
Satwik-Chirag stumped by nemeses Chia-Soh again as they falter at China Open semifinal
But now, with their 13-21 17-21 defeat in 42 minutes on Saturday at Changzhou Sports Center Gymnasium in the semifinal of China Open Super 1000, Satwik-Chirag have lost thrice in a row against the world No 2 from Malaysia. It appears once more that the pair that tormented them for so long, are back to being their nemeses, especially considering the heartbreak that Chia and Soh gave at the Paris Olympics last year.
While the China Open reversal comes at a juncture where the Indians are still trying to rebuild their game, the caveat being that they are not at their 100% yet after all the off-court niggles they have had to deal with, the manner of the defeat should be a matter of concern. At the Olympics last August and in the Singapore Open semifinal earlier this year, SatChi took the opening game and went on to lose in three – and the contest was dead even for the most part, the margins fine. But in Changzhou, Chia-Soh outplayed the Indians for large parts, except a brief period in Game 2 where Satwik-Chirag drew level from 12-16 to 16-16.
'We had our chances, especially in the second game,' Chirag would tell BWF later, but he too was aware they didn't do enough. 'But (overall we) were not playing the right game. We were playing strokes which we shouldn't have, hitting more on Aaron and I think that's what took the game away from us. When we started playing smarter at 12-16, we came back at 16-16. A good tournament for us, but sad that we had to go out this way.'
Chirag added that they were too late to realise the mistakes they were doing and in a discipline as fast and furious as men's doubles, where rallies rarely develop out of the first 3-4 shots after service-return, such lethargy can prove mighty costly. 'We should have played a little more tactically. We had planned it, but we didn't execute it as well. I think it will take some time. We are still not at 100% as yet. We still need to get these matches; we can't be as sloppy.'
The reunion with Malaysian coach Tan Kim Her – the man who responsible for convincing Satwik and Chirag during their early uncertain days – hasn't quite brought silverware yet. But the Malaysian men's doubles pairs have been boosted by the arrival of new national coach Herry IP, the legendary Indonesian nicknamed Fire Dragon. The impact, especially on Chia-Soh, has been immediate and immense, as he has overseen the former world champions winning three titles already this year, including the notoriously difficult Badminton Asia Championships.
Chia-Soh are already a pedigreed duo but Herry has brought about a relentlessness to their game. Their flat attacking game was always their biggest strength but in the past they have shown a tendency to ditch their Plan A and resort to defensive lifts if they were under pressure – Herry seems to have drilled that out of them, and they rarely gave Satwik-Chirag the chances to go on their attacks.
And when the Indians did find the height or time to launch their smashes, Soh and especially Chia were sensational on defence, extending rallies they had no business extending, and forcing the Indians into unforced errors, of which there were many especially in the opening game when Satwik and Chirag mishit quite a few shots under drifty conditions.
It isn't a cause of alarm, not yet. But at some point, Satwik-Chirag would have to find more consistent solutions to the flat game that the Malaysian pairs – not just Chia-Soh – are becoming experts at. Last week in Japan, Satwik hinted that he has been working on a spin serve in training, bringing in that variation to their game would be a good start. There is no doubting the brilliance of their Plan A, but a few variations to disrupt their opponents could well be the next step.
An Se Young began China Open with a dream of achieving something incredible: winning all Super 1000s of the year to complete a Calendar Slam. But on Saturday, bothered by a knee injury, she was forced to retire hurt while 19-21 6-11 down against Han Yue. The reigning Olympic and World Champion from Korea, who had won titles at Malaysia, All England and Indonesia Opens, has been near unstoppable this year. 'I'm very disappointed (at missing the Super Slam) but it can't be helped that I got this injury. Although I really wished to accomplish this record, my body failed me,' she told BWF.
A consequence of An not competing for the China Open title on Sunday is that, incredibly, four out of the five finals are all-Chinese affairs. The only final to not feature China is men's doubles, where Aaron Chia-Soh Wooi Yik – after their win against India's Satwiksairaj Rankireddy and Chirag Shetty – will take on scratch Indonesian pairing of Fajar Alfian and Muhammad Shohibul Fikri.
