Budget 2025-26: Govt provides income tax relief for salaried class
Listen to article
The government has taken a significant step to provide substantial relief to lower and middle-income sectors, proposing up to a four per cent decrease in income tax across various slabs.
Presenting the federal budget for the fiscal year 2025-26, Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb stated that the prime minister had consistently endeavoured to lower taxes on salaried individuals.
"Keeping this objective in mind, we have proposed a decrease in income tax across all slabs," he said. "This measure will not only ease the existing tax structure but also strike a crucial balance between inflationary pressures and individuals' take-home pay by alleviating the tax burden."
Under the new budget, individuals earning between Rs0.6 million (Rs50,000 monthly) and Rs1.2 million per annum (Rs100,000 monthly) are set to receive significant tax relief, as the government has lowered their tax rate from five per cent to one per cent. For those earning up to Rs100,000 per month, the federal budget also proposes a reduction in the total tax amount from Rs30,000 to Rs6,000.
Similarly, individuals earning up to Rs2.2 million per annum will see a four per cent decrease in tax on their salaries, bringing the rate down from 15 per cent to 11 per cent.
Some relief has also been extended to the higher income bracket. Individuals earning up to Rs3.2 million will benefit from a two per cent cut, reducing their tax rate from 25 per cent to 23 per cent for the upcoming fiscal year.
Meanwhile, in a move to mitigate the brain drain phenomenon, which sees professional human resources facing the highest tax burden in the region, the government has proposed a one per cent decrease in the surcharge applied to individuals earning more than Rs10 million per annum.
Earlier, it was revealed that the salaried class paid a staggering Rs331 billion in income tax in the eight months of the current fiscal, which is 1,350% more than the taxes paid by retailers, but still not enough for the government to seek relief from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for the marginalised segment.
The total income tax contributions by the salaried people during the July–February period of this fiscal year were Rs120 billion, or 56% higher than the Rs211 billion collected during the same period of the last fiscal year.
Last year, the salaried class paid Rs368 billion in taxes. But despite this backbreaking burden on the salaried people, who pay taxes on their gross income without adjusting expenditures, the government did not take up the issue of lessening this burden with the IMF during the recently held talks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Will low reserves be the new normal?
EDITORIAL: That the economy is stuck in a low-growth trap is a fact. Imports are already inching up without being accompanied by a robust growth momentum. Traditionally, import pressure has been felt when growth reached over four percent; however, now after two years of stabilisation at 2-3 percent growth, a stress is already visible in the interbank market. The issue is that the economy's size is growing, as nominal GDP has increased from US$ 311 billion in FY16 to US$ 410 billion in FY25. However, SBP forex reserves today stand at US$10-12 billion compared to US$18 billion in FY16. Commodity prices, even after declining from their super cycle peak, remain higher than their FY16-18 levels. Low reserves combined with relatively higher commodity prices have created a new normal that coupled with a rising consumption demand from a young and growing population traps the economy in a cycle of low growth. The key question is why reserves are not increasing and why external funding has dried up, despite the country continuously being in IMF programmes and receiving praise from the Fund for its progress and reform commitments. Moreover, why are bilateral and market-based inflows scarce, even though international rating agencies have upgraded the country's ratings? Why is the country stuck in repeated rollovers? Recently, China approved only half of its committed funding. Other bilateral partners are merely rolling over existing loans. Commercial loans remain expensive, despite improved ratings. The finance minister has yet to start attracting capital from Chinese markets via panda bonds, and there are no discussions about issuing new Eurobonds or sukuk. No fresh loans appear imminent. Currently, the government has only empty promises for investment. At best, it can secure sovereign loans by improving perceived sovereignty internationally. Investment should ideally come from the private sector, but when local investors themselves are looking to take capital out of the country, it is unrealistic to expect foreign investors to show interest. The drain on the financial account continues, and some loans might not roll over, while capital account inflows (FDI) remain insufficient to bridge the gap. Consequently, the current account must remain balanced — if not in surplus — during FY26. Remittances cannot grow significantly, given their large existing base, and exports have limited upside potential. Conversely, import pressure is building. At current growth levels of 2-3 percent, imports are already difficult to manage. With the national tariff rationalisation policy in action, reductions in import duties are likely to drive even higher imports, thus making demand management critical. The currency is the first line of defence. The SBP has accelerated currency depreciation from five paisas a day to 15 paisas a day, with PKR/USD currently hovering around 284. The currency needs to adjust further until imports are brought under control, which implies little room remains for additional interest rate cuts. Another concern is that currency depreciation will reignite inflation expectations because fuel and energy costs are pegged to the US dollar and the interest payments on government's external debt would increase. Any corresponding increase in exports as a result of currency depreciation would at best be marginal to begin with. Thus the fragile macroeconomic recovery faces premature challenges as these trends likely to persist in FY26 as well. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Saudi Arabia's net FDI fall 7pc in Q1
RIYADH: Saudi Arabia's net foreign direct investment (FDI) fell 7% in the first quarter of 2025 compared to the previous quarter, government data showed on Sunday, as the kingdom continues to lag behind its ambitious FDI goals. The kingdom drew 22.2 billion riyals ($5.92 billion) in FDI in the three months ended March 31 from 24 billion riyals ($6.40 billion) in the last three months of 2024. Net FDI rose 44% compared to the same quarter the previous year when the kingdom drew 15.5 billion riyals ($4.13 billion), the General Authority of Statistics data showed. Raising FDI is a key element of the kingdom's Vision 2030 economic transformation programme, which aims to lower the country's dependence on oil, expand the private sector, and create jobs. Saudi Arabia has set a goal of attracting $100 billion in FDI by 2030, spending massively on huge development projects known as 'giga projects' and expanding sectors like sports, tourism, and entertainment. But FDI numbers remain far from that target. Saudi Arabia has been seen as a source of capital rather than a home for investment, and foreign investors can find it difficult to navigate the kingdom's business environment, sources told Reuters when the FDI goal was first announced in 2021. The kingdom is projected to post a fiscal deficit of around $27 billion this year, which will largely be financed by borrowing, said a recent report by the International Monetary Fund. Saudi Arabia was the largest emerging market dollar debt issuer last year, but the IMF says the country has room to continue borrowing, with its net debt around 17% of GDP making it one of the least indebted nations globally. Riyadh has taken steps to encourage foreign firms to invest more in the country. Since 2021 companies seeking to secure state contracts have been required to set up their regional headquarters in Saudi Arabia. The government has also said it would update existing investment laws to boost transparency and promote equal treatment of local and foreign investors.
