Spanish Economy Minister Cuerpo Running for Eurogroup President
Spanish Economy Minister Carlos Cuerpo is running to lead the Eurogroup of euro-zone finance ministers.
Cuerpo presented his bid before a deadline to do so expired on Friday, according to his spokesman. Ireland's Paschal Donohoe currently holds the position and is seeking another term.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What's the Best Investment Strategy to Retire a Multi-Millionaire?
Consistent dollar-cost averaging is the best investment strategy to retire a multi-millionaire. Monthly investments of as little as $500 can turn into millions of dollars when you are set to retire. There are a number of ETFs that can help you get the necessary returns to become a multi-millionaire. 10 stocks we like better than Vanguard S&P 500 ETF › The secret to retiring a multi-millionaire is quite simple. There is no easier way to accomplish this than by using a consistent dollar-cost averaging strategy. If you start investing early and use this investment strategy, your odds of retiring a multi-millionaire are extremely good. Dollar-cost averaging is one of the simplest and most effective investing strategies out there. Instead of trying to time the market, you simply invest at regular intervals, regardless of where prices are. By investing a fixed amount every month, or every paycheck, you'll buy more shares when prices are low and fewer shares when they're high. Over time, this will smooth out your cost basis and help protect you from big market swings. It's a disciplined approach that will keep you investing through both bull and bear markets. Some of the best investment vehicles to use this strategy with are exchange-traded funds (ETFs). With ETFs, you can get an instant portfolio of stocks without doing a lot of research. ETFs are also very accessible. You can feel comfortable starting with a small amount -- the key is just investing consistently. With the power of compounding, dollar-cost averaging consistently into an ETF can help you retire a multi-millionaire. You also don't have to start with a large amount. If you are in your mid-twenties and have 40 years until retirement, a simple $500 investment each month can turn into a nearly $5 million nest egg by the time you hit retirement age with just a 12% average annual return. If you're older, though, don't fret. A $1,000 investment each month at a 12% annual return can give you a $3 million portfolio after 30 years. However, the sooner you start, the better, as $1,000 each month for 40 years turns into nearly $10 million. Let's look at five ETFs with strong track records that can help you retire a multi-millionaire. With a 12.8% return over the past decade, the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: VOO) is one of the first choices that investors should consider when looking to implement a dollar-cost-averaging strategy. The ETF replicates the performance of the S&P 500, which is widely considered the benchmark for the U.S. stock market. The ETF is a nice blend of growth and value large-cap stocks, and with around 500 stocks in the fund, it gives investors instant diversity. Growth stocks have been leading the way in the market for the better part of two decades. The Vanguard Growth ETF (NYSEMKT: VUG) is a great way to invest in this dynamic. With a 15.3% return over the last 10 years, this ETF is another solid choice for investors looking to use a dollar-cost-averaging strategy. While the ETF officially tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, this is essentially the growth side of the S&P 500. It's not as diversified as the S&P 500, with only around 165 stocks in its portfolio, but you're getting the best of the large-cap growth stocks through the ETF. The Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ: QQQ) has quite simply been one of the best-performing non-sector-specific or non-leveraged ETFs over the past decade. The ETF tracks the performance of the Nasdaq-100 index, which is made up of the 100 largest non-financial stocks that trade on the Nasdaq Stock Exchange. The Nasdaq has long been known as the exchange for emerging growth and technology companies, so the ETF is heavily weighted toward these types of stocks. The ETF has generated an average annual return of 17.7% over the past 10 years, easily ahead of the return of the S&P 500 over the same stretch. Even more impressive is that it has consistently beaten the S&P 500 more than 87% of the time on a 12-month rolling basis. Investing in growth and technology stocks is not the only investment style, and the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (NYSEMKT: SCHD) is a nice value investment alternative. The ETF tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, which consists of high-yielding U.S. stocks that have long track records of consistently paying out dividends. While the ETF has only generated a 10.6% average annual return over the past 10 years, it has produced a 12.2% annual average return since its inception in October 2011. That's a solid long-term track record. If you're looking to swing for the fences, the ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (NYSEMKT: ARKW) could be right for you. Unlike the other ETFs, it is actively managed and does not follow an index. Instead, it is focused on investing in companies "that benefit from the increased use of shared technology, infrastructure and services, internet-based products and services, new payment methods, big data, the internet of things, and social distribution and media." In addition to investing in stocks, it currently has an investment in an ETF that tracks the price of Bitcoin. The ETF has been a strong performer, generating an average annual return of 18.2% over the past 10 years. However, you'll need a strong stomach, as the ETF has seen some wild swings over the past few years, as shown in the table below. Year 2020 Year 2021 Year 2022 Year 2023 Year 2024 Year Performance 157.08% -16.65% -67.49% 96.99% 42.27% Data source: Ark Invest. As such, this ETF is only for the most aggressive investors. Before you buy stock in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Geoffrey Seiler has positions in Invesco QQQ Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin, Vanguard Index Funds-Vanguard Growth ETF, and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. What's the Best Investment Strategy to Retire a Multi-Millionaire? was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Slowing Rates Of Return At General Dynamics (NYSE:GD) Leave Little Room For Excitement
