Car salesman, 24, who killed his colleague when he lost control of BMW and smashed into 26-tonne lorry at nearly 100mph walks free from court
Ivan Zailac, 24, ploughed into a 26-tonne truck at well over double the speed limit killing passenger Stephanie Nye-Diroyan, 21, in Enfield, north London, on October 23, 2022.
The pair were colleagues at the second hand car dealership Big Motoring World.
A colleague was FaceTiming them at the moment of impact and heard Stephanie scream before connection was lost.
Zailac suffers from amnesia and doesn't remember the details of what happened after suffering a brain injury in the collision and subsequent psychiatric issues.
He sat at the back of court between his parents laying on his mother or father's shoulder and had to be lifted up by them to stand when the judge came into court.
Zailac had been been ruled unfit to stand trial so the jury had to formally decide whether he did the act alleged, namely causing Ms Nye-Diroyan's death by dangerous driving.
The jury then found he did carry out the act. Judge Sarah Munro, KC, said Zailac will be supervised by a nominated social worker and the Hillingdon mental health team for two years.
'This is the only way your mental health can be restored in order for a decision to be made as to whether there are further legal consequences for you to face,' the judge said.
Prosecutor Frederick Hookway told the court that the Crown intends to put Zailac on trial if he recovers.
'The objective of this order is for the improvement of the defendant's mental health not only for his own sake but for the future of these proceedings.
'The crown do intend to reinstitute these proceedings when and if appropriate.'
Stephanie's mother Nicholle Diroyan sobbed as she read her victim impact statement in court.
She said: 'Stephanie was my only child. The pain of losing her is immeasurable and every day without her feels incomplete.
'From a young age she was an incredibly happy chid always. Her inquisitive mind and thirst for learning shaped her joyful spirt.
'Her laughter was contagious, she was well mannered, respectful and deeply empathetic. She had a natural ability to sense others feelings and comfort them with her kind and thoughtful nature and she is remembered fondly by everyone who knew her.
'Stephanie and I shared a special unbreakable bond, she was my best friend and our connection was based on mutual care and support.
'Our weekends were filled with quality time together after working long hours.
'In her professional life Stephanie worked at Big Motoring World for over two years, she started as a reception manager and the week before she was killed was promoted to the finance team.
'Her dedication, work ethic and commitment to her team was apparent to everyone around her.
'Stephanie was the best of us and the love she gave will never be forgotten.. Her legacy lives on in the hearts of all who knew her.
'Over two years after losing her I am still fighting in court and I am still struggling to understand how the person responsible for her death has shown no remorse or taken any responsibility for his actions.
'The lack of accountability from those who caused the death and the pain from the injustice makes the loss even more unbearable.
'I have tried to do everything I can to pursue justice. No amount of time or legal proceedings will ever bring Stephanie back but I will keep fighting in the hope no other parent will ever have to face this dreadful loss without the accountability that is so desperately needed.'
Stephanie's aunt Michelle Diroyan said they were 'closer than any family could be' and remembered making fancy dress outfits for Stephanie to wear to school including an Amy Winehouse outfit where she won first prize.
Her grandmother Sheila Ballis said Stephanie and her mother had lived with her until Stephanie was 14.
'We did so much together. She loved and enjoyed all life had to offer her and I was so proud to call her my granddaughter.
'We used to call her the class clown as she was always the one to make us laugh.
'All of this is because she was a passenger in a vehicle whose driver had no regard for the speed limit, taking our Stephanie's life and destroying our lives too.'
Judge Munro said: 'This court deals with many, many cases where lives have been taken at the hands of others but rarely do we deal with cases as tragic as this one.
'Stephanie's joyful life was snuffed out in an instant. Her mother will never recover from her grief and as a result of losing her beloved daughter her life will never be the same again.
'What's clear to me is that Stephanie lived life to the full. She had her whole life ahead of her and would undoubtedly have shone in her working and personal life.
'She was a wonderful young woman who was taken away from everyone far too soon.
'Perhaps the only comfort is from Stephanie making the most of every moment for her life, that she lived life to the full and had so many best nights of her life- but far too few.'
Addressing Zailac she said: 'On October, 23, 2022 you were driving a powerful three litre BMW lent to you by your father.
'This court has noted the severe distress upon your father, no doubt living with the guilt that he lent you that car on that night.
