The price of a pen — when free speech hits the fan in South-east Asia — Che Ran
Arundhati Roy, the indomitable Indian author, stands as a symbol of this uneasy dance. Her latest skirmish with the Indian government – a 'terror' case for the sin of speaking her mind – has become a global spectacle. But the echoes of her battle reach far beyond India's borders, resonating in the humid halls of power across Southeast Asia, where governments have perfected the art of silencing dissent.
In India, Roy's sharp tongue and unflinching pen have long been a thorn in the side of the establishment. She has exposed uncomfortable truths about caste, class, and the erosion of democracy. In a nation where the press is increasingly muzzled and dissent is branded as betrayal, her every word is a provocation – a reminder that not all voices can be bought or buried.
But India is not alone in this delicate, dangerous dance. From Singapore's POFMA (Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act) to Thailand's lèse-majesté laws, the region has a long history of trimming the tongues of its truth-tellers. The methods vary – fines, arrests, smear campaigns – but the message remains the same: Speak at your own risk.
Take Malaysia, a country where the pen has proven mightier than the sword in recent history. It was here that The Edge, one of the nation's most influential business publications, dared to report on the largest financial scandal the world has ever seen – 1MDB. Its editor, Ho Kay Tat, faced jail for exposing the truth, and the prime minister who once held the reins of power now sits behind bars. Yet, this is also a country that has seen significant change. There was a time when whistleblowers like Kevin Morais met brutal fates for speaking out against corruption. But today, Malaysia stands at a crossroads – a place where freedom is no longer just a whispered hope, but a growing expectation.
In Myanmar, the price of truth can be even steeper. The 2021 military coup shattered the fragile democracy that had been painstakingly built over decades. Journalists like Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo were thrown into prison for their courageous reporting on the military's brutal crackdown on the Rohingya, exposing the dark underbelly of a state desperate to control its narrative. Even now, under the harsh rule of the Tatmadaw, speaking the truth can be a death sentence, as independent media outlets are raided, shuttered, or forced into exile.
Indonesia, too, has felt the weight of this pressure. Its democracy, young and fragile, is haunted by the ghosts of Suharto's iron-fisted rule. The echoes of the New Order era still reverberate, and journalists here still tread carefully, knowing that the wrong story can summon the heavy hand of the state. The murder of activist Munir Said Thalib, who was poisoned on a flight in 2004, serves as a grim reminder that even today, dissent can come at a devastating cost. Even now, the fear of being 'red-tagged' – labelled a communist or a threat to national security – is enough to chill the spine of any writer.
In neighbouring Singapore, the approach is more surgical, precise – a scalpel to Malaysia's cautious balancing act. The city-state's leaders have perfected the art of legal intimidation. POFMA, with its bureaucratic sheen and clinical efficiency, allows the government to call out 'falsehoods' with the speed and finality of a guillotine. It is a system built not just to silence, but to humiliate – to remind its citizens that the truth is a privilege, not a right.
Rappler CEO and Nobel Laureate Maria Ressa gestures after a Manila court acquitted her from a tax evasion case, outside the Court of Tax Appeals in Quezon City, Philippines January 18, 2023. — Reuters pic
And then there's the Philippines, where journalists face not just the law, but the barrel of a gun. It is a country where the free press has become a blood sport, where a critical headline can get you killed. Maria Ressa, the Nobel Prize-winning journalist, knows this all too well. Her fight for truth against a regime that branded her a criminal is a stark reminder that in some parts of South-east Asia, words don't just cut – they bleed.
Yet, despite the risks, despite the threats, the voices of dissent refuse to be silenced. Because in every censored article, every banned book, every whispered truth, there is a defiance that cannot be snuffed out. South-east Asia's storytellers know this – that their words, however dangerous, however costly, are the lifeblood of democracy.
So when Arundhati Roy stands in a courtroom, defiant and unbowed, she carries with her the echoes of every silenced voice, every censored word, every jailed writer from Colombo to Cebu. She is a reminder that the truth, though battered and bruised, still breathes.
And that, perhaps, is what the powerful fear most – the simple, stubborn truth that words, once written, once spoken, cannot be unmade.
So here's to the writers, the dreamers, the troublemakers – those brave enough to tell the truth, even when the price is everything.
* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Trump again threatens India with harsh tariffs over Russian oil purchases
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump again threatened on Monday to raise tariffs on goods from India over its Russian oil purchases, while New Delhi called his attack "unjustified" and vowed to protect its economic interests, deepening the trade rift between the two countries. In a social media post, Trump wrote, "India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine." "Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA," he added. A spokesperson for India's foreign ministry said in response that India will "take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security." "The targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable," the spokesperson added. Trump has said that from Friday he will impose new sanctions on Russia as well as on countries that buy its energy exports, unless Moscow takes steps to end its 3-1/2 year war with Ukraine. Russian President Vladimir Putin has shown no public sign of altering his stance despite the deadline. Over the weekend, two Indian government sources told Reuters that India will keep purchasing oil from Russia despite Trump's threats. India has faced pressure from the West to distance itself from Moscow since Russia invaded Ukraine in early 2022. New Delhi has resisted, citing its longstanding ties with Russia and economic needs. Trump had already in July announced 25 per cent tariffs on Indian imports, and US officials have cited a range of geopolitical issues standing in the way of a US-India trade accord. Trump has also cast the wider BRICS group of developing nations as hostile to the United States. Those nations have dismissed his accusation, saying the group promotes the interests of its members and of developing countries at large. CRUDE BUYER India is the biggest buyer of seaborne crude from Russia, importing about 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil from January to June this year, up 1 per cent from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by trade sources. India began importing oil from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the Ukraine conflict, the Indian spokesperson said, calling it a "necessity compelled by global market situation." The spokesperson also noted the West's, particularly the European Union's, bilateral trade with Russia: "It is revealing that the very nations criticizing India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia." Despite the Indian government's defiance, the country's main refiners paused buying Russian oil last week, sources told Reuters. Discounts to other suppliers narrowed after Trump threatened hefty tariffs on countries that make any such purchases. Indian government officials denied any policy change. The country's largest refiner, Indian Oil Corp, has bought 7 million barrels of crude from the United States, Canada and the Middle East, four trade sources told Reuters on Monday. India also has been frustrated by Trump repeatedly taking credit for an India-Pakistan ceasefire that he announced on social media in May, which halted days of hostilities between the nuclear-armed neighbors. The unpredictability of the Trump administration creates a challenge for Delhi, said Richard Rossow, head of the India program at Washington's Center for Strategic and International Studies. "India's continued energy and defense purchases from Russia presents a larger challenge, where India does not feel it can predict how the Trump administration will approach Russia from month to month," he said.

Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Anwar earns respect from China and US by mediating Cambodia-Thailand peace talks — Phar Kim Beng
AUG 5 — Amid a shifting and uncertain global order, Malaysia's Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has achieved what few regional leaders have managed: gaining the respect of both China and the United States while elevating Asean diplomacy from ceremonial declarations to substantive peacebuilding. In hosting the historic Cambodian-Thai military talks in Kuala Lumpur, Anwar has not only asserted Malaysia's credibility as Asean Chair, but also demonstrated that principled neutrality, when anchored in regional responsibility, can earn international trust. The ongoing negotiations at the Malaysian Ministry of Defence between the military leaderships of Cambodia and Thailand mark the first time that defence officials from both sides have come together under third-party auspices to address their tense border dispute. These talks are no mere photo opportunity. Overseen by Malaysian Army Chief General Mohammad Nizam Jaafar, they are deeply technical and intentionally discreet, focusing on contentious flashpoints and the mechanics of sustaining the ceasefire agreed just days earlier. With military attachés on standby to monitor implementation and a parallel Asean-led mechanism under development, Malaysia is doing more than hosting; it is actively shaping the architecture of regional security. By convening these talks ahead of Thursday's General Border Committee (GBC) meeting — comprised of 54 senior representatives including Defence Ministers and Army Chiefs — Malaysia has created the preconditions for concrete deliverables. That this process is happening without fanfare, and yet with full awareness and tacit support from Beijing and Washington, is no accident. Cambodia's Prime Minister Hun Manet, Malaysia's Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and Thailand's acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai shake hands as they pose for photos following a press conference, on the day of mediation talks on the