
Govt gives 48-hour ultimatum to MSC Shipmanagement to begin oil extraction from MSC ELSA 3
The government has given a 48-hour ultimatum to
MSC Shipmanagement
Ltd to start work on extraction of oil from the sunken ship
MSC ELSA 3
off the coast of
Kerala
or face legal consequences for 'continued inaction and delay representing not only negligence but also a violation of statutory obligations' in the backdrop of imminent environmental and economic threat posed to the Indian coastline and its coastal communities.
The
oil extraction
work was slated to start around June 5 but has not even begun, the Director General of Shipping, Shyam Jagannathan, wrote in a June 11 notice issued to MSC Shipmanagement, the Cyprus-based ship management unit of Mediterranean Shipping Company, S.A., the world's biggest container shipping line and the operator of MSC ELSA 3.
Voicing increasing concern on the progress made in salvage and emergency response operations of the sunken container ship, the
D G Shipping
said that it was 'grossly inadequate and continues to fall short of the timelines and operational commitments previously provided by the salvors (T&T Salvage) and the owner of the ship'.
Despite repeated instructions and coordination meetings, the response from the salvors has been 'consistently delayed and insufficient', the country's maritime regulator said.
'The lack of prompt action has resulted in a continued and serious risk to the marine environment and coastline of India, particularly affecting the coastal regions of Kerala. The region's local communities, which heavily rely on fishing for their livelihoods, have already suffered extensive loss of work and income due to the prolonged presence of the sunken vessel, floating debris, oil sheen, and ongoing pollution risk,' Jagannathan wrote in the notice.
The ship was carrying 367.1 metric tonnes of very low sulphur fuel oil and 84.4 metric tonnes of diesel in its tanks when it capsized and sank on May 25.
Recalling that salvors were clearly advised to mobilise necessary assets required for diving and oil recovery operations as early as the first day of the incident, the D G Shipping noted that the Diving Support Vessel (DSV) and necessary diving assets were not mobilised until after May 30.
'This initial delay set back the entire timeline for the operation. Even the tug assets hired by the owners arrived on scene only after June 1, with no prior deployment initiated by the salvors,' he told MSC Shipmanagement.
While it was abundantly clear considering the depth of the water (51 meters) that saturation diving was required for the extraction of oil from the vessel, the salvors have, to date, been able to conduct only limited air diving operations, which are inadequate for the extraction of oil from the tanks of the sunken vessel.
'The timeline provided for these operations has been grossly violated. Capping of vents, which was scheduled for completion earlier this month, is still being conducted at present. The extraction of oil, originally scheduled to commence around June 5, 2025, has not even begun as of this date,' Jagannathan pointed out.
The delay, Jagannathan wrote, is 'even more unacceptable' considering that the western coast of India, including Kerala, is entering its monsoon season - a period during which offshore
salvage operations
become highly unsafe or entirely unfeasible due to harsh weather conditions. 'The salvage operation was provided a short weather window to conduct these critical activities, and that window has now largely been lost as a direct consequence of the salvors' failure to timely deploy assets and personnel,' he said.
The salvors had committed to arrange expert saturation divers and a team for the specialised equipment from 11 countries. The Directorate General of Shipping (DGS), to assist the salvors, had written directly to the Indian Embassies and High Commissions in these countries to expedite visa clearances.
'Yet, it has come to light that several visa applications were not even filed by the salvors, resulting in continued non-availability of the saturation divers even at this stage,' the D G Shipping stated.
'This consistent inaction and delay represent not only negligence but also a violation of statutory obligations. Should the extraction of oil not commence within the next 48 hours, the government of India shall be left with no alternative but examine all avenues against the shipowners and salvors under applicable Indian legislation for the continuing threat posed to Indian waters and the coastal environment,' the D G Shipping told MSC Shipmanagement.
'Your actions (or lack thereof) may attract prosecution and penalties under the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958; Environment (Protection) Act 1986; Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023; Disaster Management Act, 2005, and any other applicable provisions under Indian maritime safety, environmental protection, and disaster management laws,' Jagannathan wrote in the notice.