'You suffered physical injuries including a traumatic brain injury and psychological consequences and at this stage you were found unfit to be tried.
'Therefore my powers are extremely limited and that is obviously extremely frustrating and distressing for Stephanie's mother and family.'
The judge told Stephanie's family that Zailac and his family had expressed 'very considerable remorse and guilt' in the reports she had read.
Referring to Zailac and his family's distress, she said: 'This isn't put on, you might think it is, but it's not.'
Earlier Dr Jaleel Mohammed told the court Zailac had suffered a brain injury.
He said: 'The evidence from the medical records showed that he had suffered a brain injury.
'He subsequently had amnesia after the accident itself.
'My opinion on the matter is that the amnesia was caused by the traumatic brain injury, and not a psychiatric condition.
'The amnesia is not a psychiatric condition but it's a neurological condition.'
Mr Hookway said Zailac drove a BMW, an M340D, at approximately 98mph on Mollison Avenue, an A-road in north London that has a speed limit of 40mph.
'And it is alleged that due to the speed and manner of his driving he lost control of that vehicle, causing it to crash into an oncoming lorry that was driving in the opposite direction.
'Stephanie Nye-Diyoran at the time was in the front passenger seat.
'She was caused death by serious injury due to the collision between the vehicle and the lorry, and despite the attention and efforts of emergency services, she was tragically pronounced dead the scene.'
Mr Hookway said lorry driver Andre Allen had one passenger with him.
'Their route started at a depot in Enfield, the destination was Covent Garden.
'The route took them southbound along Mollison Avenue. The road has a single carriageway in each direction and a speed limit of 40mph.
'The incident itself happened on a corner of that road.
'The lorry driver, he described it as a blind corner where you are unable to see what is coming in the other direction due to an incline in the road and change in direction.
'He also remembered that the conditions that night were dark and wet.
'As he came around the corner in the lorry, he saw a grey car coming in the other direction - it was coming at some speed and initially it was in the correct lane for oncoming traffic, but as it came around the corner Mr Allen watched it slide, as he described it, into his lane.
'It continued to slide until it collided with the front of his lorry, the point of collision being towards the driver's side of the HGV.
'Mr Allen thought he was driving at around 20-25mph, so well within the speed limit, and he had braked his lorry when he first saw this car.
'Based on data from the airbag module in the defendant's BMW, the collision happened at 19.54pm, so six minutes to eight in the evening.'
The prosecutor said using a combination of dash-cam footage, data recorded by the airbag module and witness evidence, a collision investigator had put together a reconstruction.
The BMW 'had partly and then wholly crossed the white lines in the middle of the road,' said Mr Hookway.
Jurors heard Zailac was driving at '98mph before the collision, representing something well over double the applicable speed limit for that road.'
Following the crash Ms Nye-Diroyan was initially able to respond to the lorry driver by 'nodding her head', Mr Hookway said.
But her condition deteriorated and despite the best efforts of doctors at the scene, resuscitation efforts failed she was pronounced dead at 21.46pm.
Zailac was taken to the emergency department at Royal London Hospital.
Dr Gourinath Tokachichu earlier said Zailac 'hasn't got the emotional strength at this stage to engage in any kind of discussion about the court case.
'Because of this, his mental disorder is ongoing and his symptoms are ongoing, and sometimes getting worse.'
Dr Tokachichu suggested Zailac is suffering from a treatable post-traumatic stress disorder condition.