Vinayakk Mohanarangan is Senior Assistant Editor and is based in New Delhi. ... Read More
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
23 minutes ago
- Mint
What prompted BCCI to agree to India vs Pakistan clash in Asia Cup 2025 despite recent border tensions? Details
The announcement of the India vs Pakistan clash in the upcoming Asia Cup 2025 has created a lot of buzz even two months before the high-octane clash in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The Asian Cricket Council (ACC) on Saturday revealed the dates of Asia Cup 2025 with the IND vs PAK encounter scheduled for September 14. If all goes well, the arch-rivals could face each other thrice in the tournament. The dates of the Asia Cup 2025 were finalised after an ACC meeting on July 24 in Dhaka, chaired by president Mohsin Naqvi. BCCI was represented by vice-president Rajeev Shukla through a video call after the Indian board refused to travel to Bangladesh due to the political situations in the neighbouring country. Ever since the Asia Cup 2025 dates were announced on Saturday, former cricketers have raised their voices over the IND vs PAK clash. The two countries had come close to the brink of war following the Pahalgam attack, to which India responded with Operation Sindoor. But the biggest question is what prompted the BCCI to go ahead with the Asia Cup 2025 despite the recent tensions? Well, the answer to this is India's bid to host the 2036 Olympics in the country. Although India doesn't play any bilateral series with Pakistan in any sport in more than a decade, the India's no objection in multilateral competitions against their arch-rivals is deemed as a necessity if they were to get the hosting rights of the Olympic Games in 11 years time. Recently, the Government of India has allowed the Pakistan hockey teams to compete in the Asia Cup and Junior World Cup to be held in the country later in the year. Meanwhile, India could possibly face Pakistan thrice in the tournament. After the league stage, the top two teams from the groups will qualify for Super Fours. The top two teams in Super Fours will play in the final. After the Group A India vs Pakistan clash on September 14, the arch-rivals are expected to face again in Super Four. If all goes well, an India vs Pakistan final is on cards. The previous edition of the event was in a 50-over format, but this year's tournament was scheduled as a shorter-format event in preparation for next year's T20 World Cup in India. The final of the Asia Cup 2025 will be held on September 28. However, the venues are yet to be decided.


News18
an hour ago
- News18
Drama! India Reject Ben Stokes' Offer To Shake Hands And Accept Draw In 4th Test
The drawn fourth Test in the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy had remained drama-free, but only until the final hour of the last day. With 15 overs left and India's score at 386/4 with no result in sight, England captain Ben Stokes offered Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar the chance to draw with a shake of hands. However, the Indians rejected, airing Stokes. The on-field umpires tried to step in and take Stokes' offer to the Indians, but got the same answer. India wanted to play on, and they did. At that moment, Jadeja was at 89 (173), and Sundar was not too behind at 80 (188) and clearly they wanted to get to their centuries.


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Young India refuse to fall: Manchester Test ends in draw, series alive
Sport gives us moments we never forget - the kind etched in memory, passed down like folklore. It gives us tales to whisper to our children and shout to our grandchildren. Tales of grit, defiance, and the audacity to dream. The latest chapter was written not by a team stacked with legends, but by a patched-up Indian side, bruised by injuries and seemingly out of breath - and yet bursting with a stone's throw from the Theatre of Dreams, India stitched together a dream of their own. What felt unthinkable one grey afternoon became hope, then belief, then something bordering on magic. They were 0 for 2 - in real terms, perhaps 0 for 3 with Pant broken and padded up. England had a 311-run cushion. Five sessions to vs IND, 4th Test Day 5: Highlights But then KL Rahul summoned the stillness of another era, and Shubman Gill stepped into the shoes of the great No. 4s he had quietly followed. Once they were done, Jadeja (107*) and Washington (100*) took India towards safety - and then helped seal the historic draw. What began as a rescue mission turned into a counterattack, and finally, into a quiet domination that left England stunned and spent.24 HOURS ON, INDIA TURN TABLESAt lunch the previous day, even Michael Atherton had given up on India. "We were checking train times home as we all felt India were a bit down and out at that point,' he admitted on Sky. 'Great respect to Gill and Rahul first of all for getting them through that initial crisis. Then it was over to Washington and Jadeja, who have taken it on terrific character from India.'If Gill and Rahul were the resistance, then Jadeja and Sundar were the renaissance. Together, they carried the fight deep into the final session, stringing together a 100-run stand that not only wiped out the deficit but pushed India into the lead, forcing England to chase ghosts in the fading fact, by the time the final hour began at Old Trafford, England were done. Literally and emotionally. Captain Ben Stokes walked up to the umpires, gestured that England had had enough. But the Indians weren't budging. Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar stood their ground. Both were in their 80s. Both in sight of hundreds. The draw was secure, but pride wasn't negotiable. They wanted to bat on."How long do you need? An hour?" shouted one of the England players, irritation crackling beneath the overcast skies. The pitch was flat. The tension wasn't. Stokes, visibly unimpressed, was going at the Indian pair. His team had thrown everything, and India had simply refused to yield. For a side that had trailed by 311 runs and stood at 0 for 2 in the first over of their second innings, the sheer audacity to dictate terms by the end of Day 5 was the stuff of folklore. This wasn't just a draw; it was a rebuke to the inevitability of defeat. It was the kind of day that keeps Test cricket KL SHOW CHARACTERadvertisementBut the journey to that moment was littered with bruises — both physical and mental. Shubman Gill's fourth century of the series came with the series on the line, the scoreboard reading 0 for 2, and Chris Woakes on a hat-trick. It was a captain's innings for the ages — constructed with poise, patience, and palpable had bowled 943 deliveries the previous day. Their bodies were heavy, legs sore, minds fraying. But Gill, carrying the pressure of expectation and his own uncertain form, found steel in adversity. Alongside KL Rahul, he staged a masterclass in restraint. Their 188-run partnership was not just about numbers. It was two men digging trenches and laying down the sandbags against an English playing his 50th Test, was elegance tempered by grit. His 90 off 230 balls was understated yet unshakeable — an innings that added to India's belief even without reaching three then, just before lunch, came the turning Archer, steaming in, got one to shape away. Gill, already struck on the glove and helmet, feathered one to Jamie Smith behind the stumps. The dam had cracked. India still trailed. England sensed their overs later, Stokes produced a delivery from around the wicket that skidded low and trapped Rahul plumb. Another surge of joy for England. Gill gone. Rahul gone. Pant padded up with a fractured toe. India's lower order thin. And yet, what followed was a masterclass in composure and WASHINGTON DIG DEEPEnter Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar. The draw was still a mountain away. India were 174/4 at lunch, still 88 runs behind. But the left-handed duo chose their battles with care and never blinked. England rotated bowlers. They changed ends. They adjusted fields. Nothing venom, Carse's zip, Woakes' probing lines, Root's teasing flight, Dawson's angles — none could breach the wall. There were edges that fell short, balls that beat the bat, lbw shouts turned down. But Jadeja and Sundar were batting not just with technique but with time. They survived. They then they began to push. Sundar brought up his half-century with a six and a four. Jadeja got to his with a crisp boundary, taking India into the lead. That stroke — more symbolic than statistical — broke England's spirit. From a position of dominance, they were now chasing a side that had looked dead and buried just 24 hours came on after tea with a 7-2 leg-side field, hoping the rough outside off to the left-handers would do the trick. Stokes whispered plans into his ears. Everyone closed in. Jadeja stepped out and launched him over mid-wicket. Then drilled him straight down the ground. The plan was shredded. Stokes rotated Dawson, switching him back over the wicket. Jadeja just smiled. It wasn't cocky. It was quiet defiance. Dawson had a long chat with his captain. England were out of ideas. They had all the overs, all the weapons. But none of the Ben Stokes kept soldiering on. Not fit to bowl on Day 4, he sent down eight overs on Day 5 despite obvious pain in his shoulder and hamstring. Grimacing after each ball, he still hit the pitch hard, one delivery even smashing into Gill's thumb and helmet. It was raw. It was brave. But it wasn't spell was a mirror to India's character — gritty, unrelenting, unwilling to bow down to limitations. But while Stokes could not tilt the scales alone, India found allies in each and Jadeja closed out a wicketless final session. The last hour was drama in slow motion. England were waiting for India to call it off. India didn't. The batters stayed out. The scoreboard moved. England's frustrations simmered. But there was no handshake when the last over was done did the players trudge off. No victors, but plenty of the end, this wasn't a game that needed a needed a story. And India gave it were two down in the first over. Pant was injured. Their bowlers had nothing left. Their captain was battered. And yet they batted. For 131 overs. They batted through the fire.A draw, yes. But one forged like a Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy remains alive. So does the beauty of Test cricket.- EndsTune In