'Any further delay beyond the specified period will be treated as wilful and deliberate noncompliance, and the government shall proceed to exercise its full legal rights and remedies without further reference,' he added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
31 minutes ago
- Business Standard
HDFC Bank, Bharti Airtel: Analysts pick 8 blue-chip stocks to own this July
The second half of CY25 might paint a stable, if not entirely positive, trajectory for the D-street. While investor sentiment continues to improve with tariff-related uncertainties taking a breather, the risk factor driven by flip-flopping policy stances still lingers. However, equity market analysts are expecting stronger earnings for FY26 compared to the previous fiscal, which might provide support to the markets on the upside. Axis Securities has maintained its Mar'26 Nifty target at 26,300, based on 20x Mar'27 earnings, signalling a minor upside of over 3 per cent from current levels. "We expect near-term consolidation in the market, with breadth likely remaining narrow in the immediate term. If the two upcoming events—trade related uncertainty easing further and the absence of major negative surprises in Q1FY26 earnings—play out as expected, the market is likely to make a new high in the upcoming earnings season," the Axis Securities stated in its recent report. After a subdued start to 2025, the Indian stock market made a strong comeback during the closing of H1. The benchmark Nifty witnessed a 15 per cent surge from March lows, with mid and small-caps following the uptrend. The report pointed out that the overall breadth of the market has improved significantly over the last 3-month period. A combination of factors, including global uncertainties taking a breather and the RBI's liquidity infusion, provided the momentum to the overall market trajectory. That apart, an uptick in the government capex spending and a consumption boost in this year's budget also added to the overall optimism. With the earnings season in sight, all eyes are now on how India Inc's first quarter played out in FY26. CHECK STOCK MARKET LIVE UPDATES Fresh highs possible? In a bull case, the brokerage values Nifty at 21x, implying a Mar'26 target of 27,600. However, the assumption is built on a Goldilocks scenario marked by lower volatility and a soft landing in the US market. On the flip side, the bear case pegs Nifty at 17x, translating to a Mar'26 target of 22,300. Meanwhile, a supportive macro backdrop along with rising capex, is expected to support market momentum going forward. Axis Securities projected Nifty earnings to deliver a robust 14 per cent CAGR (compound annual growth rate) over FY23–27. As markets continue to trade range-bound, Axis Securities suggests buying these stocks in July 2025 with a one-year horizon- Bajaj Finance Ltd. CMP (Current market price): ₹937 Target price: ₹1,050 Upside: 12 per cent State Bank of India CMP: ₹820 Target price: ₹1,025 Upside: 25 per cent Varun Beverages CMP: ₹458 Target price: ₹650 Upside:42 per cent HDFC Bank CMP: ₹2,002 Target price: ₹2,250 Upside: 12 per cent Bharti Airtel CMP: ₹2,010 Target price: ₹2,330 Upside:16 per cent Shriram Finance CMP: ₹707 Target price: ₹790 Upside:12 per cent Hero MotoCorp CMP: ₹4,237 Target price: ₹5,030 Upside: 19 per cent Avenue Supermarts CMP: ₹4,372 Target price: ₹5,091 Upside:16 per cent
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
31 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Nuvama, Angle One, BSE slide up to 7% after Sebi ban on Jane Street
Shares of India's capital market stocks took a hit on Friday after the market regulator barred US-based quant firm Jane Street from accessing the domestic securities market for allegedly manipulating the markets. To be sure, the direct impact was felt by Jane Street's local trading partner, Nuvama Wealth Management Ltd., whose shares plunged as much as 6.7 per cent, the worst since May 5 this year. Other stocks that saw a sentimental impact were BSE and Angel One, although different triggers also impacted the stocks. BSE's counter fell as much as 6.1 per cent, while Angel One's scrip plunged 7.3 per cent on Friday. Shares of listed depository CDSL fell over 2 per cent during the session. Sebi bans Jane Street after alleged illegal gain The Securities and Exchange Board of India barred Jane Street from accessing the domestic securities market for allegedly manipulating the markets. In an interim order, Sebi has also directed the high-frequency trading outfit to disgorge ₹4,844 crore made 'unlawfully'. Jane Street's modus operandi included building aggressive positions in the options segment and then influencing the price in the underlying stock market, where volumes tend to be relatively low, according to Sebi. The Sebi investigation found that Jane Street accounted for a significant portion of the net buying in the 12 Bank Nifty component stocks and their futures. The 'burst of buying' was intended to influence the price of these securities, which in turn allowed the firm to put on significantly larger and profitable positions in the highly liquid index options segment. As per the Sebi order, between January 2023 and March 2025, Jane Street earned ₹44,358 crore in options, lost ₹7,208 crore in stock futures, lost ₹191 crore in index futures, and another ₹288 crore in cash, pocketing an overall gain of ₹36,671 crore during this period. Angel One F&O option premium turnover falls Angel One reported a year-on-year decline in its futures and options (F&O) segment based on option premium turnover for the quarter ended June 2025 (Q1 FY26). The F&O option premium turnover fell 17.8 per cent to ₹13,500 crore, compared to ₹16,400 crore in the same period last year (Q1 FY25). The decline highlights moderation in the derivatives volumes after Sebi's action to curb retail frenzy. However, overall option premium turnover, which includes all segments, rose 40.0 per cent year-on-year (Y-o-Y) to ₹1,048 crore, reflecting increased interest in non-F&O segments and broader market hedging. Angel One also saw a notable slowdown in trading activity during the June 2025 quarter (Q1 FY26), as key operational metrics declined year-on-year. The total number of orders executed on the platform fell 25.8 per cent to 343.11 million, while the average daily orders dropped 27.0 per cent to 5.62 million. Additionally, gross client acquisition declined sharply by 40 per cent Y-o-Y, with the company adding 1.45 million new clients during the quarter.


Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
How 'now-famous' Indian techie Soham Parekh managed to work for several companies simultaneously
Indian software engineer Soham Parekh has publicly responded to the growing controversy surrounding his professional conduct. In an interview with TBPN , Parekh admitted that the allegations of working with multiple startups simultaneously were true. He revealed that he had been managing an intense workload, putting in nearly 140 hours every week. According to Parekh, this decision stemmed not from ambition or opportunism, but from a need to navigate a tough financial situation. During the discussion, the hosts attempted to understand how Parekh maintained such a punishing schedule. They pointed out that he seemed to sleep only 6 to 8 hours per day while coding non-stop for 12 to 14 hours daily, including weekends. When asked whether the use of AI tools like code assistants contributed to him juggling multiple roles, Parekh agreed that these tools did enhance productivity, but he denied that they allowed him to take on more positions than he could handle. Unconventional Work Ethic and Lifestyle Parekh also spoke about his irregular routine, stating that he never followed a fixed work schedule for any company. Instead, he focused entirely on the immediate tasks before him. He admitted to operating on minimal sleep and said that friends and colleagues often remarked on his chronic lack of rest. Parekh described himself as someone who has become accustomed to sleeplessness, describing it almost as a part of his identity. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now "I think people around me will probably say this: that I am notoriously known for not sleeping. I am a… you know… I am a serial-like non-sleeper at this point, I would say..." he said. He stated that he worked for 12-14 hours every day. Reason Behind Moonlighting: Financial Crisis Expanding on his motivations, Parekh reiterated that his choice to work multiple jobs was rooted in pressing financial challenges. He emphasized that no one willingly chooses to work nearly 140 hours per week unless driven by extreme necessity. His decision, he said, was not born out of greed but survival, as he had bills to pay and responsibilities to manage. "Financial circumstances, essentially. No one really likes to work 140 hours a week, but I had to do it out of necessity.." he said. Denying Outsourcing Allegations As the controversy gained traction on social media, several users accused Parekh of transforming his multiple jobs into a business model by subcontracting his work to junior developers. These claims suggested that he was profiting off others' efforts while maintaining the illusion of handling all responsibilities himself. Parekh flatly rejected these allegations, asserting that he personally wrote every line of code assigned to him. Journey from Mumbai to the U.S. Parekh shared that he was originally from Mumbai and had moved to the United States in 2020. His initial plan was to relocate in 2018 to pursue graduate studies. However, financial difficulties forced him to delay that move. Once in the U.S., he finally enrolled and earned his master's degree in computer science from the prestigious Georgia Institute of Technology . Prior to this, he completed his undergraduate studies in computer engineering at the University of Mumbai, graduating with an outstanding GPA of 9.83 out of 10. Triggering the Backlash The allegations against Parekh surfaced when Suhail Doshi, co-founder of Mixpanel and Playground AI, issued a public advisory to other startup founders via X (formerly Twitter). Doshi accused Parekh of misleading several startups, many of which were funded by Y Combinator, by accepting roles with them simultaneously. Following Doshi's post, at least six other technology executives confirmed that Parekh had been employed at their companies and was removed once his dual employment status was discovered. Parekh's story has sparked widespread debate in the tech industry about burnout, financial pressures, and the growing ethical dilemmas in remote work environments.