Zailac, of Greycote Place, Ruislip, was charged with causing death by dangerous driving and the jury found he carried out the act.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Aussie shock jock turns on his bosses and sues radio network after 'royal prank' call to a UK hospital led to nurse's suicide
A 'shock jock' who made a prank call to a UK hospital caring for Princess Catherine claims he was not supported by his employer in the fall-out of a nurse's death by suicide. Mike Christian and Mel Greig were presenting on 2Day FM on December 4, 2012 when they made the phone call to the King Edward VII Hospital in London. The then-Duchess of Cambridge had been admitted to the hospital for severe morning sickness ahead of her first child's birth. Christian alleges he was ordered by 2Day FM's production team to make a prank call to the hospital and impersonate Prince Charles and Queen Elizabeth to try to gain access to the duchess. Nurse Jacintha Saldanha died by suicide days after the prank call, leading to widespread backlash against the radio hosts and broadcaster. Almost 13 years later, Christian has sued 2Day FM's broadcaster Southern Cross Austereo in the Federal Court, claiming the firm promised to provide support if the content put out by its 'shock jocks' ever went too far. The former radio host - who was made redundant in February - says he believed these claims, but was let down by the organisation. The broadcaster did not 'step in' but rather let its radio presenters take the blame, negatively impacting their careers, court documents seen by AAP allege. Christian and Greig called out Southern Cross Austereo and tried to prevent the company from crossing the line, but were left in the cold after the suicide, the documents say. 'SCA did not immediately take public accountability for the incident, but rather allowed Mr Christian and Ms Greig to be left exposed to relentless public vitriol, harassment and abuse, including death threats,' his lawyers wrote. 'The radio presenters were left by SCA as the convenient fall guys and scapegoats for SCA management decisions and non-compliance.' Greig made a tearful apology to Ms Saldanha's family at an inquest into the nurse's death in 2014, placing the blame on the radio station and commercial radio culture. Rhys Holleran, SCA's chief executive at the time of the incident, told the ABC in 2024 he suffers anxiety about it. 'I have always felt completely and utterly responsible for this,' he said. Christian says he started as a 2Day FM presenter just two days before the prank call, which he alleges breached the Australian Communications and Media Authority code of practice. He claims he was told in early 2013 the broadcaster would help restore his reputation and rebuild his career. He remained working for 2Day FM and did not pursue legal proceedings against them because of this promise, court documents say. However, the firm failed to provide meaningful health support, did not start a public relations campaign to rebuild his brand, and failed to offer meaningful opportunities or pay rises to reward his loyalty, he alleges. Instead, he claims he was 'gradually marginalised' within the organisation. Christian did not sign a release preventing him from speaking publicly about his time at the broadcaster, instead retaining lawyers after learning of his impending redundancy in February. 'Mr Christian claims that the redundancy was not genuine, particularly in circumstances where SCA still requires Mr Christian's former role to be performed,' court documents allege. Christian is seeking penalties, compensation for economic loss and damages. The matter is yet to appear before the Federal Court.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Times letters: Junking juries and the pursuit of swift justice
Write to letters@ Sir, I agree with Frances Gibb ('Don't assume that junking juries will speed up justice', comment, Jul 7) and unless strong and immediate opposition is mounted to resist any further attempts to dilute trial by jury, in my opinion it can only be a matter of time before it is abolished altogether. Chronic under-funding is not solved by creating a parallel system with inadequate resources, human and financial, as well as fewer safeguards against miscarriages of justice. Trial by jury is slower and more expensive than trial by judge and magistrates, but we should cherish and protect a system that puts the right to a fair trial by an impartial tribunal — the jury — before anything else. Ronald Thwaites KC Esher, Surrey Sir, I prosecuted many fraud cases during my career at the Bar ('Fraud suspects 'will lose their right to jury trial' ', news, Jul 5). The essential question in all of these cases was the same: namely, was the defendant behaving honestly or not. That is classically a question for a jury to use their varied worldly knowledge and experience to determine and my experience was that they did so very well. Of course, they were always directed that they must be sure of guilt to convict and must acquit in cases of reasonable doubt, which sometimes produced acquittals in cases where a single judge (or I) would probably have convicted. Cost and delay are, no doubt, concerns, but I would be very reluctant to make fundamental changes to a system which has served the interests of justice so well for so many years. Lawrence Griffiths Prosecuting counsel to HM Inland Revenue, 1969-93; standing counsel to HM Customs and Excise, 1989-93 Sir, The indication that specialist judges might in future preside over fraud trials represents common sense, not simply a means of reducing the huge backlog of cases. Some years ago I followed