Finding a business that has the potential to grow substantially is not easy, but it is possible if we look at a few key financial metrics. Ideally, a business will show two trends; firstly a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and secondly, an increasing amount of capital employed. Ultimately, this demonstrates that it's a business that is reinvesting profits at increasing rates of return. In light of that, when we looked at General Dynamics (NYSE:GD) and its ROCE trend, we weren't exactly thrilled. AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for General Dynamics: Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities) 0.13 = US$5.0b ÷ (US$57b - US$19b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2025). Therefore, General Dynamics has an ROCE of 13%. On its own, that's a standard return, however it's much better than the 11% generated by the Aerospace & Defense industry. Check out our latest analysis for General Dynamics In the above chart we have measured General Dynamics' prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free analyst report for General Dynamics . Things have been pretty stable at General Dynamics, with its capital employed and returns on that capital staying somewhat the same for the last five years. It's not uncommon to see this when looking at a mature and stable business that isn't re-investing its earnings because it has likely passed that phase of the business cycle. So unless we see a substantial change at General Dynamics in terms of ROCE and additional investments being made, we wouldn't hold our breath on it being a multi-bagger. With fewer investment opportunities, it makes sense that General Dynamics has been paying out a decent 37% of its earnings to shareholders. Unless businesses have highly compelling growth opportunities, they'll typically return some money to shareholders. We can conclude that in regards to General Dynamics' returns on capital employed and the trends, there isn't much change to report on. Yet to long term shareholders the stock has gifted them an incredible 120% return in the last five years, so the market appears to be rosy about its future. However, unless these underlying trends turn more positive, we wouldn't get our hopes up too high. General Dynamics could be trading at an attractive price in other respects, so you might find our on our platform quite valuable. If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why I Question SCHD's Role in My Portfolio -- Is There a Better Choice for Income and Growth?
Schwab's U.S. Dividend Equity ETF has underperformed other funds of late. The funds being held in comparison aren't actually all that comparable. The purpose of diversifying any portfolio is to limit the risk of inevitable but unpredictable change. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › As always, The Motley Fool cannot and does not provide personalized investing or financial advice. This information is for informational and educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional financial advice. Always seek the guidance of a qualified financial advisor for any questions regarding your personal financial situation. If you'd like to submit your question for feedback, you can do so here. Do you own the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (NYSEMKT: SCHD), and if so, have you been disappointed by its recent performance? If your answer to both questions is yes, you're not alone. Plenty of people have been frustrated with its lack of progress versus the broader market. One of these disappointed investors recently asked an entire Reddit community about this fund's usefulness when there are so many other options available. Why SCHD? It loses to both SPY and JEPQ in total returnsby u/Malevin87 in dividends There's always more to the story than anyone can know through a single Reddit post. Since many investors are likely grappling with this very same question, however, some thoughts on the matter are in order. First, you're not imagining things. As the original poster's math suggests, SCHD is trailing alternative exchange-traded funds (ETFs) like the JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (NASDAQ: JEPQ) or the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (NYSEMKT: SPY). Indeed, even adding its sizable dividend payments (its trailing yield is just under 4%) into the mix, the Schwab fund has consistently underperformed SPY and JEPQ since the middle of 2023. This doesn't necessarily mean a fund like the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF doesn't belong in your portfolio, though. Yes, Schwab's dividend fund is lagging. It has for a while. There's an underappreciated reason for that. The Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100™ Index that it is meant to mirror holds a bunch of the market's very biggest dividend payers that have been out of favor for a couple of years now. The fund -- and index -- are highly exposed to consumer goods names like Altria, oil and gas giants such as Chevron, and industrial tech stocks like Texas Instruments. These are all fine companies. But they've just not been what investors have been clamoring for over the course of the past few years. Investors are still mostly in love with technology stocks that are heavily exposed to the artificial intelligence (AI) revolution. That's a big reason the JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF has done so well since 2023, when the AI movement really took hold. As the name suggests, JPMorgan's Nasdaq Equity Premium Income fund holds the same stocks you'll find in the Nasdaq-100 Index. They include Nvidia, Microsoft, and Broadcom, just to name a few. There's a slight twist with JEPQ. Its primary purpose is to generate distributable income to its owners by selling "covered" call options against the stocks the fund holds. The strategy for achieving this usually works quite well, too. The ETF's current annualized dividend yield stands at an impressive 14.5%. Make no mistake -- this strategy also ultimately means that this fund's performance trails the Nasdaq-100's. It's just an attractive investment because so much of the Nasdaq-100's gains are still able to be collected in the form of immediate and perpetual income. It's a completely different kind of investment than the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF, so its net performance should be different. The same can be said of SPY. This ETF is neither dividend-oriented nor growth-oriented. It's just meant to mirror the performance of the S&P 500, which encompasses 85% of the U.S. stock market's total market capitalization. That's why it's such a good market barometer. Of course, the same AI-centric technology names that dominate the Nasdaq-100 also dominate the S&P 500. That's why it's also outperformed SCHD for the past couple of years. So what? Performance is performance, after all, and JEPQ and SPY are performing when Schwab's U.S. Dividend Equity ETF isn't. The reason you diversify isn't to capitalize on current leadership. You diversify because you have no idea what the future holds, and your job as an investor is to maximize your potential upside while minimizing your risk of the unknown. More to the point, although the JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF and the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust may be leading the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF right now, that could change in an instant. That possibility is more real right now than you might realize, given the environment. While selling (or "writing") covered call options on the Nasdaq-100's stocks has worked well enough since 2023, the market's somewhat choppy sideways to slightly bullish trend favors this strategy. That's especially true in an environment with above-average volatility and rising interest rates, as we've seen lately. This rise in interest rates also works against dividend stocks, since the market will adjust their prices lower to push their dividend yields closer to bonds' yields. Given this, it's not surprising that SCHD has underperformed of late. But what if everything about this backdrop reverses? What if interest rates start to sink and/or the market's volatility starts mellowing out? Or what if a strong marketwide bull market takes hold? This situation would favor dividend stocks again, but also make JPMorgan's option-writing strategy even more difficult to execute, and relatively less productive than simply buying and holding. You won't see this shift coming before it happens. You'll only see it after the fact, when SCHD starts to perform better, and JEPQ starts to perform worse. This isn't to suggest that JPMorgan's covered call ETFs aren't worth owning, nor is it a guarantee that Schwab's dividend ETF is on the verge of recovery. That's the point. While an environmental shift is likely, we can't know when or to what extent it will take shape. That's why you remain diversified even when it's difficult to stick with a laggard and not double down on leaders. You're preparing for all possibilities by owning a little of everything, and not too much of anything. It's also worth considering that one year's time isn't actually very long when it comes to stocks. It may be too soon to come to a sweeping long-term conclusion here. That being said, in this particular instance, two of the three exchange-traded funds in focus are at the extreme opposite ends of the spectrum. There may be room for something else in between that isn't quite so dividend-oriented, but also not so tech-centric. For instance, while its dividend yield may be a modest 1.7%, the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (NYSEMKT: VIG) is based on the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, which makes a point of not including the highest-yielding stocks just because they're more likely to underperform. Sure enough, this dividend fund has easily outperformed SCHD for the past couple of years. Even if it hasn't quite kept pace with JEPQ, it's at least been respectably close. High-quality dividend stocks do offer the capital growth that most investors also want. They do better in times of market weakness too, since their cash dividend payments usually remain unfazed. VIG is just one of several other ETFs that might be worth considering here, however. The Vanguard Growth ETF (NYSEMKT: VUG) wouldn't be a bad bet either, if income isn't actually an immediate concern. When a portfolio is well-diversified (as it should be) to protect an investor from the unknowable, the unexpected, and the unpredictable, one of those holdings is always going to lag. That's OK. That's the reasonable price you pay for the protection. Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $409,114!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $38,173!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $713,547!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. James Brumley has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Chevron, JPMorgan Chase, Microsoft, Nvidia, Texas Instruments, Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF, and Vanguard Index Funds - Vanguard Growth ETF. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why I Question SCHD's Role in My Portfolio -- Is There a Better Choice for Income and Growth? was originally published by The Motley Fool