Thailand-Cambodia border conflict, in Putrajaya July 28, 2025. — Reuters pic Both great powers — China and the United States — have vested interests in a stable Asean . For China, the Thai-Cambodian border serves as a critical corridor into mainland Southeast Asia and Indochina. For the U.S., stability in this region reduces the risk of further militarization and offsets the spread of spoilers aligned with anti-democratic impulses. By playing the honest broker and avoiding overt alignment with either camp, Malaysia under Anwar has demonstrated that Asean need not be a pawn in great power politics — it can be a partner. Malaysia's role here is fundamentally Asean in spirit but global in consequence. This is the type of conflict resolution that aligns with the original intent of the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation (TAC): non-violence, peaceful dialogue, and regional solutions to regional problems. Yet too often, TAC principles have remained aspirational. Anwar's facilitation of these military-to-military talks has moved them squarely into the realm of action. What sets this initiative apart is its firm foundation in confidence-building measures, not coercive diplomacy. No guns are drawn, no ultimatums issued — just serious, high-level engagements that involve both civilian and military chains of command. That this is happening in Kuala Lumpur — not Bangkok, Phnom Penh, Beijing, or Washington — speaks volumes about Malaysia's growing strategic capital. The regional silence that greeted the initial outbreak of violence between Thailand and Cambodia only underscored the urgency for credible intervention. With over 300,000 displaced and military tensions simmering since late July, there was a real risk that Asean 's credibility could collapse under the weight of its own indecision. That collapse has now been averted, thanks to Malaysia's resolve and the maturity of the Anwar administration's foreign policy apparatus. This moment is not just a win for Malaysia — it is a defining test for Asean 's evolution. If the current talks result in verified ceasefire compliance and long-term deconfliction measures, it would mark a milestone in Asean 's ability to contain bilateral disputes before they metastasize into regional crises. The long-criticized 'Asean Way' is being refined in real time: quiet, deliberate, but no longer impotent. For Malaysia, this is also a return to its long-standing tradition of behind-the-scenes diplomacy — from the days of Tun Hussein Onn's neutrality to Tun Razak's outreach to China. But under Anwar, there is a sharpened edge: the willingness to assume responsibility, invite the aggrieved parties to the table, and assume verification roles typically eschewed by Asean states. This is not just diplomacy — it is leadership. And the world is watching. From Beijing's calibrated approval to Washington's quiet endorsement, Malaysia's credibility is being affirmed. In an era where most peace efforts collapse under the weight of mistrust or great power rivalry, Malaysia's achievement offers a rare and valuable alternative: that a mid-sized Muslim-majority state in Southeast Asia, led by a Prime Minister with intellectual depth and moral clarity, can broker peace without playing patron or pawn. Anwar Ibrahim has elevated not only Malaysia's stature but also the potential of Asean as a regional peacemaker. In so doing, he has redefined the standards of statecraft in Southeast Asia — with the endorsement, if not the applause, of the world's most powerful capitals. * Phar Kim Beng PhD is Professor of Asean Studies, International Islamic University of Malaysia and Director of Institute of Internationalisation and Asean Studies (IINTAS). ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.


Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
India vows to defend interests after Trump threatens tariff hike over Russian oil
WASHINGTON, Aug 5 — President Donald Trump threatened yesterday to hike US tariffs on goods from India over its purchases of Russian oil—a key source of revenue for Moscow's war on Ukraine. New Delhi quickly pushed back, saying the move was unjustified and vowing to protect its interests. Trump's heightened pressure on India comes after he signaled fresh sanctions on Moscow if it did not make progress by Friday towards a peace deal with Kyiv, more than three years since Russia's invasion. Moscow is anticipating talks this week with the US leader's special envoy Steve Witkoff, who is expected to meet President Vladimir Putin. Yesterday, Trump said in a post to his Truth Social platform that India was 'buying massive amounts of Russian Oil' and selling it for 'big profits.' 'They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine,' Trump added. 'Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA.' He did not provide details on what tariff level he had in mind. Even before the threat, an existing 10 per cent US tariff on Indian products is expected to rise to 25 per cent this week. 'The targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable,' India Foreign Ministry spokesman Randhir Jaiswal said in a statement, after Trump's announcement. 'Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security.' India has become a major buyer of Russian oil, providing a much-needed export market for Moscow after it was cut off from traditional buyers in Europe because of the war. That has drastically reshaped energy ties, with India saving itself billions of dollars while bolstering Moscow's coffers. But India argued it 'began importing from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict.' The world's most populous country is not an export powerhouse, but the United States is its largest trading partner. — AFP