closely a particular trial at Southwark crown court. The first day was mostly taken up with the selection of a jury for a trial expected to last for at least two months. The judge heard pleas from potential jurors who had holidays booked and various medical appointments to attend, but the day was crowned by one candidate who stood up and said she simply could not concentrate for that amount of time. She was excused. When the trial began, there were long explanations about how a profit and loss account is compiled, accrual accounting and revenue recognition in a technology business. It became obvious to those of us in the visitors' gallery that three or four of the jurors had little idea of what was going on. Sure enough, many weeks later the jury failed to reach a verdict and the trial collapsed. Several years later I met someone at the Financial Conduct Authority, who explained that this had been one of the simpler cases and it could not contemplate taking many of the more complex ones to court. John White Petworth, W Sussex Sir, I have had more than 50 years' practice in the criminal courts (both prosecuting and defending, and also as a judge). I think it is quite wrong for any one person to be able to decide on guilt or innocence followed by a potentially long sentence of imprisonment and criminal bankruptcy. Most English judges are fair, but some are notorious for their prejudice in favour of the prosecution. The jury system is essential to protect the public against oppressive judges, police officers or even governments. As that great judge Lord Devlin wrote: It is the lamp that shows that freedom lives. Robert Rhodes KC London WC2 Sir, I am sure that Lord Evans of Weardale is doing his very best within the confines of whatever guidelines and time he has been given to find a new Archbishop of Canterbury (news, Jul 5, and letter, Jul 7), but the committee he chairs seems to have arrived at a situation where they have decided not to decide what to decide until they have decided what to do. I had a discussion a month ago with a senior churchman and suggested that six months is a long time to leave the Church of England leaderless and rudderless, and we should copy the example of the Catholic Church, who found their new Pope in less than three weeks. The CofE should set up a conclave of bishops. The conduct of it should be the same, with the bishops out of contact with the outside world until they reach a decision. It was suggested that I should write to the King, as head of the Church, to make that proposal. I have not yet done that but I am sure that he reads The Times. Alastair Stewart Nunnington, N Yorks Sir, Why does the letter from former ambassadors ('Recognise Palestine', Jul 7) fail to mention Hamas, the October 7 attacks that started this latest conflict or the hostages that were kidnapped and are still being held, but instead heaps all the blame on Israel, when the biggest barrier to peace in the Middle East has always been the threats its enemies pose to Israel's security? I too want to see a Palestinian state and have campaigned for that for decades, but the 'unconditional' recognition the letter calls for would mean doing so before any negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians on security, borders, Jerusalem or the status of settlements and would, of course, leave Hamas in place, something to which Israel can obviously not agree. Lord Austin of Dudley House of Lords Sir, It is telling that the letter signed by some two dozen former ambassadors does not include one who formerly served as an ambassador to Israel. They would understand the impractical and unhelpful nature of this suggestion and presumably refused to sign. Lord Leigh of Hurley House of Lords Sir, It is clear that, with the burgeoning numbers, there needs to be a redefinition of children's learning difficulties and disabilities ('PM facing fresh revolt over special needs help', news, Jul 7). We first need to recognise that most conditions are on a continuum; yet there is an increasing tendency to attribute a fixed label to those conditions, whatever the degree, and often after constant pressure from importunate parents. Moderate needs can and should be addressed within mainstream schools, with more specialist teachers and earlier intervention, as Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, states. Those on the severe end of the spectrum only should require a special school. The current route to this is through an EHCP (education, health and care plan). This is a lengthy and costly process for local authorities who, understandably, wish to avoid parents taking them to tribunals. Phillipson is looking into ways of reforming the unwieldy system of special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) support. We must hope that she will not be impeded by the Labour backbench brigade. Susan Bickley Ret'd teacher; Huntingdon, Cambs Sir, Before the EHCP was introduced in 2014, the school where I taught had a thriving special needs department with teaching assistants who could work with teachers on lesson material and assist a wide number of students with various needs. The department was decimated by the change in funding, leaving certain students with full-time help but all others with none. The year I retired, in 2019, the school even lost its nurture teacher due to a lack of funding. Meanwhile, the school was paying for a 'super head' and accountants at vast expense due to the switch to becoming an academy trust. Much needs reform, not only special needs help, but parents are not going to want to lose the support for their child. The government is in an impossible position until