
'Something's gotta give': Gov. Braun hints state could intervene over Indy violence
That's what the president of the city's police union has publicly asked for, though specifics are lacking, following nearly a dozen shooting deaths in the first two weekends of July. Braun also declined to specify what kinds of interventions the state government may consider.
"I think it would be a dereliction if you weren't at least talking about it, and then sooner or later seeing if they're going to take action that really shows results, or put your heads together in terms of what that next step might be," he told reporters at the governor's mansion Tuesday. "I'm not going to say what it's going to be. I'm saying it's at the point where something needs to change."
A mass shooting downtown in the early hours of July 5 claimed the lives of two teens, in addition to three others shot and killed across the city over the holiday weekend. This past weekend, at least six people were killed. In response, the city-county council is considering extending the curfew for youth and adding punitive fines for parents whose kids violate curfew.
Rick Snyder, president of the Indianapolis Fraternal Order of Police, yesterday indicated this response doesn't go far enough and called upon state elected leaders to "step in."
Already during the July 4 holiday weekend, at the request of the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department, Braun sent some state troopers to Indianapolis to assist with patrols, weapons recovery and arrests.
Snyder hasn't responded to questions on what else specifically he'd like state leaders to do beyond this kind of operational assistance.
Braun expressed some reluctance to trump local control, saying Indianapolis is "its own political subdivision," but he also said he doesn't want to see things get worse and earn the state headlines that, in his words, resemble those from larger urban areas.
In an interview with IndyStar Wednesday, Senate Pro Tempore Rodric Bray, R-Martinsville, expressed similar sentiments: vague about what could be done, hesitant to usurp local control, but warning that the state may be willing to take action.
"I'm just open to any conversation about how we can be helpful there. I should tell you, though, if people come to us for help, not everybody probably likes the things we come up with," he said. "I'm not going to say right now exactly what we're going to do, because it's extremely complicated and I need to listen to law enforcement and Rick Snyder and the FOP and figure out what it is exactly they need, because we want to be helpful if and where we can be. "
Braun challenged residents of Indianapolis to "put different people in charge" and think about what things were like in the city nine years ago, referring to the Republican Greg Ballard's mayoral administration.
"When it comes to our state capital, measured to where it was nine years ago, something's got to give," he said.
See the data: Indianapolis homicide tracker 2025
Looking at just one statistic, criminal homicides, there were fewer of them nine years ago than there are in a given year today in Indianapolis. It should be noted, too, that the numbers have steadily increased each year since 2012, and Both the Mayor Greg Ballard and Joe Hogsett administrations, which span this time period, have shattered records.
While in former Mayor Greg Ballard's first term in office, the criminal homicides typically numbered just below 100 per year, the city then broke a record during his second term: 144 criminal homicides in 2015, the most since 1998.
That number has continued to climb. In 2021, a pandemic year, the city saw a historic 249 criminal homicides. The annual numbers have receded since then.
So far this year, Indianapolis police have reported 84 criminal homicides.
This figure is 27% lower than this time last year, according to IMPD data shared with IndyStar. Crime writ large in the downtown neighborhood is down 6% year-to-date.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Scores Second Massive Legislative Victory
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The House of Representatives has voted in favor of a rule approving President Donald Trump's request to claw back around $9 billion for public broadcasting and foreign aid. The House passed the bill early Friday in a 216-213 vote, and it will now go to Trump's desk for signature. Responding to the vote, Trump wrote on Truth Social: "House approves nine billion dollar cuts package, including atrocious NPR and public broadcasting, where billions of dollars a year were wasted. Republicans have tried doing this for 40 years, and no more. This is big!!!" President Donald Trump shakes hands with House Speaker Mike Johnson in Washington D.C. earlier this month. President Donald Trump shakes hands with House Speaker Mike Johnson in Washington D.C. earlier this month. Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP Why It Matters A rescissions package is a request from the president to claw back funding that Congress has already approved. In this case, the Trump administration wanted to take back more than $1 billion in federal funding for public broadcasters like NPR and PBS, and more than $8 billion in foreign aid funding. Friday's vote is a major victory for the president's agenda and his second major legislative success since taking office less than six months ago. It is also a win for House Speaker Mike Johnson, who had to wrangle the chamber's Republican caucus together amid days of internal turmoil over the Trump administration's handling of the investigation into the disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. What To Know The Republican-controlled House voted to pass the rule shortly before a Friday deadline, after which the administration would not have been able to claw back the funds. GOP Representatives Brian Fitzpatrick and Mike Turner joined all present Democrats in voting against the measure. The House's vote came after the Senate passed an amended version of Trump's rescissions proposal earlier Thursday, sending it to the House. No democrats supported the measure when it passed the Senate in a 51-48 vote. This is a developing story. More to follow.