Express Tribune
7 hours ago
- Express Tribune
The hidden cost of hefty borrowing
While infrastructure projects have brought critical improvements in energy generation, transport connectivity and logistics, they have also saddled Pakistan with an increasing debt burden. photo: file Listen to article Pakistan's recent move to secure a $3.3 billion loan package from Chinese banks has once again placed its economic dependence on Beijing in sharp focus. The deal, which includes a $2 billion syndicated loan and a $1.3 billion refinancing arrangement, is intended to provide much-needed short-term relief to Pakistan's low foreign exchange reserves. In June 2025, following the disbursement of these funds, the reserves rose to nearly $15 billion, offering a temporary cushion equivalent to about two months' worth of imports. However, beneath the surface of this fiscal reprieve lies a complex web of financial vulnerabilities and strategic risks that could undermine Pakistan's long-term economic sovereignty. China has emerged as Pakistan's largest bilateral lender, with outstanding loans exceeding $29 billion. Much of this lending is linked to infrastructure development under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a central component of China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). While CPEC projects have brought critical improvements in energy generation, transport connectivity, and logistics, they have also saddled Pakistan with an increasing debt burden. Many of these loans are non-concessional, meaning they carry higher interest rates. Additionally, several Chinese-backed energy projects include capacity payment clauses that obligate Pakistan to make fixed payments regardless of power consumption, leading to billions in annual outflows. This contractual structure places sustained pressure on Pakistan's already overextended public finances. The current loan deal underscores a pattern that has developed in recent years: instead of retiring its obligations, Pakistan has increasingly relied on refinancing maturing Chinese debt. While this approach alleviates immediate liquidity crises, it does little to improve long-term sustainability. Refinancing delays the inevitable, creating a revolving door of repayments that expands the debt stock without addressing underlying structural weaknesses. As Pakistan's access to Western credit diminishes due to poor reform implementation and global risk perceptions, Chinese loans appear increasingly attractive because they are disbursed quickly and without stringent conditions. However, this convenience increases China's leverage over Pakistan – not only economically but diplomatically. The growing financial relationship shapes Pakistan's foreign policy calculus, particularly in matters related to India, the United States, and broader regional alignments. Efforts to diversify external financing have yielded some support. The World Bank recently approved a ten-year, $20 billion support package aimed at structural reform and development financing. Additionally, Pakistan remains under the IMF's Extended Fund Facility, which offers periodic tranches of funding subject to conditions such as tax reform, energy subsidy cuts, and improved fiscal management. Yet successive governments have struggled to meet these reform benchmarks, weakening credibility and leading to repeated interruptions in disbursement. In contrast, Chinese funding is politically less sensitive, often directed at visible infrastructure projects and devoid of institutional scrutiny, which makes it more attractive to policymakers under short-term political pressure. Without internal reforms, external financing — no matter how generous or immediate — cannot create sustainable stability. The challenge is not merely about securing foreign funds but about using those funds to build institutional capacity, diversify the economy, and reduce dependency. Continued borrowing without a parallel commitment to reform merely postpones the crisis and locks Pakistan into a cycle of debt and vulnerability. Moreover, the bilateral nature of Chinese lending can undermine Pakistan's position in global credit markets. Multilateral lenders and private investors closely monitor sovereign debt profiles, and overreliance on one creditor can affect Pakistan's risk rating, borrowing costs, and diplomatic flexibility. Questions around repayment capacity, especially in light of high annual debt servicing requirements, may erode investor confidence and reduce future funding opportunities. The latest $3.3 billion package offers short-term relief but does little to change the fundamentals. It is, in essence, a temporary fix that masks a growing problem. Every loan signed without reform commitments increases Pakistan's exposure to future crises. To move beyond this precarious cycle, Pakistan must take control of its economic trajectory. That means implementing broad-based reforms to expand the tax base, restructure public enterprises, improve energy sector efficiency, and enhance transparency in debt contracting. Only then can external financing serve as a tool for growth rather than a source of dependency. Multilateral lenders may impose tough conditions, but their long-term orientation and oversight mechanisms offer a pathway to resilience that bilateral loans alone cannot provide. In the short run, the Chinese loan provides breathing space and may help avoid immediate balance-of-payments crises. But in the long run, the real question is whether this dependence on a single creditor compromises Pakistan's ability to make independent economic choices. For Pakistan to secure a sustainable future, it must shift from firefighting to reform, from short-term relief to long-term resilience. The time to act is now. The writer is a member of PEC and holds a Master's in Engineering