everyone accepts the reality of what we all face and that no system is ever perfect. Amanda Walker Ret'd teacher; Walkington, East Riding Sir, Your correspondents (letters, Jul 7) focused on the impact of AI on older children and young adults. As a preparatory school headmaster (now retired 12 years), I was often asked what was my school's academic focus in the primary years. I used to say with conviction that a core aim was to equip our pupils with the academic skills that would sustain them for life if they did not have access to computers and calculators 'if the lights went out': the four rules of number; times tables; percentages; a love of reading; accurate spelling; and cursive handwriting — the last enabling them to write from the heart a love letter or a letter of condolence. Nicholas Allen Chairman, Independent Association of Preparatory Schools, 2012-13; Ipswich Sir, Specialists value hospital resources (letter, Jul 7), but in the first instance the public crave prompt access to a medical opinion, with onward referral only if necessary. A 'neighbourhood health service' and enhanced technology (the NHS app and AI especially) could facilitate this and also free up hospitals to concentrate on delivering high-class tertiary care. Many community hospitals have closed and 'Darzi centres', modelled on Continental polyclinics, were never fully implemented. Let's give Wes Streeting the chance to restore quick, effective local primary healthcare. Tim Williams Ret'd consultant surgeon; Waldron, E Sussex Sir, Matthew Parris (comment, Jul 7) refers to economics as a dismal science. Dismal, yes. Science, no. The Rev Dr JE Roulston Bonnyrigg, Midlothian Sir, Further to your leading article on village cricket (Jul 7), judges have considered similar issues in the past and agreed with your views. Perhaps one of the most memorable is Lord Denning's dissent in Miller v Jackson (1977) where he found that it was not a nuisance that cricket balls were occasionally hit on to the property neighbouring the Lintz cricket club in Co Durham. He may have got some things (dreadfully) wrong in the past, but he got this right, saying 'in summertime, village cricket is the delight of everyone' and arguing that the cricketers of Lintz should continue to play. Quite apart from all the personal benefits of playing the sport, cricket is quintessentially British; it should be allowed to thrive. Anthony Philips London, W11 Sir, Those complaining about the possibility of cricket balls hitting them or their property might consider the example of Sir William Worsley, who captained Yorkshire County Cricket Club in the 1920s. He gave a monetary reward to any batsman who broke his library window in Hovingham Hall, thus encouraging local talent. Complainants might also consider who was there first. Ann Gray Beverley, East Riding Sir, As a parent whose eldest son went to Eton and youngest to Michaelhouse in KwaZulu-Natal in South Africa, I've attended my fair share of matches at both schools over the years ('Rugby parents told off for touchline opulence', world, Jul 7). While at Eton, the June 4 celebrations steadily evolved into picnics with unbelievable extravagance, more worthy of being at a grand opera, whereas picnics at Michaelhouse remained reassuringly rustic: a sausage out of a farmer's 4×4 possibly still sizzling from the veld. How things are changing! Louisa Woods Greens Norton, Northants Sir, My parents always claimed to have had three weddings ('To have and to hold two weddings', Jul 7). Living in Chile in the 1930s, the first was the civil wedding, the legal element; next came a church one, a few days before they sailed for Liverpool. While at sea, the captain performed their third. In the 1980s they celebrated their 50th anniversary — but only the once. Alison Rollin Ruislip, Middx Write to letters@
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
First tranche of final report from Horizon scandal inquiry to be published
The first tranche of the long-awaited final report from an inquiry into the Post Office Horizon scandal is set to be published. More than 900 subpostmasters were wrongfully prosecuted by the Post Office between 1999 and 2015 in what has been dubbed as the worst miscarriage of justice in British legal history. Many were wrongly convicted of crimes such as theft and false accounting after faulty Horizon software made it look as though money was missing from their accounts. Subpostmasters' lives were destroyed – with some bankrupted by legal action and sent to prison. On Tuesday, the first volume of the Horizon IT inquiry's final report will be published – covering the devastating impact on the lives of the scandal's victims and the compensation process. The issue of financial redress has frequently been flagged as an issue by subpostmasters – with many still awaiting full compensation. The various compensation schemes have been criticised by victims as unfair and difficult to navigate – processes which lead campaigner Sir Alan Bates has previously described as 'quasi-kangaroo courts'. Retired judge Sir Wyn Williams, the chairman of the probe, will make a public statement following the report's publication. The inquiry was established in 2020, with a number of witnesses giving evidence on the use of Fujitsu's Horizon system, Post Office governance and the legal action taken against subpostmasters. In a previous statement addressing the compensation schemes, the Department for Business and Trade said: 'This Government has quadrupled the total amount paid to affected postmasters to provide them with full and fair redress, with more than £1 billion having now been paid to over 7,300 claimants.'
