
New Zealand's place in global cyber defence - From medieval knights to cybercriminals
Conflict quickly reveals what works and what doesn't. In 2025, global instability has reshaped the battlefield once again. This time, it's digital.
The rise of digital guerilla warfare
We are witnessing a new kind of conflict: digital guerrilla war.
This is where decentralised cybercriminal groups are being funded by shadowy nation states to carry out cyber-attacks. These hidden attackers "live off the land" by using legitimate tools to infiltrate systems and strike when least expected.
Government entities are frequent targets, but private and listed companies are just as vulnerable. A major attack on them wouldn't just impact businesses, it could affect national stability and disrupt the economy.
New Zealand, like the rest of the world, is locked in a cyber battle where threats can come from anywhere, at any time. Today, the front line is everywhere. This might sound excessive and overdramatic, but that's the reality all business leaders need to understand.
A key concept in cyber security is that the investment to prevent harm should be in proportion to the needs of the business. But for many businesses, simple technology choices supported by people and processes are enough to mitigate most threats. But some organisations play integral roles in society and we can't afford for them not have the best security procedures in place.
The Government must lead on critical infrastructure
Critical infrastructure faces a much bigger threat. Last year, the United States Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), found proof that a state backed cyber security group, Volt Typhoon, had secretly infiltrated critical infrastructure providers across the Western world. Their goal? To cause disruption at a key moment.
Another group, backed by the same nation-state, Salt Typhoon, has infiltrated nine major U.S. telecoms, accessing call data, text messages, and even recordings of prominent national leaders.
New Zealanders have a right to know that our infrastructure is being protected, and that the government is investing in national cyber defence before disaster strikes.
Cyber threats are no longer just a business problem; they're a national security issue.
Is New Zealand doing enough to protect its critical infrastructure?
Right now, the answer is no. We're at risk of falling behind.
In late 2024, Australia passed sweeping cybersecurity legislation to harden national defences. The new laws require industries to uphold high security standards and give the government powers to intervene in the event of a serious breach.
These reforms came in the wake of a string of devastating cyber incidents, including major data breaches at Medibank, Optus, and Latitude Finance in 2022 and 2023. The Latitude breach alone became the second largest in Australian history and the most damaging for citizens. It was also New Zealand's largest-ever data breach, exposing the personal information of 20% of our population.
Australia has been put serious effort into building its cyber posture at a national level, with a vision of being a global leader in cybersecurity by 2030. In a world reliant on digital infrastructure, this will be a key competitive advantage.
New Zealand has the chance to tell the same story, but only if we act soon.
That's why we need the government to enact legislation that will protect our country and people. I appreciate developing legislation is not trivial, but the template has been created in Australia and it's in everyone's interest to reflect that over here.
This will require some businesses to invest more to become compliant, but that's the point, that we all incur comparable costs to achieve a common standard.
Cyber security is complex to understand. Humans evolved to recognise that a warrior charging at you is a threat, not a remote network of industrialised guerilla fighters with keyboards, backed by nations hiding their true intent.
New Zealand must not wait until we're reacting to disaster. We need a nationally unified, proactive cyber defence to protect our people, businesses, and critical systems before it's too late.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scoop
21 minutes ago
- Scoop
Fire And Emergency New Zealand Offers Firefighters A 5.1 Percent Pay Increase
Fire and Emergency New Zealand and the New Zealand Professional Firefighters Union have been negotiating a collective employment agreement for career firefighters since 16 July 2024. Deputy Chief Executive Service Delivery Operations/Deputy National Commander Megan Stiffler says Fire and Emergency has offered the Union a 5.1 percent pay increase over the next three years, as well as increases to some allowances. "We consider the offer is fair, balances cost of living pressures being faced by individuals alongside fiscal pressures faced by Fire and Emergency and is consistent with the Government Workforce Policy Statement." Megan Stiffler says Fire and Emergency has invested significantly in its people and its resources for the safety of communities since it was established in 2017. "The previous collective employment agreement settlement in 2022 provided a cumulative wage increase of up to 24 percent over a three-year period for our career firefighters." "Fire and Emergency has also been investing in replacing our fleet, with 317 trucks replaced since 2017 and another 70 on order. We are currently spending over $20 million per year on replacement trucks. There is also a significant programme of station upgrades underway, as well as investment in training," she says. "In 2023/24 most career firefighters earned over $100,000 per year, including overtime and allowances. The turnover rate for our career firefighters was just 3.6 percent last year, and the average length of service was 17 years. We work constantly with our people to ensure we are an employer of choice." "Our firefighters are highly trained and deeply committed to serving their communities and we are investing in our people and our resources, to support them. They do an incredible job keeping New Zealanders safe."


NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Agribusiness and Trade: Valocity's app speeds up property valuation in India
'We had this amazing tech, and the key thing that really differentiated us, is that it is customisable and modular. It can handle complex rules. It can handle varied property types and it can handle regional nuances. All of these proved essential in India.' That's because, aside from its sheer scale and the complexity of different language and ethnic groups, India posed some unique challenges for companies working in the property sector. Not least of these is the lack of a standardised addressing system in the Western sense. Vicelich says Valocity has a role to play in that growth. Like elsewhere, Indian banks need a valuation before they can lend money on a property. That is just as important for entrepreneurs seeking finance as for people wanting to buy a house. 'Previously, valuation was very manual in India and based entirely on physical documents. It took weeks to complete a valuation — there was no technology involved. Banks were not digitally connected to valuers. She describes what she found as a 'disparate and broken-up disintermediation — a fragmented ecosystem'. India's valuers are often small one- or two-person operations, while some banks are huge. The big banks deal with tens of thousands of valuations each month. At the other end of the market are tiny banks, more like our idea of building societies. They typically lend on low-value properties and can be in remote areas. Both need better systems. Valocity Founder and CEO Carmen Vicelich was part of the New Zealand delegation to visit India on the mission led by Prime Minister Christopher Luxon in March 2025. She says: 'We realised we could make a massive difference and we also realised that we had to localise our systems. When solving the problem of no data, we looked to partner, we looked to buy. We found no one had accurate addressing data and that government records are not digitised. We also found that recorded sales prices are not necessarily what a buyer pays for a property because there can be a cash payment on top.' Valocity developed a phone app and made it free for valuers. This was preloaded with banks' templates. When a valuer visits a property, the address is geotagged and photos are timestamped. The valuer has to take a selfie to prove he or she was at the property. This can all happen off-line, because mobile network coverage doesn't reach everywhere. 'The app makes calculations on the spot. Then all the data goes back to the bank digitally within ours of the visit. Everything the bank needs to know is there. We've managed to get 20 large banks live on the platform.' While the systems were developed for valuing buildings, Indians are using it to value factory plants and machinery. In some cases they drive the software to its limits. Vicelich says one user dragged and dropped 400 fields of data into the app and complained it was working slowly — the user was valuing a hospital.


NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Govt forces Sport NZ to ditch transgender guidelines as NZ First threatens funding cut
In 2023 coalition negotiations, National and NZ First agreed to ensure publicly funded sporting bodies supported fairness that wasn't compromised by gender-based rules. Sport NZ chief executive Raelene Castle released a statement this morning. Photo / Photosport Last year, former Sports Minister Chris Bishop asked Sport NZ to review the guidelines. It's understood Sport NZ completed the review recently and offered new draft guidelines for current Sports Minister Mark Mitchell to assess. In a letter to Sport NZ on Tuesday, Mitchell said the policy in the coalition agreement meant Sport NZ should 'no longer have guiding principles published and should leave that decision-making and judgment up to individual sports and community organisations'. 'The Government has a role in making sport accessible to all New Zealanders by creating opportunities, not in providing principles as to who should be included and how,' he said. In her statement, Castle said the guiding principles had been removed from Sport NZ's website and advised sporting organisations to 'make their own decisions on the participation of transgender people in community sport'. Castle declined to be interviewed. In April last year, Sport NZ reported to the Government it had no evidence of a code-specific policy position or set of rules that prohibited fair competition. However, anecdotal reports and specific cases had prompted public debate, such as weightlifter Laurel Hubbard and mountain biker Kate Weatherly, who had both competed against women. NZ First leader Winston Peters wants to see fairness prioritised in community sport. Photo / Mark Mitchell Speaking to the Herald, Peters referenced both examples as he explained his party opposed inclusion being prioritised over fairness in sport. 'We faced all sorts of woke nonsense about how we couldn't do this and it was unfair,' he said. 'The very point that we're pushing is fairness.' Peters then claimed he would seek to pull funding from codes that didn't comply. 'We're saying to the sports out there, 'Well, if you want to ignore it, don't expect public or taxpayer funding'.' He affirmed his intention to cut all public funding for any sporting codes that didn't align with the Government's position. Peters also claimed Mitchell agreed with his position. Peters' threat would likely turn heads at New Zealand Cricket, given it allowed trans women to compete in female competitions at a community level. New Zealand Rugby's head of community rugby participation, Mike Hester, said its policy was still being developed, but the organisation believed 'ideally allowing people to play in the gender with which they identify'. Netball NZ required transgender women to provide documentation proving gender reassignment and hormone therapy before allowing them to play. Umpires had the discretion to assess whether a player's actions aligned with safety expectations. Mark Mitchell is the Minister for Sport. Photo / Mark Mitchell While Peters might want to cut funding, the relevant legislation might stop him. The Sport and Recreation New Zealand Act 2002 said the minister – Mitchell – could not direct Sport NZ in relation to the allocation of funds. The Government retained the ability to change legislation and determine the level of funding Sport NZ received. In the event a sporting code didn't align with the Government's position, it's understood Mitchell could reiterate his expectations to Sport NZ. Adam Pearse is the deputy political editor and part of the NZ Herald's press gallery team based at Parliament in Wellington. He has worked for NZME since 2018, reporting for the Northern Advocate in Whangārei and the Herald in Auckland.