CNA938 Rewind - What could SIA gain from a joint venture with Malaysia Airlines?
The joint venture (JV) between Singapore Airlines (SIA) and Malaysia Airlines will see the two airlines working together on scheduling, pricing, sales and marketing, including expanded codesharing of flights, among other things, on routes between Singapore and Malaysia. Andrea Heng and Hairianto Diman chat with Shukor Yusof, Analyst & Founder at Endau Analytics Pte Ltd to look at how this JV will benefit both airlines, and the impact on their bottom line.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
44 minutes ago
- CNA
Philippines' semiconductor industry in the spotlight amid threat of US tariffs
Semiconductors are the Philippines' top export - a cornerstone of its services-driven economy. Former United States president Joe Biden's administration previously signaled plans to deepen preferential investment in the country's semiconductor supply chains and workforce. But with a shift in US trade policy, will the Trump-era tariff scheme threaten to stall that momentum? CNA's Buena Bernal reports.
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
New grant to help Singapore businesses adapt to Trump's tariffs to be launched in October
SINGAPORE: To help Singapore companies adapt to the new tariff environment, the government will be launching a Business Adaptation Grant in October, the Singapore Economic Resilience Taskforce (SERT) announced on Thursday (Jul 10). The grant will be capped at S$100,000 (US$78,000) and will have a co-funding element, said Minister for Manpower Tan See Leng. Revealing details of the new grant at a SERT press conference, which was held two days after US President Donald Trump started firing off letters on reciprocal tariffs to several countries, Dr Tan said small and medium enterprises will likely be able to receive a higher percentage of co-funding from the government than multinational firms. Small and medium enterprises employ around two-thirds of Singapore workers, he added. The grant will cover two categories of businesses and eligible companies will get support for a "time-bound period" of two years. The first group includes companies export to or operate in overseas markets and are affected by tariffs, and the second group is companies that need support with reconfiguration costs, including logistics and inventory holding costs. For the first group, the grant will help them conduct free trade agreements, trade compliance advisory, legal and contractual advisory and supply chain optimisation and market diversification advisory. More details of the grant will be available later. The Business Adaptation Grant complements other schemes that help businesses enter new markets, transform, innovate and grow, said Dr Tan, who is also Second Minister for Trade and Industry. Since the task force was formed in April, it has engaged more than 3,000 people, including business leaders, union leaders, workers and new graduates, said Minister for Digital Development and Information Josephine Teo. For businesses, she said some are monitoring the situation, while others have decided to defer or hold back major investment decisions, or are reviewing their plans. "Companies in the outward oriented sectors, they feel the impact much more imminently, and their plans, therefore will be much more likely to have to be adjusted sooner rather than later," she said. Chairman of the Singapore Business Federation (SBF) Council Teo Siong Seng said businesses gave feedback that they need to diversify into different markets and reconfigure their supply chain. "We have raised this concern to SERT," he said. "SBF is very heartened to see that the government has taken swift and decisive action in response to the needs of the business community." Mr Teo said the grant will help businesses with their first step in restructuring business operations and this will help them to be more decisive in seizing opportunities in the "new tariff environment". He added that the public-private sector partnership is crucial in the coming months. SBF will continue to work with the government and businesses to navigate the uncertainty and help companies press ahead with growth and transformation. AUG 1 TARIFF DEADLINE SERT's update comes as US president Trump continues to send letters to countries informing them that they would be subject to sharply higher tariffs from Aug 1. While Singapore has not received a letter, neighbouring countries such as Malaysia and Indonesia will face tariffs of 25 per cent and 32 per cent respectively. The letters hinted that there will be opportunities for additional negotiations, but the deadline appears to be fixed. Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong noted that tariffs for some countries in Asia were reduced from what was initially announced in April, but others will see higher levies. "This will likely prolong the uncertainty and volatility and challenges for the economies around the world," he said. "We hope that negotiations and consultations will continue and that the US will be able to reach deals (with these countries)." Discussions with the US on potential concessions for pharmaceutical tariffs are ongoing, said Mr Gan. He declined to share more details but said Singapore wants to better understand the US's expectations and to explore a practical and implementable approach. He added that he will be traveling to the US later this month for discussions with the Trump administration as well as business leaders. For now, businesses have been preparing to adjust to the new realities, said Mr Gan. Some have taken advantage of the pause in reciprocal tariffs to frontload their exports to the US. "As a result, the economy is likely to hold up relatively well in the first half this year," he said. "However, given the expectation of higher tariffs going forward, as well as the diminishing frontloading effect, we will likely see slower economic growth over the next six to 12 months."