an hour ago
House Republicans grasp for response to demands for transparency in Epstein case
WASHINGTON -- House Republicans were grasping late Thursday to formulate a response to the Trump administration's handling of records in the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking case, ultimately putting forward a resolution that carries no legal weight but nodded to the growing demand for greater transparency. The House resolution, which could potentially be voted on next week, will do practically nothing to force the Justice Department to release more records in the case. Still, it showed how backlash from the Republican base is putting pressure on the Trump administration and roiling GOP lawmakers. The House was held up for hours Thursday from final consideration of President Donald Trump's request for about $9 billion in government funding cuts because GOP leaders were trying to respond to demands from their own ranks that they weigh in on the Epstein files. In the late evening they settled on the resolution as an attempt to simultaneously placate calls from the far-right for greater transparency and satisfy Trump, who has called the issue a 'hoax' that his supporters should forget about. Yet the House resolution was the latest demonstration of how practically no one is moving on from Attorney General Pam Bondi's promises to publicly release documents related to Epstein. Since he was found dead in his New York jail cell in August 2019 following his arrest on sex trafficking charges, the well-connected financier has loomed large among conservatives and conspiracy theorists who have now lashed out at Trump and Bondi for declining to release more files in the case. 'The House Republicans are for transparency, and they're looking for a way to say that they agree with the White House. We agree with the president. Everything he said about that, all the credible evidence should come out,' House Speaker Mike Johnson said Thursday afternoon. Democrats vehemently decried the resolution's lack of force. They have advanced their own legislation, with support from nine Republicans, that would require the Justice Department to release more information on the case. Rep. Jim McGovern, who led the Democrats' debate against the Republican resolution Thursday night, called it a 'glorified press release' and 'a fig leaf so they can move on from this issue.' Under pressure from his own GOP members, Johnson had to demonstrate action on the Epstein files or risk having Republicans support the Democratic measures that would force the release of nearly all documents. 'The American people simply need to know the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth,' House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said at a news conference. 'Democrats didn't put this into the public domain. The conspiracy theory provocateur-in-chief Donald Trump is the one, along with his extreme MAGA Republican associates, who put this whole thing into the public domain for years. And now they are reaping what they have sown.' Still, Democrats, who hold minorities in both chambers, have relished the opportunity to make Republicans repeatedly block their attempts to force the Justice Department to release the documents. Trump in recent years has suggested he would release more information about the investigation into Epstein, especially amid speculation over a supposed list of Epstein's clients. In February, the Justice Department released some government documents regarding the case, but there were no new revelations. After a months-long review of additional evidence, the department earlier this month released a video meant to prove that Epstein killed himself, but said no other files related to the case would be made public. A White House spokeswoman said Thursday that Trump would not recommend a special counsel in the case. But later Thursday, the president said he had asked Bondi to seek the release of testimony from grand jury proceedings in the case. Rep. Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, said that process would likely only produce limited information, but added that it showed that 'the president is hearing the American people.'


Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Federal Secrets Republican Rallies Behind Trump on Epstein
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. U.S. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, a Florida Republican who leads a House task force on declassifying federal secrets, rallied behind President Donald Trump over the Jeffrey Epstein issue, accusing some of his supporters of back-stabbing. Amid a MAGA backlash over his administration's handling of the release of Epstein case files, Trump said he had instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce "all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval." Trump, who was once friends with the disgraced pedophile financier, also said he would be suing The Wall Street Journal after it reported that he had written Epstein a bawdy birthday letter in 2003. Trump says the letter is a fake. "While others were busy stabbing President Trump in the back, we were working overtime behind the scenes—in the Oval Office," Luna, who heads the House Oversight Committee task force on federal secrets, posted to X. Luna, who is pushing for greater government transparency, and recently helped to secure the release of secret files related to the JFK assassination, also shared a photo of her with Trump and her husband. "This photo was taken earlier today, and no, it's not a coincidence. This is 4D chess, not checkers," Luna said. "Welcome to the big leagues. Enjoy Phase 3. @AGPamBondi is unsealing grand jury testimony—and there's much more to come. This is the most transparent administration in U.S. history." In a separate post on X, Luna also said she was investigating "destruction of Epstein evidence at the FBI" under the previous Biden administration. This is a developing article. Updates to follow.