighth, respectively. FXCM stood out for its support across multiple mobile platforms, while AvaTrade earned praise for its robust features on Apple iOS. To determine the top eight mobile spread betting apps and brokers, the team employed a comprehensive and multi-layered evaluation process. First, the team conducted hands-on testing of each app, allowing them to assess usability, performance and overall effectiveness based on their own expertise. As experienced spread betting professionals, they drew on industry knowledge to deliver informed, first-hand assessments. In addition to internal testing, the team analyzed user reviews and community feedback, identifying which platforms were receiving the most positive responses from real users. Only apps that scored well in both expert evaluations and consumer sentiment earned a place on the final list. To ensure results remain accurate and relevant, regularly updates its rankings of top brokers and spread betting software — providing users with current, trustworthy guidance as they navigate the market. About Launched in 2024, is designed to help UK traders learn more about the tools and brokers available to them. The website is operated by its co-founders Justin Grossbard and Noam Korbl, two experienced traders who also run the sister site, CompareForexBrokers. For more information, visit opens new tab. Media Contact Justin Grossbard justin@ ### SOURCE: Copyright 2025 EZ Newswire See release on EZ Newswire