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Bankrupt doctor fined S$43,000 for not disclosing about S$4 million in assets
SINGAPORE: A bankrupt doctor was fined S$43,000 (US$33,600) by a court on Wednesday (Jul 9) for failing to disclose about S$4 million in assets. Dr Goh Seng Heng, a 70-year-old Singaporean, had omitted to disclose assets including S$1.4 million in shares, as well as about S$1.2 million and US$900,000 owed to him by the Singapore Yacht Charter. The fine was fully paid by his daughter. Dr Goh is still an undischarged bankrupt and is listed as a registered doctor on the Singapore Medical Council's website. He pleaded guilty to eight charges under the Bankruptcy Act for not disclosing his disposal of certain assets, or not disclosing that those assets existed. WHAT HAPPENED Dr Goh was a well-known aesthetic doctor. In 2015, a Chinese businesswoman, Wang Xiaopu, launched proceedings against him for alleged fraudulent misrepresentation over the sale of his company's shares to her. The High Court in March 2023 held that Dr Goh, who founded the PPP Laser Clinic chain, had moved millions in assets to his family members with the intent to defraud his creditors. Madam Wang obtained a judgment for a full return of her investment, with interest and costs, that amounted to more than S$40 million. However, Dr Goh did not repay the money and instead voluntarily obtained a bankruptcy order in March 2020. He was adjudged a bankrupt in March 2020 and the Official Assignee was appointed to administer his affairs in bankruptcy. Today, he is still an undischarged bankrupt, with a total debt of about S$48 million owed to his creditors as of May 2025. After his bankruptcy was declared, the Official Assignee wrote to Dr Goh to submit information necessary to make the statement of his affairs complete. However, Dr Goh made a number of "material omissions". These include his shares in the Dr Michelle Goh company, disposed of in June 2015, and shares in GSHKML that were disposed of in February 2015, insurance policies disposed of in March 2020 and debts of more than S$2 million owed to Dr Goh by the Singapore Yacht Charter, which were disposed of in September 2017. Dr Goh did not disclose that he had disposed of 760 shares worth S$306,766.40 to his wife, daughter and two sons for a total consideration of S$4. He was supposed to have disclosed this, as it was done within five years before the date of his bankruptcy. He also did not disclose that he had disposed of three shares worth S$1.38 million to his children for a total consideration of S$3. Dr Goh also had a Prudential Insurance Policy with an initial value of S$162,744. However, he took out a loan of S$146,000 against this policy in March 2020 and did not pay back any part of this loan before terminating the policy by surrendering it for S$16,743.55. He similarly took out a loan of S$278,000 against a policy valued at S$308,993 in March 2020 and surrendered it for S$30,993. In September 2017, he assigned the debts worth more than S$2 million owed to him by the Singapore Yacht Charter to his wife for zero consideration. A prosecutor from the Ministry of Law sought a total fine of S$43,000 for Dr Goh, saying his offences impeded the orderly administration of his bankruptcy estate. MITIGATION Defence lawyers, Mr Chooi Jing Yen and Ms Claire Chong from Mr Chooi's eponymous law firm, did not object to the fine sought by the prosecution. Mr Chooi said his client had no previous convictions and had indicated his plea of guilt early in the proceedings. When Dr Goh self-petitioned for bankruptcy on Mar 6, 2020, he was unrepresented and acted as a layperson without the benefit of legal advice, said Mr Chooi. When he submitted the requested information, he was also unrepresented and acting without legal advice, and the omissions were "inadvertent and unintentional", said the lawyer. Once the omissions were discovered, Dr Goh fully cooperated with the Official Assignee, said Mr Chooi. He said Dr Goh had genuinely forgotten about several of the sums he omitted as they were disposed of too long ago or were relatively small. Mr Chooi said Dr Goh, although bankrupt, has access to funds that are not available for creditors in the form of support from his daughter, who undertook to pay the fine on his behalf. The lawyer cited the High Court case of Tan Beng Chua v Public Prosecutor, where the judge noted that there is no reason why, in appropriate circumstances, a fine cannot be considered where a bankrupt has access to such sources of funds.
